Reconstruction of Anal Sphincters Following Fecal Incontinence and Assessment of Functional Results
Authors:
P. Šlauf; P. Bartoška; O. Ryska; F. Antoš
Authors place of work:
Chirurgická klinika IPVZ a 1. LF UK, FN Na Bulovce, Praha, přednosta: prof. MUDr. F. Antoš, CSc.
Published in the journal:
Rozhl. Chir., 2008, roč. 87, č. 8, s. 426-431.
Category:
Monothematic special - Original
Summary
The aim of the study was to assess functional results of surgical sphincter reconstructions for anal incontinence. From August 1999 to January 2007, 52 patients (females 50, males 2), 45 y.o.a. on average (24–69), underwent secondary anal sphincters reconstructions for fecal incontinence, resulting from birth injuries, event. in combination with sphincter weakening in pudendal neurophathy, or for post- anorectal surgery incontinence. Duration of the incontinence symptoms prior to the surgery was 2 months to 19 years. The overlap technique in combination with anterior levatorplasty was used in most subjects (n = 31). In 12 subjects, anterior sphincters and levators plication was performed. Four patients underwent overlap reconstructions only and five patients underwent complete sphincter reconstructions. Protective colostomy was performed in six patients. Six patients underwent additional postoperative biofeedback. Endoanal ultrasound was performed in all patients prior to their procedures. Terminal motor latency examination of the pudendal nerve was indicated in all patients with sphincter dysfunction without localized defects. Anal manometry was recorded prior and post- operatively. Incontinence was assessed using the St. Mark‘s incontinence score (0–13). The patients assessed the reconstruction results based on the Likert scale.The reconstruction was successfull in 46 patients (88.5 %), full continence was recovered in 20 (38.5 %) patients and improvement of incontinence was recorded in 26 (50 %) subjects. In six subjects (11.5 %), the reconstruction failed. The mean incontinence score reduction following the procedure was from11.8 to 2.4. The short- term sphincter reconstruction results were successful in the majority of the subjects, the long- term results will be assessed in another study.
Key words:
anal sphincters – incontinence – surgical management – functional results
Zdroje
1. Consensus conference: Treatment options for fecal incontinence. St.Vincent, Oct, 2002, (cit.2007-06-01)dostupný z www – http://www.colorep.it/Rivista20CEC/consensus_conference.htm
2. Seymour, S. D. Fecal incontinence. e Medicine from WebMD, 2006-06-12 (cit.2007-06-01) dostupný z www – http://www.emedicine.com/med/topic3326.htm
3. Engel, A. F., Kamm, M. A., Sultan, A. H., Bartram, C. I., Nicholls, R. J. Anterior anal sphincter repair in patients with obtetric trauma. Br. J. Surg., 1994, 81, 1231–1234.
4. Londono-Schimmer, E. E., Garcia-Duperly, R., Nicholls, R. J., Ritchie, J. K., Hawley, P. R., Thompson, J. P. Overlapping anal sphincter repair for faecal incontinence due to sphincter trauma: Five year Follow-up functional results. Int. J. Colorect. Dis., 1994, 9, 110-113.
5. Jorge, J. M. N., Wexner, S. D. Anorectal manometry:Techniques and clinical applications. Southern Med. J., 1993, Vol. 86, No. 8, 924–931.
6. Oliveira, L., Pfeifer, J., Wexner, S. D. Physiologial and clinical outcome of anterior sphincteroplasty. Br. J. Surg., 1996, 83, 502–505.
7. Lunniss, P. J., Kamm, M. A., Phillips, R. K. S. Factors affecting continence after surgery for anal fistula. Br. J. Surg., 1994, 81, 1382–1385.
8. Pescatori, M., Anastasio, G., Bottini, C., Mentasti, A. New grading and scoring for anal incontinence. Dis. Colon Rectum, 1992, 35, 482–487.
9. Oberwalder, M., Connor, J., Wexner, S. D. Meta-analysis to determine the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter damage. Br. J. Surg., 2003, Nov, 90(11), 1333–1337.
10. Gilliland, R., Altomare, D. F., Moreira, H., Oliveira, L., Gilliland, J. E., Wexner, S. D. Pudendal neuropathy is predictive of failure following anterior overlapping sphincteroplasty. Dis. Colon Rectum, 1998, 41(12), 1516–1522. (ISSN:0012-3706).
11. Grey, R. B., Sheldon, R. R., Telford, K. J., Kiff, E. S. Anterior anal sphincter repair can be of long-term benefit:a 12-year case cohort from a single surgeon. BMC Surgery, 2007, 7:1, (cit. 2007-06-01) dostupný z www – http://www.biomedcentral.eom/1471-2482/7/l.
12. Malouf, A. J., Norton, C. S., Engel, A. F., Nicholls, R. J., Kamm, M. A. Long-term results of overlapping anterior anal-sphincter repair for obstetric trauma. Lancet 2000, 355, 205–206.
13. Halverson, A. L., Hull, T. L. Long-term outcome of overlapping anal sphincter repair. Dis. Colon Rectum, 2002, 45, 345–348.
14. Karoui, S., Leroi, A. M., Koning, E., Menard, J. F., Michot, F., Denis, P. Results of sphincteroplasty in 86 patients with anal incontinence. Dis. Colon Rectum, 2000, 43, 813–820.
15. Pinedo, G., Vaizey, C. L., Nicholls, R. J., Roach, R., Halligan, S., Kamm,. M. A. Results of repeat anal sphincter repair. Br. J. Surg., 1999, 86, 66–69.
16. Giordano, P., Remzi, A., Effron, J., Weiss, E. G., Nogueras, J. J., Wexner, S. D. Previous sphincter repair does not affect the outcome of repeat repair. Dis. Colon Rectum, 2002, 45(5), 635–640.
17. Mann, C. H. V., Glass, R. E. Technique of anal sphincter repair. In: Mann, C. H. V., Glass, R. E: Surgical treatment of anal incontinence. Springer Verlag London Limited, 1991, 103–106.
18. Pemberton, J. H. Sphincter and pelvic floor reconstruction. In: Keighley, M. R. B., Pemberton, J. H., Fazio, V. W., Parc, R.: Atlas of colorectal surgery. Churchill Livingstone Inc., 1996, 131–144.
19. Romano, G. Sphincteroplasties. In: Romano, G., Lehur, P. A., Weiss, E., Cuomo, R.: Diagnosis and treatment of fecal incontinence. Idelson-Gnocchi Limited Publisher, 2001, 129–145.
20. Young, C. H. J., Mathur, M. N., Eyers, A. E., Salomon, M. J. Successful overlapping anal sphincter repair: Relationship to patients age, neuropathy and colostomy formation. Dis. Colon Rectum, 1998, 41, 344–349.
21. Hoch, J., Škába, R., Jech, Z. Umělý svěrač u nemocných po kongenitálních malformacích anorekta. Rozhl. Chir., 2007, roč. 86, č. 4, s. 170–173.
Štítky
Surgery Orthopaedics Trauma surgeryČlánok vyšiel v časopise
Perspectives in Surgery
2008 Číslo 8
- Spasmolytic Effect of Metamizole
- Metamizole at a Glance and in Practice – Effective Non-Opioid Analgesic for All Ages
- Metamizole in perioperative treatment in children under 14 years – results of a questionnaire survey from practice
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Serious Complications Following Simple Appendectomy
- Reconstruction of Anal Sphincters Following Fecal Incontinence and Assessment of Functional Results
- Laparoscopic Proctocolectomy with Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis
- Clostridium Difficile Colitis