Efficacy of Oseltamivir-Zanamivir Combination Compared to Each Monotherapy for Seasonal Influenza: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial
Background:
Neuraminidase inhibitors are thought to be efficacious in reducing the time to alleviation of symptoms in outpatients with seasonal influenza. The objective of this study was to compare the short-term virological efficacy of oseltamivir-zanamivir combination versus each monotherapy plus placebo.
Methods and Findings:
We conducted a randomized placebo-controlled trial with 145 general practitioners throughout France during the 2008–2009 seasonal influenza epidemic. Patients, general practitioners, and outcome assessors were all blinded to treatment assignment. Adult outpatients presenting influenza-like illness for less than 36 hours and a positive influenza A rapid test diagnosis were randomized to oseltamivir 75 mg orally twice daily plus zanamivir 10 mg by inhalation twice daily (OZ), oseltamivir plus inhaled placebo (O), or zanamivir plus oral placebo (Z). Treatment efficacy was assessed virologically according to the proportion of patients with nasal influenza reverse transcription (RT)-PCR below 200 copies genome equivalent (cgeq)/µl at day 2 (primary outcome), and clinically to the time to alleviation of symptoms until day 14. Overall 541 patients (of the 900 planned) were included (OZ, n = 192; O, n = 176; Z, n = 173), 49% male, mean age 39 years. In the intention-to-treat analysis conducted in the 447 patients with RT-PCR-confirmed influenza A, 46%, 59%, and 34% in OZ (n = 157), O (n = 141), and Z (n = 149) arms had RT-PCR<200 cgeq/µl (−13.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] −23.1 to −2.9, p = 0.025; +12.3%, 95% CI 2.39–22.2, p = 0.028 for OZ/O and OZ/Z comparisons). Mean day 0 to day 2 viral load decrease was 2.14, 2.49, and 1.68 log10 cgeq/µl (p = 0.060, p = 0.016 for OZ/O and OZ/Z). Median time to alleviation of symptoms was 4.0, 3.0, and 4.0 days (+1.0, 95% CI 0.0–4.0, p = 0.018; +0.0, 95% CI −3.0 to 3.0, p = 0.960 for OZ/O and OZ/Z). Four severe adverse events were observed. Nausea and/or vomiting tended to be more frequent in the combination arm (OZ, n = 13; O, n = 4; and Z, n = 5 patients, respectively).
Conclusions:
In adults with seasonal influenza A mainly H3N2 virus infection, the oseltamivir-zanamivir combination appeared less effective than oseltamivir monotherapy, and not significantly more effective than zanamivir monotherapy. Despite the theoretical potential for the reduction of the emergence of antiviral resistance, the lower effectiveness of this combination calls for caution in its use in clinical practice.
Trial registration:
www.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00799760
: Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary
Vyšlo v časopise:
Efficacy of Oseltamivir-Zanamivir Combination Compared to Each Monotherapy for Seasonal Influenza: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial. PLoS Med 7(11): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000362
Kategorie:
Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000362
Souhrn
Background:
Neuraminidase inhibitors are thought to be efficacious in reducing the time to alleviation of symptoms in outpatients with seasonal influenza. The objective of this study was to compare the short-term virological efficacy of oseltamivir-zanamivir combination versus each monotherapy plus placebo.
Methods and Findings:
We conducted a randomized placebo-controlled trial with 145 general practitioners throughout France during the 2008–2009 seasonal influenza epidemic. Patients, general practitioners, and outcome assessors were all blinded to treatment assignment. Adult outpatients presenting influenza-like illness for less than 36 hours and a positive influenza A rapid test diagnosis were randomized to oseltamivir 75 mg orally twice daily plus zanamivir 10 mg by inhalation twice daily (OZ), oseltamivir plus inhaled placebo (O), or zanamivir plus oral placebo (Z). Treatment efficacy was assessed virologically according to the proportion of patients with nasal influenza reverse transcription (RT)-PCR below 200 copies genome equivalent (cgeq)/µl at day 2 (primary outcome), and clinically to the time to alleviation of symptoms until day 14. Overall 541 patients (of the 900 planned) were included (OZ, n = 192; O, n = 176; Z, n = 173), 49% male, mean age 39 years. In the intention-to-treat analysis conducted in the 447 patients with RT-PCR-confirmed influenza A, 46%, 59%, and 34% in OZ (n = 157), O (n = 141), and Z (n = 149) arms had RT-PCR<200 cgeq/µl (−13.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] −23.1 to −2.9, p = 0.025; +12.3%, 95% CI 2.39–22.2, p = 0.028 for OZ/O and OZ/Z comparisons). Mean day 0 to day 2 viral load decrease was 2.14, 2.49, and 1.68 log10 cgeq/µl (p = 0.060, p = 0.016 for OZ/O and OZ/Z). Median time to alleviation of symptoms was 4.0, 3.0, and 4.0 days (+1.0, 95% CI 0.0–4.0, p = 0.018; +0.0, 95% CI −3.0 to 3.0, p = 0.960 for OZ/O and OZ/Z). Four severe adverse events were observed. Nausea and/or vomiting tended to be more frequent in the combination arm (OZ, n = 13; O, n = 4; and Z, n = 5 patients, respectively).
Conclusions:
In adults with seasonal influenza A mainly H3N2 virus infection, the oseltamivir-zanamivir combination appeared less effective than oseltamivir monotherapy, and not significantly more effective than zanamivir monotherapy. Despite the theoretical potential for the reduction of the emergence of antiviral resistance, the lower effectiveness of this combination calls for caution in its use in clinical practice.
Trial registration:
www.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00799760
: Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary
Zdroje
1. BurchJ
CorbettM
StockC
NicholsonK
ElliotAJ
2009 Prescription of anti-influenza drugs for healthy adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 9 537 545
2. HaydenFG
OsterhausAD
TreanorJJ
FlemingDM
AokiFY
1997 Efficacy and safety of the neuraminidase inhibitor zanamivir in the treatment of influenzavirus infections. GG167 Influenza Study Group. N Engl J Med 337 874 880
3. NicholsonKG
AokiFY
OsterhausAD
TrottierS
CarewiczO
2000 Efficacy and safety of oseltamivir in treatment of acute influenza: a randomised controlled trial. Neuraminidase Inhibitor Flu Treatment Investigator Group. Lancet 355 1845 1850
4. TreanorJJ
HaydenFG
VroomanPS
BarbarashR
BettisR
2000 Efficacy and safety of the oral neuraminidase inhibitor oseltamivir in treating acute influenza: a randomized controlled trial. US Oral Neuraminidase Study Group. JAMA 283 1016 1024
5. JeffersonT
JonesM
DoshiP
Del MarC
2009 Neuraminidase inhibitors for preventing and treating influenza in healthy adults: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 339 b5106
6. PuhakkaT
LehtiH
VainionpaaR
JormanainenV
PulkkinenM
2003 Zanamivir: a significant reduction in viral load during treatment in military conscripts with influenza. Scand J Infect Dis 35 52 58
7. The MIST (Management of Influenza in the Southern Hemisphere Trialists) Study Group 1998 Randomised trial of efficacy and safety of inhaled zanamivir in treatment of influenza A and B virus infections. Lancet 352 1877 1881
8. PolandGA
JacobsonRM
OvsyannikovaIG
2009 Influenza virus resistance to antiviral agents: a plea for rational use. Clin Infect Dis 48 1254 1256
9. WuJT
LeungGM
LipsitchM
CooperBS
RileyS
2009 Hedging against antiviral resistance during the next influenza pandemic using small stockpiles of an alternative chemotherapy. PLoS Med 6 e1000085 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000085
10. SheuTG
DeydeVM
Okomo-AdhiamboM
GartenRJ
XuX
2008 Surveillance for neuraminidase inhibitor resistance among human influenza A and B viruses circulating worldwide from 2004 to 2008. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 52 3284 3292
11. DawoodFS
JainS
FinelliL
ShawMW
LindstromS
2009 Emergence of a novel swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) virus in humans. N Engl J Med 360 2605 2615
12. WongSC
ChanJK
LeeKC
LoES
TsangDN
2005 Development of a quantitative assay for SARS coronavirus and correlation of GAPDH mRNA with SARS coronavirus in clinical specimens. J Clin Pathol 58 276 280
13. DuchampMB
CasalegnoJS
GilletY
FrobertE
BernardE
2010 Pandemic A(H1N1)2009 influenza virus detection by real time RT-PCR: is viral quantification useful? Clin Microbiol Infect 16 317 321
14. HaydenFG
TreanorJJ
FritzRS
LoboM
BettsRF
1999 Use of the oral neuraminidase inhibitor oseltamivir in experimental human influenza: randomized controlled trials for prevention and treatment. JAMA 282 1240 1246
15. GubarevaLV
KaiserL
HaydenFG
2000 Influenza virus neuraminidase inhibitors. Lancet 355 827 835
16. NguyenJT
HoopesJD
LeMH
SmeeDF
PatickAK
2010 Triple combination of amantadine, ribavirin, and oseltamivir is highly active and synergistic against drug resistant influenza virus strains in vitro. PLoS One 5 e9332 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009332
17. RussellRJ
HaireLF
StevensDJ
CollinsPJ
LinYP
2006 The structure of H5N1 avian influenza neuraminidase suggests new opportunities for drug design. Nature 443 45 49
18. AokiFY
BoivinG
RobertsN
2007 Influenza virus susceptibility and resistance to oseltamivir. Antivir Ther 12 603 616
19. GubarevaLV
KaiserL
MatrosovichMN
Soo-HooY
HaydenFG
2001 Selection of influenza virus mutants in experimentally infected volunteers treated with oseltamivir. J Infect Dis 183 523 531
20. StephensonI
DemocratisJ
LackenbyA
McNallyT
SmithJ
2009 Neuraminidase inhibitor resistance after oseltamivir treatment of acute influenza A and B in children. Clin Infect Dis 48 389 396
Štítky
Interné lekárstvoČlánok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS Medicine
2010 Číslo 11
- Statinová intolerance
- Očkování proti virové hemoragické horečce Ebola experimentální vakcínou rVSVDG-ZEBOV-GP
- Co dělat při intoleranci statinů?
- Pleiotropní účinky statinů na kardiovaskulární systém
- DESATORO PRE PRAX: Aktuálne odporúčanie ESPEN pre nutričný manažment u pacientov s COVID-19
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Doctors and Drug Companies: Still Cozy after All These Years
- Strategies for Increasing Recruitment to Randomised Controlled Trials: Systematic Review
- Prescription Medicines and the Risk of Road Traffic Crashes: A French Registry-Based Study
- Efficacy of Oseltamivir-Zanamivir Combination Compared to Each Monotherapy for Seasonal Influenza: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial