Observational Studies: Getting Clear about Transparency

article has not abstract

Vyšlo v časopise: Observational Studies: Getting Clear about Transparency. PLoS Med 11(8): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001711
Kategorie: Editorial
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001711

Souhrn

article has not abstract

Zdroje

1. Equator Network (2014) CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Available: http://www.equator-network.org/reporting-guidelines/consort/. Accessed 17 July 2014.

2. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2014) Clinical Trial Registration. Available: http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/publishing-and-editorial-issues/clinical-trial-registration.html. Accessed 17 July 2014.

3. ClinicalTrials.gov (2014) FDAAA 801 Requirements. Available: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/manage-recs/fdaaa. Accessed 17 July 2014.

4. Virginia Barbour (2013) Full registration and reporting of all trials at PLOS Medicine. Available: http://blogs.plos.org/speakingofmedicine/2013/08/13/full-registration-and-reporting-of-all-trials-at-plos-medicine/. Accessed 17 July 2014.

5. PRISMA. Available: http://www.prisma-statement.org. Accessed 17 July 2014.

6. The PLOS Medicine Editors (2007) Many Reviews Are Systematic but Some Are More Transparent and Completely Reported than Others. PLoS Med 4(3): e147 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040147

7. PeatG, RileyRD, CroftP, MorleyKI, KyzasPA, et al. (2014) Improving the Transparency of Prognosis Research: The Role of Reporting, Data Sharing, Registration, and Protocols. PLoS Med 11(7): e1001671 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001671

8. von ElmE, AltmanDG, EggerM, PocockSJ, GøtzschePC, et al. (2007) The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies. PLoS Med 4(10): e296 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040296

9. VandenbrouckeJP, von ElmE, AltmanDG, GøtzschePC, MulrowCD, et al. (2007) Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration. PLoS Med 4(10): e297 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040297

10. STROBE (2007) STROBE checklists, Version 4 as published in Oct/Nov 2007. Available: http://www.strobe-statement.org/index.php?id=available-checklists. Accessed 3 June 2014.

11. Equator Network (2014) Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. Available: http://www.equator-network.org/reporting-guidelines/stard/. Accessed 17 July 2014.

12. PLOS Medicine (2014) Sharing of Data, Materials, and Software. Available: http://www.plosmedicine.org/static/policies#sharing. Accessed 17 July 2014.

13. SoxHC, HelfandM, GrimshawJ, DickersinK (2010) the PLOS Medicine Editors, (2010) et al. Comparative Effectiveness Research: Challenges for Medical Journals. PLoS Med 7(4): e1000269 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000269

14. The Lancet (2010) Should protocols for observational research be registered? Lancet 375: 348.

15. LoderE, GrovesT, MacAuleyD (2010) Registration of observational studies. BMJ 340: c950.

16. WilliamsRJ, TseT, HarlanWR, ZarinDA (2010) Registration of observational studies: Is it time? CMAJ 182: 15.

17. DwanK, AltmanDG, ClarkeM, GambleC, HigginsJPT, et al. (2014) Evidence for the Selective Reporting of Analyses and Discrepancies in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of Cohort Studies of Clinical Trials. PLoS Med 11(6): e1001666 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001666