Do Health and Forensic DNA Databases Increase Racial Disparities?

article has not abstract

Vyšlo v časopise: Do Health and Forensic DNA Databases Increase Racial Disparities?. PLoS Med 8(10): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001100
Kategorie: Essay
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001100

Souhrn

article has not abstract

Zdroje

1. Van DijkJ 2006 The deepening divide: inequality and the information society. Thousand Oaks (California) Sage Publications

2. GilbertW 1991 Towards a paradigm shift in biology. Nature 349 99

3. CollinsFSGreenEDGuttmacherAEGuyerMS 2003 A vision for the future of genomics research: a blueprint for the genomic era. Nature 422 835 847

4. WilliamsPJ 15 April 2010 The hidden cost of DNA banking. The Nation Available: http://www.thenation.com/article/hidden-cost-dna-banking. Accessed 2 September 2011

5. BolnickDAFullwileyDDusterTCooperRSFujimuraJH 2007 The science and business of genetic ancestry testing. Science 318 399 400

6. Lee SS-J, BolnickDADusterTOssorioPTallbearK 2009 The illusive gold standard in genetic ancestry testing. Science 325 38 39

7. BamshadM 2005 Genetic influences on health: does race matter? JAMA 294 937 946

8. LeeSKoenigB 2003 Racial profiling of DNA samples: will it affect scientific knowledge about human genetic variation? KnoppersB Populations and genetics: legal and socio-ethical perspectives Leiden, Netherlands Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 231 245

9. SchwartzRS 2001 Racial profiling in medical research. N Engl J Med 344 1392 1393

10. BraunLFausto-SterlingAFullwileyDHammondsEMNelsonA 2007 Racial categories in medical practice: how useful are they? PLoS Med 4 e271 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040271

11. DusterT 2005 Race and reification in science. Science 307 1050 1051

12. IoannidisJPANtzaniEETrikalinosTA 2004 ‘Racial’ differences in genetic effects for complex diseases. Nat Genet 36 1312 1318

13. TangH 2006 Confronting ethnicity-specific disease risk. Nat Genet 38 15

14. NeedACGoldsteinDB 2009 Next generation disparities in human genomics: concerns and remedies. Trends Gen 25 489 494

15. BustamanteCDDe La VegaFMBurchardEG 2011 Genomics for the world. Nature 475 163 165

16. Chow-WhitePA 2011 Genomic databases and an emerging digital divide in biotechnology. NakamuraLChow-WhitePA Race after the internet New York Routledge Press

17. 23andMe 2011 23andMe database surpasses 100,000 users. 23andMe

18. MountainJ 2011 What can genealogists learn through genetic testing? Stories from 23andMe. Southern California Genealogical Society Jamboree June 11. Burbank (California) California Genealogical Society

19. BenjaminR 2009 A lab of their own: genomic sovereignty as postcolonial science policy. Policy and Society 28 341 355

20. LevineHGSmallDP 2008 Marijuana arrest crusade: racial bias and police policy in New York City – 1997–2007. New York New York Civil Liberties Union

21. PrainsackBKitzbergerM 2009 DNA behind bars: ‘other’ ways of knowing forensic DNA technologies. Social Studies of Science 39 51 79

22. MurphyE 2008 The art in the science of DNA: a layperson's guide to the subjectivity inherent in forensic DNA typing. Emory Law Journal 58 489 512

23. ABC News 2010 July 12 Familial DNA led police to ‘grim sleeper.’ Available: http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/video/grim-sleeper-arrested-11148785. Accessed 2 September 2011

24. ScienceDaily 2010 October 28 Researchers find a ‘liberal gene.’ Available: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/10/101027161452.htm. Accessed 2 September 2011

25. GandyO 2009 Coming to terms with chance: engaging rational discrimination and cumulative disadvantage. Burlington (Vermont) Ashgate

26. Nuffield Council on Bioethics 2010 Medical profiling and online medicine: the ethics of ‘personalised healthcare’ in a consumer age. London Nuffield Press

27. Council for Responsible Genetics 2011 National DNA databases report. Available: http://www.councilforresponsiblegenetics.org/dnadata/. Accessed 2 September 2011

28. Nation Academy of Sciences/National Research Council 2009 Strengthening forensic science in the United States: a path forward. Washington (D.C.) The National Academy Press

29. Nuffield Council on Bioethics 2007 The forensic use of bioinformation: ethical Issues. London Nuffield Press

30. LyallS 2008 December 4 European court rules against Britain's policy of keeping DNA database of suspects New York Times Available: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/05/world/europe/05britain.html?ref=science. Accessed 2 September 2011

31. TravisA 2011 February 11 DNA profiles to be deleted from police database The Guardian Available: http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2011/feb/11/dna-profiles-deleted-police-database. Accessed 2 September 2011

32. GuzzardiW 2011 May 26 Illinois bill could allow state to collect DNA from those presumed innocent, marking nationwide shift. Huffington Post Available: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/05/25/illinois-dna-collection_n_867088.html. Accessed 2 September 2011