Ten years of endovenous ablation – achievements, failures and future
Authors:
L. Veverková 1
; L. Páč 2; J. Kalač 1; I. Procházková 1; J. Žák 1; P. Vlček 1
Authors place of work:
I. chirurgická klinika LF MU, FN u sv. Anny v Brně, přednosta: Prof. MUDr. I. Čapov, CSc.
1; Anatomický ústav LF MU v Brně, přednosta: Prof. RNDr. P. Dubový, CSc.
2
Published in the journal:
Rozhl. Chir., 2014, roč. 93, č. 2, s. 57-62.
Category:
Review
Práce je věnována prof. MUDr. Janu Wechslerovi, CSc., k významnému životnímu jubileu.
Summary
Endovenous ablation of varicose veins is a very frequent treatment method which has more or less replaced the classic stripping method. It has its limitations, advantages as well as disadvantages. The authors present a summarizing article and their own experience with these methods. Histology examinations performed prove differences in the reaction of the endothelium to the individual types of endovenous therapy. Causes of varicose veins treatment failures are discussed.
Key words:
saphenous-femoral junction – great saphenous vein – laser RFA – histology of vein following endothermic ablation
Zdroje
1. Evans CJ, Fowkes FG, Ruckley CV, Lee AJ. Prevalence of varicose veins and chronic venous insufficiency in men and women in the general population: Edinburgh Vein Study. J Epidemiol Community Health 1999;53:149–153.
2. Kurz X, Kahn SR, Abenhaim L, et al. Chronic venous disorders of the leg: epidemiology, outcomes, diagnosis and management. Summary of an evidence based report of the VEINES task force. Venous Insufficiency Epidemiologic and Economic Studies. Int Angiol 1999;18:83–102.
3. Brand FN, Dannenberg AL, Abbott RD, Kannel WB. The epidemiology of varicose veins: the Framingham Study. Am J Prev Med 1988;4:96–101.
4. Krajíček M, Peregrin J, Roček M, Šebesta P. Chirurgická a intervenční léčba cévních onemocnění, Praha, Grada 2007; 1285.
5. Perrin M, et al. Presentation of the patient with recurrent varices after surgery (REVAS) J Vasc Surg 2006;43:327–334.
6. MacKenzie RK, Paisley A, Allan PL, Lee AJ, Ruckley CV, et al. The effect of long saphenous vein stripping on quality of life. J Vasc Surg 2002;35:1197–1203.
7. Navarro L, Min RJ, Bone C. Endovenous laser: a new minimally invasive method of treatment for varicose veins – preliminary observations using an 810 nm diode laser. Dermatol Surg 2001;27:117–122.
8. Kašpar S. Endovenózní laserová ablace varixů dolních končetin. Postgraduální medicína 2013;15:149–152.
9. Merchant RF, Pichot O. Closure Study Group. Long-term outcomes of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration of saphenous reflux as a treatment for superficial venous insufficiency. J Vasc Surg 2005;42:502–509.
10. Darwood RJ, Gough MJ. Endovenous laser treatment for uncomplicated varicose veins. Phlebology 2009;24(Suppl 1):50–61.
11. Proebstle TM, Alm J, Gockeritz O, et al. Three-year European follow-up of endovenous radiofrequency-powered segmental thermal ablation of the great saphenous vein with or without treatment of calf varicosities. J Vasc Surg 2011;54:146–152.
12. Lurie F, Creton D, Eklof B, Kabnick LS, Kistner RL, et al. Prospective randomized study of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration (closure procedure) versus ligation and stripping in a selected patient population (EVOLVeS Study). J Vasc Surg 2003; 38:207–214.
13. Wright AP, Berridge DC, Scott DJ. Return to work following varicose vein surgery: influence of type of operation, employment and social status. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2006;31:553–557.
14. Rasmussen LH, Lawaetz M, Bjoern L, Vennits B, Blemings A, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation, radiofrequency ablation, foam sclerotherapy and surgical stripping for greatsaphenous varicose veins. British Journal of Surgery 2011;98:1079–1087.
15. Roger M. Greenhalgh, Vascular and endovascular consessus Up data Journal of Vascular surgery 2011;suplement: 353–372
16. Eklof B, Perrin M. Randomised controled trials comparing endovenous thermal and chemical ablation, CX, Vascular and and endovascular challenges update, Biba Medical Ltd., London UK 2013;402–405.
Štítky
Surgery Orthopaedics Trauma surgeryČlánok vyšiel v časopise
Perspectives in Surgery
2014 Číslo 2
- Spasmolytic Effect of Metamizole
- Metamizole at a Glance and in Practice – Effective Non-Opioid Analgesic for All Ages
- Metamizole in perioperative treatment in children under 14 years – results of a questionnaire survey from practice
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Evaluation of safe resection margins in tumours of parenchymatous organs
- Evaluation of safe resection margins in rectal carcinoma
- Evaluation of safe margins in pathology examination in breast oncosurgery
- Clostridium colitis at a surgical department