Transrectal ultrasonography guided prostate needle biopsy
Authors:
prim. MUDr. Aleš Čermák; Prof. MUDr. Dalibor Pacík, CSc.
Authors place of work:
Urologická klinika LF MU a FN Brno
Published in the journal:
Urol List 2007; 5(4): 22-29
Summary
Transrectal ultrasonography guided prostate needle biopsy has become the procedure of choice for obtaining high-quality tissue cores for histopatological assessment in the patients with suspected prostate cancer. The sextant method has become widely accepted as the „gold standard“ biopsy technique. However, concern has arisen that the sextant biopsy method under-samples the prostate and may consequently fail to detect a significant proportion of clinically important tumors. It is uncertain how many biopsy cores are needed to optimize the detection of these tumors. Improved glandular coverage, by either taking more biopsies per gland and/or optimalization of the systematic biopsy scheme, should minimize sampling inaccuracy. Local anesthesia enables to make procedure almost painless and improve acceptance of particularly repeated biopsies.
Key words:
prostate cancer, prostate biopsy, transrectal ultrasonography guided biopsy
Zdroje
1. Dvořáček J, Babjuk M et al. Onkourologie. Praha: Galén 2005: 275-280.
2. Uzzo RG, Wei JT, Waldbaum RS et al. The influence of prostatic size on cancer detection. Urology 1995; 46: 831.
3. Karakiewicz PI, Bazinet M, Aprikian AG et al. Outcome of sextant biopsy according to gland volume. Urology 1997; 49: 55-59.
4. Hodge KK, McNeal JE, Terris MK, Stamey TA. Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J Urol 1986; 142: 71.
5. Cooner WH, Mosley BR, Rutherford CL et al. Prostate cancer detection in a clinical urological practice by ultrasonography, digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen. J Urol 1990; 143: 1146.
6. Epstein JI, Walsh PC, Sauvageot J, Carter HB. Use of repeat sextant and transition zone biopsies for assessing extent of prostatic cancer. J Urol 1997; 158: 1886-1890.
7. Babian RJ, Toi A, Kamoi K et al. A comparative analysis of sextant and extended 11-core multisite directed biopsy strategy. J Urol 2000; 163: 152-157.
8. Borboroglu PG, Comer SW, Riffenburgh RH, Amling CL. Extensive repeat transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy in patients with previous benign sextant biopsies. J Urol 2000; 163: 158-162.
9. Applewhite JC, Matala BR, McCullough DL. Results of the 5 region prostate biopsy Metod: the repeat biopsy population. J Urol 2002; 168: 500.
10. Eskew LA, Bare RL, McCullough DL. Systematic 5 region prostate biopsy is superior to sextant method for diagnosing carcinoma of the prostate cancer. J Urol 1997; 57: 199.
11. Stamey TA. Making the most out of six systematic sextant biopsies. Urology 1995; 45: 2-12.
12. Terris MK, Wallen EM, Stamey TA. Comparison of mid-lobe versus lateral systematic sextant biopsies in the detection of prostate cancer. Urol Int 1997; 59: 239-242.
13. Stehen JJ, Patel A, Schoenfield L et al. Saturation Technique does not improve cancer detection as an initial prostate biopsy strategy. J Urol 2006; 175: 485-488.
14. Issa MM, Bux S, Chun T et al. A randomized prospective trial of intrarectal lidocaine for pain control during transrectal prostate biopsy: the Emory University experience. J Urol 2000; 164: 397-399.
15. Soloway MS, Obek C. Periprostatic local anesthesia before ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. J Urol 2000; 163: 172-173.
16. Kamoi K, Troncoso P, Babaian J. Strategy for repeat biopsy in patients with high grade pros-tatic intraepitelial neoplasia. J Urol 2000; 163: 819-823.
17. Nash PA, Bruce JE, Indudhara R, Shinohara K. Transrectal ultrasound guided prostatic nerve blockade eases systematic needle biopsy of the prostate. J Urol 1996; 155(2): 607-609.
18. Hollabaugh RS Jr, Dmochowski RR, Steiner MS. Neuroanatomy of the male rhabdosphincter. Urology 1997; 49(3): 426-434.
19. Hollabaugh RS Jr, Dmochowski RR, Kneib TG, Steiner MS. Preservation of putative continence nerves during radical retropubic prostatectomy leads to more rapid return of urinary continence. Urology 1998; 51(6): 960-967.
20. Soloway MS, Obek C. Periprostatic local anesthesia before ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. J Urol 2000; 163(1): 172-173.
21. Alavi AS, Soloway MS, Vaidya A et al. Local anesthesia for ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: a prospective randomized trial comparing 2 methods. J Urol 2001; 166(4): 1343-1345.
22. Saad F, Sabbagh R, McCormack M, Peloquin F. A prospective randomized trial comparing lidocaine and lubricating gel on pain level in patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy. Can J Urol 2002; 9(4): 1592-1594.
23. Obek C, Ozkan B, Tunc B et al. Comparison of 3 different methods of anesthesia before transrectal prostate biopsy: a prospective randomized trial. J Urol 2004; 172(2): 502-505.
24. Benoit G, Merlaud L, Meduri G et al. Anatomy of the prostatic nerves. Surg Radiol Anat. 1994; 16(1): 23-29.
25. Mutaguchi K, Shinohara K, Matsubara A et al. Local anesthesia during 10 core biopsy of the prostate: comparison of 2 methods. J Urol 2005 Mar; 173(3): 742-745.
Štítky
Paediatric urologist UrologyČlánok vyšiel v časopise
Urological Journal
2007 Číslo 4
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Whats new about PSMA (Prostate-specific membrane antigen): urologist´s point of view
- Transrectal ultrasonography guided prostate needle biopsy
- Current methods of nephroureteroctomy
- Role of Surgery in Treatment of Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer