Blood loss during HPB procedures
Authors:
J. Zajak 1,2
; K. Vinklerová 1,2
; J. Páral 1,2,3; E. V. Valkyová 4; Eva Čermáková 5
; F. Čečka 1,3
Authors place of work:
Chirurgická klinika, Fakultní nemocnice Hradec Králové, Česká republika
1; Katedra vojenské chirurgie, Fakulta vojenského zdravotnictví, Univerzita obrany, Brno, Česká republika
2; Katedra chirurgie, Lékařská fakulta Univerzity Karlovy v Hradci Králové, Česká republika
3; Farmaceutická fakulta Univerzity Karlovy v Hradci Králové, Česká republika
4; Ústav lékařské biofyziky, oddělení výpočetní techniky, Lékařská fakulta Univerzity Karlovy v Hradci Králové, Česká republika
5
Published in the journal:
Rozhl. Chir., 2023, roč. 102, č. 9, s. 356-362.
Category:
Original articles
doi:
https://doi.org/10.33699/PIS.2023.102.9.356–362
Summary
Introduction: During the last decades, simultaneously with the development of surgical technique, modern equipment and perioperative management, there has been a significant improvement in postoperative outcome. Despite this, infectious complications and perioperative bleeding remain the leading causes of postoperative morbidity and mortality in HPB surgery.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective study over a three-year period in 256 patients who underwent surgery of the pancreas, liver, gallbladder, or bile ducts. We monitored perioperative blood loss, the number of administered transfusions, the type and severity of postoperative complications, the number of reoperations and the number of readmissions.
Results: The average blood loss was 457 ml. We administered transfusions to 39 patients (17%). We confirmed the hypothesis that the presence of blood loss statistically significantly increases the development of deep intra-abdominal infections (p=0.0188). Morbidity increases with increasing blood loss (p=0.0168). We confirmed a statistically significant difference in the blood loss between the groups with and without complications (p=0.001). Postoperative 30-day mortality was less than 1% (n=2). There were 15 (6%) reoperated patients, seven for acute bleeding and eight for infectious complications. The length of hospital stay was statistically significantly longer in patients who received transfusions – erythrocytes (p=0.023), and plasma (p=0.011). We readmitted 12 patients, three patients died during rehospitalization (the 90-day mortality rate was 2%, n=5). A total of 59% patients in our group were classified as ASA III.
Conclusion: With increasing blood loss, morbidity (development of intra-abdominal infections) increases significantly, but despite this, overall post- operative mortality remains low. Early postoperative bleeding is the cause of more than half of reoperations. The length of hospitalization increases significantly with the number of transfusions administered.
Keywords:
morbidity – liver resection – pancreatic resection – blood loss
Zdroje
1. Perri G, Marchegiani G, Reich F, et al. Intraoperative blood loss estimation in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery – relevant, not reported, not standardized: Results from a systematic review and a worldwide snapshot survey. Annals of Surgery 2023 Apr 1;277(4):e849–e855. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000005536.
2. Lehmann K, Clavien PA. History of hepatic surgery. Surgical clinics of North America 2010;90(4):655–664. doi:10.1016/j. suc.2010.04.018.
3. Kokudo N, Takemura N, Ito K, et al. The history of liver surgery: Achievements over the past 50 years. Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery 2020 Feb 26;4(2):109– 117. doi:10.1002/ags3.12322.
4. Poon RT, Fan ST, Lo CM, et al. Improving perioperative outcome expands the role of hepatectomy in management of benign and malignant hepatobiliary diseases. Transactions of the Meeting of the American Surgical Association 2019;296–308. doi:10.1097/01. sla.0000141195.66155.0c .
5. Jarnagin WR, Gonen M, Fong Y, et al. Improvement in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection: analysis of 1,803 consecutive cases over the past decade. Annals of Surgery 2002 Oct;236(4):397– 406; discussion 406–407. doi:10.1097/01. SLA.0000029003.66466.B3.
6. Gouma DJ, van Geenen RC, van Gulik TM, et al. Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the impact of hospital volume. Annals of Surgery 2000 Dec;232(6):786– 795. doi:10.1097/00000658-200012000-00007.
7. Jin S, Fu Q, Wuyun G, et al. Management of post-hepatectomy complications. World Journal of Gastroenterology 2013 Nov 28;19(44):7983–7991. doi:10.3748/ wjg.v19.i44.7983.
8. Stella M, Bissolati M, Gentile D, et al. Impact of surgical experience on management and outcome of pancreatic surgery performed in high and low-volume centers. Updates in Surgery 2017;9(3):351– 358. doi:10.1007/s13304-017-0422-3.
9. Van Roessel S, Mackay TM, van Dieren S, et al. Textbook outcome. Annals of Surgery 2019;1. doi:10.1097/ sla.0000000000003451.
10. Sánchez-Velázquez P, Muller X, Malleo G, et al. Benchmarks in pancreatic surgery: A novel tool for unbiased outcome comparisons. Annals of Surgery 2019 Aug;270(2):211–218. doi:10.1097/ SLA.0000000000003223. PMID: 30829701.
11. Alkozai EM, Lisman T, Porte RJ. Bleeding in liver surgery: Prevention and treatment. Clinical Liver Disease 2009;13(1):145– 154. doi:10.1016/j.cld.2008.09.012.
12. McNally SJ, Revie EJ, Massie LJ, et al. Factors in perioperative care that determine blood loss in liver surgery. HPB 2012;14(4):236–241. doi:10.1111/j.1477-2574.2011.00433.x.
13. Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, et al. Post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) – an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 2007;142(1):20–25. doi:10.1016/j. surg.2007.02.001.
14. Wellner UF, Kulemann B, Lapshyn H, et al Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage—incidence, treatment, and risk factors in over 1,000 pancreatic resections. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2014;18(3):464– 475. doi:10.1007/s11605-013-2437-5.
15. Kasumova GG, Eskander MF, Kent TS, et al. Hemorrhage after pancreaticoduodenectomy: does timing matter? HPB 2016;18(10):861–869. doi:10.1016/j. hpb.2016.07.001.
16. Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R, et al. Post-hepatectomy haemorrhage: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). HPB 2011;13(8):528–535. doi:10.1111/j.14772574.2011.00319.x.
17. Lim C, Dokmak S, Farges O, et al. Reoperation for post-hepatectomy hemorrhage: increased risk of mortality. Langenbeck’s Archives of Surgery 2014; 399(6):735–740. doi:10.1007/s00423-0141189-3.
18. Yang T, Zhang J, Lu JH, et al. Risk factors influencing postoperative outcomes of major hepatic resection of hepatocellular carcinoma for patients with underlying liver diseases. World Journal of Surgery 2011;35(9):2073– 2082. doi:10.1007/s00268-011-1161-0.
19. Yang T, Li L, Zhong Q, et al. Risk factors of hospital mortality after re-laparotomy for post-hepatectomy hemorrhage. World Journal of Surgery 2013;37(10):2394– 2401. doi:10.1007/s00268-013-2147-x.
20. Muhammad MA. Muhammad ZS. Muhammad AA. Hemorrhagic complications after pancreatic surgery: A comprehensive review of literature. Journal of the Pancreas 2019 Nov 29;20(6):159–166.
21. Chen J, Xu S, Zhao W, et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic strategies to manage post-pancreaticoduodenectomy hemorrhage. World Journal of Surgery 2014;39(2): 509–515. doi:10.1007/s00268-014-2809-3.
22. Treckmann J, Paul A, Sotiropoulos GC, et al. Sentinel bleeding after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a disregarded sign. Journal of Gastrointest Surgery 2008 Feb;12(2):313–318. doi:10.1007/s11605007-0361-2.
23. Floortje van Oosten A, Smits FJ, van den Heuvel, et al. Diagnosis and management of postpancreatectomy hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB 2019;21(8):953–961. doi:10.1016/j. hpb.2019.02.011.
24. Biondetti P, Fumarola EM, Ierardi AM. Bleeding complications after pancreatic surgery: interventional radiology management. Gland Surgery 2019;8(2):150– 163. doi:10.21037/gs.2019.01.06.
25. Correa-Gallego C, Brennan M, D‘Angelica M, et al. Contemporary experience with postpancreatectomy hemorrhage: Results of 1,122 patients resected between 2006 and 2011. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 2012; 215(5):616–621. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg. 2012.07.010.
26. Baker L, Park L, Gilbert R, et al. Intraoperative red blood cell transfusion decision-making: A systematic review of guidelines. Annals of Surgery 2021 Jul 1;274(1): 86– 96. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000004710.
27. Ball CG, Pitt HA, Kilbane ME, et al. Peri-operative blood transfusion and operative time are quality indicators for pancreatoduodenectomy. HPB 2010; 12(7):465–471. doi:10.1111/j.1477-2574. 2010.00209.x.
28. Kooby DA, Stockman J, Ben-Porat L, et al. Influence of transfusions on perioperative and long-term outcome in patients following hepatic resection for colorectal metastases. Annals of Surgery 2003;237(6):860–870. doi:10.1097/01.sla. 0000072371.95.
29. Ahmad SA, Edwards MJ, Sutton, et al. Factors influencing readmission after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Annals of Surgery 2012;256(3):529–537. doi:10.1097/ sla.0b013e318265ef0b.
30. Fisher AV, Fernandes-Taylor S, Campbell-Flohr SA, et al. 30-day readmission after pancreatic resection. Annals of Surgery 2017;266(2):242–250. doi:10.1097/ sla.0000000000002230.
31. Algadiem AE, Aleisa AA, Alsubaie HI, et al. Blood loss estimation using gauze visual analogue. Trauma Monthly 2016 May 3;21(2):e34131. doi: 10.5812.
doc. MUDr. Filip Čečka, Ph.D.
Chirurgická klinika, FN Hradec
Králové Katedra chirurgie, LF UK v Hradci Králové
e-mail: Filip.cecka@fnhk.cz
ORCID: 0000-0001-9617-7051
Štítky
Surgery Orthopaedics Trauma surgeryČlánok vyšiel v časopise
Perspectives in Surgery
2023 Číslo 9
- Metamizole at a Glance and in Practice – Effective Non-Opioid Analgesic for All Ages
- Metamizole vs. Tramadol in Postoperative Analgesia
- Spasmolytic Effect of Metamizole
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Treatment of the congenital thoracic deformity pectus excavatum
- Triple neurectomy following Lichtenstein repair of inguinal hernia
- Blood loss during HPB procedures
- Surgical therapy of chronic lung allograft dysfunction