MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN UROLOGICAL INDICATIONS

Česká verzia

Authors: MUDr. Jiří Vaníček; doc. MUDr. Petr Krupa, CSc.
Authors place of work: Klinika zobrazovacích metod LF MU a FN U sv. Anny, Brno
Published in the journal: Urol List 2006; 4(2): 44-49

Summary

MRI examinations have increasingly been used in urological indications thanks to the better accessibility of MRI devices and absence of any known undesirable effects. In some regions such as pelvis minor the accuracy of tissue differentiation of MRI is higher than that of CT; in other regions it provides an element in the ultrasonography - computer tomography - MRI diagnostic algorithm targeting an accurate diagnosis.

KEY WORDS:
magnetic resonance, diagnostic algorithm, tissue differentiation

Zdroje

1. Brush JP. Positron emission tomography in urological malignancy. Current Opinion in Urology 2001; 11(2): 175-179.

2. Sakai N, Kanda F, Kondo K et al. Sonographically detected malignant transformation of a simple renal cyst. Int J Urol 2001; 8(1): 23-25.

3. Huang AJ, Lee VS, Rusinek H. MR imaging of renal function. Radiol Clin North Am 2003; 41: 1001-1017.

4. Leonardou P, Semelka RC, Mastropasqua M et al. Renal cell carcinoma in a transplanted kidney: MR imaging findings. Magn Reson Imaging 2003; 21: 691-693.

5. Rusinek H, Kaur M, Lee VS. Renal magnetic resonance imaging. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2004; 13(6): 667-673.

6. Zhang J, Pedrosa I, Rofsky NM. MR techniques for renal imaging. Radiol Clin North Am 2003; 41: 877-907.

7. Israel GM, Hindman N, Bosniak MA. Evaluation of cystic renal masses: comparison of CT and MR imaging by using the Bosniak classification system. Radiology 2004; 231: 365-371.

8. Glass RB, Astrin KH, Norton KI et al. Fabry disease: renal sonographic and magnetic resonance imaging findings in affected males and carrier females with the classic and cardiac variant phenotypes. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004; 28: 158-168.

9. Farres MT, Ronco P, Saadoun D et al. Chronic lithium nephropathy: MR imaging for diagnosis. Radiology 2003; 229: 570-574.

10. Harisinghani MG, Gervais D, Hahn PF et al. CT and MR of Atypical Cystic Renal Masses: Revisiting the Bosniak Classification. Radiologist 2001; 8(3): 145-153.

11. Koga S, Nishikido M, Inuzuka S et al. An evaluation of Bosniak's radiological classification of cystic renal masses. BJU International 2000; 86(6): 607-609.

12. Leder RA. Radiological approach to renal cysts and the Bosniak classification system. Curr Opin Urol 1999; 9(2): 129-133.

13. Luciani LG, Tsui KH, Shvarts O et al. Renal cell carcinoma: prognostic significance of incidentally defected tumors. Jour Urol 2001; 65(4): 1223.

14. Borges Oliva MR, Hsing J, Rybicki FJ et al. Glomerulocystic kidney disease: MRI findings. Abdom Imaging 2003; 28: 889-892.

15. Kreft B, Schild HH. Cystic renal lesions. Rofo 2003; 175: 892-903.

16. Teigen EL. Newhouse JH. Imaging renal masses. Curr Opin Urol 2000; 10(5): 421-427.

17. Israel GM, Bosniak MA. Renal imaging for the diagnosis and staging of renal cell carcinoma. Urol Clin North Am 2003; 30: 499-514.

18. Dahlman P, Semenas E, Brekkan E et al. Detection and characterisation of renal lesions by multiphasic helical CT. Acta Radiol 2000; 41(4): 361-366.

19. Yabuki T, Togami I, Kitagawa T et al. MR imaging of renal cell carcinoma: associations among signal intensity, tumor enhancement, and pathologic findings. Acta Med Okayama 2003; 57: 179-186.

20. Ergen FB, Hussain HK, Caoili EM et al. MRI for preoperative staging of renal cell carcinoma using the 1997 TNM classification: comparison with surgical and pathologic staging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 182: 217-225.

21. Smith W, Lewis C, Bauman G et al. 3DUS, MRI and CT Prostate Volume Definition: 3D Evaluation of Intra- and Inter-Modality and Observer Variability: TU-C-J-6B-07. Medical Physics 2005; 32(6): 2083.

22. Chan I, Wells W 3rd, Mulkern RV et al. Detection of prostate cancer by integration of line-scan diffusion, T2-mapping and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging; a multichannel statistical classifier. Medical Physics 2003; 30(9): 2390-2398.

23. Kim HW, Buckley DL, Peterson DM et al. In Vivo Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy at 3 Tesla Using a Transceive Pelvic Phased Array Coil: Preliminary Results. Investigative Radiology 2003; 38(7): 443-451.

24. Futterer JJ, Scheenen TW, Huisman HJ et al. Initial Experience of 3 Tesla Endorectal Coil Magnetic Resonance Imaging and 1H-Spectroscopic Imaging of the Prostate. Investigative Radiology 2004; 39(11): 671-680.

25. Yang WT, Lam WW, Yu MY et al. Comparison of dynamic helical CT and dynamic MR imaging in the evaluation of pelvic lymph nodes in cervical carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175(3): 759-766.

26. Walter C, Kruessell M, Gindele A et al. Imaging of renal lesions: evaluation of fast MRI and helical CT. Br J Radiol 2003; 76: 696-703.