#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Long-Term Biological and Behavioural Impact of an Adolescent Sexual Health Intervention in Tanzania: Follow-up Survey of the Community-Based MEMA kwa Vijana Trial


Background:
The ability of specific behaviour-change interventions to reduce HIV infection in young people remains questionable. Since January 1999, an adolescent sexual and reproductive health (SRH) intervention has been implemented in ten randomly chosen intervention communities in rural Tanzania, within a community randomised trial (see below; NCT00248469). The intervention consisted of teacher-led, peer-assisted in-school education, youth-friendly health services, community activities, and youth condom promotion and distribution. Process evaluation in 1999–2002 showed high intervention quality and coverage. A 2001/2 intervention impact evaluation showed no impact on the primary outcomes of HIV seroincidence and herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) seroprevalence but found substantial improvements in SRH knowledge, reported attitudes, and some reported sexual behaviours. It was postulated that the impact on “upstream” knowledge, attitude, and reported behaviour outcomes seen at the 3-year follow-up would, in the longer term, lead to a reduction in HIV and HSV-2 infection rates and other biological outcomes. A further impact evaluation survey in 2007/8 (∼9 years post-intervention) tested this hypothesis.

Methods and Findings:
This is a cross-sectional survey (June 2007 through July 2008) of 13,814 young people aged 15–30 y who had attended trial schools during the first phase of the MEMA kwa Vijana intervention trial (1999–2002). Prevalences of the primary outcomes HIV and HSV-2 were 1.8% and 25.9% in males and 4.0% and 41.4% in females, respectively. The intervention did not significantly reduce risk of HIV (males adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] 0.91, 95%CI 0.50–1.65; females aPR 1.07, 95%CI 0.68–1.67) or HSV-2 (males aPR 0.94, 95%CI 0.77–1.15; females aPR 0.96, 95%CI 0.87–1.06). The intervention was associated with a reduction in the proportion of males reporting more than four sexual partners in their lifetime (aPR 0.87, 95%CI 0.78–0.97) and an increase in reported condom use at last sex with a non-regular partner among females (aPR 1.34, 95%CI 1.07–1.69). There was a clear and consistent beneficial impact on knowledge, but no significant impact on reported attitudes to sexual risk, reported pregnancies, or other reported sexual behaviours. The study population was likely to have been, on average, at lower risk of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections compared to other rural populations, as only youth who had reached year five of primary school were eligible.

Conclusions:
SRH knowledge can be improved and retained long-term, but this intervention had only a limited effect on reported behaviour and no significant effect on HIV/STI prevalence. Youth interventions integrated within intensive, community-wide risk reduction programmes may be more successful and should be evaluated.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00248469

: Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary


Vyšlo v časopise: Long-Term Biological and Behavioural Impact of an Adolescent Sexual Health Intervention in Tanzania: Follow-up Survey of the Community-Based MEMA kwa Vijana Trial. PLoS Med 7(6): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000287
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000287

Souhrn

Background:
The ability of specific behaviour-change interventions to reduce HIV infection in young people remains questionable. Since January 1999, an adolescent sexual and reproductive health (SRH) intervention has been implemented in ten randomly chosen intervention communities in rural Tanzania, within a community randomised trial (see below; NCT00248469). The intervention consisted of teacher-led, peer-assisted in-school education, youth-friendly health services, community activities, and youth condom promotion and distribution. Process evaluation in 1999–2002 showed high intervention quality and coverage. A 2001/2 intervention impact evaluation showed no impact on the primary outcomes of HIV seroincidence and herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) seroprevalence but found substantial improvements in SRH knowledge, reported attitudes, and some reported sexual behaviours. It was postulated that the impact on “upstream” knowledge, attitude, and reported behaviour outcomes seen at the 3-year follow-up would, in the longer term, lead to a reduction in HIV and HSV-2 infection rates and other biological outcomes. A further impact evaluation survey in 2007/8 (∼9 years post-intervention) tested this hypothesis.

Methods and Findings:
This is a cross-sectional survey (June 2007 through July 2008) of 13,814 young people aged 15–30 y who had attended trial schools during the first phase of the MEMA kwa Vijana intervention trial (1999–2002). Prevalences of the primary outcomes HIV and HSV-2 were 1.8% and 25.9% in males and 4.0% and 41.4% in females, respectively. The intervention did not significantly reduce risk of HIV (males adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] 0.91, 95%CI 0.50–1.65; females aPR 1.07, 95%CI 0.68–1.67) or HSV-2 (males aPR 0.94, 95%CI 0.77–1.15; females aPR 0.96, 95%CI 0.87–1.06). The intervention was associated with a reduction in the proportion of males reporting more than four sexual partners in their lifetime (aPR 0.87, 95%CI 0.78–0.97) and an increase in reported condom use at last sex with a non-regular partner among females (aPR 1.34, 95%CI 1.07–1.69). There was a clear and consistent beneficial impact on knowledge, but no significant impact on reported attitudes to sexual risk, reported pregnancies, or other reported sexual behaviours. The study population was likely to have been, on average, at lower risk of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections compared to other rural populations, as only youth who had reached year five of primary school were eligible.

Conclusions:
SRH knowledge can be improved and retained long-term, but this intervention had only a limited effect on reported behaviour and no significant effect on HIV/STI prevalence. Youth interventions integrated within intensive, community-wide risk reduction programmes may be more successful and should be evaluated.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00248469

: Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary


Zdroje

1. UNAIDS 2008 Report on the global HIV/AIDS epidemic 2008. Geneva UNAIDS (UNAIDS/08.25E/JC1510E UNAIDS/08.25E/JC1510E) 362

2. TemmermanM

1994 Sexually transmitted diseases and reproductive health. Sex Transm Dis 21 S55 58

3. ObasiAI

BaliraR

ToddJ

RossDA

ChangaluchaJ

2001 Prevalence of HIV and Chlamydia trachomatis infection in 15-19-year olds in rural Tanzania. Trop Med Int Health 6 517 525

4. PequegnatW

StoverE

2000 Behavioral prevention is today's AIDS vaccine! AIDS 14 Suppl 2 S1 7

5. UNICEF 2002 Young people and HIV/AIDS: Opportunity in crisis. New York UNICEF

6. UNAIDS 2007 Practical Guidelines for Intensifying HIV Prevention: Towards Universal Access. Geneva UNAIDS (UNAIDS/07.07E/JC1274E UNAIDS/07.07E/JC1274E) 68

7. WHOUNAIDS 2007 New data on male circumcision and HIV prevention: policy and programme implications: WHO/UNAIDS Technical Consultation, Male Circumcision and HIV Prevention: Research Implications for Policy and Programming, Montreux, 6–7 March 2007:conclusions and recommendations. Geneva World Health Organization 10

8. WeissHA

HalperinD

BaileyRC

HayesRJ

SchmidG

2008 Male circumcision for HIV prevention: from evidence to action? AIDS 22 567 574

9. HendersonM

WightD

RaabGM

AbrahamC

ParkesA

2007 Impact of a theoretically based sex education programme (SHARE) delivered by teachers on NHS registered conceptions and terminations: final results of cluster randomised trial. BMJ 334 133

10. DiCensoA

GuyattG

WillanA

GriffithL

2002 Interventions to reduce unintended pregnancies among adolescents: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 324 1426 1430

11. GallantM

Maticka-TyndaleE

2004 School-based HIV prevention programmes for African youth. Soc Sci Med 58 1337 1351

12. PronykPM

HargreavesJR

KimJC

MorisonLA

PhetlaG

2006 Effect of a structural intervention for the prevention of intimate-partner violence and HIV in rural South Africa: a cluster randomised trial. Lancet 368 1973 1983

13. JewkesR

NdunaM

LevinJ

JamaN

DunkleK

2008 Impact of stepping stones on incidence of HIV and HSV-2 and sexual behaviour in rural South Africa: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ 337 a506

14. StephensonJ

StrangeV

AllenE

CopasA

JohnsonA

2008 The long-term effects of a peer-led sex education programme (RIPPLE): a cluster randomised trial in schools in England. PLoS Med 5 e224 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050224

15. KirbyD

ObasiA

LarisBA

2006 The effectiveness of sex education and HIV education interventions in schools in developing countries.

RossDA

DickB

FergusonJ

938 103 150 Preventing HIV/AIDS in Young People: a systematic review of the evidence from developing countries. WHO Tech Rep Ser

16. CowanFM

PascoeSJ

LanghaugLF

DirawoJ

ChidiyaS

2008 The Regai Dzive Shiri Project: a cluster randomised controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of a multi-component community-based HIV prevention intervention for rural youth in Zimbabwe–study design and baseline results. Trop Med Int Health 13 1235 1244

17. CataniaJA

GibsonDR

ChitwoodDD

CoatesTJ

1990 Methodological problems in AIDS behavioral research: influences on measurement error and participation bias in studies of sexual behavior. Psychol Bull 108 339 362

18. McFarlaneM

St LawrenceJS

1999 Adolescents' recall of sexual behavior: consistency of self-report and effect of variations in recall duration. J Adolesc Health 25 199 206

19. WightD

WestP

1999 Poor recall, misunderstandings and embarrassment: interpreting discrepancies in young men's reported heterosexual behaviour. Cult Health Sex 1 55 78

20. PlummerML

RossDA

WightD

ChangaluchaJ

MshanaG

2004 “A bit more truthful”: the validity of adolescent sexual behaviour data collected in rural northern Tanzania using five methods. Sex Transm Infect 80 Suppl2 ii49 ii56

21. HayesRJ

ChangaluchaJ

RossDA

GavyoleA

ToddJ

2005 The MEMA kwa Vijana project: design of a community randomised trial of an innovative adolescent sexual health intervention in rural Tanzania. Contemp Clin Trials 26 430 442

22. ObasiAI

CleophasB

RossDA

ChimaKL

MmassyG

2006 Rationale and design of the MEMA kwa Vijana adolescent sexual and reproductive health intervention in Mwanza Region, Tanzania. AIDS Care 18 311 322

23. RossDA

ChangaluchaJ

ObasiAI

ToddJ

PlummerML

2007 Biological and behavioural impact of an adolescent sexual health intervention in Tanzania: a community-randomized trial. AIDS 21 1943 1955

24. PlummerML

WightD

ObasiAIN

WamoyiJ

MshanaG

2007 A process evaluation of a school-based adolescent sexual health intervention in rural Tanzania: the MEMA kwa Vijana programme. Health Educ Res 22 500 512

25. GuyonA

LugoeWL

FergusonJ

2000 Evaluation report of HIV/AIDS peer education in the MEMA kwa Vijana project, Mwanza, Tanzania. AMREF, NIMR and LSHTM Collaborative Research Projects (Unpublished report)

26. KirbyD

2001 The Mema kwa Vijana Curriculum: A Review. Santa Cruz, California ETR Associates 8 (Unpublished report)

27. LugoeWL

2001 Evaluation of Teacher-training sessions for MkV teacher led component. Dar es Salaam Faculty of Education, University of Dar es Salaam (Unpublished report)

28. RenjuJ

NyalaliK

2008 Scaling up ASRH education through widespread teacher training: training evaluation report. National Institute for Medical Research, Mwanza, Tanzania and Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, UK 24 (www.memakwavijana.org)

29. RenjuJ

NyalaliK

2008 Scaling up Youth Friendly health services through widespread health worker training; training evaluation report. National Institute for Medical Research, Mwanza, Tanzania and Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, UK 40 (www.memakwavijana.org)

30. BoermaJT

UrassaM

NnkoS

Ng'weshemiJ

IsingoR

2002 Sociodemographic context of the AIDS epidemic in a rural area in Tanzania with a focus on people's mobility and marriage. Sex Transm Infect 78 Suppl 1 i97 105

31. RossauR

HeyndrickxL

Van HeuverswynH

1988 Nucleotide sequence of a 16S ribosomal RNA gene from Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Nucleic Acids Res 16 6227

32. RoymansR

OnlandG

JanszA

QuintW

BoelE

1999 Evaluation of an in-house polymerase chain reaction for detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in urogenital samples. J Clin Pathol 52 411 414

33. GrosskurthH

MoshaF

ToddJ

MwijarubiE

KlokkeA

1995 Impact of improved treatment of sexually transmitted diseases on HIV infection in rural Tanzania: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 346 530 536

34. del Mar Pujades RodriguezM

ObasiA

MoshaF

ToddJ

BrownD

2002 Herpes simplex virus type 2 infection increases HIV incidence: a prospective study in rural Tanzania. AIDS 16 451 462

35. HayesRJ

MoultonLH

2009 Cluster Randomised Trials. CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA

36. MakokhaM

2008 What MEMA kwa Vijana has to offer the education sector AIDS response in Tanzania: A comparative review. National Institute for Medical Research, Medical Research Council, UK and Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, UK 69 (www.memakwavijana.org)

37. MwitaW

WhiteR

ChilonganiJ

OrrothK

ZabaB

2002 The association between population mobility and HIV prevalence in rural villages in Mwanza region, Tanzania. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 96 363 364

38. United Nations 2001 UNGASS Goals. Declaration of commitment on HIV/AIDS. New York, United Nations, 2001

39. WightD

PlummerML

MshanaG

WamoyiJ

ShigongoZS

2006 Contradictory sexual norms and expectations for young people in rural Northern Tanzania. Soc Sci Med 62 987 997

40. PlummerML

WightD

WamoyiJ

MshanaG

HayesRJ

2006 Farming with your hoe in a sack: condom attitudes, access, and use in rural Tanzania. Stud Fam Plann 37 29 40

Štítky
Interné lekárstvo

Článok vyšiel v časopise

PLOS Medicine


2010 Číslo 6
Najčítanejšie tento týždeň
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
Kurzy

Zvýšte si kvalifikáciu online z pohodlia domova

Aktuální možnosti diagnostiky a léčby litiáz
nový kurz
Autori: MUDr. Tomáš Ürge, PhD.

Všetky kurzy
Prihlásenie
Zabudnuté heslo

Zadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.

Prihlásenie

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte sa

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#