Benign prostatic hyperplasia – awareness of the general public and quality of preventive care
Authors:
I. Dolan 1; K. Ďuranová 2
Authors place of work:
Urologické oddělení FN u sv. Anny v Brně, primář: MUDr. Arne Rovný
1; Katedra ošetřovatelství LF MU Brno, vedoucí katedry: Doc. PhDr. Miroslava Kyasová, Ph. D.
2
Published in the journal:
Rozhl. Chir., 2012, roč. 91, č. 6, s. 317-321.
Category:
Original articles
Summary
Introduction:
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a non-malignant enlargement of the prostate gland and a common disease among elderly men. The disease typically manifests with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and, due to the presenting symptoms, it significantly decreases the patient´s quality of life. In the vast majority of cases the symptoms can be reduced or minimized by treatment. We focused on the awareness of the disease itself in the general male population and we also asked the respondents about their own experience with diagnosis of benign prostatic hyperplasia in the general practitioner´s office.
Material and methods:
A semi-standardised questionnaire drawing on the standardised IPSS (International Prostate Symptom Score) questionnaire was used to collect empirical data; the data were then evaluated using descriptive statistics.
Results:
The study points to underdiagnosis during standard preventive check-ups in the general practitioner’s office in the sample of respondents examined. The practical benefits of our study have included the fact that using the standardised IPSS questionnaire the respondents were able to diagnose themselves, taking notice of the early symptoms of BPH, which made them seek specialist advice.
Conclusions:
Symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia significantly decreases the quality of life. Prevention and public as well as professional awareness are very important. It is usually the general practitioner who should be the first to refer the patient for a specialist urological examination upon clinical suspicion of the disease.
Key words:
BPH – IPSS questionnaire – general practitioner – underdiagnosis
Zdroje
1. Barry MJ, Fowler FJ Jr, OęLeary MP, Bruskewitz RC, Holtgrewe HL, Mebust WK, Cockett AT. The American Urological Association symptom index for benign prostatic hyperplasia. The Measurement Committee of the American Urological Association. J Urol 1992;148(5):1549–57.
2. Ďuranová K. Problematika benigní hyperplasie prostaty ve sledované populaci. Bakalářská práce, Katedra ošetřovatelství LF MU Brno, 2010:37–81.
3. Tanagho E, Mc Aninch J. Smithova všeobecná urológia. 1. slovenské vyd. Martin, Osveta 2006:179–193.
4. Babjuk M, Matoušková M, Fínek J, Petruželka L, et al. Konsenzuální doporučené postupy v uroonkologii. 1. vyd. Praha, Galén 2009:18–21.
5. Zvara V, Horňák M, a kol. Urologické operace. 1. české vyd. Martin, Osveta 2010:226–228.
6. Dvořáček J, Babjuk M. Onkourologie. 1. vyd. Praha, Galén 2005:225–242.
7. De La Rosette J, Alivizatos G, Madersbacher S, Rioja Sanz C, Nordling J, Emberton M, Gravas S, Michel MC, Oelke M. Guidelines EAU pro benigní hyperplasii prostaty. Urol list 2009a;3:69–84.
8. Rosette J, Alivizatos G, Madersbacher S, Rioja Sanz C, Nordling J, Emberton M, Gravas S, Michel MC, Oelke M. Guidelines EAU pro benigní hyperplasii prostaty. Urol list 2009b;4:61–80.
9. Vyhláška č. 3/2010 o stanovení obsahu a časového rozmezí preventivních prohlídek [on line]. [cit. 2012-03-07]. Dostupný na www:http://www.sagit.cz/pages/sbirkatxt.asp?zdroj=sb10003&cd=76&typ=r
Štítky
Surgery Orthopaedics Trauma surgeryČlánok vyšiel v časopise
Perspectives in Surgery
2012 Číslo 6
- Metamizole at a Glance and in Practice – Effective Non-Opioid Analgesic for All Ages
- Metamizole vs. Tramadol in Postoperative Analgesia
- Spasmolytic Effect of Metamizole
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Treatment of an asymptomatic splenic cyst using percutaneous drainage
- Meckel´s diverticulum in adults – our five-year experience
- Laparoscopic appendectomy in pregnancy – a case report
- Percutaneous interspinous dynamic stabilization (In-Space) in patients with degenerative disease of the lumbosacral spine – a prospective study