Laparoscopic Proctocolectomy with Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis
Authors:
A. Vrzgula; J. Bober; Z. Lukáčová; E. Tóth
Authors place of work:
I. chirurgická klinika LF UPJŠ a FNLP Košice, Slovenská republika, prednosta: prof. MUDr. J. Bober, CSc.
Published in the journal:
Rozhl. Chir., 2008, roč. 87, č. 8, s. 432-437.
Category:
Monothematic special - Original
Summary
Introduction:
Proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (restorative proctocolectomy) became a method of choice in surgical treatment of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and ulcerative colitis (UC) during last years. The improvement of laparoscopic technique in colorectal surgery permit to perform this operation by miniinvasive approach.
Patients and method:
Authors present the informations about two patients (one with FAP and one with UC) in whom they perform the laparoscopic proctocolectomy with ileal pouch – anal anastomosis and protective loop ileostomy.
Results:
Although authors present their first experiences with corresponding operating time(390 and 360 minutes), they noticed hopeful postoperative period with quickly return of bowel movement, early return of oral intake and rapid reconvalescence. They observed one postoperative complication – wound infection. The longer postoperative hospital stay (17 and 19 days) may be related to the consistent management of protective ileostomy and precise postoperative follow-up.
Conclusion:
Restorative proctocolectomy is possible to perform by miniinvasive approach having the adequate experiences with laparoscopic colorectal operations and open procedures for inflammatory bowel diseases. The more procedures experiences allow to consider the benefit of laparoscopic approach for patients.
Key words:
proctocolectomy – ileal pouch-anal anastomosis – laparoscopy – familial adenomatous polyposis – ulcerative colitis
Zdroje
1. Fazio, W. F., O’Riordain, M. G., Lavery, I. C., Church, J. M., Lau, P., Strong, S. A., Hull, T. Long-term functional outcome and quality of life after stapled restorative proctocolectomy. Ann. Surg., 1999, 230, s. 575–586.
2. Parks, A. G., Nicholls, R. J. Proctocolectomy without ileostomy for ulcerative colitis. Br. Med. J., 1978: 2, s. 85–88.
3. Lovegrove, R. E., Constantinides, V. A., Heriot, A. G., Athanasiou, T., Darzi, A., Remzi, F. H., Nicholls, R. J., Fazio, V. W., Tekkis, P. P. A comparision of hand-sewn versus stapled ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) following proctocolectomy. A meta – analysis of 4183 patients. Ann. Surg., 2006, 244, s. 18–26.
4. Maartense, S., Dunker, M. S., Slors, J. F., Cuesta, M. A., Gouma, D. J., J van Deventer, S., A van Bodegraveden, A., Bemelman, W. A. Hand assisted laparoscopic versus open restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis – a randomized trial. Ann. Surg., 2004, 240, s. 984–992.
5. Lovegrove, R. E., Tiolney, H. S., Heriot, A. G., C. von Roon, A., Athanasiou, T., Church, J., Fazio, V. W., Tekkis, P. P. A comparison of adverse events and functional outcomes after restorative proctocolectomy for familial adenomatous polyposis and ulcerative colitis. Dis. Colon Rectum, 2006, 49, s. 1293–1306.
6. Fonkalsrud, E. W. Total colectomy and endorectal ileal pull-through with internal ileal reservoir for ulcerative colitis. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet, 1980, 150 (1), s. 1–8.
7. Nicholls, R. J., Pescatori, M., Motson, R. W., Pezim, M. E. Restorative proctocolectomy with a three-loop ileal reservoir for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Clinical results in 66 patients followed for up to 6 years. Ann. Surg., 1984, 199, s. 383–388.
8. Nicholls, R. J., Lubowski, D. Z. Restorative proctocolectomy: the four loop (W) reservoir. Br. J. Surg., 1987, 74, s. 564–566.
9. Krška, Z., Šváb, J., Pešková, M., Lukáš, M. Idiopatické střevní záněty – profil chirurgicky řešených nemocných. II. Colitis ulcerosa. Miniinvazívna chirurgia a endoskopia, I/2005, s. 25–30.
10. Klementa, I., Zbořil, P., Starý, L., Skalický, P., Vomáčková, K., Neoral, Č. Změna fyziologie anorekta po kolektómii s J-rezervoárem pro ulcerózni kolitídu. Miniinvazívna chirurgia a endoskopia, I/2007, s. 5–8.
11. Landl, E., Landa, L., Marmorale, C., Miconi, G. Proctocolectomy and mechanical ileo-anal anastomosis without mucosectomy. G. Chir., 1991, 12, s. 118–120.
12. Remzi, F. H., Church, J. M., Bast, J., Lavery, I. C., Strong, S. A., Hull, T. L., Harris, G. J., Delaney, C. P., O’Riordain, M. G., McGannon, E. A., Fazio, V. W. Mucosectomy vs. stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis: functional outcome and neoplasia control. Dis. Colon Rectum 2001, 44, s. 1590–1596.
13. Marcello, P. W., Milson, J. W., Wong, S. K., Hammerhofer, K. A., Goormastic, M., Church, J. M., Fazio, V. W. Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy. Case-matched comparative study with open restorative proctocolectomy. Dis. Colon Rectum, 2000, 43, s. 604–608.
14. Schmitt, S. L., Cohen, S. M., Wexner, S. D., Nogueras, J. J., Jagelman, D. G. Does laparoscopic-assisted ileal pouch anal anastomosis reduce the length of hospitalization? Int. J. Colorectal Dis., 1994, 9, s. 134–137.
15. Dunker, M. S., Bemelman, W. A., Slors, J. F., van Duijvendijk, P., Gouma, D. J. Functional outcome, quality of life body image and cosmetics in patients after laparoscopic-assisted and conventional restorative proctocolectomy: a comparative study. Dis. Colon Rectum, 2001, 44, s. 1800–1807.
16. Kienle, P., Z’graggen, K., Schmidt, J., Benner, A., Weltz, J., Buchler, M. W. Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy. Br. J. Surg., 2005, 92, s. 88–93.
17. López-Rosales, F., Gonzáles-Contreras, Q., Muro, L. J., Berber, M. M., Cid de León, H. T., Fernández, O. V., Veana, R. R. Laparoscopic total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis: initial experience in Mexico. Surg. Endosc., 2007, 21, s. 2304–2307.
18. Madden, M. V., Neale, K. F., Nicholls, R. J., Landgrebe, J. C., Chapman, P. D., Bussey, H. J., Thomson, J. P. S. Comparison of morbidity and function after colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis or restorative proctocolectomy for familial adenomatous polyposis. Br. J. Surg., 1991, 78, s. 789–792.
19. van Duijvendijk, P., Stors, J. F. M., Taat, C. W., Oosterveld, P., Vasten, H. F. A. Functional outcome after colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis compared with proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in familial adenomatous polyposis. Ann. Surg., 1999, 230, s. 648–654.
20. Heald, R. J., Allen, D. R. Stapled ileo-anal anastomosis: a technique to avoid mucosal proctectomy in the ileal pouch operation. Br. J. Surg., 1986, 73, s. 571–572.
21. Reilly, W. T., Pemberton, J. H., Wolff, B. G., Nivatvongs, S., Devine, R. M., Litchy, W. J., McIntyre, P. B. Randomized prospective trial comparing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed by excising the anal mucosa to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed by preserving the anal mucosa. Ann. Surg., 1997, 225, s. 666–676.
22. Cohen, J. L., Strong, S. A., et al. Practice parameters for the surgical treatment of ulcerative colitis. Dis. Colon Rectum, 2005, 48, s. 1997–2009.
23. Rotholz, N. A., Aued, M. L., Lencinas, S. M., Zanoni, G., Laporte, M., Bun, M., Boerr, L., Mezzardi, N. A. Laparoscopic-asssisted proctocolectomy using complete intracorporal dissection. Surg. Endosc., 2008, 22, s. 1303–1308.
24. Sardinha, T. C., Wexner, S. Laparoscopy for inflammatory bowel disease: pros and cons. Word J. Surg., 22, s. 371–374.
25. Hasegawa, S., Nomura, A., Kawamura, J., Nagayama, S., Hata, H., Yamaguchi, T., Kuroyanagi, H., Sakai, Y. Laparoscopic restorative total proctocolectomy with mucosal resection. Dis. Colon Rectum, 2007, 50, s. 1152–1153.
26. Vaľko, M., Bober, J., Firment, J., Steranková, M., Vrzgula, A., Uram, V., Stančeáková, M., Jarčuška, P., Novosadová, Z, Baumgartnerová, M. Naše prvé skúsenosti s projektom „ERAS“ v kolorektálnej chirurgii. SK Chir., 2006, roč. 3, č. 6, s. 26–29.
27. Agha, A., Moser, Ch., Iesalnicks, I., Piso, P., Schlitt, H.-J. Combination of hand-assisted and laparoscopic proctocolectomy (HALP): Technical aspects, learning curve and early postoperative results. Surg. Endosc., 2008, 22: s. 1547–1552.
28. Vávra, P., Dostalík, J., Martínek, L., Rydlová, M., Guňková, P., Anděl, P., Richter, V., Guňka, I., Vávrová, M. Přínos laparoskopického přístupu v léčbe familiární adenomatózní polypózy. Slovenský chirurg, III / 2004, s, 17–20.
Štítky
Surgery Orthopaedics Trauma surgeryČlánok vyšiel v časopise
Perspectives in Surgery
2008 Číslo 8
- Spasmolytic Effect of Metamizole
- Metamizole at a Glance and in Practice – Effective Non-Opioid Analgesic for All Ages
- Metamizole in perioperative treatment in children under 14 years – results of a questionnaire survey from practice
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Serious Complications Following Simple Appendectomy
- Reconstruction of Anal Sphincters Following Fecal Incontinence and Assessment of Functional Results
- Laparoscopic Proctocolectomy with Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis
- Clostridium Difficile Colitis