Residual vascular risk and the possibilities of therapy.

Česká verzia

Authors: V. Bláha
Published in the journal: Kardiol Rev Int Med 2012, 14(3): 161-171
Category:

Summary

Residual cardiovascular risk can be defined as the residual risk of incident vascular events or progression of established vascular damage persisting in patients treated with current evidence-based recommended care including the risk that established from risk factors, such as dyslipidemia, characterized by low HDL-cholesterol, elevated triglycerides and apolipoprotein B, small dense LDL and sometimes also high lipoprotein(a), high blood pressure, and the risk related to emerging or newer risk factors. High residual risk is common in patients with metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes mellitus, insulinoresistance and abdominal obesity. Current evidence supports a causal association between elevated triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and their remnants, low HDL-C, and cardiovascular risk. This interpretation is based on mechanistic and genetic studies for triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and remnants, together with the epidemiological data suggestive of the association for circulating triglycerides and cardiovascular disease. For HDL, epidemiological, mechanistic, and clinical intervention data are consistent with the view that low HDL-C contributes to elevated cardiovascular risk; genetic evidence is unclear however, potentially reflecting the complexity of HDL metabolism. The concept clearly derives from intervention trials, mainly the statin trials, and there is a lot of debate about the residual risk conferred by other lipid components, in particular low levels of HDL cholesterol and high levels of triglycerides. A meta-analysis of 53 fibrates (16,802 subjects) and 30 niacin trials (4,749 subjects) revealed an average HDL-C increase of 10% with fibrates and 16% with niacin, a triglyceride decrease of 36% with fibrates and 20% with niacin, and a LDL-C decrease of 8% with fibrates and 14% with niacin. These lipid changes resulted in similar overall reductions in major coronary events evidenced by a 25% decrease with fibrates and 27% with niacin. The experts believe that therapeutic targeting of elevated triglycerides (≥ 1.7 mmol/L), a marker of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and their remnants, and/or low HDL-C (< 1.0 mmol/L) may provide further benefit. The first step should be lifestyle interventions together with consideration of compliance with pharmacotherapy and secondary causes of dyslipidaemia. If inadequately corrected, adding niacin or a fibrate, or intensifying LDL-C lowering therapy may be considered. Treatment decisions regarding statin combination therapy should take into account relevant safety concerns, i.e. the risk of elevation of blood glucose, uric acid or liver enzymes with niacin, and myopathy, increased serum creatinine and cholelithiasis with fibrates. These recommendations will facilitate reduction in the substantial cardiovascular risk that persists in patients with cardiometabolic abnormalities at LDL-C goal.

Keywords:
residual cardiovascular risk – metabolic syndrom – diabetes mellitus type 2 – aterogenic dyslipidaemia – statin – fibrate – niacin

Zdroje

1. Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Merz CN et al. Coordinating Committee of the National Cholesterol Education Program. Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III Guidelines. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2004; 24: e149–e161.

2. Deedwania P, Barter P, Carmena R et al. Treating to New Targets Investigators. Reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients with coronary heart disease and metabolic syndrome: analysis of the Treating to New Targets study. Lancet 2006; 368: 919–928.

3. Soška V. Reziduální riziko kardiovaskulárních komplikací a jeho snížení kombinací hypolipidemiky. Vnitř Lék 2011; 57: 313–316.

4. Chapman MJ, Ginsberg HN, Amarenco P et al. Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease: evidence and guidance for management. Eu Heart J 2011; 32: 1345–1361.

5. Miller M, Cannon CP, Murphy SA et al. Impact of triglyceride levels beyond low-density lipoproteid cholesterol after acute coronary syndrome in the PROVE IT--TIMI 22 trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 51: 724–730.

6. Barter P, Gotto AM, LaRosa JC et al. Treating to New Targets Investigators. HDL cholesterol, very low levels of LDL cholesterol, and cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 1301–1310.

7. Turner RC, Millns H, Neil HA et al. Risk factors for coronary artery disease in non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus: United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS: 23). BMJ 1998; 316: 823–828.

8. Hermans MP, Fruchart JC. Reducing Residual Vascular Risk in Patients with Atherogenic Dyslipidemia: Where do we go from here? Clin Lipidology 2010; 5: 811–826.

9. Rye KA, Bursill CA, Lambert G et al. The metabolism and antiatherogenic properties of HDL. J Lipid Res 2009; 50 (Suppl): S195–S200.

10. Austin MA. Plasma triglyceride and coronary heart disease. Arterioscler Tromb 1991; 11: 2–14.

11. Gordon DJ, Probstfield JL, Garrison RJ et al. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol and cardiovascular disease. Four prospective American studies. Circulation 1989; 79: 8–15.

12. Di Angelantonio E, Sarwar N, Perry P et al. Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration. Major lipids, apolipoproteins, and risk of vascular disease. JAMA 2009; 302: 1993–2000.

13. Nordestgaard BG, Benn M, Schnohr P et al. Non--fasting triglycerides and risk of myocardial infarction, ischemic heart disease, and death in men and women. JAMA 2007; 298: 299–308.

14. Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Surfoval Study (4S). Lancet 1994; 344: 1383–1389.

15. Prevention of cardiovascular events and death with pravastatin in patients with coronary heart disease and a broad range of initial cholesterol levels. The Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease (LIPID) Study Group. N Engl J Med 1998; 339: 1349–1357.

16. Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group. MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20,536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2002; 360: 7–22.

17. Downs JR, Clearfield M, Weis S et al. Primary prevention of acute coronary events with lovastatin in men and women with average cholesterol levels: results of AFCAPS/TexCAPS. Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study. JAMA 1998; 279: 1615–1622.

18. Sacks FM, Pfeffer MA, Moye LA et al. The effect of pravastatin on coronary events after myocardial infarction in patients with average cholesterol levels. Cholesterol and Recurrent Events Trial investigators. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 1001–1009.

19. Shepherd J, Cobbe SM, Ford I et al. Prevention of coronary heart disease with pravastatin in men with hypercholesterolemia. West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Group. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 1301–1307.

20. Gordon T, Castelli WP, Hjortland MC et al. High--density lipoprotein as a protective factor against coronary heart disease. The Framingham Study. Am J Med 1977; 62: 707–714.

21. Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA 2001; 285: 2486–2497.

22. Jafri H, Alsheikh-Ali AA, Karas RH. Meta-analysis: statin therapy does not alter the association between low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and increased cardiovascular risk. Ann Intern Med 2010; 153: 800–808.

23. Ridker PM, Genest J, Boekholdt SM et al. HDL cholesterol and residual risk of first cardiovascular events after treatment with potent statin therapy: an analysis from the JUPITER trial. Lancet 2010; 376: 333–339.

24. Bruckert E, Labreuche J, Amarenco P. Meta-analysis of the effect of nicotinic acid alone or in combination on cardiovascular events and atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis 2010; 210: 353–361.

25. Khera AV, Cuchel M, de la Llera-Moya M et al. Cholesterol efflux capacity, high-density lipoprotein function, and atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med 2011; 364: 127–135.

26. Sarwar N, Danesh J, Eiriksdottir G et al. Triglycerides and the risk of coronary heart disease: 10,158 incident cases aminy 262,525 participants in 29 Western prospective studies. Circulation 2007; 115: 450–458.

27. Keech A, Simes RJ, Barter P et al. Effects of long--term fenofibrate therapy on cardiovascular events in 9,795 people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (the FIELD study): randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 366: 1849–1861.

28. Ginsberg HN, Elam MB, Lovato LC et al. ACCORD Study Group. Effects of combination lipid therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 1563–1574.

29. Liu J, Sempos CT, Donahue RP et al. Non--high-density lipoprotein and very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and their risk predictive values in coronary heart disease. Am J Cardiol 2006; 98: 1363–1368.

30. Lee M, Saver JL, Towfighi A et al. Efficacy of fibrates for cardiovascular risk reduction in persons with atherogenic dyslipidemia: a meta-analysis. Atherosclerosis 2011; 217: 492–498.

31. Kearney PM, Blackwell L, Collins R et al. Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaborators. Efficacy of cholesterol-lowering therapy in 18,686 people with diabetes in 14 randomised trials of statins: a meta-analysis. Lancet 2008; 371: 117–125.

32. Ridker PM, Danielson E, Fonseca FA et al. Reduction in C-reactive protein and LDL cholesterol and cardiovascular event rates after initiation of rosuvastatin: a prospective study of the JUPITER trial. Lancet 2009; 373: 1175–1182.

33. Ridker PM. Testing the inflammatory hypothesis of atherothrombosis: scientific rationale for the cardiovascular inflammation reduction trial (CIRT). J Thromb Haemost 2009; 7 (Suppl 1): 332–339.