Combined Training of Closed and Open Kinematic Chains in Rehabilitation Exemplified by the FLOWIN^® System

Česká verzia

Authors: M. Stehlíková; M. Havlíčková; L. Keclíková; A. Steinerová
Authors place of work: Centrum pro demyelinizační onemocnění, Neurologická klinika 1. LF UK a VFN, Praha přednosta prof. MUDr. E. Růžička, DrSc. ; Klinika rehabilitace a tělovýchovného lékařství 2. LF UK a FN Motol, Praha přednosta prof. PaedDr. P. Kolář, Ph. D.
Published in the journal: Rehabil. fyz. Lék., 20, 2013, No. 4, pp. 222-227.
Category: Original Papers

Summary

The article summarizes biomechanical and neurophysiological knowledge about motion oriented to resistance training. The review of literature indicted that motion with the most prominent sensory stimulus from the locomotor system is the work in isometric contraction, where a part of muscles works in a concentric way and another part in the exocentric one. On possibility of using these principles is sc. friction training by the FLOWIN^® system. An analysis of motion mechanism on FLOWIN^® refers to a combined use of advantages of work in the open and closed kinematic chain, described in detail in the paper. The article finally summarized general clinical experience with application of this remedy at the hospital and outpatient wards of rehabilitation and refers to possibilities of the use in therapy of some patients with neurological or orthopedic deficits.

Keywords:
friction training, kinematic chain, FLOWIN

Zdroje

1. AGEBERG, E.: Consequences of a ligament injury on neuromuscular function and relevance to rehabilitation - using the anterior cruciate ligament-injured knee as model. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol., 12, 2002, 3, s. 205-212.

2. BARATTA, R., SOLOMONOW, M., ZHOU, B. H., LETSON, D. L., CHUINARD, R., D´AMBROSIA, R.: Muscular coactivation. The role of the antagonist musculature in maintaining knee stability. Am. J. Sports Med., 16, 1988, s. 113-122.

3. BROTZMAN, B. S.: Clinical orthopaedic rehabilitation. St. Louis, Mosby, 1996, 402 s., ISBN: 0815110340.

4. Cameron, M. H., Wagner, J. M.: Gait abnormalitites in MS: pathogenesis, evaluation, and advances in treatment. Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep., 11. 2001, 5, s. 507-515.

5. CARROLL, T. J., RIEK, S., CARSON, R. G.: Corticospinal responses to motor training revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev., 26, 2001, s. 54-59.

6. CRACRAFT, J. D., PETAJAN, J. H.: Effect of muscle training on the pattern of firing of single motor units. Am. J. Phys. Med., 56, 1977, s. 183-194.

7. DE LUCA, C. J., MAMBRITO, B.: Voluntary kontrol of motor units in human antagonist muscles: coactivation and reciprocal activation. J. Neurophysiol., 58, 1987, s. 525-542.

8. DeBOLT, L. S., Mc CUBBIN, J. A.: The effects of home-based resistence exercise on balance, power and mobility in adults with multiple sclerosis. Arch. Phys. Med Rehabil., 85, 2004, 2, s. 290-297.

9. DESMEDT, J. E., GODAUX, E.: Ballistic contractions in man: characteristic recruitment pattern of single motor units of the tibialis anterior muscle. J. Physiol., 264, 1977, s. 673-693.

10. DUCHATEAU, J., SEMMLER, J. G., ENOKA, R. M.: Training adaptations in the behavior of human motor units. J. Appl. Physiol., 101, 2006, s. 1766-1775.

11. ESCAMILLA, R. F., FLEISIG, G. S., ZHENG, N., BARRENTINE, S. W., WILK, K. E., ANDREWS, J. R.: Biomechanics of the knee during closed kinetic chain and open kinetic chain exercises. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., 30, 1998, 4, s. 556-569.

12. Flowin® Friction Training™ [online]. Malmö: Flowin AB. [cit. 27.2.2013]. Dostupné z: http://www.flowin.com.

13. GABRIEL, D. A., KAMEN, G., FROST, G.: Neural adaptations to resistive exercise: mechanisms and recommendations for training practices. Sports Med., 36, 2006, 2, s. 133-149.

14. Hayes, H. A., Gappmaier, E., LaStayo, P. C.: Effects of high- intensity resistence training on strength, mobility, balance, and fatigue in individuals with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial. J. Neurol. Phys. Ther., 35, 2011, 1, s. 2-10.

15. HENNEMAN, E.: Relation between size of neurons and their susceptibility to discharge. Science, 126, 1957, s. 1345-1347.

16. HOSKOVCOVÁ, M., HONSOVÁ, M., KECLÍKOVÁ, L.: Rehabilitace u roztroušené sklerózy. Neurol. pro praxi, 9, 2008, 4, s. 232–235.

17. Huisinga, J. M., filipi, M. L., Stergiou, N.: Supervised resistence training results in changes in postural control in patients with multiple sclerosis. Motor Control, 16, 2012, 1, s. 50-63.

18. Chmielewski, T. L., Wilk, K. E., Snzder-Mackler, L.: Changes in weight-bearing following injury or surgical reconstruction of the ACL: relationship to quadriceps strength and function. Gait & Posture, 16, 2002, 1, s. 87-95.

19. JANURA, M.: Úvod do biomechaniky pohybového systému člověka. Olomouc, Univerzita Palackého, 2003, 84 s.

20. JULIŠ, K., BREPTA, R. a kol.: Smykové tření. In: Mechanika I. díl – Statika a kinematika. 1. vyd., Praha, SNTL, 1986, s. 68-70.

21. KARAS, V., OTÁHAL, S., SUŠANKA, P.: Biomechanika tělesných cvičení. Praha, Státní pedagogické nakladatelství, 1990, 180 s.

22. Kelleher, K. J., Spence, W., Solomonidis, S., Apatsidis, D.: Ambulatory rehabilitation in MS. Disabil. Rehabil., 31, 2009, 20, s. 1625-1632.

23. KIBLER, B. W., SCIASCIA, A.: Rehabilitation of the athlete's shoulder. Clin. Sports Med., 27, 2008, 4, s. 821-831.

24. KJøLHEDE, T., VISSING, K., DALGAS, U.: Multiple sclerosis and progressive resistence training: a systematic review. Multiple Sclerosis Journal, 18, 2012, 9, s. 1215-1228.

25. KOLÁŘ, P.: Spondylolistéza - funkční diagnostika a konzervativní terapie. In: Suchomel, P., Krbec, M.: Spondylolistéza. Galén, Praha, 2007, 161 s.

26. KOLÁŘ, P. et al.: Rehabilitace v klinické praxi. Praha, Galén, 2009, 713 s.

27. KRÁLÍČEK, P.: Úvod do speciální neurofyziologie. 2. vyd., Praha, Karolinum, 2002. 230 s.

28. LEE, M., CARROLL, T. J.: Cross education: possible mechanisms for the contralateral effects of unilateral resistance training. Sports Med., 37, 2007, 1, s. 1-14.

29. MUNN, J., HERBERT, R. D., HANCOCK, M. J., GANDEVIA, S. C.: Training with unilateral resistance exercise increases contralateral strength. J. Appl. Physiol., 99, 2005, s. 1880-1884.

30. O'SULLIVAN, S. B., SCHMITZ, T. J.: Physical rehabilitation. Fifth edition. Philadephia, F. A. Davis Co., 2007, 719 s.

31. O’Sullivan, P. B., Twomey, L. T., Allison, G. T.: Evaluation of specific stabilizing exercise in the treatment of chronic low back pain with radiologic diagnosis of spondylolysis or spondylolisthesis. Spine, 22, 1997, 24, s. 2959-2967.

32. PASQUET, B., CARPENTIER, A., DUCHATEAU, J.: Change in muscle fascicle length influences the recruitment and discharge rate of motor units during isometric contractions. J. Neurophysiol., 94, 2005, s. 3126-3133.

33. SALE, D. G.: Neural adaptation to resistance training. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., 20, 1988, s. 135-145.

34. SEMMLER, J. G., ENOKA, R. M.: Neural contributions to changes in muscle strength In: Biomechanics in Sport: Performance enhancement and injury orevention, edited by Zatsiorsky V. M., Oxfort, UK, Blackwell, Science, 2000, s. 3-20.

35. STEINDLER, A.: Kinesiology of the human body under normal and pathological conditions. Springfield, Charles C. Thomas, 1955, 708 s., ISBN:978-0398018467.

36. TAX, A. A., DENVER van der GON, J. J., GIELEN, C. C., van den TEMPEL, C. M.: Differences in the activation of m. biceps brachii in the control of slow isotonic movements and isometric contractions. Exp. Brain. Res., 76, 1989, s. 55-63.

37. VAŘEKA, I.: Posturální stabilita. 1. část: Terminologie a biomechanické principy. Rehabil. fyz. Lék., 4, 2002, s. 115-121.

38. VAUGHAN, C. L., DAVIS, B. L., O´CONNOR, J. C.: Dynamics of human gait. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1992, 152 s.

39. WILSON, G. J., MURPHY, A. J., WALSHE, A.: The specificity of strength training: the effect of posture. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol., 73, 1996, s. 346-352.

40. ZOGHI, M., PEARCE, S. L., NORDSTROM, M. A.: Differential modulation of intracortical inhibition in human motor cortex during selective activation of an intrinsic hand muscle. J. Physiol., 550, 2003, s. 933-946.