The conditions for the „Smoke-free homes“ program: preliminary results
Authors:
J. Fialová; J. Stávková; D. Hrubá
Authors place of work:
Ústav ochrany a podpory zdraví LF MU, Brno
přednostka prof. MUDr. Z. Derflerová Brázdová, DrSc.
Published in the journal:
Čes-slov Pediat 2016; 71 (4): 187-195.
Category:
Original Papers
Summary
Nowadays, many countries worldwide have accepted laws to ban smoking in enclosed public places and workplaces, to protect no-smokes from the risk of passive smoking. These restrictions cannot protect children, the most vulnerable population, from their exposure at homes and private motor vehicles. The health risk for children is not only inhalation of the secondhand smoke, but also contacts with persisting thirdhand smoke and risks of domestic accidents (fires, burns, poisoning). Close relatives are also models to be imitated. The widespread movements invited smokers voluntary create smoke free homes and smoke-free cars were impulses to seek conditions for such approach in our society.
Methods:
The managers of two primary schools and one kindergarten were interested for the project Smoke-Free homes realization. Two informative brochures, leaflets for parents and stories for children, sticks for the determination of smoke-free rules were prepared as well as the oral presentation for parents. The anonymous questionnaire about children knowledge, attitudes and exposure to relatives´ smoking were filled in face-to-face discussion with trained medical students. Another questionnaire for parent included some similar questions.
Results:
Together 128 children aged 5–8 years (34 from kindergarten and 94 from the 2nd class of primary schools), and their parents were invited for the participation. Half of all children had smokers in their close relatives. Although the majority of children declared that smoking is not allowed in their homes, 25% of children are directly exposed to their relatives smoking. More than 95% of children do not like smoking, mainly due to the bad smell and irritation. They have appropriate knowledge about health risks of active and passive smoking. While almost 83% of children declare, they will not smoke in future, 17% are thinking about it; more of them live in smoking families.
The responsive rate from parents was 60%; they were good educated (high schools/university). Almost 30% of them were smokers and 20% had smoking partners. Majority (82%) of parents claimed the rules for smoke-free environment at homes, including also smoking visitors. Despite of the good education, 20% did not admit the contribution of smoking to cancers (other than of lung), and 30% of parents do not understand the role of the bad model of smokers for their children. Nevertheless, they refused the discussion about these topics.
Conclusion:
The Czech society is not fully prepared to accept comprehensive approach to protect children against their exposure to passive smoking. It is necessary to state this topic as a politic priority.
Key words:
passive smoking, children, smoke-free homes
Zdroje
1. US Department of Health and Human Services. The health consequences of involuntary exposure to tobacco smoke: a report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta (GA): US DHHS, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Coordinating Center for Health Promotion, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, 2006; dostupné na http://www.Surgeongeneral.gov/library/secondhandsmoke/report/index.html. Accessed October 2011.
2. The Tobacco Atlas. 3rd ed. American Cancer Society, 2009.
3. Hrubá D, Žaloudíková I. What limits the effectiveness of school based anti-smoking programmes? CEJPH 2012; 20 (1): 18–23.
4. Mikaeloff Y, Caridade G, Tardieu M, Suissa S. Parental smoking at home and the risk of childhood-onset multiple sclerosis in children. Brain 2007; 130: 2589–2595.
5. Siegrist J, Marmot M. Health inequalities and the psychosocial environment – two scientifiy challenges. Soc Sci Med 2004 Apr; 58 (8): 1463–1473.
6. Hrubá D, Žaloudíková I, Matějová H. Jak chránit děti před expozicí pasivnímu kouření v jejich domovech? Hygiena 2010; 55 (3): 86–91.
7. Leonardi-Bee J, Jere MS, Britton J. Exposure to paternal and sibling smoking and the risk of smoking uptake in childhood and adolescence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Thorax 2011; 66: 847–855.
8. Emerson E, Hatton C, Robertson J, Baines S. Exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke at home and child with smoking at age 11 among British children with and without intellectual disability. J Intellect Disabil Res 2016 Mar; 60 (3): 274–281.
9. Gilman SE, Rende R, Boergers J, et al. Parental smoking and adolescent smoking initiation: an intergenerational perspective on tobacco control. Pediatrics 2009; 123: e274–e28110.
10. Escario JJ, Wilkinson AV. The intergenerational transmission of smoking across three cohabitant generations: A count data approach. J Comm Health 2015; 140: 912–919.
11. Vanderwater EA, Park SE, Corey FR, Wilkinson AV. Intergenerational transfer of smoking across three generations and forty-five years. Nicotine Tob Res 2014; 16: 11–17.
12. El-Amin SET, Kinnunen JM, Ollila H, et al. Transmission of smoking across three generations in Finland. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2015; doi: 10.3390/ijerph120x0000x.
13. Rainio SU, Rimpelä AH. Home smoking bans in Finland and the association with child smoking. Eur J Public Health 2008; 18 (3): 306–311
14. Hrubá D, Žaloudíková I, Matějová H. Similarities and differences between smoking and non-smoking ten-years-old children in primary schools. CEJPH 2010 March; 18 (1): 19–24.
15. Geckova A, van Dijk JP, van Ittersum-Gritter T, et al. Determinants of adolescents´ smoking behaviour: a literature review. CEJPH 2002 Sept; 10 (3): 79–87.
16. Csémy L, Krch FD, Provazníková H, a kol. Životní styl a zdraví českých školáků. Praha: Psychiatrické centrum, 2005.
17. Hrubá D, Žaloudíková, I. Where do our children learn to smoke? CEJPH 2008 Dec; 16 (4): 178-181.
18. Žaloudíková I, Hrubá D. Prevence kouření ve škole. In: Králíková E, a kol. Závislost na tabáku, epidemiologie, prevence a léčba. Adamira, 2013: 155–162.
19. Hrubá D, Šikolová V, Peřina A. Expozice dětí v zakouřeném prostředí je ještě nebezpečnější, než jsme předpokládali. Čes-slov Pediat 2014; 69 (4): 250–257.
20. Northrup TF, Amir MK, Peytan J III, et al. Thirdhand smoke contamination in hospital settings: assising exposure risk for vulnerable paediatric patients. Tob Control 2015, Dec 7; dostupné na http://tobaccocontrol.bmh.com/.
21. Matt GE, Quintana PJ, Hovell MF, et al. Household contaminated by environmental tobacco smoke: sources of infant exposures. Tob Control 2004 Mar; 13 (1): 29–37.
22. Ritchie D, Amos A, Phillips R, et al. Action to archive smoke-free homes – an exploration of experts´ views. BMC Public Health 2009 Apr 9; doi:10.1186/147-2458-9-112.
23. Myers JMB, Hershey GKK, Deka R, et al. Asking the right questions to ascertain early childhood secondhand smoke exposures. J Pediatrics 2012; www.jpeds.com.
24. Dostál M, Milcová A, Binková B, et al. Environmental tobcco smoke exposure in children in two districts of the Czech Republic. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2008 Jul; 211 (3–4): 318–325.
25. Zhang X, Martinez-Donate A, Rhoad N. Parental practices and attitudes related to smoke-free rules in homes, cars, and outdoor play-grounds in US households with underage children and smokers. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Preventing Chronic Disease 2015 June; www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2015/14_0553.htm.
26. King BA, Patel R, Babb SD, et al. National and state prevalence od smoke-free rules in homes with and withouth children and smokers: Two decades of progress. Prev Med 2016; 82: 51–58.
27. Ulbricht S, Groß S, Meyer Ch, et al. Reducing tobacco smoke exposure in children aged below 4 years – a randomized controlled trial. Prev Med 2014; 69: 208–213
28. Jarvis MJ, Mindell J, Gilmore A, et al. Smoke-free homes in England: prevalence, trends and validation by cotinine in children. Tob Control 2009 Dec; 18 (6): 343–345.
29. Rosen LJ, Myers V, Winickoff JP, Kott J. Effectiveness of intervention to reduce tobacco smoke pollution in homes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2015; 12: 16043–16059.
30. Campbell R, Webster P, Spencer N, et al. Family and carer smoking control programmes for reducing children´s exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; (3): CD001746.
31. Jackson Ch, Hayes KA, Dickinson DM. Engaging parents who quit smoking in Antismoking Socialization of Children: a novel approach to relapse prevention. Nicotine Tob Res 2015 Sept 27; doi:10.1093/ntr.ntv214.
32. Hrubá D, Žaloudíková I. Úloha rodiny pro vývoj vybraných postojů ke kouření a kuřácké chování. Hygiena 2008; (4): 135–140.
33. Hrubá D, Žaloudíková I. Kuřáctví a názory rodičů školních dětí. Hygiena 2007; 52 (4): 105–109.
34. Sendzik T, Fong GT, Travers MJ, Hyland A. An experimental investigation of tobacco smoke pollution in cars. Nicotine Tob Res 2009 Aug; 11: 627–634.
35. Hrubá D, Kachlík P. Program „Kouření a já“ ovlivňuje žáky základních škol již po tři roky. Hygiena 2000; 45 (1): 3–9.
36. Novák P, Miovský M, Vopravil J, a kol. Gender-specific effectiveness of the unplugged preventive intervention in reducing substance use among Czech adolescents. Czech Sociological Review 2013; 49 (6): 903–926.
37. American Academy of Pediatrics: Health for all children. Pediatrics 2015; doi:10.1542/peds.2015-3109.
38. King K, Martynenko M, Bergman MHL, et al. Family composition and children´s exposure to adult smokers in their homes. Pediatrics 2009; 123: e559–e564.
39. Hovell MF, Lessov-Schlaggar ChN, Ding D. Smokefree community policies promote home smoking bans. Unknown mechanisms and opportunities for preventive medicine. Am J Prev Med 2011; doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2011.09.015.
40. Ferrence R, Ashley MJ. Protecting children from passive smoking. The risks are clear and a comprehensive strategy is now needed. BMJ 2000 Aug; 321: 310–311.
41. World Health Organization. WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control: Arricle 8 2006 Aug; http://www.who.in/tobacco/framework/WHO_FCTC_english.pdf.
Štítky
Neonatology Paediatrics General practitioner for children and adolescentsČlánok vyšiel v časopise
Czech-Slovak Pediatrics
2016 Číslo 4
- What Effect Can Be Expected from Limosilactobacillus reuteri in Mucositis and Peri-Implantitis?
- The Importance of Limosilactobacillus reuteri in Administration to Diabetics with Gingivitis
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- How to assess high-sensitive troponin T in newborns?
- Current perspectives on inherited bone marrow syndromes
- Rectal suction biopsy in clinical practice
- Bonding support after child birth