Minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease – benefits, risks and perspectives

Česká verzia

Authors: J. Örhalmi ¹; T. Dušek ¹; Z. Šerclová ²; O. Sotona ¹; O. Ryska ²; O. Malý ¹
Authors place of work: Chirurgická klinika LF UK a FN Hradec Králové ¹; Chirurgické oddělení, NH Hospital a. s., Nemocnice Hořovice ²
Published in the journal: Gastroent Hepatol 2016; 70(1): 57-60
Category: IBD: Review Article
doi: https://doi.org/10.14735/amgh201657

Summary

This review examines the minimally invasive approach for the surgical treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. The advantages, disadvantages, and risks of the minimally invasive approach are evaluated. New minimally invasive approach methods, such as single-port laparoscopy (SILS) and the transanal approach (TAMIS), are reviewed. Based on the results of multicenter studies, the laparoscopic approach is still considered the optimal method for primary ileocecal resection and stoma construction. Also, it provides better short-term results for other indications. The benefits of other minimally invasive techniques have not yet been sufficiently explored.

Key words:
inflammatory bowel disease – Crohn’s disease – ulcerative colitis - laparoscopy – SILS – TAMIS

The authors declare they have no potential conflicts of interest concerning drugs, products, or services used in the study.

The Editorial Board declares that the manuscript met the ICMJE „uniform requirements“ for biomedical papers.

Submitted:
21. 12. 2015

Accepted:
5. 1. 2016

Zdroje

1. Patel SV, Patel SV, Ramagopalan SV et al. Laparoscopic surgery for Crohn’s disease: a meta-analysis of perioperative complications and long term outcomes compared with open surgery. BMC Surg 2013; 13(1): 14. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-13-14.

2. Bernstein CN, Ng SC, Lakatos PL et al. A review of mortality and surgery in ulcerative colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2013; 19(9): 2001––2010. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0b013e318 281f3bb.

3. Van Assche G, Dignass A, Reinisch W et al. The second European evidence-based Consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn’s disease: special situations. J Crohns Colitis 2010; 4(1): 63–101. doi: 10.1016/j.crohns.2009.09.009.

4. Canin-Endres J, Salky B, Gattorno F et al. Laparoscopically assisted intestinal resection in 88 patients with Crohn’s disease. Surg Endosc 1999; 13(6): 595–599.

5. Milsom JW, Lavery IC, Böhm B et al. Laparoscopically assisted ileocolectomy in Crohn’s disease. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1993; 3(2): 77–80.

6. Bauer JJ, Harris MT, Grumbach NM et al. Laparoscopic-assisted intestinal resection for Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum 1995; 38(7): 712–715.

7. Tan JJ, Tjandra JJ. Laparoscopic Surgery for Crohn's Disease: A Meta-Analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 2007; 50(5): 576–585. doi: 10.1007/s10350-006-0855-0.

8. Lee Y, Fleming FJ, Deeb AP et al. A laparoscopic approach reduces short-term complications and length of stay following ileocolic resection in Crohn’s disease: an analysis of outcomes from the NSQIP database. Colorectal Dis 2012; 14(5): 572–577. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02756.x.

9. Bergamaschi R, Pessaux P, Arnaud JP. Comparison of conventional and laparo-scopic ileocolic resection for Crohn’s dis-ease. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46(8): 1129––1133. doi: 10.1097/01.DCR.0000074727.07777.FB.

10. Young-Fadok TM, Long KH, McConnell EJet al. Advantages of laparoscopic resection for ileocolic Crohn’s disease. Surg Endosc 2001; 15(5): 450–454. doi: 10.1007/s004640080078.

11. Šerclová Z, Ryska O, Bortlík M et al. Doporučené postupy chirurgické léčby pacientů s idiopatickými střevními záněty – 2. část: Crohnova nemoc. Gastroent Hepatol 2015; 69(3): 223–238. doi: 10.14735/amgh2015223.

12. Maartense S, Dunker MS, Slors JF et al. Laparoscopic-assisted versus open ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 2006; 243(2): 143–149; discussion 150–153. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000197318.37459.ec.

13. Øresland T, Bemelman WA, Sampietro GM et al. European evidence based consensus on surgery for ulcerative colitis. J Crohns Colitis 2015; 9(1): 4–25. doi: 10.1016/j.crohns.2014.08.012.

14. Casillas S, Delaney CP. Laparoscopic surgery for inflammatory bowel disease. Dig Surg 2005; 22(3): 135–142. doi: 10.1159/000087130.

15. Lefevre JH, Bretagnol F, Ouaïssi M et al. Total laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: prospective series of 82 patients. Surg Endosc 2008; 23(1): 166–173. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0121-8.

16. Chatzizacharias NA, Torrente F, Brennan M et al. Single port laparoscopic subtotal colectomy and ileostomy in an adolescent with ulcerative colitis. J CrohnsColitis 2012; 6(10): 1031–1033. doi: 10.1016/j.crohns.2012.03.011.

17. Messenger DE, Mihailovic D, MacRae HMet al. Subtotal colectomy in severe ulcerative and Crohn’s colitis: what benefit does the laparoscopic approach confer? Dis Colon Rectum 2014; 57(12): 1349–1357. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000238.

18. Huang R, Valerian BT, Lee EC. Laparoscopic approach in patients with recurrent Crohn’s disease. Am Surg 2012; 78(5): 595–599.

19. Hasegawa H, Watanabe M, Nishibori Het al. Laparoscopic surgery for recurrent Crohn’s disease. Br J Surg 2003; 90(8): 970––973. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4136.

20. Chaudhary B, Glancy D, Dixon AR. Laparoscopic surgery for recurrent ileocolic Crohn’s disease is as safe and effective asprimary resection. Colorectal Dis 2011;13(12): 1413–1416. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02511.x.

21. Brouquet A, Bretagnol F, Soprani A et al. A laparoscopic approach to iterative ileocolonic resection for the recurrence of Crohn’s disease. Surg Endosc 2009; 24(4): 879–887. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0682-1.

22. Beyer-Berjot L, Mancini J, Bege T et al. Laparoscopic Approach Is feasible in Crohn’sComplex Enterovisceral Fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 2013; 56(2): 191–197. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31826fedeb.

23. Tavernier M, Lebreton G, Alves A. Laparoscopic surgery for complex Crohn’s disease. J Visc Surg 2013; 150(6): 389–393. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2013.09.004.

24. Hasegawa S, Nomura A, Kawamura J et al. Laparoscopic restorative total proctocolectomy with mucosal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 2007; 50(8): 1152–1156. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-0220-y.

25. Strong S, Steele SR, Boutrous M et al. Clinical Practice Guideline for the Surgical Management of Crohn’s Disease. Dis Colon Rectum 2015; 58(11): 1021–1036. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000450.

26. Vermeire S, Carbonnel F, Coulie PG et al. Management of inflammatory bowel disease in pregnancy. J Crohns Colitis 2012; 6(8): 811–823. doi: 10.1016/j.crohns.2012.04.009.

27. Moftah M, Nazour F, Cunningham M et al. Single port laparoscopic surgery for patients with complex and recurrent Crohn’s disease. J Crohns Colitis 2014; 8(9): 1055–1061. doi: 10.1016/j.crohns.2014.02.003.

28. Van der Woude CJ, Ardizzone S, Bengtson MB et al. The second European evidenced-based consensus on reproduction and pregnancy in inflammatory bowel disease. J Crohns Colitis 2015; 9(2): 107–124. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jju006.

29. Aytac E, Ozuner G, Isik O et al. Surgical management of patients with ulcerative colitis during pregnancy: Maternal and fetal outcomes. J Crohns Colitis 2015; 9(1): 82–85. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jju001.

30. Pandey S, Luther G, Umanskiy K et al. Minimally invasive pouch surgery for ulcerative colitis: is there a benefit in staging? Dis Colon Rectum 2011; 54(3): 306–310. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e31820347b4.

31. Fleming FJ, Francone TD, Kim MJ et al. A laparoscopic approach does reduce short-term complications in patients undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 2011; 54(2): 176–182. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181fb4232.

32. Bartels SA, Vlug MS, Henneman D et al. Less adhesiolysis and hernia repair during completion proctocolectomy after laparoscopic emergency colectomy for ulcerative colitis. Surg Endosc 2012; 26(2): 368–373. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1880-1.

33. Gardenbroek TJ, Verlaan T, Tanis PJ et al. Single-port versus multiport laparoscopic ileocecal resection for Crohn’s disease. J Crohns Colitis 2013; 7(10): e443–e448. doi: 10.1016/j.crohns.2013.02.015.

34. Sangster W, Messaris E, Berg AS et al. Single-site laparoscopic colorectal surgery provides similar clinical outcomes compared with standard laparoscopic surgery: an analysis of 626 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 2015; 58(9): 862–869. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000435.