Complications with the Pocket of Cardiostimulator
Authors:
J. Vlašínová; M. Kozák; L. Křivan; M. Sepši
Authors place of work:
Interní kardiologická klinika FN, Brno
Published in the journal:
Čas. Lék. čes. 2008; 147: 102-105
Category:
Original Article
Summary
Background.
The number of patients with pacemakers is icreasing. The first reason is longer survival, the second reason is widening indications to cardiostimulation. Along with increasing numbers of performances, we have to recken larger number of complications and these complications solve so, that we avoid more serious damage of a patient.
Methods and Results.
In our article we focused an possible complications in the area of pacemaker pockets, monitored their appearence, watched the type of complication, the danger of the creation infection endocarditis and we present our own experiences with solving such complications. From the total numer of 3978 surgical interventions was 141 patiens indicated for the revision of the pocket
Conclusions.
Repeated controls of the pocket and early reported of the patients to the specialised clinic is necessary for the safety of tke patients with pacemakers.
Key words:
pocket of cardiostimulator, infection endocarditis.
Zdroje
1. Táborský, M.: Zásady pro implantace kardiostimulátorů a implantabilních kardioverterů–defibrilátorů. Cor Vasa, 2001, 43(2), s. K32–K41.
2. Anderson, J. L., Hallstrom, A. P., Epstein, A. E. for the AVID investigators: Design and results of the Antiarrhythmic versus implantable defibrillators registry. Circulation, 1999, 99, s. 1692–1699.
3. Buxton, A. E., Lee, K. L., Fisher, J. D. et al for the MUSTT investigators: A randomized study of the prevention of sudden death in patients with coronary artery disease. N. Engl. J. Med., 1999, 341, s. 1882–1890.
4. Goud, P. A., Krahn, A. D.: Complications associated with implantable cardioverter–defibrillator replacement in response to device advisories. Jama, 2006, 295(16), s. 1907–1911.
5. Eberhardt, F., Bode, F., Bonnemeier, H. et al.: Long term complications in single and dual chamber Laciny are influenced by surgical experience and patient morbidity. Heart, 2005, 91(4), s. 500–506.
6. Khadra, A. S.: Implantation of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators in orally anticoagulated patients. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol., 2003, 26, s. 511–514.
7. Nandala, R., Parsonnet, V.: One Stage Side-to-Side Replacement of Infected Pulse Generators and Leads. PACE, 2006, 29, s. 393–396.
8. Paul, A., Gould, M. B. B. S., Andrew, D., Krahn, M. D.: Complications Associated With Implantable Cardioverter – Defibrillator Replacement in Response to Device Advisories. JAMA, 2006, 295, s. 1907–1911.
9. Sohail, M. R., Uslan, D. Z., Khan, A. H. et al.: Management and outcome of permanent Pagemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator infections. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., 2007, 49, s. 1851–1859.
10. Uslan, D. Z., Sohail, M. R., Sauver, J. L. et al.: Permanent pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator infection, a population-based study. Arch. Intern. Med., 2007, 167, s. 669–675.
11. Chiu, S. W., Nguyen, D.: Pacemaker lead extraction in pacemaker endocarditis with lead vegetation, Usefulness of transesophageal echocardiography. Can. J. Cardiol., 1998, 14, s. 87–89.
12. Kantharia, B. K., Kutalek, S.: Extraction of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads. Current Opinion in Cardiology, 1999, 14, s. 44–51.
13. Fleck, T., Khazen, C., Wolner, E., Grabenwoger, M.: The incidence of reoperations in Pacemaker recipients. Heart Surg. Forum, 2006, 9, s. E779–E782.
14. Pavia, S.: Wilkoff, B.: The management of surgical complications of Pacemaker and implantable. Cardioverter-Defibrillators. Current Opinion in Cardiology, 2001, 16, s. 66–71.
Štítky
Addictology Allergology and clinical immunology Angiology Audiology Clinical biochemistry Dermatology & STDs Paediatric gastroenterology Paediatric surgery Paediatric cardiology Paediatric neurology Paediatric ENT Paediatric psychiatry Paediatric rheumatology Diabetology Pharmacy Vascular surgery Pain management Dental HygienistČlánok vyšiel v časopise
Journal of Czech Physicians
- Metamizole at a Glance and in Practice – Effective Non-Opioid Analgesic for All Ages
- Advances in the Treatment of Myasthenia Gravis on the Horizon
- Metamizole vs. Tramadol in Postoperative Analgesia
- Spasmolytic Effect of Metamizole
- What Effect Can Be Expected from Limosilactobacillus reuteri in Mucositis and Peri-Implantitis?
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- The Occurrence of Malignancies in Former Blood Donors
- Complications with the Pocket of Cardiostimulator
- Tracheal Intubation without Muscle Relaxant – the Impact of Different Sufentanil Doses on the Quality of Intubating Conditions: A Prospective Study
- Is the Extent of Present Examination of Blood Donors Sufficient? Malignancies in Active Blood Donors