Aneuryzmatické subarachoidální krvácení v těhotenství – úspěšný kliping po selhání koilingu

Dear Editor,
Subarachnoid haemorrhage from a cerebral aneurysm (aSAH) in pregnancy is uncommon. The incidence is estimated at 5.8 cases per 100,000 births [1]. The bleeding constitutes a very serious condition for both the mother and the foetus. aSAH is the third most common non-pregnancy cause of maternal mortality during pregnancy and is responsible for severe maternal and foetal morbidity [2]. aSAH mortality is double in untreated patients compared to those who are treated (10.2 vs. 5.2%) [3]. Special consideration must be taken for both the mother and the foetus. Our knowledge is based solely on case reports, as prospective studies are impossible due to both the scarcity of the ailment and ethical objections.

A 29-year-old woman in the 27^th week of pregnancy was admitted to hospital with a severe headache. CT revealed aSAH caused by an aneurysm in the anterior communicating artery. The decision making required a multidisciplinary discussion involving neurosurgeon, intervention radiologist, neonatologist, obstetrician and anesthesiologist. The likely need for an urgent Caesarian section (CS) was discussed. Therefore, the corticosteroid induced acceleration of the lung maturation was initiated. The characteristics of an aneurysm – its location, size, shape, the direction of the sac, neck-fundus ratio – required both microsurgical and endovascular treatment. After the discussion, the team decided to favour the endovascular treatment to minimise general anaesthesia duration and risk of hypotension-induced hypoxaemia of the foetus. Radiation load was of significant concern but proved to be acceptable. The coiling was performed without complications (viz Fig. 1a, b, c).
Both the patient and the child were subsequently in good health. During the 13^th postoperative day, brief loss of consciousness and transient hemiparesis suddenly appeared. CT showed a recurrence of the haemorrhage in the interhemispheric fissure. Angiography showed a bilocular aneurysm in the original localization with visible coils at the top of one of the sacs. The recurrence of an aneurysm may be explained by a partial thrombosis of an aneurysm at the time of coiling, followed by the recanalisation of the sac after the thrombus had dissolved. Due to vasospasm of the right middle cerebral artery, the team decided not to continue with further endovascular treatment. At the time of the aSAH recurrence, the foetus was in the 29^th week of gestation. Therefore, it was decided to perform a CS with a subsequent clipping. After the uncomplicated CS, the neurosurgeon clipped the aneurysm from the right pterional approach. The successful closure of the sac was verified by indocyanine green (ICG) during the surgery (viz Fig. 2a, b; Fig 3 and video).

The patient was in good clinical condition after the surgery. Mild asymptomatic vasospasm subsided within a few days. One year after the surgery, mother and child were in good condition.
The data proving pregnancy to be a risk factor for the rupture of an aneurysm are ambiguous. The initial assumption that pregnancy does not increase the incidence of bleeding was disputed by Dias et al, who pointed out that the presence of aSAH is rising with the length of gestation [4]. During the pregnancy, the heart rate increases by 60%, blood volume and blood pressure increase continuously until delivery. At the same time, hormone levels such as progesterone, estrogen, gonadotropin and relaxin increase, which may predispose a patient to the onset, growth, and potential rupture of an aneurysm. In the third trimester, aSAH occurs at 77%, compared with 8% in the first trimester and 11% in the second trimester. [5]. Therefore, screening of high-risk pregnant women is important. Kataoka et al lists chronic hypertension and a history of stroke among the risk factors. Auxiliary risk factors include obesity, age over 40 years, chronic headache, pregnancy hypertension and a family history of stroke. The presence of two or more auxiliary risk factors is an indication for MRA [6]. In the case of a finding of a non-ruptured aneurysm in pregnancy, we have to decide whether to intervene. An active approach is recommended for aneurysms larger than 5 mm, growing, of irregular shape, with secondary sacs and in “risk locations” (posterior circulation, anterior and posterior communicating arteries). Symptomatic aneurysms are also indicated for treatment. [7]. As for diagnostic methods, CT is the dominant method followed by CTA. In an attempt to avoid the radiation burden, the authors have recently preferred to perform MRA. For the same reason, they prefer clipping as a treatment method; coiling is acceptable following the delivery when the radiation does not burden the foetus [8]. However, if the protection of the foetus is performed correctly, the radiation load is below teratogenic doses in both the diagnostic angiography and the endovascular treatment [9]. When treating a ruptured aneurysm, we generally can select from microsurgical and endovascular treatment. The advantage of coiling is usually a shorter duration of general anaesthesia. The disadvantage is the above-mentioned radiation burden, especially in the first trimester. Another disadvantage is the need for systemic administration of heparin and risk of haemorrhage [9]. Both methods are now generally perceived as equal and deciding on the type of treatment should be individual. It is determined by the location of the aneurysm, its size, shape, direction and neck-fundus ratio [10]. There are no guidelines for the treatment of aSAH during pregnancy, and it is impossible to stipulate any. Nevertheless, in the first and second trimesters, a ruptured aneurysm is to be treated as if the patient was not pregnant. In the third trimester decision making is individual. From the 34^th week of gestation up to the delivery date, the CS is preferred initially, followed by the ruptured aneurysm treatment. The occurrence of an aneurysm on the verge of the second and third trimester up to the 34^th week gives the possibility to treat the aneurysm without terminating the pregnancy. CS at term is dominant over vaginal delivery also in this case. [5,9]. Obstetricians and neonatologists should decide on preterm delivery and its method. Treatment of a ruptured aneurysm in pregnancy is not standardized. The solution is always individual and interdisciplinary.

Supported by MH CZ – DRO (Faculty Hospital in Pilsen – FNPl, 00669806).

Accepted for review: 15. 11. 2018

Accepted for print: 25. 1. 2019

doc. MUDr. Vladimír Přibáň Ph.D

Neurochirurgická klinika LF v Plzni

UK a FN Plzeň

Alej Svobody 80

304 60 Plzeň

e-mail: pribanv@fnplzen.cz

Video