Why Are Some Population Interventions for Diet and Obesity More Equitable and Effective Than Others? The Role of Individual Agency

English version České info

Jean Adams and colleagues argue that population interventions that require individuals to use a low level of agency to benefit are likely to be most effective and most equitable.

Vyšlo v časopise: Why Are Some Population Interventions for Diet and Obesity More Equitable and Effective Than Others? The Role of Individual Agency. PLoS Med 13(4): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001990
Kategorie: Essay
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001990

Souhrn

Jean Adams and colleagues argue that population interventions that require individuals to use a low level of agency to benefit are likely to be most effective and most equitable.

Zdroje

1. Ng M, Fleming T, Robinson M, Thomson B, Graetz N, Margono C, et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. The Lancet. 2014;384(9945):766–81. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60460-8

2. Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, Danaei G, Shibuya K, Adair-Rohani H, et al. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2224–60. Epub 2012/12/19. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61766-8 23245609; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc4156511.

3. Darmon N, Drewnowski A. Does social class predict diet quality? Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;87(5):1107–17. Epub 2008/05/13. 18469226.

4. Jones-Smith JC, Gordon-Larsen P, Siddiqi A, Popkin BM. Is the burden of overweight shifting to the poor across the globe? Time trends among women in 39 low- and middle-income countries (1991–2008). Int J Obes (Lond). 2012;36(8):1114–20. Epub 2011/09/14. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2011.179 21912397; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc3516372.

5. Rose G. The strategy of preventive medicine. Guildford: Oxford University Press; 1992.

6. Tsai AC. A typology of structural approaches to HIV prevention. Social science & medicine (1982). 2012;75(9):1562–71. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.06.033 PMC3443954.

7. Capewell S, Graham H. Will Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Widen Health Inequalities? PLoS Med. 2010;7(8):e1000320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000320 20811492

8. McLaren L, McIntyre L, Kirkpatrick S. Rose's population strategy of prevention need not increase social inequalities in health. Int J Epidemiol. 2010;39(2):372–7. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyp315 19887510

9. He FJ, Pombo-Rodrigues S, MacGregor GA. Salt reduction in England from 2003 to 2011: its relationship to blood pressure, stroke and ischaemic heart disease mortality. BMJ Open. 2014;4(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004549

10. Hollands GJ, Shemilt I, Marteau TM, Jebb SA, Kelly MP, Nakamura R, et al. Altering micro-environments to change population health behaviour: towards an evidence base for choice architecture interventions. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:1218. Epub 2013/12/24. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1218 24359583; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc3881502.

11. Frieden TR. A Framework for Public Health Action: The Health Impact Pyramid. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(4):590–5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.2009.185652 20167880

12. Cappuccio FP, Capewell S, Lincoln P, McPherson K. Policy options to reduce population salt intake. BMJ. 2011;343:d4995. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d4995 21835876

13. Beauchamp A, Backholer K, Magliano D, Peeters A. The effect of obesity prevention interventions according to socioeconomic position: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2014;15(7):541–54. doi: 10.1111/obr.12161 24629126

14. Lorenc T, Petticrew M, Welch V, Tugwell P. What types of interventions generate inequalities? Evidence from systematic reviews. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012;67(2):190–3. doi: 10.1136/jech-2012-201257 22875078

15. Sumar N, McLaren L. Impact on social inequalities of population strategies of prevention for folate intake in women of childbearing age. Am J Public Health. 2011;101(7):1218–24. Epub 2011/05/14. doi: 10.2105/ajph.2010.300018 21566037; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc3110217.

16. White M, Adams J, Heywood P. How and why do interventions that increase health overall widen inequalities within populations? In: Babones S, editor. Social inequality and public health. Bristol: Policy Press; 2009. p. 65–82.

17. Gazmararian JA, Baker DW, Williams MV, Parker RM, Scott TL, Green DC, et al. Health literacy among medicare enrollees in a managed care organization. J Am Med Assoc. 1999;281(6):545–51. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.6.545

18. Campbell S, James EL, Stacey FG, Bowman J, Chapman K, Kelly B. A mixed-method examination of food marketing directed towards children in Australian supermarkets. Health Promot Int. 2014;29(2):267–77. Epub 2012/11/17. doi: 10.1093/heapro/das060 23154998.

19. Monsivais P, Aggarwal A, Drewnowski A. Are socioeconomic disparities in diet quality explained by diet cost? J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012;66(6):530–5. doi: 10.1136/jech.2010.122333 PMC3951975.

20. Jabs J, Devine CM. Time scarcity and food choices: an overview. Appetite. 2006;47(2):196–204. Epub 2006/05/16. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2006.02.014 16698116.

21. Backholer K, Beauchamp A, Ball K, Turrell G, Martin J, Woods J, et al. A framework for evaluating the impact of obesity prevention strategies on socioeconomic inequalities in weight. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(10):e43–50. Epub 2014/08/15. doi: 10.2105/ajph.2014.302066 25121810.

22. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Public health: ethical issues. Cambridge, UK: Nuffield Council on Bioethics, 2007.

23. National Obesity Observatory. Knowledge and attitudes towards healthy eating and physical activity: what the data tell us. London: National Obesity Observatory, 2011.

24. Diepeveen S, Ling T, Suhrcke M, Roland M, Marteau T. Public acceptability of government intervention to change health-related behaviours: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:756. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-756 23947336

25. Platt S, Amos A, Godfrey C, Martin C, Ritchie D, White M, et al. Evaluation of Smokefree England: a longitudinal, qualitative study London: Public Health Research Consortium, 2009.

26. Moise N, Cifuentes E, Orozco E, Willett W. Limiting the consumption of sugar sweetened beverages in Mexico's obesogenic environment: A qualitative policy review and stakeholder analysis. J Public Health Policy. 2011;32(4):458–75. doi: 10.2307/41342698 21654826

27. Gollust SE, Barry CL, Niederdeppe J. Americans' opinions about policies to reduce consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages. Prev Med. 2014;63:52–7. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.03.002 24631499

28. Blankenship KM, Friedman SR, Dworkin S, Mantell JE. Structural Interventions: Concepts, Challenges and Opportunities for Research. J Urban Health. 2006;83(1):59–72. doi: 10.1007/s11524-005-9007-4 16736355