Policies and Initiatives Aimed at Addressing Research Misconduct in High-Income Countries

article has not abstract

Vyšlo v časopise: Policies and Initiatives Aimed at Addressing Research Misconduct in High-Income Countries. PLoS Med 10(3): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001406
Kategorie: Essay
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001406

Souhrn

article has not abstract

Zdroje

1. AnaJ, KoehlmoosT, SmithR, YanLL (2013) Research misconduct in low- and middle-income countries. PLoS Med 10: e1001315 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001315

2. Kevles D (1998) The Baltimore case: a trial of politics, science, and character. New York: W.W. Norton.

3. SteneckNH (1999) Confronting misconduct in science in the 1980s and 1990s: what has and has not been accomplished? Sci Eng Ethics 5: 161–176.

4. Office of Science and Technology Policy (2000) Federal Research Misconduct Policy. Federal Register, 6 December 2000 65 (235) 76260–76264.

5. Shamoo AS, Resnik DB (2009) Responsible conduct of research. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.

6. National Institutes of Health (2011) Update on the requirement for instruction in responsible conduct of research. Available: http://grants1.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-10-019.html. Accessed 1 November 2012.

7. National Institutes of Health (2000) NIH policy on instruction in the responsible conduct of research. Available: http://sourcebook.od.nih.gov/ResEthicsCases/nih-policy.htm. Accessed 1 November 2012.

8. National Science Foundation (2009) Responsible conduct of research. Federal Register, 20 August 2009 74 (160) 42126–42128.

9. ResnikDB, DinseGE (2012) Do U.S. research institutions meet or exceed federal mandates for instruction in responsible conduct of research? A national survey. Acad Med 87: 1237–1242.

10. Office of Research Integrity (2012) RRI Publications. Available: http://ori.hhs.gov/rri-publications. Accessed 1 November 2012.

11. AntesAL, MurphyST, WaplesEP, MumfordMD, BrownRP, et al. (2009) A meta-analysis of ethics instruction effectiveness in the sciences. Ethics Behav 19: 379–402.

12. MayDR, LuthMT (2012) The effectiveness of ethics education: a quasi-experimental field study. Sci Eng Ethics Epub ahead of print 3 Jan 2012.

13. RisbeyKR, RonningEA, De VriesR, MartinsonBC (2007) What do mentoring and training in the responsible conduct of research have to do with scientists' misbehavior? Findings from a national survey of NIH-funded scientists. Acad Med 82: 853–860.

14. AngellM, KassirerJP (1994) Setting the record straight in the breast cancer trials. N Engl J Med 330: 1448–1450.

15. Tri-Agencies (2011) The Tri-Agency Framework: responsible conduct of research. Available: http://www.rcr.ethics.gc.ca/eng/policy-politique/framework-cadre/. Accessed 6 November 2012.

16. MasterZ (2012) The governance of research integrity in Canada. Health Law Rev 20: 5–14.

17. Tri-Agencies (2011) Agency statement: consent to disclose personal information. Available: http://www.nserc-crsng.gc.ca/NSERC-CRSNG/governance-gouvernance/consent-consentement_eng.asp. Accessed 6 November 2012.

18. MasterZ, McDonaldM, Williams-JonesB (2012) Promoting research on research integrity in Canada. Account Res 19: 47–52.

19. UK Research Council (2012) The research ethics guidebook. Available: http://www.ethicsguidebook.ac.uk/Research-Council-funding-122. Accessed 2 November 2012.

20. General Medical Council. Research guidance. Available: http://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/ethical_guidance/research.asp. Accessed 18 December 2012.

21. UK Research Integrity Office (2012) About us. Available: http://www.ukrio.org/about-us/. Accessed 2 November 2012.

22. TorjesenI (2012) Research bodies try to strengthen the integrity of UK research. BMJ 344: e2677.

23. Universities UK. The concordat to support research integrity, signed July 2012.

24. AndersenD (2000) From case management to prevention of scientific honesty in Denmark. Sci Eng Ethics 6: 25–34.

25. Lomborg B (2001) The skeptical environmentalist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

26. Editors of The New Atlantis (2004) The ideological environmentalist. The New Atlantis 4 (Winter): 108–110.

27. The Danish Committees on Scientific Dishonesty (2009) Guidelines for good scientific practice with special focus on health science, natural science and technical science. Available: http://en.fi.dk/publications/2009/the-danish-committees-on-scientific-guidelines-for-good-scientific-practice. Accessed 6 November 2012.

28. Drenth PJD (2010) A European code of conduct for research integrity. Available: http://www.allea.org/Content/ALLEA/Scientific%20Integrity/A%20European%20Code%20of%20Conduct%20for%20Research%20Integrity_final.10.10.pdf. Accessed 6 November 2012.

29. European Science Foundation, All European Academies (2011) The European code of conduct for research integrity. Available: http://www.allea.org/Content/ALLEA/Scientific%20Integrity/Code_Conduct_ResearchIntegrity.pdf. Accessed 6 November 2012.

30. ResnikDB, PeddadaS, BrunsonWJr (2009) Research misconduct policies of scientific journals. Account Res 16: 2567.

31. BoschX, HernándezC, PericasJM, DotiP, MarušićA (2012) Misconduct policies in high-impact biomedical journals. PLoS ONE 7 (12) e51928 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051928

32. ResnikDB, PatroneD, PeddadaS (2010) Research misconduct policies of social science journals and impact factor. Account Res 17: 79–84.

33. Committee on Publication Ethics (2011) Code of conduct and best practice guidelines for journal editors. Available: http://publicationethics.org/files/Code_of_conduct_for_journal_editors_Mar11.pdf. Accessed 2 November 2012.

34. MacrinaFL (2007) Scientific societies and promotion of the responsible conduct of research: codes, policies, and education. Acad Med 82: 865–869.

35. ResnikDB (2009) International standards for research integrity: an idea whose time has come? Account Res 16: 218–228.

36. Singapore Statement on Research Integrity (2010) Available: http://www.singaporestatement.org/. Accessed 2 November 2012.