Validation of the sensitivity of the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) Head computed tomographic (CT) decision instrument for selective imaging of blunt head injury patients: An observational study

English version České info

In an observational study of over 11,000 blunt trauma head injury patients, William Mower and colleagues validate a decision instrument to identify patients who require computed tomographic imaging.

Vyšlo v časopise: Validation of the sensitivity of the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) Head computed tomographic (CT) decision instrument for selective imaging of blunt head injury patients: An observational study. PLoS Med 14(7): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002313
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002313

Souhrn

In an observational study of over 11,000 blunt trauma head injury patients, William Mower and colleagues validate a decision instrument to identify patients who require computed tomographic imaging.

Zdroje

1. Korley FK, Kelen GD, Jones CM, Diaz-Arrastia R. Emergency department evaluation of traumatic brain injury in the United States, 2009–2010. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2016;31:379–87. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000187 26360006

2. Brenner DJ. Slowing the increase in the population dose resulting from CT scans. Radiat Res. 2010;174:809–15. doi: 10.1667/RR1859.1 20731591

3. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2277–84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra072149 18046031

4. Shetty VS, Reis MN, Aulino JM, et al. ACR Appropriateness criteria head trauma. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016;13:668–79. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.02.023 27262056

5. Gaw CE, Zonfrillo MR. Emergency department visits for head trauma in the United States. BMC Emerg Med. 2016;16:5. doi: 10.1186/s12873-016-0071-8 26781953

6. Hussein W, Mullins PM, Alghamdi K, Sarani B, Pines JM. Trends in advanced computed tomography use for injured patients in United States emergency departments: 2007–2010. Acad Emerg Med. 2015;22:663–9. doi: 10.1111/acem.12684 25996245

7. Marin JR, Weaver MD, Yealy DM, Mannix RC. Trends in visits for traumatic brain injury to emergency departments in the United States. JAMA. 2014;311:1917–9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.3979 24825648

8. Mower WR, Hoffman JR, Herbert M, et al. Developing a decision instrument to guide computed tomographic imaging of blunt head injury patients. J Trauma. 2005;59:954–9. 16374287

9. Choosing wisely: an initiative of the ABIM foundation. American Board of Internal Medicine. http://www.choosingwisely.org/clinician-lists/american-college-emergency-physicians-ct-scans-of-head-for-emergency-department-patients-with-minor-head-injury/. Accessed February 10, 2017.

10. Sierink JC, Treskes K, Edwards MJ, et al. Immediate total-body CT scanning versus conventional imaging and selective CT scanning in patients with severe trauma (REACT-2): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;388:673–83. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30932-1 27371185

11. Haydel MJ, Preston CA, Mills TJ, Luber S, Blaudeau E, DeBlieux PM. Indications for computed tomography in patients with minor head injury. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:100–5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200007133430204 10891517

12. Kuppermann N, Holmes JF, Dayan PS, et al. Identification of children at very low risk of clinically-important brain injuries after head trauma: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2009;374:1160–70. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61558-0 19758692

13. Prowse SJ, Sloan J. NICE guidelines for the investigation of head injuries—an anticoagulant loop hole? Emerg Med J. 2010;27:277–8. doi: 10.1136/emj.2008.070649 20385678

14. Stiell IG, Wells GA, Vandemheen K, et al. The Canadian CT Head Rule for patients with minor head injury. Lancet. 2001;357:1391–6. 11356436

15. Melnick ER, Keegan J, Taylor RA. Redefining overuse to include costs: a decision analysis for computed tomography in minor head injury. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2015;41:313–22. 26108124

16. Stiell IG, Clement CM, Grimshaw JM, et al. A prospective cluster-randomized trial to implement the Canadian CT Head Rule in emergency departments. CMAJ. 2010;182:1527–32. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.091974 20732978

17. Stiell IG, Clement CM, Rowe BH, et al. Comparison of the Canadian CT Head Rule and the New Orleans Criteria in patients with minor head injury. JAMA. 2005;294:1511–8. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.12.1511 16189364

18. Smits M, Dippel DW, de Haan GG, et al. External validation of the Canadian CT Head Rule and the New Orleans Criteria for CT scanning in patients with minor head injury. JAMA. 2005;294:1519–25. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.12.1519 16189365

19. Mower WR, Hoffman JR, Herbert M, Wolfson AB, Pollack CV Jr, Zucker MI; NEXUS II Investigators. National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study. Developing a clinical decision instrument to rule out intracranial injuries in patients with minor head trauma: methodology of the NEXUS II investigation. Ann Emerge Med. 2002;40:505–14.

20. National Research Council. Committee on the biological effects of ionizing radiation (BIER V). Health Effects of Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation. National Academy Press. Washington, DC. 1990.

21. Fleiss JL, Levin B, Paik MC. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 3rd ed. John Wiley and Sons. Hoboken, NJ. 2003.

22. Biberthaler P, Linsenmeier U, Pfeifer KJ, Kroetz M, Mussack T, Kanz KG, et al. Serum S-100B concentration provides additional information for the indication of computed tomography in patients after minor head injury: a prospective multicenter study. Shock. 2006;25:446–53. doi: 10.1097/01.shk.0000209534.61058.35 16680008

23. Zongo D, Ribereau-Gayon R, Masson F, Laborey M, Contrand B, Salmi LR, et al. S100-B protein as a screening tool for the early assessment of minor head injury. Ann Emerg Med. 2012;59:209–18. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.07.027 21944878

24. Ro YS, Shin SD, Holmes JF, et al. Comparison of clinical performance of cranial computed tomography rules in patients with minor head injury: a multicenter prospective study. Acad Emerg Med. 2011;18:597–604. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01094.x 21676057