Hospital-based Health Technology Assessment
Authors:
Martin Zavadil; Vladimír Rogalewicz; Ivana Kubátová; Veronika Matloňová; Kristýna Salačová
Authors place of work:
Czech HTA, Fakulta biomedicínského inženýrství, České vysoké učení technické v Praze
; Fakultní nemocnice Motol
Published in the journal:
Čas. Lék. čes. 2016; 155: 254-259
Category:
Original Article
Summary
Hospital-based HTA (HB-HTA) consists in implementation of assessment activities "in" or "for" hospitals; hence, it covers processes and methods supporting organization and execution of health technology assessment (HTA) at the level of individual hospitals. This process is multidisciplinary, systematic and evidence-based.
HB-HTA objectives and methods differ from the classic utilization of HTA at the national regulator level. Most experience and information concerning HB-HTA has originated in two large recent projects: activities of the HB-HTA Interest Group of the HTAi international association established in 2006, and the AdHopHTA European research project (2012−2015).
This paper describes four basic organizational models of HB-HTA, their characteristics and utilization in various countries and hospital types. Results of the AdHopHTA project are analyzed, and recommendations for HB-HTA implementation in Czech hospitals are formulated.
Key words:
hospital-based HTA, medical device, implementation, hospital strategy
Zdroje
1. Schöffski O, Schulenburg JM. Gesundheitsökonomische Evaluationen (4th ed.). Berlin: Springer, 2012.
2. Facey K. HTAi Policy Forum 2015 Background Paper: Improving the effectiveness and efficiency of evidence production for HTA, in the light of current trends in drug and device development, health system funding, regulation and HTA. Health Technology Assessment International, Edmonton, 2015.
3. Markiewicz K, van Til J, IJzerman M. Medical devices early assessment methods: systematic literature review. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care2014; 30: 137−146.
4. Moharra M, Espallargues M, Kubesch N et al. Systems to support health technology assessment (HTA) in Member States of the European Union with limited institutionalization of HTA. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2009; 25: 75−83.
5. Rosina J, Rogalewicz V, Ivlev I et al. Health Technology Assessment for Medical Devices.Lékař a technika − Clinician and Technology 2014; 44: 23−36.
6. Goodman CS. HTA101. Introduction to Health Technology Assessment. USA National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, 2014.
7. Ehlers L, Vestergaard M, Kidholm K et al. Doing mini-health technology assessments in hospitals: A new concept of decision support in health care? International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2006; 22: 295−301.
8. Mitchell MD, Williams K, Brennan PJ et al. Integrating local data into hospital-based healthcare technology assessment: two case studies. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2010; 26: 294−300.
9. Matloňová V. Hospital-based HTA. Implementation for the Czech Republic. Diplomová práce.Fakulta biomedicínského inženýrství, České vysoké učení technické v Praze, 2015.
10. Salačová K. Implementace "Hospital-based HTA" v České republice. Diplomová práce.Fakulta biomedicínského inženýrství, České vysoké učení technické v Praze, 2015.
11. Cicchetti A, Marchetti M, Dibidino R et al. Hospital Based Health Technology Assessment World-Wide Survey. Health Technology Assessment International, Edmonton, 2008.
12. Gagnon M. Hospital-based health technology assessment: developments to date.Pharmacoeconomics 2014; 32: 819−824.
13. Sampietro-Colom L, Lach K, Cicchetti A et al. The AdHopHTA handbook: a handbook of hospital-based Health Technology Assessment (HB-HTA). Public deliverable. The AdHopHTA Project (FP7/2007-13 grant agreement No. 305018), 2015.
14. Sampietro-Colom L, Lach K, Pasternack I et al. Guiding principles for good practices in hospital-based health technology assessment units. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2015; 31: 457−465.
15. Ølholm AM, Kidholm K, Birk-Olsen M et al. Hospital managers’ need for information on health technology investments. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2015; 31: 414−425.
16. Cicchetti A, Marchetti M, Iacopino V et al. Organizational Models of Hospital Based HTA: empirical evidence from AdHopHTA European project. Value in health 2015; 18: A560−A561.
17. Martelli N, Lelong A, Prognon P et al. Hospital-based health technology assessment for innovative medical devices in university hospitals and the role of hospital pharmacists: learning from international experience. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2013; 29: 185−191.
18. Boudard A, Martelli N, Prognon P et al. Clinical studies of innovative medical devices: what level of evidence for hospital-based health technology assessment? J Eval Clin Pract 2013; 19: 697−702.
19. Zavadil M, Rogalewicz V, Kotlanová S. Development of hospital-based HTA unit processes in the Czech hospital environment. Value in health 2015; 18: A570.
20. Kubátová I, Matloňová V. Hospital-based HTA − implementation for the Czech Republic. MEDICON 2016. Springer, Paphos, 2016.
21. Gagnon M, Lepage-Savary D, Gagnon J et al. Introducing patient perspective in health technology assessment at the local level. BMC Health Services Research 2009; 9.
22. Husereau D, Boucher M, Noorani H. Priority setting for health technology assessment at CADTH. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2010; 26: 341−347.
23. Ratcliffe J, Longworth L. Investigating the structural reliability of a discrete choice experiment within health technology assessment. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2002; 18: 139−144.
24. Gagnon M, Desmartis M, Lepage-Savary D, et al. Introducing patients' and the public's perspectives to health technology assessment: A systematic review of international experiences. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2011; 27: 31−42.
25. AdHopHTA (project FP7/2007-13 grant agreement No. 305018) (http://www.adhophta.eu).
26. Rogalewicz V, Juřičková I. Hodnocení zdravotnických technologií jako zdroj informací pro rozhodování. Zdravotnictví v České republice 2011; 14: 32−35.
27. Burianová V, Kubátová I. Studie vzniklé v rámci studijního oboru Systémová integrace procesů ve zdravotnictví. Ekonomie ve zdravotnictví 2016; 2: v tisku.
28. Jagerová J. Analýza klinické a nákladové efektivity navigačních systémů používaných v arytmologii. Diplomová práce. Fakulta biomedicínského inženýrství, České vysoké učení technické v Praze, 2013.
29. Jarošová V. Náklady a efektivita technologie MediGuide v podmínkách České republiky. Diplomová práce. Fakulta biomedicínského inženýrství, České vysoké učení technické v Praze, 2014.
30. Viktora M. Porovnání nákladů a přínosů rozšíření oddělení Emergency v Masarykově nemocnici v Ústí nad Labem. Diplomová práce. Fakulta biomedicínského inženýrství, České vysoké učení technické v Praze, 2013.
Štítky
Addictology Allergology and clinical immunology Angiology Audiology Clinical biochemistry Dermatology & STDs Paediatric gastroenterology Paediatric surgery Paediatric cardiology Paediatric neurology Paediatric ENT Paediatric psychiatry Paediatric rheumatology Diabetology Pharmacy Vascular surgery Pain management Dental HygienistČlánok vyšiel v časopise
Journal of Czech Physicians
- Metamizole at a Glance and in Practice – Effective Non-Opioid Analgesic for All Ages
- Advances in the Treatment of Myasthenia Gravis on the Horizon
- Metamizole vs. Tramadol in Postoperative Analgesia
- Spasmolytic Effect of Metamizole
- What Effect Can Be Expected from Limosilactobacillus reuteri in Mucositis and Peri-Implantitis?
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Health literacy in Czech population − results of the comparative representative research
- Alternative healing methods around us
- International Comparison of Health System Performance in Visegrad Countries
- Social medicine, public health and governance for health