The eff ect of a respiratory physiotherapy program on extraoesophageal refl ux dis ease symptoms

Česká verzia

Authors: Horová P. ¹; Dvořáček M. ¹; Zatloukal J. ²; Rybnikár T. ³; Raisová K. ¹
Published in the journal: Rehabil. fyz. Lék., 31, 2024, No. 3, pp. 108-115.
Category: Original Papers
doi: https://doi.org/10.48095/ccrhfl 2024108

Summary

Introduction: Respiratory physiotherapy methods can reduce the incidence and intensity of oesophageal symptoms in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Whether this therapy has the same effect on the extraoesophageal symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease has not been investigated yet. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a respiratory physiotherapy program aimed at activating and strengthening the diaphragm by inspiratory muscle training performed in postural positions on the intensity of extraoesophageal reflux disease (EERD) symptoms and to assess whether the effect of this program differs in patients with normal and decreased inspiratory muscle strength. Methods: Patients with EERD were included in the study. Patients with decompensated cardiovascular disease, pulmonary disease, soft tissue disease, post-fundoplication patients, smokers and pregnant women were excluded from the study. Patients were assessed for inspiratory muscle strength (PI_max) and the severity of EERD symptoms before and after completing an 8-week respiratory physiotherapy program using the Hull Airway Reflux Questionnaire (HARQ) and the Reflux Symptom Index. Based on the initial PI_max value, patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 – patients with PI_max ≥ 90% of the normative value (NV) (15 patients, mean age 45.6 ± 10.4 years); Group 2 – patients with PI_max < 90% NV (21 patients, mean age 46.9 ± 10.9 years). The respiratory physiotherapy program included diaphragmatic breathing training and inspiratory muscle training, which was performed in three postural positions with the Threshold inspiratory muscle trainer resistance device. Results: A total of 36 patients (8 males) with EERD, mean age 46.4 ± 10.4 years and body mass index 25.6 ± 4.5 kg/m² were included in the study. Significantly higher symptom severity according to the HARQ before treatment was found in group 2. Both groups showed a statistically significant increase in inspiratory muscle strength and a decrease in symptom intensity according to both questionnaires after treatment. Patients who were found to have reduced inspiratory muscle strength below 90% NV at baseline achieved greater improvement in inspiratory muscle strength and a greater reduction in symptom intensity after treatment. Conclusion: The respiratory physiotherapy program led to an increase in inspiratory muscle strength and a reduction in symptom intensity regardless of initial inspiratory muscle strength.

Keywords:

respiratory muscle strength – respiratory physiotherapy – extraoesophageal reflux – extraoesophageal reflux disease symptoms

Zdroje

1. Vakil N, Van Zanten SV, Kahrilas P et al. The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a global evidence--based consensus. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101 (8): 1900–1920. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241. 2006.00630.x.

2. Chen JW, Vela MF, Peterson KA et al. AGA clinical practice update on the diagnosis and management of extraesophageal gastroesophageal reflux disease: expert review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 21 (6): 1414–1421. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.01.040.

3. Vydrová J, Zeleník K, Brandtl P et al. Extraezofageální refluxní choroba – mezioborový konsenzus. Otorinolaryngol Foniatr 2011; 60 (2): 63–70.

4. Holloway RH. The anti-reflux barrier and mechanisms of gastro-oesophageal reflux. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2002; 14 (5): 681–699. doi: 10.1053/bega.2000.0118.

5. Kocjan J, Adamek M, Gzik-Zroska B et al. Network of breathing. Multifunctional role of the diaphragm: a review. Adv Respir Med 2017; 85 (4): 224–232. doi: 10.5603/ARM.2017.0037.

6. Bitnar P, Hlava S, Stovicek J et al. Diaphragm in the role of esophageal sphincter and possibilities of treatment of esophageal reflux disease using physiotherapeutic procedures. Eur Respir J 2018; 52 (Suppl 62): 2446.

7. Kahrilas PJ, Mittal RK, Bor S et al. Chicago Classification update (v4.0): technical review of high-resolution manometry metrics for EGJ barrier function. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2021; 33 (10): e14113. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14113.

8. Cacale M, Sabation L, Moffa A et al. Breathing training on lower esophageal sphincter as a complementary treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD): a systematic review. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2016; 20 (21): 4547–4552.

9. Zdrhova L, Bitnar P, Balihar K et al. Breathing exercises in gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Dysphagia 2023; 38 (2): 609–621. doi: 10.1007/s00455-022-10494-6.

10. Bitnar P, Stovicek J, Andel R et al. Leg raise increases pressure in lower and upper esophageal sphincter among patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2016; 20 (3): 518–524. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2015.12.002.

11. Kobesova A, Kolar P. Developmental kinesiology: three levels of motor control in the assessment and treatment of the motor system. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2014; 18 (1): 23–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2013.04.002.

12. Kolář P, Lewit K. Význam hlubokého stabilizačního systému v rámci vertebrogenních obtíží. Neurol Praxi 2005; 6 (5): 270–275.

13. De Troyer A, Boriek AM. Mechanics of the respiratory muscles. Compr Physiol 2011; 1 (3): 1273–1300. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c100009.

14. Nadaleto BF, Herbella FAM, Pinna BR et al. Upper esophageal sphincter motility in gastroesophageal reflux disease in the light of the high-resolution manometry. Dis Esophagus 2017; 30 (4): 1–5. doi: 10.1093/dote/dox001.

15. Lang IM, Shaker R. Anatomy and physiology of the upper esophageal sphincter. Am J Med 1997; 103 (5A): 50–55. doi: 10.1016/s0002- 9343 (97) 00323-9.

16. Babaei A, Venu M, Naini SR et al. Impaired upper esophageal sphincter reflexes in patients with supraesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterology 2015; 149 (6): 1381–1391.

17. Pandolfino JE, Ghosh SK, Zhang Q et al. Upper sphincter function during transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation (tLOSR); it is mainly about microburps. Neurogastroenterology Motil 2007; 19 (3): 203–210. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2006.00882.x.

18. Bitnar P, Stovicek J, Hlava S et al. Manual cervical traction and trunk stabilization cause significant changes in upper and lower esophageal sphincter: a randomized trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2021; 44 (4): 344–351. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2021.01.004.

19. Bognár L, Vereczkei A, Papp A et al. Gastroesophageal reflux disease might induce certain – supposedly adaptative – changes in the esophagus: a hypothesis. Dig Dis Sci 2018; 63 (10): 2529–2535. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5184-3.

20. Laveneziana P, Albuquerque A, Aliverti A et al. ERS statement on respiratory muscle testing at rest and during exercise. Eur Respir J 2019; 53 (6): 1801214. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01214-2018.

21. Evans JA, Whitelaw WA. The assessment of maximal respiratory mouth pressures in adults. Respir Care 2009; 54 (10): 1348–1359.

22. Kapil A, Acharya S, Bepari K et al. Clinical evaluation of laryngopharyngeal reflux and its response to proton pump inhibitors. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 75 (2): 409–415. doi: 10.1007/s12070-022-03219-6.

23. Lechien JR, Muls V, Dapri G et al. The management of suspected or confirmed laryngopharyngeal reflux patients with recalcitrant symptoms: a contemporary review. Clin Otolaryngol 2019; 44 (5): 784–800. doi: 10.1111/coa. 13395.

24. Kamani T, Penney S, Mitra I et al. The prev- alence of laryngopharyngeal reflux in the English population. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2012; 269 (10): 2219–2225. doi: 10.1007/ s00405-012-2028-1.

25. Spantideas N, Drosou E, Bougea A et al. Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease in the Greek general population, prevalence and risk factors. BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord 2015; 15: 1–7. doi: 10.1186/s12901-015-0020-2.

26. Spantideas N, Drosou E, Bougea A et al. Proton pump inhibitors for the treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux. A systematic review. J Voice 2020; 34 (6): 918–929. doi: 10.1016/ j.jvoice.2019.05.005.

27. Carvalho de de Miranda Chaves R, Suesada M, Polisel F et al. Respiratory physiotherapy can increase lower esophageal sphincter pressure in GERD patients. Respir Med 2012; 106 (12): 1794–1799. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2012. 08.023.

28. Nobre e Souza MÂ, Lima MJV, Martins GB et al. Inspiratory muscle training improves antireflux barrier in GERD patients. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2013; 305 (11): G862–G867. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00054.2013.

29. Horová P, Neumannová K. Vliv posturálně dechového tréninku na mimojícnové projevy gastroezofageálního refluxu u pacientky s asthma bronchiale. Stud Pneumol et Phthiseologica 2021; 81 (2): 57–63.

30. Horová P, Neumannová K, Dvořáček M. Vliv rehabilitační léčby na ventilační parametry a sílu dýchacích svalů u dětského pacienta s extraezofageálními projevy gastroezofageálního refluxu. Kazuistiky v alergologii, pneumologii a ORL 2022; 19 (1): 20–24.

31. Neumannová K, Zatloukal J, Koblížek V. Doporučený postup plicní rehabilitace. 2014. [online]. Dostupné z: https: //www.unify-cr.cz/uploads/page/26/doc/doporuceny-postup-plicni-rehabilitace.pdf.

32. Neumannová K, Zatloukal J. Ovlivnění poruch dýcháni pomocí tréninku dýchacích svalů. Rehabil Fyz Lék 2011; 18 (4): 188–192.

33. Wang G, Qu C, Wang L et al. Utility of 24-hour pharyngeal pH monitoring and clinical feature in laryngopharyngeal reflux disease. Acta Otolaryngol 2019; 139: 299–303. doi: 10.1080/00016489.2019.1571280.

34. Zeleník K, Hránková V, Vrtková A et al. Diag- nostic value of the PeptestTM in detecting laryngopharyngeal reflux. J Clin Med 2021; 10 (13): 2996. doi: 10.3390/jcm10132996

35. Duricek M, Banovcin P Jr, Halickova T et al. Comprehensive analysis of acidic pharyngeal reflux before and after proton pump inhibitor treatment in patients with suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 32 (2): 166–174. doi: 10.1097/MEG.00000 00000001584.

Doručeno/Submitted: 22. 1. 2024

Přijato/Accepted: 19. 4. 2024

Korespondenční autor:

Mgr. Pavla Horová

Katedra fyzioterapie

Fakulta tělesné kultury

Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci

třída Míru 671/117

771 11 Olomouc

e-mail: pavla.horova01@upol.cz