Guidance for Evidence-Informed Policies about Health Systems: Assessing How Much Confidence to Place in the Research Evidence

1. Bosch-CapblanchXLavisJNLewinSAtunRRøttingenJA 2012 Guidance for evidence-informed decisions about health systems: rationale for and challenges of guidance development. PLoS Med 9 e1001185 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001185

2. LavisJNRøttingenJABosch-CapblanchXAtunREl-JardaliF 2012 Guidance for evidence-informed policies about health systems: linking guidance development to policy development. PLoS Med 9 e1001187 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001187

3. GuyattGOxmanADAklEAKunzRVistG 2011 GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol 64 383 394

4. LavisJNOxmanADLewinSFretheimA 2009 SUPPORT tools for evidence-informed health policymaking (STP). Health Res Policy Syst 7 Suppl 1 I1

5. LavisJNWilsonMGOxmanADGrimshawJLewinS 2009 SUPPORT tools for evidence-informed health policymaking (STP) 5: using research evidence to frame options to address a problem. Health Res Policy Syst 7 Suppl 1 S5

6. WestSKingVCareyTSLohrKNMcKoyN 2002 Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence. Evidence report/technology assessment No. 47 (prepared by the Research Triangle Institute–University of North Carolina Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-97-0011). AHRQ publication no. 02-E016

7. CohenDJCrabtreeBF 2008 Evaluative criteria for qualitative research in health care: controversies and recommendations. Ann Fam Med 6 331 339

8. LiberatiAAltmanDGTetzlaffJMulrowCGotzschePC 2009 The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol 62 e1 e34

9. LewinSOxmanADLavisJNFretheimA 2009 SUPPORT tools for evidence-informed health policymaking (STP) 8: deciding how much confidence to place in a systematic review. Health Res Policy Syst 7 Suppl 1 S8

10. SheaBJGrimshawJMWellsGABoersMAnderssonN 2007 Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 7 10

11. AtkinsDEcclesMFlottorpSGuyattGHHenryD 2004 Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group. BMC Health Serv Res 4 38

12. OxmanADLavisJNLewinSFretheimA 2009 SUPPORT tools for evidence-informed health policymaking (STP) 1: What is evidence-informed policymaking? Health Res Policy Syst 7 Suppl 1 S1

13. ThomasJHardenA 2008 Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 8 45

14. SpencerLRitchieJLewisJDillonL 2003 Quality in qualitative evaluation: a framework for assessing research evidence England Government Chief Social Researcher's Office

15. PawsonR 2002 Evidence-based policy: the promise of ‘realist’ synthesis. Evaluation 8 340 358

16. OliverSClarke-JonesLReesRMilneRBuchananP 2004 Involving consumers in research and development agenda setting for the NHS: developing an evidence-based approach. Health Technol Assess 8 1 IV

17. KiwanukaSNKinengyereAARutebemberwaENalwaddaCSsengoobaF 2011 Dual practice regulatory mechanisms in the health sector: a systematic review of approaches and implementation London EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London

18. CarrollCBoothACooperK 2011 A worked example of “best fit” framework synthesis: a systematic review of views concerning the taking of some potential chemopreventive agents. BMC Med Res Methodol 11 29

19. PawsonR 2006 Digging for nuggets: how ‘bad’ research can yield ‘good’ evidence. Int J Soc Res Methodol 9 127 142

20. JeffersonTDemicheliVValeL 2002 Quality of systematic reviews of economic evaluations in health care. JAMA 287 2809 2812

21. GuyattGHOxmanADKunzRJaeschkeRHelfandM 2008 Incorporating considerations of resources use into grading recommendations. BMJ 336 1170 1173

22. TreweekSZwarensteinM 2009 Making trials matter: pragmatic and explanatory trials and the problem of applicability. Trials 10 37

23. LewinSLavisJNOxmanADBastiasGChopraM 2008 Supporting the delivery of cost-effective interventions in primary health-care systems in low-income and middle-income countries: an overview of systematic reviews. Lancet 372 928 939

24. ChopraMMunroSLavisJNVistGBennettS 2008 Effects of policy options for human resources for health: an analysis of systematic reviews. Lancet 371 668 674

25. DonnerAKlarN 2004 Pitfalls of and controversies in cluster randomization trials. Am J Public Health 94 416 422

26. VarnellSPMurrayDMJanegaJBBlitsteinJL 2004 Design and analysis of group-randomized trials: a review of recent practices. Am J Public Health 94 393 399

27. WHO 2010 Increasing access to health workers in remote and rural areas through improved retention: global policy recommendations Geneva World Health Organization

28. HuichoLDielemanMCampbellJCodjiaLBalabanovaD 2010 Increasing access to health workers in underserved areas: a conceptual framework for measuring results. Bull World Health Organ 88 357 363

29. GlasziouPChalmersIAltmanDGBastianHBoutronI 2010 Taking healthcare interventions from trial to practice. BMJ 341 c3852

30. GuyattGHOxmanADVistGEKunzRFalck-YtterY 2008 GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 336 924 926

31. GuyattGHOxmanADSchunemannHJTugwellPKnottnerusA 2011 GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. J Clin Epidemiol 64 380 382

32. PetersDHEl-SahartySSiadatBJanovskyKVujicicM 2009 Improving health service delivery in developing countries: from evidence to action Washington (D.C.) World Bank

33. LavisJNOxmanADSouzaNMLewinSGruenRL 2009 SUPPORT tools for evidence-informed health policymaking (STP) 9: assessing the applicability of the findings of a systematic review. Health Res Policy Syst 7 Suppl 1 S9

34. WangSMossJRHillerJE 2006 Applicability and transferability of interventions in evidence-based public health. Health Promot Int 21 76 83

35. VictoraCG 2010 Commentary: LiST: using epidemiology to guide child survival policymaking and programming. Int J Epidemiol 39 Suppl 1 i1 i2

36. BryceJFribergIKKraushaarDNsonaHAfenyaduGY 2010 LiST as a catalyst in program planning: experiences from Burkina Faso, Ghana and Malawi. Int J Epidemiol 39 Suppl 1 i40 i47

37. RosenbaumSEGlentonCWiysongeCSAbalosEMigniniL 2011 Evidence summaries tailored to health policy-makers in low- and middle-income countries. Bull World Health Organ 89 54 61

38. RosenbaumSEGlentonCNylundHKOxmanAD 2010 User testing and stakeholder feedback contributed to the development of understandable and useful Summary of Findings tables for Cochrane reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 63 607 619

39. Bosch-Capblanch X and Project Team 2011 Handbook for developing health systems guidance: supporting informed judgements for health systems policies Basel Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute Available: http://www.swisstph.ch/?id=53; http://www.swisstph.ch/fileadmin/user_upload/Pdfs/SCIH/WHOHSG_Handbook_v04.pdf. Accessed 10 February 2012

40. BennettSAgyepongIASheikhKHansonKSsengoobaF 2011 Building the field of health policy and systems research: an agenda for action. PLoS Med 8 e1001081 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001081

41. GuyattGOxmanADAklEAKunzRVistG 2011 GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol 64 383 394

42. BrouwersMCKhoMEBrowmanGPBurgersJSCluzeauF 2010 AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care. J Clin Epidemiol 63 1308 1311

43. KaneSSGerretsenBScherpbierRDalPMDielemanM 2010 A realist synthesis of randomised control trials involving use of community health workers for delivering child health interventions in low and middle income countries. BMC Health Serv Res 10 286

44. GlentonCLewinSScheelIB 2011 Still too little qualitative research to shed light on results from reviews of effectiveness trials: a case study of a Cochrane review on the use of lay health workers. Implement Sci 6 53

45. AdmassieAAbebawDWoldemichaelAD 2009 Impact evaluation of the Ethiopian Health Services Extension Programme. J Dev Effect 1 430 449

46. Oxford Policy Management 2009 Lady health worker programme. External evaluation of the National Programme for Family Planning and Primary Health Care. Management review Oxford Oxford Policy Management

47. LewinSMunabi-BabigumiraSGlentonCDanielsKBosch-CapblanchX 2010 Lay health workers in primary and community health care for maternal and child health and the management of infectious diseases. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD004015

48. LewinSOxmanADGlentonC 2006 Assessing healthcare interventions along the complex-simple continuum: a proposal [P100]. Cochrane Colloquium 2006

49. CraigPDieppePMacintyreSMichieSNazarethIPetticrewM 2008 Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 337 a1655