Lymph nodes detection and the mesorectal excision quality evaluation
Authors:
M. Grega 1; M. Vjaclovský 2; R. Chmelová 1; F. Pazdírek 2; R. Kodet 1; J. Hoch 2
Authors place of work:
Ústav patologie a molekulární medicíny 2. lékařské fakulty Univerzity Karlovy a Fakultní nemocnice Motol
1; Chirurgická klinika 2. lékařské fakulty Univerzity Karlovy a Fakultní nemocnice Motol
2
Published in the journal:
Rozhl. Chir., 2019, roč. 98, č. 5, s. 200-206.
Category:
Original articles
Summary
Introduction:
Detection and examination of proper number of lymph nodes in patients after rectal resection is important for next treatment and management of patients with rectal carcinoma. There are no clear guideliness for minimal count of lymph nodes, variant recommendations agree on the number of 12 (10−14) nodes. There are situations, when is not easy to reach this count, mainly in older age groups and in patients after neoadjuvant, especially radiation therapy. As a modality for improvement of lymph nodes harvesting seems to be establishing of defined protocols originally designed for mesorectal excision quality evaluation.
Methods:
The investigation group was formed by patients examined in 2 three-years intervals before and after implementation of the protocol. Elevation in count of harvested lymph nodes was rated generaly and in relation to age groups and gender.
Results:
The average count of lymph nodes increased from 10 to 15 nodes, in subset of patients whose received neoadjuvant therapy from 7 to almost 14 nodes. The recommended number of lymph nodes was obtained in all investigated age groups. By the increased number of lymph nodes, rises also possibility of positive nodes found, that can lead to upstaging of the disease, in subset of patients whose received neoadjuvant therapy it is more than 4%.
Conclusion:
Our conclusions show, that forming of multidisciplinary cooperative groups (chiefly surgeon-pathologist), implementation of defined protocol of surgery, specimen manipulation and investigation by detached specialists lead to benefit consequences for further management and treatment of the patients with colorectal cancer.
Keywords:
mesorectal excision – circumferential resection margin (CRM) – stage according to TNM classification and Dukes classification – lymph nodes identiffication and harvesting and examination
Zdroje
- Goldstein NS, Sanford W, Coffey M, et al. Lymph node recovery from colorectal resection specimens removed for adenocarcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol. 1996;106:209−16.
- Modrá kniha České onkologické společnosti, 23. aktualizace, Masarykův onkologický ústav 2017:25−35.
- McDonald JR, Renehan AG, O´Dwyer ST, et al. Lymph node harvest in colon and rectal cancer: Current considerations. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;27:9−19. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v4.i1.9.
- Nelson H, Petrelli N, Carlin A, Couture J, et al. Guidelines 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgery. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;18;93:583−96.
- Chang GJ, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Skibber JM, et al. Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative resection of colon cancer: Systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:433−41. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djk092
- Choi HK, Law WL, Poon JTC. The optimal number of lymph nodes examined in stage II colorectal cancer and its Impact of on outcomes. BMC Cancer 2010;10:267. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-267.
- Swanson RS, Compton CC, Stewart AK, et al. The prognosis of T3N0 colon cancer is dependent on the number of lymph nodes examined. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:65−71.
- Pheby DFH, Levine DF, Pitcher RW, et al. Node harvests directly influence the staging of colorectal cancer: Evidence from a regional audit. J Clin Pathol. 2004;57:43−7.
- Ng IOL, Luk ISC, Yuen ST, et al. Surgical lateral clarence in resected rectal carcinomas. A multivariate analysis of clinicopathologic features. Cancer 1993;71:1972−6.
- Tepper JE, O´Connell MJ, Niedzwiecki D, et al. Impact of number of nodes retrieved on outcome in patients with rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:157−63. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.1.157.
- Garcia-Granero E, Faiz O, Munoz E, et al. Macroscopic assessment of mesorectal excision in rectal cancer: A useful tool for improving quality control in a multidisciplinary team. Cancer 2009;115:3400−11. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24387.
- Loughrey MB, Quirke P, Shepherd NA. Standards and datasets for reporting cancers: Dataset for colorectal cancer histopathology reports. Royal Collage of Pathologists 2014.
- Washington MK, Berlin J, Branton P, et al. Protocol for the examinations of specimens from patients with primary carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009;133:1539−51.
- Hoch J, Ferko A, Blaha M, et al. Parametrické sledování kvality mezorektální excize a chirurgické léčby karcinomu rekta – výsledky multicentrické studie. Rozhl Chir. 2016;95:262−71.
- Hovorková E, Hadži-Nikolov D, Ferko A, et al. Problematika stanovení bezpečných resekčních okrajů u karcinomu rekta. Rozhl Chir. 2014;93:92−9.
- Dias AR, Pereira MA, Mello ES, et al. Carnoy´s solution increases the number of examined lymph nodes following gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma: A randomized trial. Gastric Cancer 2016;19:136−42. doi: 10.1007/s10120-014-0443-2.
- Bembenek AE, Rosenberg R, Wagler E, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in colon cancer. A prospective multicenter study. Ann Surg. 2007;245:858−63. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000250428.46656.7e.
Štítky
Surgery Orthopaedics Trauma surgeryČlánok vyšiel v časopise
Perspectives in Surgery
2019 Číslo 5
- Metamizole at a Glance and in Practice – Effective Non-Opioid Analgesic for All Ages
- Metamizole vs. Tramadol in Postoperative Analgesia
- Spasmolytic Effect of Metamizole
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Acute hiatal hernias
- An alternative method of surgical treatment in refractory GERD following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy
- Rare causes of acute appendicitis
- Early surgical management in patients with burns