Stoma Procedures in the Cogenital Digestive Tract Malformations

Česká verzia

Authors: J. Siman; J. Trnka
Authors place of work: Klinika detskej chirurgie v DFNsP v Bratislave, Slovenská republika, prednosta: MUDr. J. Trnka, CSc.
Published in the journal: Rozhl. Chir., 2007, roč. 86, č. 7, s. 347-352.
Category: Monothematic special - Original

Summary

The authors analyze options for intestinal stoma procedures for congenital digestive tract malformations. A primary anastomosis is considered the principal procedure, however, the authors advice against its risky performance. Although a stoma being the ultimate treatment option, indications for stoma procedures should be considered carefully and the procedure should be performed on time, to avoid any potential later pathology development in the anastomosis. The authors compare and critically assess the following principal three types of the stoma procedures:

1. The modified Gross procedure;

2. The Bishop-Koop Roux Y anastomosis;

3. The Santulli-Blanc Roux Y anastomosis.

The authors do not favour any of the above and they stress out that for each individual malformation, its own optimal procedure should be selected and performed.

Key words:
enterostomy in newborns – analysis of the method procedures

Zdroje

1. O‘Neill, jr., J. A., Grosfeld, J. L., Coran, A. G., Caldamore, A. A. Principle of pediatric surgery. 2nd edition. St. Louis: Mosby, 2003.

2. Šnajdauf, J., Škába, R., et al. Dětská chirurgie. Praha: Galén, 2005.

3. Holschneider, A. M., Puri, P. Hirschsprung disease and allied disorders. Amsterdam: Harwood academic publishers, 2000.

4. Lauwers, P., Moens, E., Wustenberghs, K., Deprettere, A., Ruppert, M., Balliu, L., Hubens, G., Vaneerdeweg, W. Association of colonic atresia and Hirschsprung‘s disease in the newborn: report of a new case and review of the literature. Pediatr. Surg. Int., 2006, roč. 22, č. 3, s. 277–281.

5. Pena, A., Migotto-Krieger, M., Lewitt, M. A. Colostomy in anorectal malformations: a procedure with serious but preventable comlications. J. Pediatr. Surg., 2006, roč. 41, č. 4, s.748–756.

6. Nagar, H. Meconium ileus – is a single surgical procedure adequate? Asian J. Surg., 2006, roč. 29, č.3, s. 161–164.

7. Cox, S. G., Numanoglu, A., Millar, A. J., Rode, H. Colonic atresia : spectrum of presentation and pitfalls in management. A review of 14 cases. Pediatr. Surg. Int., 2005, roč. 21, č. 10, s. 813–818.

8. Etensel, B., Temir, G., Karkiner, A., Melek, M., Edirne, Y., Karaca, I., Mir, E. Atresia of the colon. J. Pediatr. Surg., 2005, roč. 40, č. 8, s. 1258–1268.

9. Meier-Ruge, W. A.,Ammann, K., Holschneider, A. M., Scharli, A. F., Schmittenbecher, P. P., Stoss, F. Update results on intestinal neuronal dysplasia (IND B). Eur. J. Pediatr. Surg., 2004, roč. 14, č. 6, s. 384–391.

10. Galvez, Y., Škába, R., Vajtrová, R., Frantlová, M., Herget, J. Evidence of secondary neuronal intestinal dysplasia in a rat model of chronic intestinal obstruction. Journal of Investigative Surgery, 2004, roč. 17, č. s. 31–39.

11. Pohl, V., Terštianská, G., Schniere, M., Kirňák, J. Indikácie kolostómie u novorodencov a dojčiat. Čs. Pediat., 1964, roč. 19. č. 8, s. 700–704.

12. Pekarovič, E. K problémom lokalizacie a techniky kolostomie u detí. Rozhl. Chir., 1980, roč. 60, č. 10, s. 652–657.