Why Do Evaluations of eHealth Programs Fail? An Alternative Set of Guiding Principles

article has not abstract

Vyšlo v časopise: Why Do Evaluations of eHealth Programs Fail? An Alternative Set of Guiding Principles. PLoS Med 7(11): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000360
Kategorie: Essay
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000360

Souhrn

article has not abstract

Zdroje

1. BrownAD

JonesMR

1998 Doomed to failure: narratives of inevitability and conspiracy in a failed IS project. Organization Studies 19 73 88

2. HeeksR

MundyD

SalazarA

1999 Why health care information systems succeed or fail. Information Systems for Public Sector Management Working Paper Series. Institute for Development Policy and Management: University of Manchester Available: http://www.sed.manchester.ac.uk/idpm/research/publications/wp/igovernment/igov_wp09.htm. Accessed 27 September 2010

3. ScottT

RundallTG

VogtTM

HsuJ

2007 Implementing an electronic medical record system: successes, failures, lessons Oxford Radcliffe

4. KrepsD

RichardsonH

2007 IS success and failure - the problem of scale. The Political Quarterly 78 439 446

5. LilfordRJ

FosterJ

PringleM

2009 Evaluating eHealth: how to make evaluation more methodologically robust. PLoS Med 6 e1000186 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000186

6. CatwellL

SheikhA

2009 Evaluating eHealth interventions: the need for continuous systemic evaluation. PLoS Med 6 e1000126 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000126

7. BatesDW

WrightA

2009 Evaluating eHealth: undertaking robust international cross-cultural eHealth research. PLoS Med 6 e1000105 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000105

8. RobertsonA

CresswellK

TakianA

PetrakakiD

CroweS

2010 Implementation and adoption of nationwide electronic health records in secondary care in England: qualitative analysis of interim results from a prospective national evaluation. BMJ 341 c4564

9. OrlikowskiWJ

BaroudiJJ

1991 Studying information technology in organizations: research approaches and assumptions. Information Systems Research 2 1 28

10. KleinHK

MyersMD

1999 A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. Mis Quarterly 23 67 93

11. KlecunE

CornfordT

2005 A critical approach to evaluation. European Journal of Information Systems 14 229 243

12. WagenaarH

CookSDN

2003 Understanding policy practices: Action, dialectic and deliberation in policy analysis.

HajerM

WagenaarH

Deliberative policy analysis. Understanding governance in the network society Cambridge Cambridge University Press 139 171

13. CicourelA

1964 Method and measurement in sociology New York Free Press

14. PattonMQ

1997 Utilization-focused evaluation: The new century. Third edition London Sage

15. PawsonR

TilleyN

1997 Realistic evaluation London Sage

16. FlyvbjergB

2001 Making social science matter: why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again Cambridge Cambridge University Press

17. HouseER

2006 Democracy and evaluation. Evaluation 12 119

18. KushnerSI

2002 The object of one's passion: engagement and community in democratic evaluation. Evaluation Journal of Australasia 2 16 22

19. SchwandtTA

2003 Back to the rough ground! Beyond theory to practice in evaluation. Evaluation 9 353

20. RamillerN

PentlandB

2009 Management implications in information systems research: the untold story. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 10 474 494

21. GreenhalghT

StramerK

BratanT

ByrneE

RussellJ

2010 The devil's in the detail: final report of the independent evaluation of the Summary Care Record and HealthSpace programmes London University College London

22. GreenhalghT

StramerK

BratanT

ByrneE

RussellJ

2010 Adoption and non-adoption of a shared electronic summary record in England. BMJ 340 c311

23. BrennanS

2007 The biggest computer programme in the world ever! How's it going? Journal of Information Technology 22 202 211

24. GreenhalghT

HinderS

StramerK

BratanT