Contribution to safety of home and hospital birth

Česká verzia

Authors: Petr Křepelka ^1,2,3
Authors place of work: Ústav pro péči o matku a dítě, Praha ¹; Institut postgraduálního vzdělávání ve zdravotnictví, Praha ²; 3. LF UK v Praze ³
Published in the journal: Prakt Gyn 2016; 20(2): 84-88
Category: Gynecology and Obstetrics

Summary

Planned home birth is a modern social phenomenon that is based on the false premise that human birth is a physiological process in the course of which there is no need to intervene. Human birth is burdened by many serious risks, which are difficult to predict. Modern obstetrics was created in order to minimize these risks. This paper reviews the results of studies analyzing the safety of births in different conditions (planned home births, births in birth centers, hospital births). Outcome studies are controversial. Recent studies involving a large number of subjects, however, despite all the limitations demonstrate an increased risk of planned home births.

Key words:
home birth – birth center – maternal mortality – perinatal mortality

Zdroje

1. The World Factbook. Maternal mortality. Dostupné z WWW: <https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2223rank.html>. [4. 4.2016].

2. [GBD 2013 Mortality and Causes of Death Collaborators]. Global, regional, and national age-sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 2015; 385(9963): 117–171. [17. 12. 2014].

3. Loudon I. The transformation of maternal mortality. BMJ 1992; 305(6868):1557–1560.

4. Weiner E, Bar J, Fainstein N et al. The effect of a program to shorten the decision-to-delivery interval for emergent cesarean section on maternal and neonatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210(3): 224.e1-e6. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.01.007>.

5. Katz VL, Dotters DJ, Droegemueller W. Perimortem Caesarean delivery. Obstet Gynaecol 1986; 68(4): 571–576.

6. Kattwinkel J, Perlman JM, Aziz K et al. Part 15: Neonatal Resuscitation. 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2010; 122(18 Suppl 3): S909-S919. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.971119>.

7. Lu MC, Fridman M, Korst LM et al. Variations in the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage across hospitals in California. Matern Child Health J 2005; 9(3): 297–306.

8. Cheung WM, Hawkes A, Ibish S et al. The retained placenta: historical and geographical rate variations. J Obstet Gynaecol 2011; 31(1): 37–42.

9. Hoffman MK, Bailit JL, Branch DW et al. [Consortium on Safe Labor]. A comparison of obstetric maneuvers for the acute management of shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117(6): 1272–1278.

10. Tikkanen M. Placental abruption: epidemiology, risk factors and consequences. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2011; 90(2): 140–149.

11. Lewis G. The Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (CEMACH). Saving Mothers’ Lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer – 2003–2005. The Seventh Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. CEMACH: London 2007. ISBN: 978–0-9533536–8-2. Dostupné z WWW: <http://www.publichealth.hscni.net/sites/default/files/Saving%20Mothers‘%20Lives%202003–05%20.pdf>.

12. Koonings PP, Paul RH, Campbell K. Umbilical cord prolapse. A contemporary look. J Reprod Med 1990; 35(7): 690–692.

13. Thornberg E, Thiringer K, Odeback A et al. Birth asphyxia: incidence, clinical course and outcome in a Swedish population. Acta Paediatr 1995; 84(8): 927–932.

14. Whitfield JM, Charsha DS, Chiruvolu A. Prevention of meconium aspiration syndrome: an update and the Baylor experience. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 2009; 22(2): 128–131.

15. Bronsteen R, Whitten A, Balasubramanian M et al. Vasa previa: clinical presentations, outcomes, and implications for management. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122(2 Pt 1): 352–357.

16. McColl MD, Ramsay JE, Tait RC et al. Risk factors for pregnancy associated venous thromboembolism. Thromb Haemost 1997; 78(4): 1183–1188.

17. Fong A, Chau CT, Pan D et al. Clinical morbidities, trends, and demographics of eclampsia: a population-based study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209(3): 229.e1-e7. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2013.05.050>.

18. Abenhaim HA, Azoulay L, Kramer MS et al. Incidence and risk factors of amniotic fluid embolisms: a population-based study on 3 million births in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199(1): 49.e1-e8. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2007.11.061>.

19. Perlman JM, Risser R. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the delivery room: associated clinical events. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1995; 149(1): 20–25.

20. Mousa HA, Alfirevic Z. Treatment for primary postpartum haemorrhage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003(1): CD003249. Update in Treatment for primary postpartum haemorrhage. [Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007].

21. McKeen DM, George RB, O’Connell CM et al. Difficult and failed intubation: Incident rates and maternal, obstetrical, and anesthetic predictors. Can J Anaesth 2011; 58(6): 514–524.

22. Dick-Read G. Childbirth Without Fear. The Principles and Practice of Natural Childbirth. 4th ed. Pinter & Martin: London 2005. ISBN 978–0953096466.

23. Rooks JP, Weatherby NL, Ernst EK et al. Outcomes of care in birth centers. The National Birth Center Study. N Engl J Med 1989; 321(26): 1804–1811.

24. DeJong RN, Shy KK, Carr KC. An out-of-hospital birth center using university referral. Obstet Gynecol 1981; 58(6):703–707.

25. The Commission for the Accreditation of Birth Centers. Policy regarding vaginal birth after cesarean section in accredited birth centers. 2010. Dostupné z WWW: <https://www.birthcenteraccreditation.org/>.

26. The Commission for the Accreditation of Birth Centers 2012. Dostupné z WWW: <http://www.birthcenteraccreditation.org/find-accredited-birth-centers/>. [4. 4.2016].

27. Lindgren HE, Rådestad IJ, Christensson K et al. Perceptions of risk and risk management among 735 women who opted for a home birth. Midwifery 2010; 26(2): 163–172.

28. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Ventura S et al. National Vital Statistics Report. Births: Final data for 2011. National Vital Statistics Reports 2013; 62(1). Dostupné z WWW: <http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr62/nvsr62_01.pdf>.

29. BirthChoiceUK – Summary of home birth rates 2011. Dostupné z WWW: <http://www.birthchoiceuk.com/Professionals/index.html>. [4. 4. 2016].

30. Australian Homebirth Statistics. Dostupné z WWW: <http://homebirthaustralia.org/statistics>. [4. 4. 2016].

31. McLachlan H, Forster D. The safety of home birth: is the evidence good enough? CMAJ 2009; 181(6–7): 359–360.

32. Rodička a novorozenec. ÚZIS ČR: Praha. Dostupné z WWW: <http://www.uzis.cz/katalog/zdravotnicka-statistika/rodicka-novorozenec>. [4. 4. 2016].

33. Lindgren H, Rådestad I, Hildingsson I. Transfer in planned home births in Sweden--effects on the experience of birth: a nationwide population-based study. Sex Reprod Healthc 2011; 2(3): 101–105.

34. Stapleton SR, Osborne C, Illuzzi J. Outcomes of care in birth centers: demonstration of a durable model. J Midwifery Womens Health 2013; 58(1): 3–14.

35. Rooks JP, Weatherby NL, Ernst EK. The National Birth Center Study. Part III--Intrapartum and immediate postpartum and neonatal complications and transfers, postpartum and neonatal care, outcomes, and client satisfaction. J Nurse Midwifery 1992; 37(6): 361–397.

36. Brocklehurst P, Hardy P, Hollowell J et al. [Birthplace in England Collaborative Group]. Perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth for healthy women with low risk pregnancies: the Birthplace in England national prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2011; 343: d7400. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d7400>.

37. van der Kooy J, Poeran J, de Graaf JP et al. Planned home compared with planned hospital births in the Netherlands: intrapartum and early neonatal death in low-risk pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 118(5): 1037–1046.

38. de Jonge A, van der Goes BY, Ravelli AC et al. Perinatal mortality and morbidity in a nationwide cohort of 529,688 low-risk planned home and hospital births. BJOG 2009; 116(9): 1177–1184.

39. Janssen PA, Saxell L, Page LA et al. Outcomes of planned home birth with registered midwife versus planned hospital birth with midwife or physician. CMAJ 2009; 181(6–7): 377–383. Erratum in CMAJ 2009; 181(9): 617.

40. Lindgren HE, Radestad IJ, Christensson K et al. Outcome of planned home births compared to hospital births in Sweden between 1992 and 2004. A population-based register study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2008; 87: 751–759.

41. Evers AC, Brouwers HA, Hukkelhoven CW et al. Perinatal mortality and severe morbidity in low and high risk term pregnancies in the Netherlands: prospective cohort study. BMJ 2010; 341: c5639. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c5639>.

42. Wax JR, Lucas FL, Lamont M et al. Maternal and newborn outcomes in planned home birth vs planned hospital births: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203(3): 243.e1-e8. Erratum in Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 204(4): e7-e13. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.05.028>.

43. Cohain JS. Apgar score of 0 at 5 minutes and neonatal seizures or serious neurologic dysfunction in relation to birth setting. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210(4): 377. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2013.11.005>.

44. Grünebaum A, McCullough LB, Sapra KJ et al. Early and total neonatal mortality in relation to birth setting in the United States, 2006–2009. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211(4): 390.e1-e7. Dostupné z DOI: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.03.047>.

45. Snowden JM, Tilden EL, Snyder J et al. Planned Out-of-Hospital Birth and Birth Outcomes. N Engl J Med 2015; 373(27): 2642–2653.