Standardized ERAS protocol in liver and pancreatic surgery

Česká verzia

Authors: K. Vinklerová ^1,2 ; J. Zajak ^1,2 ; F. Čečka ^1-3 ; J. Páral ^1-3 ; J. Sedláčková ^1,2
Authors place of work: Chirurgická klinika, FN Hradec, Králové ¹; Katedra vojenské chirurgie, Vojenská lékařská fakulta, Univerzita obrany, Brno ²; Katedra chirurgie, LF UK v Hradci, Králové ³
Published in the journal: Rozhl. Chir., 2024, roč. 103, č. 9, s. 351-357.
Category: Review
doi: https://doi.org/10.48095/ccrvch2024351

Summary

ERAS (enhanced recovery after surgery) represents a comprehensive strategy aimed at expediting patient recovery, reducing complications, and optimizing postoperative care. The ERAS protocol encompasses recommendations for the preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative phases of patient care. Implementation of the ERAS protocol yields a multitude of benefits for both patients and the healthcare system. It shortens hospital stays, diminishes the number and severity of postoperative complications, and enhances patient’s quality of life. These factors contribute to healthcare cost savings and improved bed turnover efficiency. Rigorous adherence to the ERAS protocol is paramount to achieving optimal outcomes. The comprehensive ERAS strategy thus marks a paradigm shift in perioperative care and emerges as an indispensable standard in liver and pancreatic surgery.

Keywords:

perioperative care – complications – Enhanced Recovery After Surgery – liver and pancreatic surgery

Zdroje

1. Melloul E, Lassen K, Roulin D et al. Guidelines for perioperative care for pancreatoduodenectomy: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) recommendations 2019. World J Surg 2020; 44(7): 2056–2084. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05462-w.

2. Joliat GR, Kobayashi K, Hasegawa K et al. Guidelines for perioperative care for liver surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) society recommendations 2022. World J Surg 2023; 47(1): 11–34. doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06732-5.

3. Halaszynski TM, Juda R, Silverman D. Optimizing postoperative outcomes with efficient preoperative assessment and management. Crit Care Med 2004; 32(4): S76–S86. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000122046.30687.5C.

4. Steves SL, Scafide KN. Multimedia in preoperative patient education for adults undergoing cancer surgery: a systematic review. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2021; 52: 101981. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2021.101981.

5. Dewulf M, Verrips M, Coolsen ME et al. The effect of prehabilitation on postoperative complications and postoperative hospital stay in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery a systematic review. HPB 2021; 23(9): 1299–1310. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.04.021.

6. Weimann A, Braga M, Carli F et al. ESPEN practical guideline: clinical nutrition in surgery. Clin Nutr 2021; 40(7): 4745–4761. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.03.031.

7. Osland E, Hossain MB, Khan S et al. Effect of timing of pharmaconutrition (immunonutrition) administration on outcomes of elective surgery for gastrointestinal malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2014; 38(1): 53–69. doi: 10.1177/0148607112474825.

8. Darville-Beneby R, Lomanowska AM, Yu H et al. The impact of preoperative patient education on postoperative pain, opioid use, and psychological outcomes: a narrative review. Can J Pain 2023; 7(2): 2266751. doi: 10.1080/24740527.2023.2266751.

9. Keding V, Zacharowski K, Bechstein WO et al. Patient blood management improves outcome in oncologic surgery. World J Surg Oncol 2018; 16(1): 159. doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1456-9.

10. Lindström D, Sadr Azodi O, Wladis A et al. Effects of a perioperative smoking cessation intervention on postoperative complications: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 2008; 248(5): 739–745. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181889d0d.

11. Eliasen M, Grønkjær M, Skrubbeltrang LS et al. Preoperative alcohol consumption and postoperative complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2013; 258(6): 930–942. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182988d59.

12. Mehrabi A, Khajeh E, Ghamarnejad O et al. Meta-analysis of the efficacy of preoperative biliary drainage in patients undergoing liver resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Eur J Radiol 2020; 125: 108897. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108897.

13. Lee PJ, Podugu A, Wu D et al. Preoperative biliary drainage in resectable pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. HPB 2018; 20(6): 477–486. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2017.12.007.

14. Hameed A, Pang T, Chiou J et al. Percutaneous vs. endoscopic pre-operative biliary drainage in hilar cholangiocarcinoma – a systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB 2016; 18(5): 400–410. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2016.03.002.

15. Gjessing PF, Hagve M, Fuskevåg OM et al. Single-dose carbohydrate treatment in the immediate preoperative phase diminishes development of postoperative peripheral insulin resistance. Clin Nutr 2015; 34(1): 156–164. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2014.02.010.

16. Akter N, Ratnayake B, Joh DB et al. Postoperative pain relief after pancreatic resection: systematic review and meta-analysis of analgesic modalities. World J Surg 2021; 45(10): 3165–3173. doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-06217-x.

17. By the 2019 American Geriatrics Society beers criteria update expert panel. American Geriatrics Society 2019 updated AGS beers criteria for potentially inappropriate medication use in oder adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2019; 67(4): 674–694. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15767.

18. Dudek P, Zawadka M, Andruszkiewicz P et al. Postoperative analgesia after open liver surgery: systematic review of clinical evidence. J Clin Med 2021; 10(16): 3662. doi: 10.3390/jcm10163662.

19. Lyman GH, Khorana AA, Kuderer NM et al. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment in patients with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31(17): 2189–2204. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.49.1118.

20. Baltatzis M, Low R, Stathakis P et al. Efficacy and safety of pharmacological venous thromboembolism prophylaxis following liver resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB 2017; 19(4): 289–296. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2017.01.002.

21. Bratzler DW, Dellinger EP, Olsen KM et al. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2013; 14(1): 73–156. doi: 10.1089/sur.2013.9999.

22. Gavazzi F, Ridolfi C, Capretti G et al. Role of preoperative biliary stents, bile contamination and antibiotic prophylaxis in surgical site infections after pancreaticoduodenectomy. BMC Gastroenterol 2016; 16: 43. doi:10.1186/s12876-016-0460-1.

23. Mărgărit S, Bartoș A, Laza L et al. Analgesic modalities in patients undergoing open pancreatoduodenectomy – a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med 2023; 12(14): 4682. doi: 10.3390/jcm12144682.

24. Darouiche RO, Wall MJ Jr, Itani KM et al. Chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone-iodine for surgical-site antisepsis. N Engl J Med 2010; 362(1): 18–26. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810988.

25. Li X, Lin H, Zhu L et al. The clinical effectiveness of wound edge protectors in reducing surgical site infection after abdominal surgery: meta-analysis. BJS Open 2022; 6(3): zrac065. doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac065.

26. Hughes MJ, Ventham NT, Harrison EM et al. Central venous pressure and liver resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford) 2015; 17(10): 863–871. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12462.

27. Andrianello S, Marchegiani G, Bannone E et al. Clinical implications of intraoperative fluid therapy in pancreatic surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 2018; 22(12): 2072–2079. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3887-6.

28. Torossian A. Thermal management during anaesthesia and thermoregulation standards for the prevention of inadvertent perioperative hypothermia. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2008; 22(4): 659–668. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2008.07.006.

29. Gan TJ, Diemunsch P, Habib AS et al. Consensus guidelines for the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg 2014; 118(1): 85–113. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000002.

30. Čečka F, Jon B, Šubrt Z et al. The effect of somatostatin and its analogs in the prevention of pancreatic fistula after elective pancreatic surgery. Eur Surg 2012; 44: 99–108. doi: 10.1007/s10353-011-0612-z.

31. Yang Z, Zheng Q, Wang Z et al. Meta-analysis of the need for nasogastric or nasojejunal decompression after gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Br J Surg 2008; 95(7): 809–816. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6198.

32. McPhail MJ, Abu-Hilal M, Johnson CD. A meta-analysis comparing suprapubic and transurethral catheterization for bladder drainage after abdominal surgery. Br J Surg 2006; 93(9): 1038–1044. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5424.

33. Beane JD, House MG, Ceppa EP et al. Variation in drain management after pancreatoduodenectomy: early versus delayed removal. Ann Surg 2019; 269(4): 718–724. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002570.

34. Gavriilidis P, Hidalgo E, de‘Angelis N et al. Re-appraisal of prophylactic drainage in uncomplicated liver resections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford) 2017; 19(1): 16–20. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2016.07.010.

35. Hughes MJ, Harrison EM, Jin Y et al. Acetaminophen metabolism after liver resection: a prospective case-control study. Dig Liver Dis 2015; 47(12): 1039–1046. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2015.08.005.

36. Behman R, Karanicolas PJ, Lemke M et al. The effect of early postoperative non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2015; 19(9): 1632–1639. doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-2874-4.

37. Okabayashi T, Shima Y, Sumiyoshi T et al. Intensive versus intermediate glucose control in surgical intensive care unit patients. Diabetes Care 2014; 37(6): 1516–1524. doi: 10.2337/dc13-1771.

38. Kulemann B, Fritz M, Glatz T et al. Complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy are associated with higher amounts of intra and postoperative fluid therapy: a single center retrospective cohort study. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2017; 16: 23–29. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2017.02.042.

39. Chan M, Wai WL. Use of chewing gum in reducing postoperative ileus after elective colorectal resection: a systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum 2007; 50(12): 2149–2157. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-9039-9.

40. Drake TM, Ward AE. Pharmacological management to prevent ileus in major abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 2016; 20(6): 1253–1264. doi: 10.1007/s11605-016-3140-0.

41. Gerritsen A, Wennink RA, Besselink MG et al. Early oral feeding after pancreatoduodenectomy enhances recovery without increasing morbidity. HPB (Oxford) 2014; 16(7): 656–664. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12197.

42. Fujii T, Nakao A, Murotani K et al. Influence of food intake on the healing process of postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy: a multi-institutional randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg Oncol 2015; 22(12): 3905–3912. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4496-1.

43. Pathanki AM, Attard JA, Bradley E et al. Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency after pancreaticoduodenectomy: current evidence and management. World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol 2020; 11(2): 20–31. doi: 10.4291/wjgp.v11.i2.20.

44. Rompen IF, Merz DC, Alhalabi KT et al. Perioperative drug treatment in pancreatic surgery – a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med 2023; 12(5): 1750. doi: 10.3390/jcm12051750.

45. Castelino T, Fiore JF, Niculiseanu P et al. The effect of early mobilization protocols on postoperative outcomes following abdominal and thoracic surgery: a systematic review. Surgery 2016; 159(4): 991–1003. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.11.029.

46. Baimas-George M, Cochran A, Watson M et al. Vertical compliance: a novel method of reporting patient specific ERAS compliance for real-time risk assessment. Int J Med Inform 2020; 141: 104194. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104194.

47. Kocian P, Pazdírek F, Vjaclovský M et al. Methodology for implementing early recovery after surgery protocols in colorectal surgery. Rozhl Chir 2023; 102(7): 268–276. doi: 10.33699/PIS.2023.102.7.268-276.

MUDr. Kateřina Vinklerová

Chirurgická klinika

LF UK a FN Hradec Králové

Sokolská 581

500 05 Hradec Králové

katerina.vinklerova@fnhk.cz