How Can Journals Respond to Threats of Libel Litigation?

article has not abstract

Vyšlo v časopise: How Can Journals Respond to Threats of Libel Litigation?. PLoS Med 11(3): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001615
Kategorie: Policy Forum
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001615

Souhrn

article has not abstract

Zdroje

1. (2008) WIC Radio Ltd. v. Simpson [2008] 2 Supreme Court Reports 420, 2008 Supreme Court of Canada 40, at para. 15.

2. (1995) Report of the Conference to Promote International Cooperation among Medical Journal Editors; 13–17 March 1995; The Rockefeller Foundation Bellagio Study and Conference Center, Bellagio, Italy, Background. Available: http://www.wame.org/the-bellagio-report/report-of-the-bellagio-conference-background/. Accessed 12 May 2013.

3. WoganT (2010) A chilling effect? Science 328: 1348–1351.

4. FrizelleFA (2005) Lawyers and letters (editorial) N.Z.J.M. 118: 1.

5. PoythressN, PetrilaJP (2010) PCL-R psychopathy: threats to sue, peer review, and implications for science and law. A commentary. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health 9: 3–10.

6. GutermanL (2004) Peer reviewers are subpoenaed in cancer lawsuit against chemical companies. Chronicle of Higher Education 51: 13.

7. Committee on Publication Ethics (2011) Code of Conduct and Best Practices Guidelines for Journal Editors. Available: http://publicationethics.org/files/Code%20of%20conduct%20for%20journal%20editors_0.pdf. Accessed 15 January 2014.

8. (2011) Perfect 10, Inc. v Google, Inc., No. 10-56316 (9th Cir Aug. 3, 2011), at p. 4. (describing chillingeffects.org as “a nonprofit, educational project run jointly by the Electronic Frontier Foundation and various law schools, which posts such notices on the Internet.”)

9. ChillingEffects.org, search for “topic area” = “Defamation.” Available: http://www.chillingeffects.org/search/cgi. Accessed 9 May 2013.

10. (2010) Perfect 10, Inc. v Google, Inc. Brief of Amici Curiae Chilling Effects Clearinghouse Leaders in Support of Appellee, No. 04-9484 (C.D. Cal. Dec. 21, 2010). Available: https://www.eff.org/sites/default/files/filenode/Perfect10_v_Google/P10_Chilling_Effects_Amicus%20Brief.pdf. Accessed 15 November 2012.

11. (2006) Angle v. LaPierre, 2006 ABQB 198 (14 March 2006), overruled in part by Angle v. LaPierre, 2006 ABQB 380 (29 May 2006) (modifying judgment as to costs and pre-judgment interest but not to liability), appeal dismissed, Angle v. LaPierre, 2008 ABCA 120 (28 March 2008).

12. NicholsonMA (2000) McLibel: a case study in English defamation law. Wisconsin International Law Journal 18: 1–144

13. (2007) Citizen Media Law Project, Copyright Misuse and Cease-and-Desist Letters. Available: http://www.citmedialaw.org/copyright-misuse-and-cease-and-desist-letters. Accessed 15 January 2014.

14. Chilling Effects. Frequently Asked Questions About Chilling Effects. Available: http://www.chillingeffects.org/faq.cgi. Accessed 9 May 2013.

15. CresseyD (2013) England's libel laws reformed in a victory for science campaigners. Nature doi:10.1038/nature.2013.12874