Complications and pitfalls of endovenous laser therapy for varicose veins of lower extremities
Authors:
S. Kašpar 1; D. Kašpar 1,2
Authors place of work:
Flebocentrum – Centrum žilní chirurgie, Hradec Králové
1; Chirurgické oddělení Oblastní nemocnice Mladá Boleslav, a. s., nemocnice Středočeského kraje
2
Published in the journal:
Rozhl. Chir., 2022, roč. 101, č. 8, s. 369-374.
Category:
Review
doi:
https://doi.org/10.33699/PIS.2022.101.8.369–374
Summary
Varicose veins of lower extremities are a common disorder affecting a significant proportion of adult population. Endovenous techniques have been used in clinical practice for more than 20 years for their radical treatment; of these, laser therapy is one of the most widely utilized options. However, this treatment modality, too, has its specific side effects and complications which can be divided into perioperative (difficult venous access, fiber or sheath damage, vasovagal reaction with a drop in blood pressure and bradycardia, cutaneous thermal injury), and postoperative (bruising and hematomas, exceptionally pain, superficial venous thrombosis (phlebitis) and fibrous cord formation or pigmentations). Paresthesias, infections, arteriovenous fistulas, deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism are very rare. The introduction of new generators with higher wavelengths and fibers with radial emission of laser energy has substantially reduced the side effects and complications. Performing the surgery in the outpatient setting using tumescent local anesthesia and under perioperative ultrasound control is an essential condition of the procedure.
Keywords:
side effects – complications – varicose veins – endovenous therapy – laser
Zdroje
1. Siribumrungwong B, Noorit P, Wilasrusmee C, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing endovenous ablation and surgical intervention in patients with varicose vein. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012;44:214–223. doi:10.1016/j. ejvs.2012.05.017.
2. Carradice D, Mekako AI, Mazari FA, et al. Clinical and technical outcomes from a randomized clinical trial of endovenous laser ablation compared with conventional surgery for great saphenous varicose veins. Br J Surg. 2011;98:1117–1123. doi:10.1002/bjs.7615.
3. Christenson JT, Gueddi S, Gemayel G, et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing endovenous laser ablation and surgery for treatment of primary great saphenous varicose veins with a 2-year follow-up. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52:1234– 1241. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2010.06.104.
4. Rasmussen LH, Bjoern L, Lawaetz M, et al. Randomised clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation with stripping of the great saphenous vein: clinical outcome and recurrence after 2 years. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;39:630–635. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.11.040.
5. Lekich C, Hannah P. Retained laser fibre: insights and management. Phlebology 2014 Jun;29(5):318–324. doi:10.1177/0268355513483957.
6. Mazayshvili K, Akimov S. Early complications of endovenous laser ablation. Int Angiol. 2019;38:96–101. doi:10.23736/ S0392-9590.19.04097-5.
7. Wozniak W, Mlosek RK, Ciostek P. Complications and failure of endovenous laser ablation and radiofrequency ablation procedures in patients with lower extremity varicose veins in a 5-year follow up. Vasc and Endovasc Surg. 2016;50:475– 483. doi:10.1177/1538574416671247.
8. Proebstle TM, Moehler T, Gul D, et al. Endovenous treatment of the great saphenous vein using a 1320nm Nd: YAG laser causes fewer side effects than using a 940 nm diode laser. Dermatol Surg. 2005;31:1678– 1684. doi:10.2310/6350.2005.31308.
9. Shutze WP, Kane K, Fisher T, et al. The effect of wavelength on endothermal heat-induced thrombosis incidence after endovenous laser ablation. J Vasc Surg. 2016;4:36–43. doi:10.1016/j. jvsv.2015.08.003.
10. Hirokawa M, Ogawa T, Sugawara H, et al. Comparison of 1470 nm laser and radial 2ring fiber with 980 nm laser and baretip fiber in endovenous laser ablation of saphenous varicose veins: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, non-blind study. Ann Vasc Dis. 2015;8:282–289. doi:10.3400/avd.oa.15-00084.
11. Arslan U, Calik E, Tort M, et al. More successful results with less energy in endovenous laser ablation treatment: long-term comparison of bare-tip fiber 980 nm laser and radial-tip fiber 1470 nm laser application. Ann Vasc Surg. 2017;45:166–172. doi:10.1016/j. avsg.2017.06.042.
12. Kabnick LS, Sadek M. Fiber type as compared to wavelength may contribute more to improving postoperative recovery following endovenous laser ablation. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2016;4:286–292. doi:10.1016/j. jvsv.2015.12.004.
13. Hirokawa M, Kurihara N. Comparison of bare-tip and radial fiber in endovenous laser ablation with 1470nm diode laser. Ann Vasc Disc. 2014;7:239–245. doi:10.3400/avd.oa.14-00081.
14. Yamamoto T, Sakata M. Influence of fibers and wavelengths on the mechanism of action of endovenous laser ablation. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2014;2:61–69. doi:10.1016/j. jvsv.2013.05.009.
15. Healy DA, Kimura S, Power D, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of thrombotic events following endovenous thermal ablation of the great saphenous vein. Eur J Vasc. Endovasc Surg. 2018 Sep;56(3):410–424. doi:10.1016/j. ejvs.2018.05.008.
16. Dexter D, Kabnick L, Berland T, et al. Complications of endovenous lasers. Phlebology 2012;27:40–45. doi:10.1258/ phleb.2012.012s18.
17. Lin JC, Peterson EL, Revera ML, et al. Vein mapping prior to endovenous catheter ablation of the great saphenous vein predicts risk of endovenous heat-induced thrombosis. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2012;46:378–383. doi:10.1177/1538574412449392.
18. Cantelmo NL, Conrad MF, Rhee SJ, et al. Factors influencing the incidence of endovenous heat induced thrombosis (EHIT). Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2013;47:207– 212. doi:10.1177/1538574413478494.
19. Korepta LM, Mansour MA, Watson JJ, et al. Outcomes of a single-center experience with classification and treatment of endothermal heat-induced thrombosis after endovenous ablation. J Vasc Surg. 2017;5:332–338. doi:10.1016/j. jvsv.2016.12.010.
20. Ascher E, Aurshina A, Victory J, et al. Clinical correlation of success and acute thrombotic complications of lower extremity endovenous thermal ablation. J Vasc Surg. 2018;6:25–30. doi:10.1016/j. jvsv.2017.07.001.
21. Kane K, Fisher T, Bennett M, et al. The incidence and outcome of endothermal heat-induced thrombosis after endovenous laser ablation. Ann Vasc Surg. 2014;28:1744–1750. doi:10.1016/j. avsg.2014.05.005.
22. Spinedi L, Stricker H, Keo HH, et al. Feasibility and safety of flush endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein up to the saphenofemoral junction. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2020 Nov;8(6):1006–1013. doi:10.1016/j. jvsv.2020.01.017.
23. Kabnick LS, Sadek M, Bjarnason H, et al. Classification and treatment of endothermal heat-induced thrombosis: Recommendations from the American Venous Forum and the Society for Vascular Surgery. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2021 Jan;9(1):6–22. doi:10.1016/j. jvsv.2020.06.008.
24. Huisman L, Bruins R, van den Berg M, et al. Endovenous laser ablation of the small saphenous vein: prospective analysis of 150 patients, a cohort study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;38:199–202. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.04.003.
25. Balasubramaniam R, Rai R, Berridge D, et al. The relationship between the saphenopopliteal junction and the common peroneal nerve: a cadaveric study. Phlebology 2009;24:67–73. doi:10.1258/ phleb.2006.006035.
26. Gracia S, Miserey G, Risse J, et al. Update of the SFMV (French Society of Vascular Medicine) guidelines on the conditions and safety measures necessary for thermal ablation of the saphenous veins and proposals for unresolved issues. J Med Vasc. 2020 May;45(3):130– 146. doi:10.1016/j.jdmv.2020.03.005.
27. Rudarakanchana N, Berland T, Chasin C, et al. Arteriovenous fistula after endovenous ablation for varicose veins. J Vasc Surg. 2012 May;55(5):1492– 1494. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2011.09.093.
28. Ziporin Sj, Ifune CK, MacConmara MP, et al. A case of external iliac arteriovenous fistula and high-output cardiac failure after endovenous laser treatment of great saphenous vein. J Vasc Surg. 2010;51:715–719. doi:10.1016/j. jvs.2009.10.043.
29. Eidson JL, Shepherd LG, Bush RL. Aneurysmal dilatation of the great saphenous vein stump after endovenous laser ablation. J Vasc Surg. 2008;48:1037–1039. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2008.05.019.
30. Sichlau MJ, Ryu RK. Cutaneous thermal injury after endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2004 Aug;15(8):865–867. doi:10.1097/01. RVI.0000136968.64870.07.
31. Dunst KM, Huemer GM, Wayand W, et al. Diffuse phlegmonous phlebitis after endovenous laser treatment of the greater saphenous vein. J Vasc Surg. 2006;43:1056–1058. doi:10.1016/j.jvs. 2006.01.030.
32. d’Othe´e B, Ghiorse D. Non-infected, non-haematic fluid collections after endovenous laser ablation of the saphenous veins: a noteworthy complication. Phlebology 2008;23:47–49. doi:10.1258/ phleb.2007.007041.
Štítky
Surgery Orthopaedics Trauma surgeryČlánok vyšiel v časopise
Perspectives in Surgery
2022 Číslo 8
- Metamizole at a Glance and in Practice – Effective Non-Opioid Analgesic for All Ages
- Metamizole vs. Tramadol in Postoperative Analgesia
- Spasmolytic Effect of Metamizole
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Complications and pitfalls of endovenous laser therapy for varicose veins of lower extremities
- Unique robotic vascular surgery procedures
- Endovenous laser ablation of saphenous veins – favorable clinical results confirm theoretical advantages of the 1940nm diode laser
- Efficacy and safety of urgent carotid endarterectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke