Distal Pancreatic Resections: Indications, Surgical Technique, and Complications
Authors:
F. Čečka; B. Jon; A. Ferko; Z. Šubrt *
Authors place of work:
Chirurgická klinika Fakultní nemocnice Hradec Králové a Lékařské fakulty UK v Hradci Králové
přednosta kliniky: doc. MUDr. A. Ferko, CSc.
; Katedra válečné chirurgie, Fakulta vojenského zdravotnictví, Univerzita Obrany Brno
vedoucí katedry: doc. MUDr. L. Klein, CSc.
*
Published in the journal:
Rozhl. Chir., 2009, roč. 88, č. 7, s. 364-367.
Category:
Monothematic special - Original
Summary
Introduction:
Distal pancreatic resections are relatively less frequent surgical procedures than duodenopancreatectomies. This is due to lower incidence and later onset of lesion symptoms in this part of the pancreas. The aim of our work was to evaluate retrospectively the results of distal pancreatic resections performed at the Department of Surgery, University Hospital in Hradec Králové from 1996 to 2008.
Methods:
We retrospectively evaluated the indications, surgical procedure (including complications) and the postoperative course. All procedures were done through transverse laparotomy. The pancreas was transected sharply with a scalpel and the resection line was oversewn. Staplers were not used. All the patients were given Sandostatin postoperatively.
Results:
We performed 51 distal pancreatic resections at our department from 1996 to 2008, 40 of which were distal pancreatic resections with splenectomy (78%). We performed 149 duodenopancreatectomies in the samé time period. Benign lesions or borderline lesions (chronic pancreatitis, benign tumours, borderline tumours) were found in 67% of the surgical specimens. Malignant tumours were found in 33%, most of which were adenocarcinoma. Severe pancreatic fistula developed in two patients (3.9%). Two reoperations (3.9%) were necessary due to postoperative complications. Postoperative mortality was nil.
Conclusion:
We assume that our technique resulted in a relatively low morbidity and zero mortality. However, we used this technique in all cases, and therefore cannot compare it to other techniques.
Key words:
pancreas – distal pancreatic resection – pancreatic fistula
Zdroje
1. Rodriguez, J. R., Germes, S. S., Pandharipande, P. V., Gazelle, G. S., Thayer, S. P., Warshaw, A.L., Fernandez-del Castilo, C. Implications and cost of pancreatic leak following distal pancreatic resection. Arch. Surg., 2006; 141: 361–366.
2. Dindo, D., Demartines, D., Clavien, P. A. Classification of surgical complications. A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann. Surg., 2004; 240: 205–213.
3. Finney, J. M. T. Resection of the pancreas. Report of a case. Transactions of the American Surgical Associates, 1910; 28: 315–330.
4. Mayo, W. J. The surgery of the pancreas. Ann. Surg., 1913; 58: 145–150.
5. Gordon-Taylor, G. The radical surgery of cancer of the pancreas. Ann. Surg., 1934; 100: 206–214.
6. Balcom, J. H. T., Rattner, D. W., Warshaw, A. L., Chang, Y., Fernandez-del Castillo, C. Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections: changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization. Arch. Surg., 2001; 136: 391–398.
7. Kleeff, J., Diener, M. K., Zaggen, K., Hinz, U., Wagner, M., Bachmann, J., Zehetner, J., Müller, M. W., Friess, H., Büchler, M. W. Distal pancreatectomy. Risk factors for surgical failure in 302 consecutive cases. Ann. Surg., 2007; 245: 573–582.
8. Lillemoe, K. D., Kaushal, S., Cameron, J. L., Sohn, T. A., Pitt, H. A., Yeo, C. J. Distal pancreatectomy: indications and outcomes in 235 patients. Ann. Surg., 1999; 229: 693–698.
9. Fahy, B. N., Frey, C. F., Ho, H. S., Beckett, L., Bold, R. J. Morbidity, mortality, and technical factors of distal pancreatectomy. Am. J. Surg., 2002; 183: 237–241.
10. Lorenz, U., Maier, M., Steger, U., Topfer, C, Thiede, A., Timm, S. Analysis of closure of the pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatic resection. HPB, 2007; 9: 302–307.
11. Shankar, S., Theis, B., Russel, R. C. Management of the stump of the pancreas after distal pancreatic resection. Br. J. Surg., 1990; 77: 541–544.
12. Konishi, T., Hiraishi, M., Kubota, K., Bandai, Y., Makuuchi, M., Idezuki, Y. Segmental occlusion of the pancreatic duet with prolamine to prevent fistula formation after distal pancreatectomy. Ann. Surg., 1995; 221: 165–170.
13. Kajiyama, Y., Tsurumaru, M., Udagawa, H., Tsutsumi, K., Kinoshita, Y., Akiyama, H. Quick and simple distal pancreatectomy using the GIA stapler: report of 35 cases. Br. J. Surg., 1996; 83: 1711.
14. Bassi C, Butturini, G., Molinari, E., Mascetta, G., Salvia, R., Falconi, M., Gumbs, A., Pederzolli, P. Pancreatic fistula rate after pancreatic resection: the importance of definitions. Dig. Surg., 2004; 21: 54–59.
15. Takeuchi, K., Tsuzuki, Y., Ando, T., Sekihara, M., Hara, T., Kori, T., Nakajima, H., Kuwano, H. Distal pancreatectomy: is staple closure beneficial? ANZ J. Surg., 2003; 73: 922–925.
16. Sheehan, M. K., Beck, K., Creech, S., Pickelman, J., Aranha, G. V. Distal pancreatectomy: does the method of closure influence fistula formation? Am. Surg., 2002; 68: 264–267.
17. Bilimoria, M. M., Cormier, J. N., Mun, Y., Lee, J. E., Ewans, D. B., Pisters, P. W. Pancreatic leak after left pancreatectomy is reduced following main pancreatic duet ligation. Br. J. Surg., 2003; 90: 190–196.
18. Knaebel, H. P., Diener, M. K., Wente, M.N., Büchler, M. W. Seiler, C. M. Systematic review and meta-analysis of technique for closure of the pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatectomy. Br. J. Surg., 2005; 92: 539–546.
19. Adam, U., Makowiec, F., Riediger, H. Distal pancreatic resection – indications, techniques and complications. Zentralbl. Chir., 2001; 126: 908–912.
20. Issekutz, A., Belagyi, T., Romics, L., Olah, A. A novel technique for the closure of the pancreatic remnant using jejunal serosa following distal pancreatectomy. Magy. Seb., 2006; 59: 117–121.
21. Ohwada, S., Ogawa, T., Tanahashi, Y., Nakamura, S., Takeyoshi, I., Ohya, T., Ikeya, T., Kawashima, K., Kawashima, Y., Morishita, Y. Fibrin glue sandwich prevents pancreatic fistula following distal pancreatectomy. World J. Surg., 1998; 22: 494–498.
22. Suzuki, Y., Fujimo, Y., Tanioka, Y., Hori, Y., Ueda, T., Takeyama, Y., Tominaga, M., Ku, Y., Yamamoto, Y.M., Kuroda, Y. Randomized clinical trial of ultrasonic dissector or conventional division in distal pancreatectomy for non-fibrotic pancreas. Br. J. Surg., 1999; 86: 608–611.
23. Govil, S., Imrie, C. W. Value of splenic preservation during distal pancreatectomy for chronic pancreatitis. Br. J. Surg., 1999; 86: 895–898.
24. Warshaw, A. L. Conservation of the spleen with distal pancreatectomy. Arch. Surg., 1988; 123: 550–553.
25. Alghamdi, A. A., Jawas, A. M., Hart, R. S. Use of octreotide for the prevention of pancreatic fistula after elective pancreatic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can. J. Surg., 2007; 50: 459–466.
26. Kollmar, O., Moussavian, M. R., Richter, S., de Roi, P., Maurer, C. A., Schilling, M. K. Prophylactic octreotide and delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy: results of a prospective randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trial. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol., 2008; 34: 868–875.
Štítky
Surgery Orthopaedics Trauma surgeryČlánok vyšiel v časopise
Perspectives in Surgery
2009 Číslo 7
- Metamizole at a Glance and in Practice – Effective Non-Opioid Analgesic for All Ages
- Metamizole vs. Tramadol in Postoperative Analgesia
- Spasmolytic Effect of Metamizole
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Septic Shock in a Patient with the Fourniér Gangrene with Fatal Outcome
- Complications of IPOM Plasty – Our Experience
- The Complication of a Periproctal Abscess – Fourniér’s Gangrene or Necrotizing Fasciitis? A Case Report
- Anti- biotic Prophylaxis in Urology