New AOSpine subaxial cervical spine injury classification and its clinical usage
Authors:
P. Vaněk
Authors place of work:
Neurochirurgická a neuroonkologická klinika 1. lékařské fakulty Univerzity Karlovy a Ústřední vojenská nemocnice - Vojenská fakultní nemocnice Praha
Published in the journal:
Rozhl. Chir., 2018, roč. 97, č. 6, s. 273-278.
Category:
Original Papers
Summary
Introduction:
The main aim of this paper is to introduce a new AOSpine subaxial cervical spine injury classification system to the national medical community since there is no generally accepted classification system until now.
Method:
A description of the new AOSpine subaxial cervical spine injury classification and the basic principles of it exploitation are proposed in this text. Usage of the abovementioned classification in clinical practice is demonstrated on a sample of 48 patients who were investigated and treated at the author’s department during the last two years. The assessment of injured spine stability and the surgical approach used are based on the above classification.
Results:
Type A0 injury was recorded in 5 (10.4%), A1 in 4 (8.3%), A2 in 2 (4.2%), A3 in 1(2.1%), A4 in 7 (14.6%), B2 in 2 (4.2%), B3 in 4 (8.3%), C in 12 (25%), F1 in 2 (4.2%), F2 in 4 (8.3%), F3 in 3 (6.3%) and F4 in 2 (4.2%) patients. Inter-observer agreement on each type of injury was achieved in 64.3%; as regards classification into the main groups A, B, C and D, consensus was reached in 89.3% cases. Eleven (22.9%) patients classified as A0, A1 and F1 were treated conservatively and 37 (77.1%) underwent surgery.
Conclusion:
New AOSpine subaxial cervical spine injury classification represents a useful tool, allowing for proper assessment of injury severity and helping to select the type of eventual surgical procedure.
Key words: classification − fracture − cervical spine − subaxial
Zdroje
- Cloward RB. Acute cervical spine injuries. Clin Symp CIBA 1980;32:1−32.
- Bohler L. Die Technik der Knochenbruchbehandlung. Wien, Maudrich 1951.
- Holdsworth F. Fracutue, dislocations, and fracture-dislocations of the spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1970;52:1534–51.
- Allen BL, Fergusson RL, Lehmann TR, et al. A mechanistic classification of closed, indirect fractures and dislocations of the lower cervical. Spine 1982;7:1−27.
- Aebi M. Nazarian S. Classification of injuries of the cervical spine. Orthopade 1987;16:27−36.
- Harris JH Jr, Edeiken-Monroe B, Kopaniky DR. A practical classification of acute cervical spine injuries. Orthop Clin North Am 1986;17:15−30.
- Vaccaro AR, Hulbert RJ, Patel AA, et al. The subaxial cervical spine injury classification system: a novel approach to recognize the importance of morphology, neurology, and integrity of the disco-ligamentous complex. Spine 2007;32:2365−74.
- Magerl F, Aebi M, Gartzbein SD, et al. A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbr spine injuries. Eur Spine J 1993;3:184−201.
- Vaccaro AR, Koerner JD, Radcliff KE, et al. AOSpine subxial cervical spine injury classification system. Eur Spine J 2016;25:2173−84.
- Frankel HL, Hancock DO, Hyslop G, et al. The value of postural reduction in the initial management of closed injuries of the spine with paraplegia and tetraplegia. I Paraplegia 1969;7:179−92.
- Schleicher P, Scholz M, Kandziora F, et al. Subaxial cervical spine injuries: Treatment recommendations of the German Orthopedic and Trauma Society. Z Orthop Unfall 2017, available from: 10.1055/s-0043-110855 [Epub ahead of print].
- Joaquim AF, Patel AA. Subaxial cervical spine trauma: evaluation and surgical decision-making. Global Spine J 2014;4:63−70.
- Aebi M, Arlet V, Webb JK. AOSpine manual clinical applications. (vol. 2) New York, Thieme 2007.
- vanMiddendorp JJ, Audige L, Hanson B, et al. What should an ideal spinal injury classification system consist of? A methodological review and conceptual proposal for future classifications. Euro Spine J Off Pub Eur Spine Soc Euro Spinal Deformity Soc Euro Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 2010;19:1238−49.
- Slongo T, Audige L, Clavert JM, et al. The AO comprehensive classification of pediatric long-bone fracture: web-based multicenter agreement study. J Pediatr Orthop 2007;27:171−80.
- Slongo T. Audige L, Schlickewei W, et al. Development and validation of the AO pediatric comprehensiveclassification of long bone fractures by the pediatric expetr group of the AO Foundation in collaboration with AO Clinical Investigation and Documentation and International Association for Pediatric Traumatology. J Pediatr Orthop 2006;26:43−9.
- Urrutia J, Zamora T, Yurac R, et al. An independent inter- and intraobserver agreement evaluation of the AOSpine Subaxial Cervical Spine Injury Classification System. Spine 2017;42:298−303.
- Urrutia J, Zamora T, Campos M, et al. A comparative agreement evaluation of two subaxial cervical spine injury classification systems: The AOSpine and the Allen and Ferguson schemes. Eur Spine J 2016;25:2185−92.
- Silva OT, Sabba MF, Lira HI, et al. Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the newer AOSpine subaxial cervical injury classification (C-3 to C-7). J Neurosurg Spine 2016;25:303−8.
- Cheung JPY, Luk KD. Complications of anterior and posterior cervical spine surgery. Asian Spine J 2016;10:385−400.
- Villavicencio AT, Pushchak E, Burneikiene S, et al. The safety of instrumented outpatient anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine J 2007;7:148−53.
- Uribe JS, Sangala JR, Duckworth EA, et al. Comparison between anterior cervical discectomy fusion and cervical corpectomy fusion using titanium cages for reconstruction: analysis of outcome and long-term follow-up. Eur Spine J 2009;18:654−62.
- Gelb DE, Aarabi B, Dhall SS, et al. Treatment of subaxial cervical spinal injuries. Neurosurgery 2013;72:187−94.
- Samuel S, Lin JL, Smith MM, et al. Subaxial injury classification scoring system treatment recommendations: external agreement study based on retrospective review of 185 patients. Spine 2015; 40:137−42.
- Kandziora F, Pflugmacher R, Scholz M, et al. Treatment of traumatic cervical spine instability with interbody fusion cages: a prospective controlled study with a 2-year follow-up. Injury 2005;36 Suppl 2:B27−35.
- Fehlings MG, Wilson JR, Kopjar B, et al. Efficacy and safety of surgical decompression in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: results of the AOSpine North America prospective multi-center study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013;95:1651−8.
- Nassr A, Lee JY, Dvorak MF, et al. Variations in surgical treatment of cervical facet dislocations. Spine 2008;33:188−93.
- Campbell PG, Malone J, Yadla S, et al. Early complications related to approach in cervical spine surgery: a single center prospective study. World Neurosurg 2010;73:395−401.
Štítky
Surgery Orthopaedics Trauma surgeryČlánok vyšiel v časopise
Perspectives in Surgery
2018 Číslo 6
- Metamizole vs. Tramadol in Postoperative Analgesia
- Metamizole at a Glance and in Practice – Effective Non-Opioid Analgesic for All Ages
- Spasmolytic Effect of Metamizole
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Meralgia paresthetica
- Chronic subdural hematoma – review article
- Epidural hematoma – benign or potentially malignant disease?
- Posttraumatic hydrocephalus