#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Dissecting the Gene Network of Dietary Restriction to Identify Evolutionarily Conserved Pathways and New Functional Genes


Dietary restriction (DR), limiting nutrient intake from diet without causing malnutrition, delays the aging process and extends lifespan in multiple organisms. The conserved life-extending effect of DR suggests the involvement of fundamental mechanisms, although these remain a subject of debate. To help decipher the life-extending mechanisms of DR, we first compiled a list of genes that if genetically altered disrupt or prevent the life-extending effects of DR. We called these DR–essential genes and identified more than 100 in model organisms such as yeast, worms, flies, and mice. In order for other researchers to benefit from this first curated list of genes essential for DR, we established an online database called GenDR (http://genomics.senescence.info/diet/). To dissect the interactions of DR–essential genes and discover the underlying lifespan-extending mechanisms, we then used a variety of network and systems biology approaches to analyze the gene network of DR. We show that DR–essential genes are more conserved at the molecular level and have more molecular interactions than expected by chance. Furthermore, we employed a guilt-by-association method to predict novel DR–essential genes. In budding yeast, we predicted nine genes related to vacuolar functions; we show experimentally that mutations deleting eight of those genes prevent the life-extending effects of DR. Three of these mutants (OPT2, FRE6, and RCR2) had extended lifespan under ad libitum, indicating that the lack of further longevity under DR is not caused by a general compromise of fitness. These results demonstrate how network analyses of DR using GenDR can be used to make phenotypically relevant predictions. Moreover, gene-regulatory circuits reveal that the DR–induced transcriptional signature in yeast involves nutrient-sensing, stress responses and meiotic transcription factors. Finally, comparing the influence of gene expression changes during DR on the interactomes of multiple organisms led us to suggest that DR commonly suppresses translation, while stimulating an ancient reproduction-related process.


Vyšlo v časopise: Dissecting the Gene Network of Dietary Restriction to Identify Evolutionarily Conserved Pathways and New Functional Genes. PLoS Genet 8(8): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002834
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002834

Souhrn

Dietary restriction (DR), limiting nutrient intake from diet without causing malnutrition, delays the aging process and extends lifespan in multiple organisms. The conserved life-extending effect of DR suggests the involvement of fundamental mechanisms, although these remain a subject of debate. To help decipher the life-extending mechanisms of DR, we first compiled a list of genes that if genetically altered disrupt or prevent the life-extending effects of DR. We called these DR–essential genes and identified more than 100 in model organisms such as yeast, worms, flies, and mice. In order for other researchers to benefit from this first curated list of genes essential for DR, we established an online database called GenDR (http://genomics.senescence.info/diet/). To dissect the interactions of DR–essential genes and discover the underlying lifespan-extending mechanisms, we then used a variety of network and systems biology approaches to analyze the gene network of DR. We show that DR–essential genes are more conserved at the molecular level and have more molecular interactions than expected by chance. Furthermore, we employed a guilt-by-association method to predict novel DR–essential genes. In budding yeast, we predicted nine genes related to vacuolar functions; we show experimentally that mutations deleting eight of those genes prevent the life-extending effects of DR. Three of these mutants (OPT2, FRE6, and RCR2) had extended lifespan under ad libitum, indicating that the lack of further longevity under DR is not caused by a general compromise of fitness. These results demonstrate how network analyses of DR using GenDR can be used to make phenotypically relevant predictions. Moreover, gene-regulatory circuits reveal that the DR–induced transcriptional signature in yeast involves nutrient-sensing, stress responses and meiotic transcription factors. Finally, comparing the influence of gene expression changes during DR on the interactomes of multiple organisms led us to suggest that DR commonly suppresses translation, while stimulating an ancient reproduction-related process.


Zdroje

1. BishopNA, GuarenteL (2007) Genetic links between diet and lifespan: shared mechanisms from yeast to humans. Nat Rev Genet 8: 835–844.

2. FontanaL, PartridgeL, LongoVD (2010) Extending healthy life span–from yeast to humans. Science 328: 321–326.

3. KemnitzJW (2011) Calorie restriction and aging in nonhuman primates. ILAR J 52: 66–77.

4. WillcoxBJ, WillcoxDC, TodorikiH, FujiyoshiA, YanoK, et al. (2007) Caloric restriction, the traditional Okinawan diet, and healthy aging: the diet of the world's longest-lived people and its potential impact on morbidity and life span. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1114: 434–455.

5. SpindlerSR (2010) Caloric restriction: from soup to nuts. Ageing Res Rev 9: 324–353.

6. de MagalhaesJP, WuttkeD, WoodSH, PlankM, VoraC (2012) Genome-environment interactions that modulate aging: powerful targets for drug discovery. Pharmacol Rev 64: 88–101.

7. LakowskiB, HekimiS (1998) The genetics of caloric restriction in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95: 13091–13096.

8. PartridgeL, PiperMD, MairW (2005) Dietary restriction in Drosophila. Mech Ageing Dev 126: 938–950.

9. BarabasiAL, GulbahceN, LoscalzoJ (2011) Network medicine: a network-based approach to human disease. Nat Rev Genet 12: 56–68.

10. de MagalhaesJP, ChurchGM (2007) Analyses of human-chimpanzee orthologous gene pairs to explore evolutionary hypotheses of aging. Mech Ageing Dev 128: 355–364.

11. BudovskyA, AbramovichA, CohenR, Chalifa-CaspiV, FraifeldV (2007) Longevity network: construction and implications. Mech Ageing Dev 128: 117–124.

12. WangJ, ZhangS, WangY, ChenL, ZhangXS (2009) Disease-aging network reveals significant roles of aging genes in connecting genetic diseases. PLoS Comput Biol 5: e1000521 doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000521.

13. PromislowDE (2004) Protein networks, pleiotropy and the evolution of senescence. Proc Biol Sci 271: 1225–1234.

14. WittenTM, BonchevD (2007) Predicting aging/longevity-related genes in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Chem Biodivers 4: 2639–2655.

15. FortneyK, KotlyarM, JurisicaI (2010) Inferring the functions of longevity genes with modular subnetwork biomarkers of Caenorhabditis elegans aging. Genome Biol 11: R13.

16. BonkowskiMS, RochaJS, MasternakMM, Al RegaieyKA, BartkeA (2006) Targeted disruption of growth hormone receptor interferes with the beneficial actions of calorie restriction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 7901–7905.

17. GemsD, PletcherS, PartridgeL (2002) Interpreting interactions between treatments that slow aging. Aging Cell 1: 1–9.

18. de MagalhaesJP, BudovskyA, LehmannG, CostaJ, LiY, et al. (2009) The Human Ageing Genomic Resources: online databases and tools for biogerontologists. Aging Cell 8: 65–72.

19. Shmookler ReisRJ, AyyadevaraS, CrowWA, LeeT, DelongchampRR (2011) Gene Categories Differentially Expressed in C. elegans Age-1 Mutants of Extraordinary Longevity: New Insights From Novel Data-Mining Procedures. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 67: 366–75.

20. TazearslanC, AyyadevaraS, BharillP, Shmookler ReisRJ (2009) Positive feedback between transcriptional and kinase suppression in nematodes with extraordinary longevity and stress resistance. PLoS Genet 5: e1000452 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000452.

21. de MagalhaesJP, ToussaintO (2004) GenAge: a genomic and proteomic network map of human ageing. FEBS Lett 571: 243–247 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000452.

22. OwenAB, StuartJ, MachK, VilleneuveAM, KimS (2003) A gene recommender algorithm to identify coexpressed genes in C. elegans. Genome Res 13: 1828–1837.

23. TangF, WatkinsJW, BermudezM, GrayR, GabanA, et al. (2008) A life-span extending form of autophagy employs the vacuole-vacuole fusion machinery. Autophagy 4: 874–886.

24. LinSJ, KaeberleinM, AndalisAA, SturtzLA, DefossezPA, et al. (2002) Calorie restriction extends Saccharomyces cerevisiae lifespan by increasing respiration. Nature 418: 344–348.

25. HonjohS, YamamotoT, UnoM, NishidaE (2009) Signalling through RHEB-1 mediates intermittent fasting-induced longevity in C. elegans. Nature 457: 726–730.

26. BauerJ, AntochM, ChangC, SchorlC, KolliS, et al. (2010) Comparative transcriptional profiling identifies takeout as a gene that regulates life span. Aging (Albany NY) 2: 298–310.

27. ZidBM, RogersAN, KatewaSD, VargasMA, KolipinskiMC, et al. (2009) 4E-BP extends lifespan upon dietary restriction by enhancing mitochondrial activity in Drosophila. Cell 139: 149–160.

28. Shmookler ReisRJ, XuL, LeeH, ChaeM, ThadenJJ, et al. (2011) Modulation of lipid biosynthesis contributes to stress resistance and longevity of C. elegans mutants. Aging (Albany NY) 3: 125–147.

29. HansenM, HsuAL, DillinA, KenyonC (2005) New genes tied to endocrine, metabolic, and dietary regulation of lifespan from a Caenorhabditis elegans genomic RNAi screen. PLoS Genet 1: e17. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0010017.

30. SteinkrausKA, SmithED, DavisC, CarrD, PendergrassWR, et al. (2008) Dietary restriction suppresses proteotoxicity and enhances longevity by an hsf-1-dependent mechanism in Caenorhabditis elegans. Aging Cell 7: 394–404.

31. SmithED, TsuchiyaM, FoxLA, DangN, HuD, et al. (2008) Quantitative evidence for conserved longevity pathways between divergent eukaryotic species. Genome Res 18: 564–570.

32. BalajiS, BabuMM, IyerLM, LuscombeNM, AravindL (2006) Comprehensive analysis of combinatorial regulation using the transcriptional regulatory network of yeast. J Mol Biol 360: 213–227.

33. AbdulrehmanD, MonteiroPT, TeixeiraMC, MiraNP, LourencoAB, et al. (2011) YEASTRACT: providing a programmatic access to curated transcriptional regulatory associations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae through a web services interface. Nucleic Acids Res 39: D136–140.

34. LeeYL, LeeCK (2008) Transcriptional response according to strength of calorie restriction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cells 26: 299–307.

35. EisenbergT, KnauerH, SchauerA, ButtnerS, RuckenstuhlC, et al. (2009) Induction of autophagy by spermidine promotes longevity. Nat Cell Biol 11: 1305–1314.

36. ChattopadhyayMK, ChenW, PoyG, CamM, StilesD, et al. (2009) Microarray studies on the genes responsive to the addition of spermidine or spermine to a Saccharomyces cerevisiae spermidine synthase mutant. Yeast 26: 531–544.

37. WarsowG, GreberB, FalkSS, HarderC, SiatkowskiM, et al. (2010) ExprEssence - Revealing the essence of differential experimental data in the context of an interaction/regulation network. BMC Syst Biol 4: 164.

38. SteffenKK, MacKayVL, KerrEO, TsuchiyaM, HuD, et al. (2008) Yeast life span extension by depletion of 60s ribosomal subunits is mediated by Gcn4. Cell 133: 292–302.

39. HansenM, TaubertS, CrawfordD, LibinaN, LeeSJ, et al. (2007) Lifespan extension by conditions that inhibit translation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Aging Cell 6: 95–110.

40. KapahiP, ZidBM, HarperT, KosloverD, SapinV, et al. (2004) Regulation of lifespan in Drosophila by modulation of genes in the TOR signaling pathway. Curr Biol 14: 885–890.

41. SelmanC, TulletJM, WieserD, IrvineE, LingardSJ, et al. (2009) Ribosomal protein S6 kinase 1 signaling regulates mammalian life span. Science 326: 140–144.

42. ShanleyDP, KirkwoodTB (2000) Calorie restriction and aging: a life-history analysis. Evolution 54: 740–750.

43. FraserHB, HirshAE, SteinmetzLM, ScharfeC, FeldmanMW (2002) Evolutionary rate in the protein interaction network. Science 296: 750–752.

44. EisenbergE, LevanonEY (2003) Preferential attachment in the protein network evolution. Phys Rev Lett 91: 138701.

45. SaeedR, DeaneCM (2006) Protein protein interactions, evolutionary rate, abundance and age. BMC Bioinformatics 7: 128.

46. KimSK (2007) Common aging pathways in worms, flies, mice and humans. J Exp Biol 210: 1607–1612.

47. UmebayashiK, NakanoA (2003) Ergosterol is required for targeting of tryptophan permease to the yeast plasma membrane. J Cell Biol 161: 1117–1131.

48. CarranoAC, LiuZ, DillinA, HunterT (2009) A conserved ubiquitination pathway determines longevity in response to diet restriction. Nature 460: 396–399.

49. NikkoE, PelhamHR (2009) Arrestin-mediated endocytosis of yeast plasma membrane transporters. Traffic 10: 1856–1867.

50. BabstM (2011) MVB vesicle formation: ESCRT-dependent, ESCRT-independent and everything in between. Curr Opin Cell Biol 23: 452–457.

51. FabrizioP, HoonS, ShamalnasabM, GalbaniA, WeiM, et al. (2010) Genome-Wide Screen in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Identifies Vacuolar Protein Sorting, Autophagy, Biosynthetic, and tRNA Methylation Genes Involved in Life Span Regulation. PLoS Genet 6: e1001024 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1001024.

52. LongoVD, NislowC, FabrizioP (2010) Endosomal protein sorting and autophagy genes contribute to the regulation of yeast life span. Autophagy 6: 1227–1228.

53. AouidaM, Khodami-PourA, RamotarD (2009) Novel role for the Saccharomyces cerevisiae oligopeptide transporter Opt2 in drug detoxification. Biochem Cell Biol 87: 653–661.

54. SharmaPK, MittalN, DeswalS, RoyN (2011) Calorie restriction up-regulates iron and copper transport genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biosyst 7: 394–402.

55. KakinumaY, OhsumiY, AnrakuY (1981) Properties of H+-translocating adenosine triphosphatase in vacuolar membranes of SAccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 256: 10859–10863.

56. ChanTF, CarvalhoJ, RilesL, ZhengXF (2000) A chemical genomics approach toward understanding the global functions of the target of rapamycin protein (TOR). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97: 13227–13232.

57. CostanzoM, BaryshnikovaA, BellayJ, KimY, SpearED, et al. (2010) The genetic landscape of a cell. Science 327: 425–431.

58. ItoT, ChibaT, OzawaR, YoshidaM, HattoriM, et al. (2001) A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 4569–4574.

59. FlinnRJ, YanY, GoswamiS, ParkerPJ, BackerJM (2010) The late endosome is essential for mTORC1 signaling. Mol Biol Cell 21: 833–841.

60. SturgillTW, CohenA, DiefenbacherM, TrautweinM, MartinDE, et al. (2008) TOR1 and TOR2 have distinct locations in live cells. Eukaryot Cell 7: 1819–1830.

61. EldakakA, RancatiG, RubinsteinB, PaulP, ConawayV, et al. (2010) Asymmetrically inherited multidrug resistance transporters are recessive determinants in cellular replicative ageing. Nat Cell Biol 12: 799–805.

62. PlankM, WuttkeD, van DamS, ClarkeSA, de MagalhaesJP (2012) A meta-analysis of caloric restriction gene expression profiles to infer common signatures and regulatory mechanisms. Mol Biosyst 8: 1339–1349.

63. AndersonRM, BittermanKJ, WoodJG, MedvedikO, SinclairDA (2003) Nicotinamide and PNC1 govern lifespan extension by calorie restriction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 423: 181–185.

64. JaenischR, BirdA (2003) Epigenetic regulation of gene expression: how the genome integrates intrinsic and environmental signals. Nat Genet 33 Suppl: 245–254.

65. BurdgeGC, HansonMA, Slater-JefferiesJL, LillycropKA (2007) Epigenetic regulation of transcription: a mechanism for inducing variations in phenotype (fetal programming) by differences in nutrition during early life? Br J Nutr 97: 1036–1046.

66. FeserJ, TylerJ (2011) Chromatin structure as a mediator of aging. FEBS Lett 585: 2041–2048.

67. VaqueroA, ReinbergD (2009) Calorie restriction and the exercise of chromatin. Genes Dev 23: 1849–1869.

68. UnalE, KindeB, AmonA (2011) Gametogenesis eliminates age-induced cellular damage and resets life span in yeast. Science 332: 1554–1557.

69. MairW, GoymerP, PletcherSD, PartridgeL (2003) Demography of dietary restriction and death in Drosophila. Science 301: 1731–1733.

70. BrawleyJV, FerroAJ (1979) Polyamine biosynthesis during germination of yeast ascospores. J Bacteriol 140: 649–654.

71. TaborCW (1981) Mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae deficient in polyamine biosynthesis: studies on the regulation of ornithine decarboxylase. Med Biol 59: 272–278.

72. JinY, BokJW, Guzman-de-PenaD, KellerNP (2002) Requirement of spermidine for developmental transitions in Aspergillus nidulans. Mol Microbiol 46: 801–812.

73. MatsumotoM, KuriharaS, KibeR, AshidaH, BennoY (2011) Longevity in mice is promoted by probiotic-induced suppression of colonic senescence dependent on upregulation of gut bacterial polyamine production. PLoS ONE 6: e23652 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0023652.

74. SodaK, DobashiY, KanoY, TsujinakaS, KonishiF (2009) Polyamine-rich food decreases age-associated pathology and mortality in aged mice. Exp Gerontol 44: 727–732.

75. PnueliL, EdryI, CohenM, KassirY (2004) Glucose and nitrogen regulate the switch from histone deacetylation to acetylation for expression of early meiosis-specific genes in budding yeast. Mol Cell Biol 24: 5197–5208.

76. de MagalhaesJP, CostaJ, ToussaintO (2005) HAGR: the Human Ageing Genomic Resources. Nucleic Acids Res 33: D537–543.

77. FischerS, BrunkBP, ChenF, GaoX, HarbOS, et al. (2011) Using OrthoMCL to assign proteins to OrthoMCL-DB groups or to cluster proteomes into new ortholog groups. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics Chapter 6 Unit 6 12 11–19.

78. OstlundG, SchmittT, ForslundK, KostlerT, MessinaDN, et al. (2010) InParanoid 7: new algorithms and tools for eukaryotic orthology analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 38: D196–203.

79. KooninEV, WolfYI (2010) Constraints and plasticity in genome and molecular-phenome evolution. Nat Rev Genet 11: 487–498.

80. ArandaB, AchuthanP, Alam-FaruqueY, ArmeanI, BridgeA, et al. (2010) The IntAct molecular interaction database in 2010. Nucleic Acids Res 38: D525–531.

81. XenariosI, SalwinskiL, DuanXJ, HigneyP, KimSM, et al. (2002) DIP, the Database of Interacting Proteins: a research tool for studying cellular networks of protein interactions. Nucleic Acids Res 30: 303–305.

82. CeolA, Chatr AryamontriA, LicataL, PelusoD, BrigantiL, et al. (2010) MINT, the molecular interaction database: 2009 update. Nucleic Acids Res 38: D532–539.

83. IsserlinR, El-BadrawiRA, BaderGD (2011) The Biomolecular Interaction Network Database in PSI-MI 2.5. Database (Oxford) 2011: baq037.

84. BreitkreutzBJ, StarkC, RegulyT, BoucherL, BreitkreutzA, et al. (2008) The BioGRID Interaction Database: 2008 update. Nucleic Acids Res 36: D637–640.

85. GuldenerU, MunsterkotterM, OesterheldM, PagelP, RueppA, et al. (2006) MPact: the MIPS protein interaction resource on yeast. Nucleic Acids Res 34: D436–441.

86. SteinLD (2004) Using the Reactome database. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics Chapter 8 Unit 8 7.

87. Keshava PrasadTS, GoelR, KandasamyK, KeerthikumarS, KumarS, et al. (2009) Human Protein Reference Database–2009 update. Nucleic Acids Res 37: D767–772.

88. BeumingT, SkrabanekL, NivMY, MukherjeeP, WeinsteinH (2005) PDZBase: a protein-protein interaction database for PDZ-domains. Bioinformatics 21: 827–828.

89. RueppA, WaegeleB, LechnerM, BraunerB, Dunger-KaltenbachI, et al. (2010) CORUM: the comprehensive resource of mammalian protein complexes–2009. Nucleic Acids Res 38: D497–501.

90. RazickS, MagklarasG, DonaldsonIM (2008) iRefIndex: a consolidated protein interaction database with provenance. BMC Bioinformatics 9: 405.

91. HornbeckPV, ChabraI, KornhauserJM, SkrzypekE, ZhangB (2004) PhosphoSite: A bioinformatics resource dedicated to physiological protein phosphorylation. Proteomics 4: 1551–1561.

92. StarkC, SuTC, BreitkreutzA, LourencoP, DahabiehM, et al. (2010) PhosphoGRID: a database of experimentally verified in vivo protein phosphorylation sites from the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Database (Oxford) 2010: bap026.

93. BrownKR, JurisicaI (2007) Unequal evolutionary conservation of human protein interactions in interologous networks. Genome Biol 8: R95.

94. MichautM, KerrienS, Montecchi-PalazziL, ChauvatF, Cassier-ChauvatC, et al. (2008) InteroPORC: automated inference of highly conserved protein interaction networks. Bioinformatics 24: 1625–1631.

95. WilesAM, DodererM, RuanJ, GuTT, RaviD, et al. (2010) Building and analyzing protein interactome networks by cross-species comparisons. BMC Syst Biol 4: 36.

96. JayapandianM, ChapmanA, TarceaVG, YuC, ElkissA, et al. (2007) Michigan Molecular Interactions (MiMI): putting the jigsaw puzzle together. Nucleic Acids Res 35: D566–571.

97. TarceaVG, WeymouthT, AdeA, BookvichA, GaoJ, et al. (2009) Michigan molecular interactions r2: from interacting proteins to pathways. Nucleic Acids Res 37: D642–646.

98. WuJ, ValleniusT, OvaskaK, WestermarckJ, MakelaTP, et al. (2009) Integrated network analysis platform for protein-protein interactions. Nat Methods 6: 75–77.

99. LeeI, LiZ, MarcotteEM (2007) An improved, bias-reduced probabilistic functional gene network of baker's yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS ONE 2: e988 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000988.

100. LeeI, LehnerB, VavouriT, ShinJ, FraserAG, et al. (2010) Predicting genetic modifier loci using functional gene networks. Genome Res 20: 1143–1153.

101. KimWK, KrumpelmanC, MarcotteEM (2008) Inferring mouse gene functions from genomic-scale data using a combined functional network/classification strategy. Genome Biol 9 Suppl 1: S5.

102. RavasiT, SuzukiH, CannistraciCV, KatayamaS, BajicVB, et al. (2010) An atlas of combinatorial transcriptional regulation in mouse and man. Cell 140: 744–752.

103. ClineMS, SmootM, CeramiE, KuchinskyA, LandysN, et al. (2007) Integration of biological networks and gene expression data using Cytoscape. Nat Protoc 2: 2366–2382.

104. Huang daW, ShermanBT, TanQ, KirJ, LiuD, et al. (2007) DAVID Bioinformatics Resources: expanded annotation database and novel algorithms to better extract biology from large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res 35: W169–175.

105. CherryJM, HongEL, AmundsenC, BalakrishnanR, BinkleyG, et al. (2012) Saccharomyces Genome Database: the genomics resource of budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res 40: D700–705.

106. Fisher RA (1932) Statistical methods for research workers. Edinburgh etc.: Oliver and Boyd. xiii p., 1 l. p.

107. WhitlockMC (2005) Combining probability from independent tests: the weighted Z-method is superior to Fisher's approach. J Evol Biol 18: 1368–1373.

108. WangYX, CatlettNL, WeismanLS (1998) Vac8p, a vacuolar protein with armadillo repeats, functions in both vacuole inheritance and protein targeting from the cytoplasm to vacuole. J Cell Biol 140: 1063–1074.

109. GebreS, ConnorR, XiaY, JawedS, BushJM, et al. (2012) Osh6 overexpression extends the lifespan of yeast by increasing vacuole fusion. Cell Cycle 11: 2176–2188.

110. ColominaN, LiuY, AldeaM, GariE (2003) TOR regulates the subcellular localization of Ime1, a transcriptional activator of meiotic development in budding yeast. Mol Cell Biol 23: 7415–7424.

111. BalderhaarHJ, ArltH, OstrowiczC, BrockerC, SundermannF, et al. (2010) The Rab GTPase Ypt7 is linked to retromer-mediated receptor recycling and fusion at the yeast late endosome. J Cell Sci 123: 4085–4094.

Štítky
Genetika Reprodukčná medicína

Článok vyšiel v časopise

PLOS Genetics


2012 Číslo 8
Najčítanejšie tento týždeň
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
Kurzy

Zvýšte si kvalifikáciu online z pohodlia domova

Aktuální možnosti diagnostiky a léčby litiáz
nový kurz
Autori: MUDr. Tomáš Ürge, PhD.

Všetky kurzy
Prihlásenie
Zabudnuté heslo

Zadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.

Prihlásenie

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte sa

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#