#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Facial (Craniofacial) Epitheses


Authors: J. Boleslavská 1;  P. Matoušek 1 ;  J. Rosický 2;  Pavel Komínek 1 ;  M. Paciorek 2,3;  R. Lipina 4
Authors place of work: ORL klinika FN Ostrava 1;  Ortopedická protetika Frýdek-Místek 2;  Klinika plastické chirurgie FN Ostrava 3;  Neurochirurgická klinika FN Ostrava 4
Published in the journal: Otorinolaryngol Foniatr, 63, 2014, No. 3, pp. 193-197.
Category: Case Reports

Summary

The authors present their experience of the application of silicon epitheses in patients after mutilating surgical interventions in the head region. Advantages and disadvantages of silicon substitutions, indications and perioperative management are discussed. Cases of patients, where epitheses were used to cover defects and reconstruction after radical oncological surgeries are described.

Keywords:
silicon epitheses, mutilating interventions


Zdroje

1. Ahmed, B., Butt, A. M., Hussain, M., Amin, M., Yazdanie, N.: Rehabilitation of nose using silicone based maxillofacial prosthesis. J. Coll. Physicians Surg. Pak., 20, 2010, s. 65-67.

2. Bilhan, H., Geckili, O., Bural, C., Sonmez, E., Guven, E.: Prosthetic rehabilitation of a patient after surgical reconstruction of the maxilla: a clinical report. J. Prosthodont., 20, 2011, s. 74-78.

3. Goiato, M. C., Anchieta, R. B., Pita, M. S., dos Santos, D. M.: Reconstruction of skull defects: curently avaible materials.J. Craniofac. Surg., 20, 2009, s. 1512-1518.

4. Hatamleh, M. M., Haylock, C., Watson, J., Watts, D. C.: Maxillofacial prosthetic rehabilitation in the UK: a survey of maxillofacial prosthetists´ and technologists´ attitudes and opinions. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 39, 2010, s. 1186-1192.

5. Konstantinović, V. S., Lazić, V. M., Stefan, I.: Nasal epithesis retained by basal(disk) implants. J. Craniofac. Surg., 21, 2010, s. 33-36.

6. Koyama, S., Sasaki, K., Hanawa, S., Sato, N.: The potential of cohesive silicone for facial prosthetit use: a material properte study and clinical report. Journal of Prosthodontics, 20, 2011, s. 299-304.

7. Rudman, K., Hoekzema, C., Rhee, J.: Computer-assisted innovations in craniofacial surgery. Facial Plastic Surgery, 27, 2011, s. 358-365.

8. Santos, D. M., Goiato, M. C., Pesqueira, A. A., Bannwart, L. C., Rezende, M. C., Magro-Filho, O., Moreno, A.: Prosthesis auricular with osseointegrated implants and quality of life. J. Craniofac. Surg., 21, 2010, s. 94-96.

9. Selcuk, C. T., Sahin, Ü., Celebioglu, S., Erbas, O., Aydin, C., Yüce, S.: Complex craniofacial reconstruction with prostheses as an alternative method to autogenous reconstruction. J. Craniofac. Surg., 22, 2011, s. 2090-2093.

10. Sinn, D. P., Bedrossian, E., Vest, A. K.: Craniofacial implant surgery. Oral Maxillofacial Surg. Clin., 23, 2011, s. 321-335.

11. Wagenblast, J., Baghi, M., Helvit, M., Arnoldner, Ch., Bisdas, S., Gstöttner, W., Hamberk, M., May, A.: Craniofacial reconstruction with bone-anchored epithesis in head and neck cancor patient – a valid way back to self-perception and social reintegration. Anticancer Research, 28, 2008, s. 2349-2352.

Štítky
Audiology Paediatric ENT ENT (Otorhinolaryngology)
Prihlásenie
Zabudnuté heslo

Zadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.

Prihlásenie

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte sa

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#