Government Inaction on Ratings and Government Subsidies to the US Film Industry Help Promote Youth Smoking
article has not abstract
Vyšlo v časopise:
Government Inaction on Ratings and Government Subsidies to the US Film Industry Help Promote Youth Smoking. PLoS Med 8(8): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001077
Kategorie:
Policy Forum
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001077
Souhrn
article has not abstract
Zdroje
1. National Cancer Institute 2008 Tobacco Control Monograph 19: The role of the media in promoting and reducing tobacco use Bethesda (Maryland) US National Cancer Institute
2. World Health Organization 2009 Smoke-free movies: from evidence to action Geneva World Health Organization
3. BMA Board of Science 2008 Forever cool: the influence of smoking imagery on young people London British Medical Association
4. Institute of Medicine 2007 Ending the tobacco problem: a blueprint for the nation Washington (D.C.) National Academies Press
5. HanewinkelRSargentJD 2008 Exposure to smoking in internationally distributed American movies and youth smoking in Germany: a cross-cultural cohort study. Pediatrics 121 e108 d117
6. ThrasherJFJacksonCArillo-SantillanESargentJD 2008 Exposure to smoking imagery in popular films and adolescent smoking in Mexico. Am J Prev Med 35 95 102
7. DaltonMASargentJDBeachMLTitus-ErnstoffLGibsonJJ 2003 Effect of viewing smoking in movies on adolescent smoking initiation: a cohort study. Lancet 362 281 285
8. AroaMMathusNGuptaVKNazarGPReddyKS 2011 Tobaco use in Bollywood movies, tobacco promotional activities and their association with tobacco use among Indian adolescents. Tob Control 2011 In press
9. WHO FCTC Conference of the Parties 2008 Guidelines for implementation of Article 13: Guidelines on tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship Geneva WHO
10. FusonB June 7 2005 Study: G-rated fare more profitable. The Hollywood Reporter
11. AndersonSMillettCPolanskyJGlantzS 2010 Exposure to smoking in movies among British adolescents 2001–2006. Tob Control 19 197 200
12. Physicians for a Smoke-Free Canada 2010 How American movies, Canadian film subsidies and provincial rating practices will kill 43,000 Canadian teens alive today – and what Canadian governments can do about it Ottawa, Canada Physicans for a Smoke-Free Canada
13. LyonsAMcNeillAChenYBrittonJ 2010 Tobacco and tobacco branding in films most popular in the UK from 1989 to 2008. Thorax 65 417 422
14. TitusKPolanskyJRGlantzS 2009 Smoking presentation trends in U.S. movies 1991–2008. San Francisco: University of California San Francisco Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education. Available: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/30q9j424. Accessed 14 February 2010)
15. MillettCGlantzS 2010 Assigning an 18 rating to movies with tobacco imagery is essential to reduce youth smoking. Thorax 65 377 378
16. PolanskyJRGlantzSA 2009 Taxpayer subsidies for US films with tobacco imagery San Francisco Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco
17. UK Department of Health 2010 A smokefree future: a comprehensive tobacco control strategy for England London Department of Health
18. UK Department of Health 2011 Healthy lives, healthy people: a tobacco control plan for England London: Department of Health. Available: http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_124917. Accessed 25 July 2011
19. Smoke-Free Ontario Scientific Advisory Committee 2010 Evidence to guide action: comprehensive tobacco control in Ontario Toronto Ontario Agency for Health Protection and Promotion
20. GlantzSTitusKMitchellSPolanskyJKaufmannR 2010 Smoking in top-grossing movies - United States, 1991–2009. MMWR 59 1014 1017
21. GlantzSMitchellSTitusKPolanskyJKauffmanR 2011 Smoking in top-grossing movies - United States, 2010. MMWR 60 909 913
22. PolanskyJMitchellSGlantzS 2010 Film-flam: how MPAA/NATO movie labels hide the biggest media risk to kids San Francisco University of California San Francisco Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education
23. MagorMSchlesingerP 2009 “For this relief much thanks”: Taxation, film policy, and the UK government. Screen 50 299 317
24. UK Film Council 2010 British film certification: schedule 1 to the Films Act 1985; cultural test guidance notes: version: June 2010 London UK Film Council
25. HM Revenue and Customs Film Production Company Manual (regarding Finance Act 2006 (FA06), rewritten to Corporation Tax Act 2009, CTA09) London HM Revenue and Customs
26. UK Film Council 2009 Statistical yearbook 2008 London UK Film Council
27. LansleyA 2010 A new approach to public health. Speech by the Secretary of State for Health to the UK Faculty of Public Health Conference; 7 July 2010. Available: http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/MediaCentre/Speeches/DH_117280. Accessed 25 July 2011
28. The Guardian 2010 12 August Steven Spielberg's studio ‘concerned’ by move to axe UK Film Council
29. ASH-UK 2010 UK tobacco control policy and expenditure - an overview. December 2010 London ASH-UK
30. Ontario Tobacco Research Unit 2010 September 1 The tobacco control environment: Ontario and beyond. Monitoring and Evaluation Series 16
31. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, American Heart Association, American Lung Association 2010 A broken promise to our children: The 1998 state tobacco settlement 12 years later (Appendix A) Washington (D.C.) Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, American Heart Association, American Lung Association
32. SongAVLingPMNeilandsTBGlantzSA 2007 Smoking in movies and increased smoking among young adults. Am J Prev Med 33 396 403
33. ShmueliDProchaskaJGlantzSA 2010 The effect of exposure to smoking scenes in films on immediate smoking: a controlled laboratory study. Am J Prev Med 38 351 358
34. WagnerDDDal CinSSargentJDKelleyWMHeathertonTF 2011 Spontaneous action representation in smokers when watching movie characters smoke. J Neurosci 31 894 898
35. Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade 2011 Film in Australia Barton Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade
36. Screen Daily 2010 28 October Incentives survive global cutbacks
37. ChristophersonSRightorN 2010 The creative economy as “big business”: evaluating strategies to lure filmmakers. J Plan Educ Res 29 336 352
38. State of Louisiana 2009 State of Louisiana Act number 478. Baton Rouge: State of Louisiana. Available: http://www.louisianaentertainment.gov/film/files/00%20Act%20478%20-%20Motion%20Picture.pdf. Accessed 25 July 2011
39. American Lung Association 2007 State of tobacco control: 2006 Washington (D.C.) American Lung Association
40. American Lung Association 2008 State of tobacco control: 2007 Washington (D.C.) American Lung Association
41. American Lung Association 2009 State of tobacco control: 2008 Washington (D.C.) American Lung Association
Štítky
Interné lekárstvoČlánok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS Medicine
2011 Číslo 8
- Statinová intolerance
- Hydroresponzivní krytí v epitelizační fázi hojení rány
- Parazitičtí červi v terapii Crohnovy choroby a dalších zánětlivých autoimunitních onemocnění
- Metamizol v liečbe pooperačnej bolesti u detí do 6 rokov veku
- Co dělat při intoleranci statinů?
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Commercial Serological Tests for the Diagnosis of Active Pulmonary and Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- Are HIV Epidemics among Men Who Have Sex with Men Emerging in the Middle East and North Africa?: A Systematic Review and Data Synthesis
- Serological Testing Versus Other Strategies for Diagnosis of Active Tuberculosis in India: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
- Being the Ghost in the Machine: A Medical Ghostwriter's Personal View