Urolithiasis in child patients - have modern times brought new options?

Česká verzia

Authors: MUDr. Květoslav Novák
Authors place of work: Urologická klinika 1. LF UK a VFN, Praha
Published in the journal: Urol List 2007; 5(1): 22-25

Summary

Urolithiasis at an child age is not a common disorder but is prone to recurrence. The most frequent causes are metabolic malfunctions, often combined with other factors (obstructive uropathy, infection). The most commonly applied treatment is extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Endoscopic treatment (ureteroscopy, percutaneous concrement extraction) has been of increasing significance, as a result of recent development of endoscopes and the possibilities of intracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Treatment must be indicated strictly individually with regard to potential complications. The objective is a complete removal of concrement and subsequent metabolic examination.

Key words:
urolithiasis in children patients, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy, percutaneous concrement extraction

Zdroje

1. Desai M. Endoscopic management of stones in children. Curr Opin Urol 2005; 15: 107-112.

2. Kočvara R. Urolitiáza. In: Dvořáček J et al. Urologie. 1. ed. Praha: ISV nakladatelství 1998: 823-856.

3. Sternberg K, Greenfield SP, Williot P et al. Pediatric stone disease: an evolving experience. J Urol 2005; 174(4 Pt 2): 1711-1714.

4. Palmer JS, Donaher ER, O´Riordan MA et al. Diagnosis of pediatric urolithiasis: role of ultrasound and computerized tomography. J Urol 2005; 174(4 Pt 1): 1413-1416.

5. Bariol SV, Moussa SA, Tolley DA. Contemporary imaging for the management of urinary stones. EAU Update series 2005; 3: 3-9.

6. Resim S, Ekebicer HC, Ciftci A. Role of tamsulosin in treatment of patients with steinstrasse developing after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Urology 2005; 66(5): 945-948.

7. Porpiglia F, Vaccino D, Billia M et al. Corticosteroids and tamsulosin in the medical expulsive therapy for symptomatic distal ureter stones:single drug or association? Eur Urol 2006; 50: 339-344.

8. El-Assmy A, Hefez AT, Eraky I et al. Safety and outcome of rigid ureteroscopy for management of ureteral calculi in children. J Endourol 2006; 20(4): 252-255.

9. Lottmann HB, Archambaud F, Traxer O et al. The Efficacy and Parenchymal Consequences of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Infants. BJU Int 2000; 85: 311-315.

10. Elsobky E, Sheir KZ, Madbouly K et al. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Children: Experience Using Two Second-Generation Lithotripters. BJU Int 2000; 86: 851-856.

11. Al Busaidy SS, Prem AR, Medhat M et al. Paediatric Ureteric Calculi: Efficacy of Primary in Situ Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy. BJU 1998; 82: 90-96.

12. Tan AH, Al-Omar M, Watterson JD et al. Results of shockwave lithotripsy for pediatric urolithiasis. J Endourol 2004; 18 (6): 527-530.

13. Novák K, Vobořil V, Kočvara R. Extrakorporální litotrypse jeko metoda první volby řešení urolitiázy u dětí (Abstrakt). čes Urol 2000; 3: 35.

14. Turna B, Nazli O, Simsir A et al. Impact of lower pole renal anatomy on stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy in children (Abstrakt). Eur Urol 2006; 5(2): 187.

15. Desai MR, Kukreja RA, Petel SH et al. Percutaneous nehrolithotomy for complex pediatric renal calculus disease. J Endourol 2004; 18(1): 23-27.

16. Thomas JC, DeMarco RT, Donohoe JM et al. Pediatric ureteroscopic stone management. J Urol 2005; 174(3): 1072-1074.

17. Raza A, Smith G, Moussa S et al. Ureteroscopy in the management of pediatric urinary tract calculi. J Endourol 2005; 19(2): 151-158.

18. El-Assmy A, Hefez AT, Eraky I et al. Safety and outcome of rigid ureteroscopy for management of ureteral calculi in children. J Endourol 2006; 20(4): 252-255.

19. Minevich E, Defoor W, Reddy P et al. Ureteroscopy is safe and effective in prepubertal children. J Urol 2005; 174(1): 276-279.

20. Reddy PP. Pediatric ureteroscopy. Urol Clin N Am 2004; 31: 145-156.