Prevention of parastomal hernia using laparoscopic introduction of a prosthetic mesh – initial experience
Authors:
L. Martínek 1
; J. Dostalík 1; P. Guňková 2; I. Guňka 2; M. Mazur 1
Authors place of work:
Katedra chirurgických oborů LF Ostravské univerzity v Ostravě, vedoucí katedry: Doc. MUDr. Jan Dostalík, CSc.
1; Chirurgická klinika FN Ostrava, přednosta: doc. MUDr. Jan Dostalík, CSc.
2
Published in the journal:
Rozhl. Chir., 2012, roč. 91, č. 4, s. 216-218.
Category:
Original articles
Summary
Introduction:
Parastomal hernia is a very common complication after stoma formation. Current surgical procedures for repairing parastomal hernia have unsatisfactory results. The aim of this study was to evaluate our initial experience with laparoscopic prophylactic mesh placement at the time of stoma formation.
Material and methods:
Four patients underwent laparoscopic abdominoperineal rectal cancer resection with prophylactic parastomal mesh placement. A specially designed mesh made of polyvinylidene fluoride with central funnel (Dynamesh IPST®) was implanted using an intraperitoneal onlay technique. The surgical data, the frequency of mesh-related complications as well as the rate of parastomal henias were evaluated.
Results:
The mean operating time for mesh placement was 15 min (10–25 min.). No mesh- related complications or infection was observed and no parastomal hernia could be detected clinically. To this date, the mean follow up time has been six months (4–8 months).
Conclusion:
Laparoscopic prophylactic parastomal mesh placement might be a safe and effective procedure with a potential to reduce the risk of parastomal hernia, at least in the short run. However, our experience is limited due to the small number of patients included in the study. Additional large trials with long term follow up are necessary.
Key words:
parastomal hernia – prevention – mesh – laparoscopy
Zdroje
1. Pearl RK. Parastomal hernias. World J Surg 1989;13:569–572.
2. Sjodahl R, Anderberg B, Bolin T. Parastomal hernia in relation to site of the abdominal stoma. Br J Surg 1988;75:339–341.
3. Carne PW, Robertson GM, Friyelle FA. Parastomal hernia. Br J Surg 2003;90:784–793.
4. Israelsson LA. Parastomal hernias. Surg Clin North Am 2008;88:113–125.
5. Shellito PC. Complications of abdominal stoma surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:1562–1572.
6. Burns FJ. Complications of colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1970;13:448–450.
7. Rieger N, Moore J, Hewett P et al. Parastomal hernia repair. Colorectal Dis 2004;6:203–205.
8. Baig MK, Larach JA, Chang S et al. Outcome of parastomal hernia repair with and without midline laparotomy. Tech Coloproctol 2006;10:282–286.
9. Rubin MS, Schoetz DJ, Matthews JB. Parastomal hernia. Is stoma relocation superior to fascial repair. Arch Surg 1994;129:413–418.
10. Kasperk R, Klinge U, Schumpelick V. The repair of large parastomal hernias using a midline approach and prosthetic mesh in the sublay position. Am J Surg 2000;179:186–188.
11. LeBlanc KA, Bellanger DE, Whitaker JM et al. Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair. Hernia 2005;9:140–144.
12. Berger D, Bientzle M. Laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernias: a single surgeon‘s experience in 66 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 2007;50:1668–1673.
13. Craft RO, Huguet KL, McLemore EC et al. Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair. Hernia 2008;12:137–140.
14. Hansson BM, Bleichrodt RP, de Hingh IH. Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair using a keyhole technique results in a high recurrence rate. Surg Endosc 2009;23:1456–1459.
15. Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Ottinger AP et al. PVDF as a new polymer for the construction of surgical meshes. Biomaterials 2002;23:3487–3493.
16. Junge K, Klinge U, Prescher A et al. Elasticity of the anterior abdominal wall and impact for reparation of incisional hernias using mesh implants. Hernia 2001;5:113–118.
17. Goligher J. Surgery of the Anus, Colon and Rectum. 5th ed. London, Balleire Tindall, 1984.
18. Jänes A, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA. Experiences with a prophylactic mesh in 93 consecutive ostomies. World J Surg 2010;34:1637–1640.
19. Muysoms EE, Hauters PJ, Van Nieuwenhove Y et al. Laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernias: a multi-centre retrospective review and shift in technique. Acta Chir Belg 2008;108:400–404.
20. Sugarbaker PH. Peritoneal approach to prosthetic mesh repair of paraostomy hernias. Ann Surg 1985;201:344–346.
21. Mancini GJ, McClusky DA, Khaitan L. et al. Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair using a nonslit mesh technique. Surg Endosc 2007;21:1487–1491.
22. Jänes A, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA. Preventing parastomal hernia with a prosthetic mesh: a 5-year follow-up of a randomized study. World J Surg 2009;33:118–121.
23. Tam KW, Wei PL, Kuo LJ, Wu ChH. Systematic review of the use of a mesh to prevent parastomal hernia. World J Surg 2010;34:2723–2729.
24. Berger D. Prevention of parastomal hernias by profylactic use of a specialy designed intraperitoneal onlay mesh (Dynamesh IPST®). Hernia 2008;12:243–246.
Štítky
Surgery Orthopaedics Trauma surgeryČlánok vyšiel v časopise
Perspectives in Surgery
2012 Číslo 4
- Spasmolytic Effect of Metamizole
- Metamizole at a Glance and in Practice – Effective Non-Opioid Analgesic for All Ages
- Metamizole in perioperative treatment in children under 14 years – results of a questionnaire survey from practice
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- GIST: Current knowledge and treatment modalities
- Laparoscopic adrenalectomy – indications and selection criteria
- Prevention of parastomal hernia using laparoscopic introduction of a prosthetic mesh – initial experience
- Extragastrointestinal stromal tumor (EGIST)