Quality of life is an important factor in the indication in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma - a prospective multicentric study
Authors:
M. Ryska 1; L. Dušek 2; Radek Pohnán 1
; B. Bunganič 3; L. Bieberová 1; O. Ryska 1; M. Loveček 4; B. Jon 5; K. Rupert 6; M. Krejčí 7; J. Jarkovský 2
Authors place of work:
Chirurgická klinika 2. LF UK a ÚVN Praha, přednosta: prof. MUDr. Miroslav Ryska, CSc.
1; Institut biostatistiky a analýz MU, Brno, ředitel: Doc. RNDr. Ladislav Dušek, CSc.
2; Interní klinika 1. LF UK a ÚVN Praha, přednosta: Prof. MUDr. Miroslav Zavoral, Ph. D.
3; Chirurgická klinika LF UP, Olomouc, přednosta: Doc. MUDr. Čestmír Neoral, CSc.
4; Chirurgická klinika LF UK, Hradec Králové, přednosta: Prof. MUDr. Alexander Ferko, CSc.
5; Chirurgická klinika LF UK, Plzeň, přednosta: Prof. MUDr. Vladislav Třeška, DrSc.
6; Chirurgická klinika 2. LF UK, přednosta: Prof. MUDr. Jiří Hoch, CSc.
7
Published in the journal:
Rozhl. Chir., 2012, roč. 91, č. 4, s. 199-208.
Category:
Original articles
Summary
Introduction:
The aim of this report is to present results of prospective multicentric study on quality of life (QoL) in advanced ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients.
Material and method:
In 426 patients with advanced ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma, the following parameters were studied: type of treatment, complication rates, 1,2 and 3-year survival rates. QoL was assessed in 151 patients, using a generic SF-36 questionnaire prior the therapy and then 3 months after the treatment. Arithmetic mean and standard deviation (SD) were used for the QoL pool analysis. The results were evaluated using SF-36 software, t-test for independent samples, ANOVA, paired t-test and SPSS 19.0.1 (IBM Corporation, 2010). The p value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
Results:
There was a significant difference in the median, 1,2 and 3- year survival rates in the patients with stage III pancreatic cancer who underwent radical resection (RR) compared to the paliative therapy patients (p < 0.001). The highest initial overal QoL value was observed in 39 stage III patients who underwent RR (60.5 ± 1.84) and no significant decrease in this value was recorded over a 3-month postoperative period (difference-5.1 ± 16.6, p= 0.064). Paliative therapy resulted in significant reduction in the overall QoL value(p = 0.020). In the paliative therapy group of patients, BDA resulted in significant reduction in the overall QoL value 3 months after the procedure (p=0.017 vs. ns.). In the group of stage IV patients, nonsignificant increase in the overall QoL value was recorded in 8 patients 3 months after BDA (46.4 ± 17.0 vs. 51.1 ± 9.5 p=0.525). Nonsignificant increase in the overal QoL values was also observed in 18 patients after stent introduction (30.6 ± 8.3 vs. 31.5 ± 8.5 p=0.783). Nonsignificant deterioration in QoL was recorded in patients undergoing exploration, whose initial QoL values corresponded with those in RR patients, while 3 months after the explorative surgery their QoL values were similar to those recorded in the stent group patients (62.0 ± 16.1vs. 41.7 ± 23.6 s rozdílem -20.3 ± 16.2 p<0.001).
Conclusion:
Based on the results of the multicentric prospective study in patients with locally advanced stage III and IV ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma, the following conclusions can be presented:
- - median and 1,2 and 3-year survival rates in stage III patients were significantly higher in the RR group compared to the paliative therapy patients,
- – initial QoL in stage III patients was significantly the highest in patients who underwent RR. Significant decrease in QoL was recorded in BDA patients. Paliative stent introduction resulted in nonsignificant improvement in the QoL 3 months after the procedure, while the initial QoL values were the lowest in this group,
- – QoL assessment in stage IV patients showed statistically nonsignificant improvement after BDA or stent procedures, the most significant deterioration was observed in the exploration group,
- – no complication which would result in prolongation of the respective hospitalization times was recorded in 67%,
- – early postoperative complications did not result in significant QoL deterioration 3 months after the procedure,
- – absence of chemotherapy results in significant decrease in QoL .
Key words:
pancreatic carcinoma – radical resection – paliative procedure – quality of life
Zdroje
1. Sharma Ch, Eltawil KM, Renfrew PD, et al. Advances in diagnosis, treatment and palliation of pancreatic carcinoma: 1990–2010. WJG 2011;17:867–897.
2. Slováček L, Slováčková B, Jebavý L, et al. Kvalita života nemocných – jeden z nejdůležitějších parametrů komplexního hodnocení léčby. Voj zdr listy 2004;73:6–9.
3. Klinický standard pro diagnostiku a léčbu pacientů se zhoubným onemocněním pankreatu KKCCS0007. Národní sada standardů NRC, 2011, www.chirurgie.cz.
4. Zásady cytostatické léčby maligních onkologických onemocnění. Masarykův onkologický ústav, Brno, www.mou.cz.
5. Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36® Health Survey Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston, MA: New England Medical Center, The Health Institute, 1993.
6. Ware JE, Kosinski M. SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales: A Manual for Users of Version 1, Second Edition. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated, 2001.
7. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, et al. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer 2010;127:2893–2917.
8. Geryk E, Dítě P, Trna J, et al. Zátěž nádory pankreatu u české populace. Onkologie 2010;4:322–325.
9. Dušek L, Duda M, Ryska M, Žaloudík J. Surgical oncology. In: Czech cancer in numbers 2008–2009, Grada, 2009.
10. Smeenk TG, Tran TC, Erdmann J, et al. Survival after surgical management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: does curative and radical surgery truly exist? Langenbecks Arch Surg 2005;390:94–103.
11. Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Bassi C et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy with Fluorouracil plus Folinic Acid vs Gemcitabine following pancreatic cancer resection. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2010;304:1073–1081.
12. Hilbig A, Oettl H. Adjuvant therapy of pancreatic cancer. Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy 2010;10:485–491.
13. Walter J, Nier A, Rose T, et al. Palliative partial pancreaticoduodenectomy impairs quality of life compared to bypass surgery in patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. Eur J Surg Oncol 2011;37:798–804.
14. Espat NJ, Brennan MF, Conlon KC. Patients with laparoscopically staged unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma do not require subsequent surgical biliary or gastric bypass. J Am Coll Surg 1999;188:649–655.
15. Gupta D, Lis CG, Grutsch JF. The European organization for research and treatment of cancer quality of life questionnaire: implications for prognosis in pancreatic cancer. Int J Gastrointest Cancer 2006;37:65–73.
16. Nieveen va Dijkum EJM, Kuhlmann KFD, Terwee CB et al. Quality of life after curative or palliative surgical treatment of pancreatic and periampullary carcinoma. Br J Surg 2005;92:471–477.
17. Schniewind B, Bestmann B, Henne-Bruns D, et al. Quality of life after pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. Br J Surg 2006;93:1099–1107.
18. Schniewind B, Bestmann B, Kurdow R, et al. Bypass surgery versus paliative pancreaticoduodenectomy in patiens with advanced ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head, with an emphasis on quality of life analyses. Ann Surg Oncol 2006;13:1403–1411.
19. Walter J, Nier A, Rose T et al. Palliative partial pancreaticoduodenectomy impairs quality of life compared to bypass surgery in patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. Eur J Surg Oncol 2011;9:798–804.
20. Bonnetain F, Dahan L, Maillard E, et al. Time until definitive quality of life score deterioration as a means of longitudinal analysis for treatment trials in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Eur J Cancer 2010;46:2753–2762.
21. Kalová H, Petr P, Soukupová A, et al. Kvalita života u chronických onemocnění ve světle novějších modelů zdraví a nemoci. Klin Farmakol Farm 2005;19:165–168.
22. Jenkinson C, Stewart-Brown S, Petersen S, et al. Assessment of the SF-36 version 2 in the United Kingdom. J Epidemiol Community Health 1999;53:46–50.
Štítky
Surgery Orthopaedics Trauma surgeryČlánok vyšiel v časopise
Perspectives in Surgery
2012 Číslo 4
- Metamizole at a Glance and in Practice – Effective Non-Opioid Analgesic for All Ages
- Metamizole vs. Tramadol in Postoperative Analgesia
- Spasmolytic Effect of Metamizole
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- GIST: Current knowledge and treatment modalities
- Laparoscopic adrenalectomy – indications and selection criteria
- Prevention of parastomal hernia using laparoscopic introduction of a prosthetic mesh – initial experience
- Extragastrointestinal stromal tumor (EGIST)