The Role of CT for Indicating Laparotomy in Blunt Abdominal Trauma: Comparing CT Results and Surgical Findings in a Group of 101 Patients. Prospective Study
Authors:
P. Chmátal 1; J. Lacman 2; P. Kupka 1; M. Ryska 1
Authors place of work:
Chirurgická klinika 2. LF UK a Ústřední vojenské nemocnice Praha, přednosta: pplk. prof. MUDr. M. Ryska, CSc.
1; Radiodiagnostické oddělení Ústřední vojenské nemocnice Praha, primář: MUDr. F. Charvát
2
Published in the journal:
Rozhl. Chir., 2007, roč. 86, č. 1, s. 37-40.
Category:
Monothematic special - Original
Summary
Background:
The helical contrast CT plays an important role in the management of abdominal trauma. For surgeons its reliability and utilization remain questionable.
Objective:
The study aimed at correlating CT results at admission with surgical findings in patients undergoing laparotomy for blunt abdominal trauma, detecting CT sensitivity for therapeutic laparotomy and uncovering organ injury. The group of patients is from one hospital; therefore mistakes from different result interpretations or data collecting are not present.
Method:
A rentgenologist’s conclusion during patient admission, late independent CT evaluation by an experienced rentgenologist and surgical finding were statistically correlated. Results: 101 out of 139 patients underwent laparotomy after initial CT. Mean ISS were 27.8. CT sensitivity (SE) for indicating therapeutic laparotomy was 88.77/ 89.88%, predictive value positive result (PVPR) 92.94/94.11%, and false negativity (FN) 11.23/10.11%. SE in liver and spleen trauma was 88.76/95.50%, PVPR 96.34/93.41%, and FN 11.24%/ 4.50%. SE in bowel and mesenteric injury was 27.27/18.18 %, SE in diaphragm injury was 33.33 %.
Conclusion:
the study presented high SE of CT forecasting therapeutic laparotomy for blunt abdominal trauma. The high SE of CT in liver and spleen injuries is useful in indicating conservative therapy. The CT accuracy was not confirmed in bowel, mesenteric or diaphragm injury. It strongly recommend patient observation even with negative CT.
Key words:
blunt abdominal trauma – computed tomography – laparotomy
Zdroje
1. Federle, M. P., Crass, R. A., Jefey, R. B., Trunkey, D. D. Computed tomography in blunt abdominal trauma. Arch. Surg., 1982; 117: 645–650.
2. Peitzman, A. B., Makaroun, M. S., Slansky, B. S., Ritter, P. Prospective study of computed tomography in initial management of blunt abdominal trauma. J. Trauma, 1986; 26: 585–592.
3. Fabian, T. C., Mangiante, E. G., White, T. J., Patterson, C. R., Britt, L. G. A prospective study of 91 patients undergoing both computed tomography and peritoneal lavage following blunt abdominal trauma. J. Trauma, 1986; 26: 602–608.
4. Delgado Millan, M. A., Deballon, P. O. Computed tomography, angiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the nonoperative management of hepatic and splenic trauma. World J. Surg., 2001; 25, 1397–1402.
5. Pal, J. D., Victorino, G. P. Defining the role of computed tomography in blunt abdominal trauma: use in the hemodynamically stable patient with a depressed level of consciousness. Arch. Surg., 2002, 137: 1029–1032.
6. Stanley, A. C., Vittemberger, F., Napolitano, L. M. The use of delayed computerized tomography in the evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma: a preliminary report. Am. Surg., 1999; 65: 369–374.
7. Jacobs, D. G., Sarafin, J. L., Marx, J. A. Abdominal CT scanning for trauma: how low can we go? Injury, 2000; 31: 337–343.
8. Moore, E. E., Cogbill, T. H., Malangoni, M. A., et al. Organ injury scaling. Surg. Clin. North. Am., 1995; 75: 293–303.
9. Civil, I. D., Schwab, C. W. The abbreviated injury scale, 1985 revision: a condensed chart for clinical use. J. Trauma, 1988; 28: 87–90.
10. Zvarova, J. Základy statistiky pro biomedicínské obory. Praha, PA: Nakladatelství Karolinum, 2002.
11. Livingston, D. H., Lavery, R. F., Passannante, M. R., et al. Admission or observation is necessary after a negative abdominal computed tomografic scan in patients with suspected blunt abdominal trauma: results of a prospective, multi-institutional trial. J. Trauma, 1998; 44: 273–280.
12. Taylor, C. R., Degutis, L., Lange, R., Burns, G., Cohn, S., Rosenfield, A. Computed tomography in the initial evaluation of hemodynamically stable patients with blunt abdominal trauma: impact of severity of injury scale and technical factors on efficacy. J. Trauma, 1998; 44: 893–901.
13. Kiu, M., Lee, C. H., P‘eng, F. K. Prospective comparison of diagnostic peritoneal lavage, computed tomographic scanning, and ultrasonography for the diagnosis of blunt abdominal trauma. J. Trauma, 1993; 35: 267–270.
14. Garber, B. G., Bigelow, E., Yelle, J. D., Pagliarelo, G. Use of abdominal computed tomography in blunt trauma: do we scan too much? Can. J. Surg., 2000; 43: 16–21.
15. Chmátal, P., Charvat, F. Porovnání CT závěrů a operačních nálezů u tupých poranění jater a sleziny. Rozhl. Chir., 1999; 78: 183–187.
16. Brasel, K. J., DeLisle, C. M., Olson, C. J., Borgstrom, D. C. Trends in the management of hepatic injury. Am. J. Surg., 1997; 174: 674–677.
17. Killeen, K. L., Shanmuganathan, K., Poleti, P. A., Cooper, C., Mirvis, S. E. Helical computed tomography of bowel and mesenteric injury. J. Trauma, 2001; 51: 26–36.
18. Allen, T. L., Mueller, M. T., Bonk, R. T., Harker, C. P., Duffz, O. H., Stevens, M. P. Computed tomographic scanning without oral contrast solution for blunt bowel and mesenteric injuries in abdominal trauma. J. Trauma, 2004; 56: 314–322.
19. Scaglione, M., de Lutio di Castelquidone, E., Scialpi, M., et al. Blunt trauma to the gastrointestinal tract and mesentery: is this e role for helical CT in the decision-making process? Eur. J. Radiol., 2004; 50: 67–73.
20. Breen, D. J., Janzen, D. L., Zwirewich, C. V., Nagy, A. G. Blunt bowel and mesenteric injury: diagnostic performance of signs. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr., 1997; 21: 706–712.
21. Holmes, J. F., Offerman, S. R., Chang, C. H., et al. Performance of helical computed tomography without oral contrast for the detection of gastrointestinal injuries. Ann. Emerg. Med., 2004; 43: 120–128.
22. Patzelas, T. N., Gallagher, E. G. The diagnostic dilemma of dia-phragm injury. Am. Surg., 2002; 68: 633–639.
23. Mihos, P., Potaris, K., Gakidis, J., Paraskevoulos, J., Varvatsoulis, P., Gougotas, B. Traumatic rupture of the diaphragm: experience with 65 patients. Injury, 2003; 34: 169–172.
Štítky
Surgery Orthopaedics Trauma surgeryČlánok vyšiel v časopise
Perspectives in Surgery
2007 Číslo 1
- Spasmolytic Effect of Metamizole
- Metamizole at a Glance and in Practice – Effective Non-Opioid Analgesic for All Ages
- Metamizole in perioperative treatment in children under 14 years – results of a questionnaire survey from practice
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Liver Hemangiomas – Diagnostic and Treatment Strategy
- Undiagnosed Posterior Dislocations of the Shoulder Joint. A Preliminary Report
- Multiple Diverticulosis of the Small and Large Intestine. A Case Review
- Insufficient Anastomoses in Sigmoideal and Rectal Resections. A Retrospective Study Conducted in a Surgical Clinic in Hradec Králové