Significance of radiosurgery for the treatment of meningiomas
Authors:
Aurélia Kollová 2; Roman Liščák 1; Gabriela Šimonová 1; Vilibald Vladyka 1; Dušan Urgošík 1; Tomáš Chytka 1
Authors place of work:
Oddělení stereotaktické a radiační neurochirurgie, Nemocnice Na Homolce, Praha
1; UPJŠ Košice, Univerzita L. Pasteura, Neurochirurgická klinika
2
Published in the journal:
Čas. Lék. čes. 2011; 150: 250-253
Category:
Review Article
Summary
Treatment of intracranial meningiomas in the light of their benignity (90%) should ensure minimal risk of recurrence, avoid new neurological deficit and preserve quality of life. Stereotactic radiosurgery has proved its long-term effectiveness and safety with a low complication rate. It can be applied as a method of choice for meningiomas in locations that are too risky for microsurgical removal, meningiomas that usually do not exceed 3 cm in diameter and in patients, who are not candidates for microsurgery because of associated disease. It is a part of multimodal treatment for recurrence after operative resection or after partial removal of large meningiomas, where radical surgery represents a high risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Indication of radiosurgical treatment of intracranial meningiomas should be considered for each patient individually in order to choose methods or their combination with the lowest risk of complications.
Key words:
meningioma, gamma knife, stereotactic radiosurgery, long term results.
Zdroje
1. DeMonte F, Marmor E, Al-Mefty O. Meningiomas. In: Kaye AH, Laws ER Jr (eds.). Brain tumors. London: Churchill Livingstone 2000; 719–750.
2. Sanson M, Cornu P. Biology of menigiomas. Review article. Acta Neurochir 2000; 142(5): 493–505.
3. Whittle IR, et al. Meningiomas. The Lancet 2004; 363(9420): 1535–1543.
4. Pfisterer WK, et al. Fluorescent in situ hybridization and ex vivo 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopic examinations of meningioma tumor tissue: is it possible to identify a clinically-aggressive subset of benign meningiomas? Neurosurgery 2000; 61(5): 1048–1059.
5. Drevelegas A, et al. Meningeal tumors. In: Drevelegas A (ed) Imaging of brain tumors with histological correlations. Berlin: Springer 2002; 177–214.
6. Couldwell WT, et al. Petroclival meningiomas: surgical experience in 109 cases. J Neurosurg 1996; 84(1): 20–28.
7. Cudlip SA, et al. Posterior fossa meningiomas: Surgical experience in 52 cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1998; 140(10): 1007–1012.
8. Fahlbush R, Schott W. Pterional surgery of meningiomas of the tuberculum sellae and planum sphenoidale: surgical results with special consideration of ophtalmological and endocrinological outcomes. J Neurosurg 2002; 96: 235–243.
9. Hirsch WL, et al. Meningiomas involving the cavernous sinus: Value of imaging for predicting surgical complications. AJR 1993; 160: 1083–1088.
10. De Jesus O, et al. Long-term follow up of patients with meningiomas involving the cavernous sinus: recurrence, progression and quality of life. Neurosurgery 1996; 39: 915–920.
11. Schaller B, et al. Premeatal and retromeatal cerebellopontine angle meningioma. Two distinct clinical entities. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1999; 141: 465–471.
12. Jung HW, et al. Long term outcome and growth rate of subtotally resected petroclival meningiomas. Neurosurgery 2000; 46: 567–574.
13. Kotapka M, et al. Infiltration of the carotid artery by cavernous sinus meningioma. J Neurosurg 1994; 81(2): 252–255.
14. Larson JJ, et al. Evidence of meningiomainfiltration into cranial nerves: clinical implications for cavernous sinus meningiomas. J Neurosurg 1995; 83(4): 596–599.
15. Sindou MM, Alaywan M. Most intracranial meningiomas are not cleavable tumors: Anatomic-surgical evidence and angiographic predictibility. Neurosurgery 1998; 42(3): 476– 480.
16. Jung HW, et al. Long term outcome and growth rate of subtotally resected petroclival meningiomas. Neurosurgery 2000; 46: 567–574.
17. Mathiesen T, et al. Recurrence of cranial base meningiomas. Neurosurgery 1996; 39: 2–9.
18. Yamashita J, et al. Reccurence of intracranial meningiomas, with special reference to radiotherapy. Surg Neurol 1980; 14: 33–40.
19. Simpson D. The recurrence of intracranial meningiomas after surgical treatment. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1957; 20: 22–39.
20. Steiner L, et al. Clinical aspects of gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery. In: Gildenberg P, Tasker R. (eds.) Textbook of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery. New York: McGraw-Hill 1997; 772–774.
21. Goldsmith BJ, et al. Postoperative irradiation for subtotally resected meningiomas. J Neurosurg 1994; 80: 192–201.
22. Lunsford LD. Contemporary management of meningiomas: radiation therapy as an adjuvant and radiosurgery as an alternative to surgical removal? J Neurosurg 1994; 80: 187–190.
23. Yamashita J, et al. Reccurence of intracranial meningiomas, with special reference to radiotherapy. Surg Neurol 1980; 14: 33–40.
24. Mathiesen T, et al. Potential complications following radiotherapy for meningiomas. Surg Neurol 2003; 60: 193–200.
25. Lunsford LD. Contemporary management of meningiomas: radiation therapy as an adjuvant and radiosurgery as an alternative to surgical removal? J Neurosurg 1994; 80: 187–190.
26. Girvigian MR, et al. Comparison of early complicationsfor patients with convexity and parasagittal meningiomas treated with either stereotactic radiosurgery or fractionated radiotherapy. Neurosurgery 2008; 62(5 Suppl): A19–A27.
27. Liščák R, a kol. Radiochirurgie gama nožem. Praha: Grada Publishing 2009.
28. Andrews DW, et al. Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for the treatment of optic nerve sheath meningiomas: preliminary observations of 33 optic nerves in 30 patients with historical comparison to observation with or without prior surgery. Neurosurgery 2002; 51(4): 890–902.
29. Selch MT, et al. Stereotactic radiotherapy for treatment of cavernous sinus meningiomas. Int J Radiation Oncology Biol Phys 2004; 59: 101–111.
30. Shrieve DC, et al. Dose fractionation in stereotactic radiotherapy for parasellar meningiomas: radiobiological considerations of efficiacy and optic nerve tolerance. J Neurosurg (Suppl) 2004; 101: 390–395.
31. Morita A, et al. Risk of injury to cranial nerves after Gamma Knife radiosurgery for skull base meningiomas: experience in 88 patients. J Neurosurg 1999; 90: 42–49.
32. Olivero WC, et al. The natural history and growth rate of asymptomatic meningiomas: a review of 60 patients. J Neurosurg 1995; 83: 222–224.
33. Niiro M, et al. Natural history of elderly patients with asymptomatic meningiomas. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000; 68: 25–28.
34. Van Havenbergh T, et al. Natural history of petroclival meningiomas. Neurosurgery 2003; 52: 55–62.
35. Yoneoka Y, et al. Growth of incidental meningiomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2000; 142: 507–511.
36. Nakamura M, et al. The natural history of incidental meningiomas. Neurosurgery 2003; 53: 62–72.
37. Leksell L. Stereotactic Radiosurgery. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1983: 46: 797–803.
38. Gildenberg PL, Tasker RR. Textbook of stereotactic and functional neurosurgery. New York: McGraw-Hill 1998.
39. Ganz JC, et al. Radiation- nduced edema after gamma knife treatment for meningioma. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1996; 66(Suppl 1): 129–133.
40. Kollová A, et al. Gamma knife surgery for benign meningioma. J Neurosurg 2007; 107: 325–336.
41. Liščák R, et al. Gamma knife radiosurgery of skull base meningiomas. Acta Neurochir 2004; 91(Suppl): 65–74.
42. Liščák R, et al. Gamma knife radiosurgery of meningiomas in the cavernous sinus region. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1999; 141: 473–480.
43. DiBiase SJ, et al. Factors predicting local tumor control after gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery for benign intracranial meningiomas. Int. J. Radiation Oncology Biol Phys 2004; 60(5): 1515–1519.
44. Iwai Y, et al. Gamma knife surgery for skull base meningiomas. The effectiveness of low-dose treatment. Surg Neurol 1999; 52 (1): 40–45.
45. Lee JY, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery providing long term tumor control of cavernous sinus meningiomas. J Neurosurg 2002; 97(1): 65–72.
46. Roche PH, et al. Gamma knife radiosurgical management of petroclival meningiomas result and indications. Acta Neurochir 2003; 145(10): 883–888.
47. Shafron DH, et al. Linac radiosurgery for benign meningiomas. Int J Radiation Oncology Biol Phys 1999; 43 (2): 321–327.
48. Spiegelmann R, et al. Linear accelerator radiosurgery for meningiomas in and around the cavernous sinus. Neurosurgery 2002; 51(6): 1373–1380.
49. Stafford SL, et al. Meningioma radiosurgery: tumor control, outcomes and complications among 190 consecutive patients. Neurosurgery 2001; 49(5): 1029–1037.
50. Subach BR, et al. Management of petroclival meningiomas by stereotactic radiosurgery. Neurosurgery 1998; 42(3): 437–443.
51. Pollock BE. Stereotactic radiosurgery for intracranial meningiomas: indications and results. Neurosurg Focus 2003; 14(5): Article 4.
52. Aichholzer M, et al. Gamma knife radiosurgery of skull base meningiomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2000; 42(6): 647–653.
53. Hakim R, et al. Results of linear accelerator-based radiosurgery for intracranial meningiomas. Neurosurgery 1998; 42(3): 446–454.
54. Selch MT, et al. Stereotactic radiotherapy for treatment of cavernous sinus meningiomas. Int J Radiation Oncology Biol Phys 2004; 59: 101–111.
55. Shrieve DC, et al. Dose fractionation in stereotactic radiotherapy for parasellar meningiomas: radiobiological considerations of efficiacy and optic nerve tolerance. J Neurosurg (Suppl) 2004; 101: 390–395.
56. Patil CG, et al. Predictors of peritumoral edema after stereotactic radiosurgery of supratentorial meningiomas. Neurosurgery 2008; 63 (3): 435–440.
57. Novotný J Jr, et al. Prediction of intracranial edema after radiosurgery of meningiomas. J Neurosurg 2006; 105(Suppl): 120–126.
58. Kondziolka D, et al. Judicious Resection and/or radiosurgery for parasagittal meningiomas: outcomes from a multicenter review. Neurosurgery 1998; 43(3): 405–414.
59. Kim DG, et al. Gamma knife surgery of superficially located meningioma. J Neurosurg 2005; 102(Suppl): 255–258.
60. Kollová A, et al. Dlhodobé výsledky liečby meningeómov Leksellovým gama nožom. Cesk Slov Neurol Neurochir 2010; 73/106(4): 415–421.
Štítky
Addictology Allergology and clinical immunology Angiology Audiology Clinical biochemistry Dermatology & STDs Paediatric gastroenterology Paediatric surgery Paediatric cardiology Paediatric neurology Paediatric ENT Paediatric psychiatry Paediatric rheumatology Diabetology Pharmacy Vascular surgery Pain management Dental HygienistČlánok vyšiel v časopise
Journal of Czech Physicians
- Metamizole at a Glance and in Practice – Effective Non-Opioid Analgesic for All Ages
- Advances in the Treatment of Myasthenia Gravis on the Horizon
- Metamizole vs. Tramadol in Postoperative Analgesia
- Spasmolytic Effect of Metamizole
- What Effect Can Be Expected from Limosilactobacillus reuteri in Mucositis and Peri-Implantitis?
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Early repolarisation syndrome and idiopathic ventricular fibrillation
- Temporal lobe epilepsy in adults and possibilities of neurosurgical treatment: the role of magnetic resonance
- Nonconvulsive status epilepticus
- Measurement of exhaled nitric oxide in the diagnosis of asthma