Ulipristal acetate: new antiretroviral drug in treatment of uterine fibroids

Česká verzia

Authors: Kristýna Kubínová
Authors place of work: Gynekologicko-porodnická klinika 1. LF UK a VFN v Praze, přednosta prof. MUDr. A. Martan, DrSc.
Published in the journal: Prakt Gyn 2012; 16(2-4): 77-79
Category: Gynecology and Obstetrics: Review Article

Summary

In patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids the dominant therapeutic modality is still surgery (hysterectomy, myomectomy) or radiological treatment (uterine artery embolization, focused ultrasound). Causal pharmacological treatment has until recently been limited to the use of Gonadoliberine analogues (GnRHa). In research for the new pharmacological options it was observed that progesterone and its receptors induce proliferative activity in uterine fibroid cells and therefore treatment with antiprogesterones may be used in patients with uterine fibroids. These substances include for example: mifeproston, its effect on fibroid volume reduction has been demonstrated in several clinical trials and telapriston and asoprisnil. The development of telapriston and asoprisnil was stopped in phase III clinical trials due to hepatotoxicity or negative effect on the endometrium. Currently, new per-oral drug containing ulipristal acetate has been introduced to the Czech market. Ulipristal acetate belongs to the so called Selective Progesterone Receptor Modulator (SPRM) family. It has recently completed Phase III clinical trials and has acquired a license for clinical use in Europe. Although further studies are needed to assess the long-term results and safety of prolonged use ulipristal acetate, undoubtedly this drug represents a new and promising treatment option for patients with uterine fibroids.

Key words:
uterine fibroid – Selective Progesterone Receptor Modulator – ulipristal acetate

Zdroje

1. Levy BS. Modern management of uterine fibroids. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2008; 87(8): 812–823.

2. Donnez J, Tatarchuk TF, Bouchard P et al. Ulipristal acetate versus placebo for fibroid treatment before surgery. N Engl J Med 2012; 366(5):409–420.

3. Donnez J, Tomaszewski J, Vázquez F et al. Ulipristal acetate versus Leuproline acetate for uterine fibroids. N Engl J Med 2012; 366(5): 421–432.

4. Sankaran S, Manyonda IT. Medical management of fibroids. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2008; 22(4): 655–676.

5. Lefebvre G, Vilos G, Allaire C et al. The management of uterine leiomyomas. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2003; 25(5): 396–418.

6. Mara M, Kubinova K, Maskova J et al. Uterine Artery Embolization Versus Laparoscopic Uterine Artery Occlusion: The Outcomes of a Prospective, Nonrandomized Clinical Trial. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2012; 35(5): 1041–1052.

7. Lethaby A, Vollenhoven B, Sowter M. Efficacy of pre-operative gonadotrophin hormone releasing analogues for women with uterine fibroids undergoing hysterectomy or myomectomy: a systematic review. BJOG 2002; 109(10): 1097–1108.

8. Talaulikar VS, Manyonda I. Progesterone and progesterone receptor modulators in the management of symptomatic uterine fibroids. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2012 Aug 14 [Epub ahead of print; v tisku]. Dostupné z: http://www.ejog.org/article/S0301–2115(12)00342–9/abstract

9. Rosa e Silva JC, de Sá Rosa e Silva AC, Cândido dos Reis FJ et al. Use of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device for the symptomatic treatment of uterine myomas. J Reprod Med 2005; 50(8): 613–617.

10. Talaulikar VS, Manyonda IT. Ulipristal acetate: a novel option for the medical management of symptomatic uterine fibroids. Adv Ther 2012; 29(8): 655–663.

11. Mutter GL, Bergeron C, Deligdisch L et al. The spectrum of endometrial pathology induced by progesterone receptor modulators. Mod Pathol 2008; 21(5): 591–598.