#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Nomadic Enhancers: Tissue-Specific -Regulatory Elements of Have Divergent Genomic Positions among Species


cis-regulatory DNA sequences known as enhancers control gene expression in space and time. They are central to metazoan development and are often responsible for changes in gene regulation that contribute to phenotypic evolution. Here, we examine the sequence, function, and genomic location of enhancers controlling tissue- and cell-type specific expression of the yellow gene in six Drosophila species. yellow is required for the production of dark pigment, and its expression has evolved largely in concert with divergent pigment patterns. Using Drosophila melanogaster as a transgenic host, we examined the expression of reporter genes in which either 5′ intergenic or intronic sequences of yellow from each species controlled the expression of Green Fluorescent Protein. Surprisingly, we found that sequences controlling expression in the wing veins, as well as sequences controlling expression in epidermal cells of the abdomen, thorax, and wing, were located in different genomic regions in different species. By contrast, sequences controlling expression in bristle-associated cells were located in the intron of all species. Differences in the precise pattern of spatial expression within the developing epidermis of D. melanogaster transformants usually correlated with adult pigmentation in the species from which the cis-regulatory sequences were derived, which is consistent with cis-regulatory evolution affecting yellow expression playing a central role in Drosophila pigmentation divergence. Sequence comparisons among species favored a model in which sequential nucleotide substitutions were responsible for the observed changes in cis-regulatory architecture. Taken together, these data demonstrate frequent changes in yellow cis-regulatory architecture among Drosophila species. Similar analyses of other genes, combining in vivo functional tests of enhancer activity with in silico comparative genomics, are needed to determine whether the pattern of regulatory evolution we observed for yellow is characteristic of genes with rapidly evolving expression patterns.


Vyšlo v časopise: Nomadic Enhancers: Tissue-Specific -Regulatory Elements of Have Divergent Genomic Positions among Species. PLoS Genet 6(11): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1001222
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001222

Souhrn

cis-regulatory DNA sequences known as enhancers control gene expression in space and time. They are central to metazoan development and are often responsible for changes in gene regulation that contribute to phenotypic evolution. Here, we examine the sequence, function, and genomic location of enhancers controlling tissue- and cell-type specific expression of the yellow gene in six Drosophila species. yellow is required for the production of dark pigment, and its expression has evolved largely in concert with divergent pigment patterns. Using Drosophila melanogaster as a transgenic host, we examined the expression of reporter genes in which either 5′ intergenic or intronic sequences of yellow from each species controlled the expression of Green Fluorescent Protein. Surprisingly, we found that sequences controlling expression in the wing veins, as well as sequences controlling expression in epidermal cells of the abdomen, thorax, and wing, were located in different genomic regions in different species. By contrast, sequences controlling expression in bristle-associated cells were located in the intron of all species. Differences in the precise pattern of spatial expression within the developing epidermis of D. melanogaster transformants usually correlated with adult pigmentation in the species from which the cis-regulatory sequences were derived, which is consistent with cis-regulatory evolution affecting yellow expression playing a central role in Drosophila pigmentation divergence. Sequence comparisons among species favored a model in which sequential nucleotide substitutions were responsible for the observed changes in cis-regulatory architecture. Taken together, these data demonstrate frequent changes in yellow cis-regulatory architecture among Drosophila species. Similar analyses of other genes, combining in vivo functional tests of enhancer activity with in silico comparative genomics, are needed to determine whether the pattern of regulatory evolution we observed for yellow is characteristic of genes with rapidly evolving expression patterns.


Zdroje

1. AmoresA

ForceA

YanYL

JolyL

AmemiyaC

1998 Zebrafish hox clusters and vertebrate genome evolution. Science 282 1711 1714

2. LukowitzW

SchroderC

GlaserG

HulskampM

TautzD

1994 Regulatory and coding regions of the segmentation gene hunchback are functionally conserved between Drosophila virilis and Drosophila melanogaster. Mech Dev 45 105 115

3. LudwigMZ

PatelNH

KreitmanM

1998 Functional analysis of eve stripe 2 enhancer evolution in Drosophila: rules governing conservation and change. Development 125 949 958

4. RomanoLA

WrayGA

2003 Conservation of Endo16 expression in sea urchins despite evolutionary divergence in both cis and trans-acting components of transcriptional regulation. Development 130 4187 4199

5. HareEE

PetersonBK

IyerVN

MeierR

EisenMB

2008 Sepsid even-skipped enhancers are functionally conserved in Drosophila despite lack of sequence conservation. PLoS Genet 4 e1000106 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000106

6. WrattenNS

McGregorAP

ShawPJ

DoverGA

2006 Evolutionary and functional analysis of the tailless enhancer in Musca domestica and Drosophila melanogaster. Evol Dev 8 6 15

7. CandeJ

GoltsevY

LevineMS

2009 Conservation of enhancer location in divergent insects. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106 14414 14419

8. WittkoppPJ

TrueJR

CarrollSB

2002 Reciprocal functions of the Drosophila Yellow and Ebony proteins in the development and evolution of pigment patterns. Development 129 1849 1858

9. FutahashiR

SatoJ

MengY

OkamotoS

DaimonT

2008 yellow and ebony are the responsible genes for the larval color mutants of the silkworm Bombyx mori. Genetics 180 1995 2005

10. ArakaneY

DittmerNT

TomoyasuY

KramerKJ

MuthukrishnanS

2010 Identification, mRNA expression and functional analysis of several yellow family genes in Tribolium castaneum. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 40 259 266

11. GompelN

Prud'hommeB

WittkoppPJ

KassnerVA

CarrollSB

2005 Chance caught on the wing: cis-regulatory evolution and the origin of pigment patterns in Drosophila. Nature 433 481 487

12. WittkoppPJ

VaccaroK

CarrollSB

2002 Evolution of yellow gene regulation and pigmentation in Drosophila. Curr Biol 12 1547 1556

13. Prud'hommeB

GompelN

RokasA

KassnerVA

WilliamsTM

2006 Repeated morphological evolution through cis-regulatory changes in a pleiotropic gene. Nature 440 1050 1053

14. JeongS

RokasA

CarrollSB

2006 Regulation of body pigmentation by the Abdominal-B Hox protein and its gain and loss in Drosophila evolution. Cell 125 1387 1399

15. GeyerPK

CorcesVG

1987 Separate regulatory elements are responsible for the complex pattern of tissue-specific and developmental transcription of the yellow locus in Drosophila melanogaster. Genes Dev 1 996 1004

16. MartinM

MengYB

ChiaW

1989 Regulatory elements involved in the tissue-specific expression of the yellow gene of Drosophila. Mol Gen Genet 218 118 126

17. WernerT

KoshikawaS

WilliamsTM

CarrollSB

2010 Generation of a novel wing colour pattern by the Wingless morphogen. Nature 464 1143 1148

18. SpicerGS

BellCD

2002 Molecular phylogeny of the Drosophila virilis species group (Diptera: Drosophilidae) inferred from mitochondrial 12S and 16S ribosomal RNA genes. Annuals of the Entomological Society of America 95 156 161

19. RussoCA

TakezakiN

NeiM

1995 Molecular phylogeny and divergence times of drosophilid species. Mol Biol Evol 12 391 404

20. GrothAC

FishM

NusseR

CalosMP

2004 Construction of transgenic Drosophila by using the site-specific integrase from phage phiC31. Genetics 166 1775 1782

21. CretekosCJ

WangY

GreenED

MartinJF

RasweilerJJt

2008 Regulatory divergence modifies limb length between mammals. Genes Dev 22 141 151

22. FrankelN

DavisGK

VargasD

WangS

PayreF

2010 Phenotypic robustness conferred by apparently redundant transcriptional enhancers. Nature 466 490 493

23. HelmsAW

AbneyAL

Ben-ArieN

ZoghbiHY

JohnsonJE

2000 Autoregulation and multiple enhancers control Math1 expression in the developing nervous system. Development 127 1185 1196

24. HongJW

HendrixDA

LevineMS

2008 Shadow enhancers as a source of evolutionary novelty. Science 321 1314

25. JeongY

El-JaickK

RoesslerE

MuenkeM

EpsteinDJ

2006 A functional screen for sonic hedgehog regulatory elements across a 1 Mb interval identifies long-range ventral forebrain enhancers. Development 133 761 772

26. PappuKS

OstrinEJ

MiddlebrooksBW

SiliBT

ChenR

2005 Dual regulation and redundant function of two eye-specific enhancers of the Drosophila retinal determination gene dachshund. Development 132 2895 2905

27. UemuraO

OkadaY

AndoH

GuedjM

HigashijimaS

2005 Comparative functional genomics revealed conservation and diversification of three enhancers of the isl1 gene for motor and sensory neuron-specific expression. Dev Biol 278 587 606

28. WittkoppPJ

BeldadeP

2008 Development and evolution of insect pigmentation: genetic mechanisms and the potential consequences of pleiotropy. Semin Cell Dev Biol 20 65 71

29. PanD

ValentineSA

CoureyAJ

1994 The bipartite D. melanogaster twist promoter is reorganized in D. virilis. Mech Dev 46 41 53

30. HauenschildA

RingroseL

AltmutterC

ParoR

RehmsmeierM

2008 Evolutionary plasticity of polycomb/trithorax response elements in Drosophila species. PLoS Biol 6 e261 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060261

31. WittkoppPJ

2006 Evolution of cis-regulatory sequence and function in Diptera. Heredity 97 139 147

32. SambrookJ

FritschEF

ManiatisT

1989 Molecular Cloning: a laboratory manual. New York Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press

33. HornC

WimmerEA

2000 A versatile vector set for animal transgenesis. Dev Genes Evol 210 630 637

34. BischofJ

MaedaRK

HedigerM

KarchF

BaslerK

2007 An optimized transgenesis system for Drosophila using germ-line-specific phiC31 integrases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104 3312 3317

35. MarksteinM

PitsouliC

VillaltaC

CelnikerSE

PerrimonN

2008 Exploiting position effects and the gypsy retrovirus insulator to engineer precisely expressed transgenes. Nat Genet 40 476 483

36. RheadB

KarolchikD

KuhnRM

HinrichsAS

ZweigAS

2010 The UCSC Genome Browser database: update 2010. Nucleic Acids Res 38 D613 619

37. RDC T 2005 A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria R Foundation for Statistical Computing

38. StothardP

2000 The sequence manipulation suite: JavaScript programs for analyzing and formatting protein and DNA sequences. Biotechniques 28 1102 1104

39. DrapeauMD

CyranSA

VieringMM

GeyerPK

LongAD

2006 A cis-regulatory sequence within the yellow locus of Drosophila melanogaster required for normal male mating success. Genetics 172 1009 1030

40. BlanchetteM

KentWJ

RiemerC

ElnitskiL

SmitAF

2004 Aligning multiple genomic sequences with the threaded blockset aligner. Genome Res 14 708 715

41. SiepelA

BejeranoG

PedersenJS

HinrichsAS

HouM

2005 Evolutionarily conserved elements in vertebrate, insect, worm, and yeast genomes. Genome Res 15 1034 1050

42. RheadB

KarolchikD

KuhnRM

HinrichsAS

ZweigAS

2010 The UCSC Genome Browser database: update 2010. Nucleic Acids Res 38 D613 619

Štítky
Genetika Reprodukčná medicína

Článok vyšiel v časopise

PLOS Genetics


2010 Číslo 11
Najčítanejšie tento týždeň
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
Kurzy

Zvýšte si kvalifikáciu online z pohodlia domova

Aktuální možnosti diagnostiky a léčby litiáz
nový kurz
Autori: MUDr. Tomáš Ürge, PhD.

Všetky kurzy
Prihlásenie
Zabudnuté heslo

Zadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.

Prihlásenie

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte sa

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#