Notch-Mediated Suppression of TSC2 Expression Regulates Cell Differentiation in the Intestinal Stem Cell Lineage
Epithelial homeostasis in the posterior midgut of Drosophila is maintained by multipotent intestinal stem cells (ISCs). ISCs self-renew and produce enteroblasts (EBs) that differentiate into either enterocytes (ECs) or enteroendocrine cells (EEs) in response to differential Notch (N) activation. Various environmental and growth signals dynamically regulate ISC activity, but their integration with differentiation cues in the ISC lineage remains unclear. Here we identify Notch-mediated repression of Tuberous Sclerosis Complex 2 (TSC2) in EBs as a required step in the commitment of EBs into the EC fate. The TSC1/2 complex inhibits TOR signaling, acting as a tumor suppressor in vertebrates and regulating cell growth. We find that TSC2 is expressed highly in ISCs, where it maintains stem cell identity, and that N-mediated repression of TSC2 in EBs is required and sufficient to promote EC differentiation. Regulation of TSC/TOR activity by N signaling thus emerges as critical for maintenance and differentiation in somatic stem cell lineages.
Vyšlo v časopise:
Notch-Mediated Suppression of TSC2 Expression Regulates Cell Differentiation in the Intestinal Stem Cell Lineage. PLoS Genet 8(11): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003045
Kategorie:
Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003045
Souhrn
Epithelial homeostasis in the posterior midgut of Drosophila is maintained by multipotent intestinal stem cells (ISCs). ISCs self-renew and produce enteroblasts (EBs) that differentiate into either enterocytes (ECs) or enteroendocrine cells (EEs) in response to differential Notch (N) activation. Various environmental and growth signals dynamically regulate ISC activity, but their integration with differentiation cues in the ISC lineage remains unclear. Here we identify Notch-mediated repression of Tuberous Sclerosis Complex 2 (TSC2) in EBs as a required step in the commitment of EBs into the EC fate. The TSC1/2 complex inhibits TOR signaling, acting as a tumor suppressor in vertebrates and regulating cell growth. We find that TSC2 is expressed highly in ISCs, where it maintains stem cell identity, and that N-mediated repression of TSC2 in EBs is required and sufficient to promote EC differentiation. Regulation of TSC/TOR activity by N signaling thus emerges as critical for maintenance and differentiation in somatic stem cell lineages.
Zdroje
1. RossiDJ, JamiesonCH, WeissmanIL (2008) Stems cells and the pathways to aging and cancer. Cell 132: 681–696.
2. Drummond-BarbosaD (2008) Stem cells, their niches and the systemic environment: an aging network. Genetics 180: 1787–1797.
3. SharplessNE, DePinhoRA (2007) How stem cells age and why this makes us grow old. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8: 703–713.
4. JasperH, JonesDL (2010) Metabolic regulation of stem cell behavior and implications for aging. Cell Metab 12: 561–565.
5. HouSX (2010) Intestinal stem cell asymmetric division in the Drosophila posterior midgut. J Cell Physiol 224: 581–584.
6. CasaliA, BatlleE (2009) Intestinal stem cells in mammals and Drosophila. Cell Stem Cell 4: 124–127.
7. BiteauB, HochmuthCE, JasperH (2011) Maintaining tissue homeostasis: dynamic control of somatic stem cell activity. Cell Stem Cell 9: 402–411.
8. MicchelliCA, PerrimonN (2006) Evidence that stem cells reside in the adult Drosophila midgut epithelium. Nature 439: 475–479.
9. OhlsteinB, SpradlingA (2006) The adult Drosophila posterior midgut is maintained by pluripotent stem cells. Nature 439: 470–474.
10. OhlsteinB, SpradlingA (2007) Multipotent Drosophila intestinal stem cells specify daughter cell fates by differential notch signaling. Science 315: 988–992.
11. PerdigotoCN, SchweisguthF, BardinAJ (2011) Distinct levels of Notch activity for commitment and terminal differentiation of stem cells in the adult fly intestine. Development 138: 4585–4595.
12. BardinAJ, PerdigotoCN, SouthallTD, BrandAH, SchweisguthF (2010) Transcriptional control of stem cell maintenance in the Drosophila intestine. Development 137: 705–714.
13. XuN, WangSQ, TanD, GaoY, LinG, et al. (2011) EGFR, Wingless and JAK/STAT signaling cooperatively maintain Drosophila intestinal stem cells. Dev Biol 354: 31–43.
14. StaleyBK, IrvineKD (2010) Warts and Yorkie mediate intestinal regeneration by influencing stem cell proliferation. Curr Biol 20: 1580–1587.
15. ShawRL, KohlmaierA, PoleselloC, VeelkenC, EdgarBA, et al. (2010) The Hippo pathway regulates intestinal stem cell proliferation during Drosophila adult midgut regeneration. Development 137: 4147–4158.
16. RenF, WangB, YueT, YunEY, IpYT, et al. (2010) Hippo signaling regulates Drosophila intestine stem cell proliferation through multiple pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 21064–21069.
17. KarpowiczP, PerezJ, PerrimonN (2010) The Hippo tumor suppressor pathway regulates intestinal stem cell regeneration. Development 137: 4135–4145.
18. AmcheslavskyA, JiangJ, IpYT (2009) Tissue damage-induced intestinal stem cell division in Drosophila. Cell Stem Cell 4: 49–61.
19. ApidianakisY, PitsouliC, PerrimonN, RahmeL (2009) Synergy between bacterial infection and genetic predisposition in intestinal dysplasia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 20883–20888.
20. BeebeK, LeeWC, MicchelliCA (2010) JAK/STAT signaling coordinates stem cell proliferation and multilineage differentiation in the Drosophila intestinal stem cell lineage. Dev Biol 338: 28–37.
21. BiteauB, HochmuthCE, JasperH (2008) JNK activity in somatic stem cells causes loss of tissue homeostasis in the aging Drosophila gut. Cell Stem Cell 3: 442–455.
22. BiteauB, JasperH (2011) EGF signaling regulates the proliferation of intestinal stem cells in Drosophila. Development 138: 1045–1055.
23. BiteauB, KarpacJ, SupoyoS, DeGennaroM, LehmannR, et al. (2010) Lifespan extension by preserving proliferative homeostasis in Drosophila. PLoS Genet 6: e1001159 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1001159.
24. BuchonN, BroderickNA, ChakrabartiS, LemaitreB (2009) Invasive and indigenous microbiota impact intestinal stem cell activity through multiple pathways in Drosophila. Genes Dev 23: 2333–2344.
25. BuchonN, BroderickNA, KuraishiT, LemaitreB (2010) Drosophila EGFR pathway coordinates stem cell proliferation and gut remodeling following infection. BMC Biol 8: 152.
26. BuchonN, BroderickNA, PoidevinM, PradervandS, LemaitreB (2009) Drosophila intestinal response to bacterial infection: activation of host defense and stem cell proliferation. Cell Host Microbe 5: 200–211.
27. JiangH, GrenleyMO, BravoMJ, BlumhagenRZ, EdgarBA (2011) EGFR/Ras/MAPK signaling mediates adult midgut epithelial homeostasis and regeneration in Drosophila. Cell Stem Cell 8: 84–95.
28. JiangH, PatelPH, KohlmaierA, GrenleyMO, McEwenDG, et al. (2009) Cytokine/Jak/Stat signaling mediates regeneration and homeostasis in the Drosophila midgut. Cell 137: 1343–1355.
29. LeeWC, BeebeK, SudmeierL, MicchelliCA (2009) Adenomatous polyposis coli regulates Drosophila intestinal stem cell proliferation. Development 136: 2255–2264.
30. LinG, XuN, XiR (2008) Paracrine Wingless signalling controls self-renewal of Drosophila intestinal stem cells. Nature 455: 1119–1123.
31. HochmuthCE, BiteauB, BohmannD, JasperH (2011) Redox regulation by Keap1 and Nrf2 controls intestinal stem cell proliferation in Drosophila. Cell Stem Cell 8: 1–12.
32. ChoiNH, KimJG, YangDJ, KimYS, YooMA (2008) Age-related changes in Drosophila midgut are associated with PVF2, a PDGF/VEGF-like growth factor. Aging Cell 7: 318–334.
33. O'BrienLE, SolimanSS, LiX, BilderD (2011) Altered modes of stem cell division drive adaptive intestinal growth. Cell 147: 603–614.
34. ChoiNH, LucchettaE, OhlsteinB (2011) Nonautonomous regulation of Drosophila midgut stem cell proliferation by the insulin-signaling pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 18702–18707.
35. GrewalSS (2009) Insulin/TOR signaling in growth and homeostasis: a view from the fly world. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 41: 1006–1010.
36. JohnstonLA, GallantP (2002) Control of growth and organ size in Drosophila. Bioessays 24: 54–64.
37. NobukiniT, ThomasG (2004) The mTOR/S6K signalling pathway: the role of the TSC1/2 tumour suppressor complex and the proto-oncogene Rheb. Novartis Found Symp 262: 148–154; discussion 154-149, 265-148.
38. HietakangasV, CohenSM (2009) Regulation of tissue growth through nutrient sensing. Annu Rev Genet 43: 389–410.
39. BrittonJS, LockwoodWK, LiL, CohenSM, EdgarBA (2002) Drosophila's insulin/PI3-kinase pathway coordinates cellular metabolism with nutritional conditions. Dev Cell 2: 239–249.
40. HuangJ, ManningBD (2008) The TSC1-TSC2 complex: a molecular switchboard controlling cell growth. Biochem J 412: 179–190.
41. LaplanteM, SabatiniDM (2012) mTOR signaling in growth control and disease. Cell 149: 274–293.
42. SchleichS, TelemanAA (2009) Akt phosphorylates both Tsc1 and Tsc2 in Drosophila, but neither phosphorylation is required for normal animal growth. PLoS ONE 4: e6305 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006305.
43. DongJ, PanD (2004) Tsc2 is not a critical target of Akt during normal Drosophila development. Genes Dev 18: 2479–2484.
44. HuJ, ZacharekS, HeYJ, LeeH, ShumwayS, et al. (2008) WD40 protein FBW5 promotes ubiquitination of tumor suppressor TSC2 by DDB1-CUL4-ROC1 ligase. Genes Dev 22: 866–871.
45. InokiK, GuanKL (2009) Tuberous sclerosis complex, implication from a rare genetic disease to common cancer treatment. Hum Mol Genet 18: R94–100.
46. EasleyCAt, Ben-YehudahA, RedingerCJ, OliverSL, VarumST, et al. (2010) mTOR-mediated activation of p70 S6K induces differentiation of pluripotent human embryonic stem cells. Cell Reprogram 12: 263–273.
47. YilmazÖH, KatajistoP, LammingDW, GültekinY, Bauer-RoweKE, et al. (2012) mTORC1 in the Paneth cell niche couples intestinal stem-cell function to calorie intake. Nature
48. LaFeverL, Drummond-BarbosaD (2005) Direct control of germline stem cell division and cyst growth by neural insulin in Drosophila. Science 309: 1071–1073.
49. LaFeverL, FeoktistovA, HsuHJ, Drummond-BarbosaD (2010) Specific roles of Target of rapamycin in the control of stem cells and their progeny in the Drosophila ovary. Development 137: 2117–2126.
50. SunP, QuanZ, ZhangB, WuT, XiR (2010) TSC1/2 tumour suppressor complex maintains Drosophila germline stem cells by preventing differentiation. Development 137: 2461–2469.
51. HsuHJ, Drummond-BarbosaD (2009) Insulin levels control female germline stem cell maintenance via the niche in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 1117–1121.
52. McLeodCJ, WangL, WongC, JonesDL (2010) Stem cell dynamics in response to nutrient availability. Curr Biol 20: 2100–2105.
53. AmcheslavskyA, ItoN, JiangJ, IpYT (2011) Tuberous sclerosis complex and Myc coordinate the growth and division of Drosophila intestinal stem cells. J Cell Biol 193: 695–710.
54. LeeT, LuoL (2001) Mosaic analysis with a repressible cell marker (MARCM) for Drosophila neural development. Trends Neurosci 24: 251–254.
55. WuQ, ZhangY, XuJ, ShenP (2005) Regulation of hunger-driven behaviors by neural ribosomal S6 kinase in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 13289–13294.
56. BohniR, Riesgo-EscovarJ, OldhamS, BrogioloW, StockerH, et al. (1999) Autonomous control of cell and organ size by CHICO, a Drosophila homolog of vertebrate IRS1-4. Cell 97: 865–875.
57. ChenC, JackJ, GarofaloRS (1996) The Drosophila insulin receptor is required for normal growth. Endocrinology 137: 846–856.
58. TaponN, ItoN, DicksonBJ, TreismanJE, HariharanIK (2001) The Drosophila tuberous sclerosis complex gene homologs restrict cell growth and cell proliferation. Cell 105: 345–355.
59. ItoN, RubinGM (1999) gigas, a Drosophila homolog of tuberous sclerosis gene product-2, regulates the cell cycle. Cell 96: 529–539.
60. OldhamS, MontagneJ, RadimerskiT, ThomasG, HafenE (2000) Genetic and biochemical characterization of dTOR, the Drosophila homolog of the target of rapamycin. Genes Dev 14: 2689–2694.
61. BatemanJM, McNeillH (2004) Temporal control of differentiation by the insulin receptor/tor pathway in Drosophila. Cell 119: 87–96.
62. McGuireSE, LePT, OsbornAJ, MatsumotoK, DavisRL (2003) Spatiotemporal rescue of memory dysfunction in Drosophila. Science 302: 1765–1768.
63. MathurD, BostA, DriverI, OhlsteinB (2010) A transient niche regulates the specification of Drosophila intestinal stem cells. Science 327: 210–213.
64. ZengX, ChauhanC, HouSX (2010) Characterization of midgut stem cell- and enteroblast-specific Gal4 lines in drosophila. Genesis 48: 607–611.
65. KrejciA, BernardF, HousdenBE, CollinsS, BraySJ (2009) Direct response to Notch activation: signaling crosstalk and incoherent logic. Sci Signal 2: ra1.
66. FehonRG, KoohPJ, RebayI, ReganCL, XuT, et al. (1990) Molecular interactions between the protein products of the neurogenic loci Notch and Delta, two EGF-homologous genes in Drosophila. Cell 61: 523–534.
67. TheodosiouNA, XuT (1998) Use of FLP/FRT system to study Drosophila development. Methods 14: 355–365.
68. KatewaSD, KapahiP (2010) Role of TOR signaling in aging and related biological processes in Drosophila melanogaster. Exp Gerontol 46: 382–390.
69. MaJ, MengY, KwiatkowskiDJ, ChenX, PengH, et al. (2010) Mammalian target of rapamycin regulates murine and human cell differentiation through STAT3/p63/Jagged/Notch cascade. J Clin Invest 120: 103–114.
70. KarbowniczekM, ZitsermanD, KhabibullinD, HartmanT, YuJ, et al. (2010) The evolutionarily conserved TSC/Rheb pathway activates Notch in tuberous sclerosis complex and Drosophila external sensory organ development. J Clin Invest 120: 93–102.
71. WangZ, LiY, BanerjeeS, KongD, AhmadA, et al. (2010) Down-regulation of Notch-1 and Jagged-1 inhibits prostate cancer cell growth, migration and invasion, and induces apoptosis via inactivation of Akt, mTOR, and NF-kappaB signaling pathways. J Cell Biochem 109: 726–736.
72. EffersonCL, WinkelmannCT, WareC, SullivanT, GiampaoliS, et al. (2010) Downregulation of Notch pathway by a gamma-secretase inhibitor attenuates AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin signaling and glucose uptake in an ERBB2 transgenic breast cancer model. Cancer Res 70: 2476–2484.
73. PearWS (2010) New roles for Notch in tuberous sclerosis. J Clin Invest 120: 84–87.
74. FisherA, CaudyM (1998) The function of hairy-related bHLH repressor proteins in cell fate decisions. Bioessays 20: 298–306.
75. LecuyerE, YoshidaH, ParthasarathyN, AlmC, BabakT, et al. (2007) Global analysis of mRNA localization reveals a prominent role in organizing cellular architecture and function. Cell 131: 174–187.
Štítky
Genetika Reprodukčná medicínaČlánok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS Genetics
2012 Číslo 11
- Je „freeze-all“ pro všechny? Odborníci na fertilitu diskutovali na virtuálním summitu
- Gynekologové a odborníci na reprodukční medicínu se sejdou na prvním virtuálním summitu
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Mechanisms Employed by to Prevent Ribonucleotide Incorporation into Genomic DNA by Pol V
- Inference of Population Splits and Mixtures from Genome-Wide Allele Frequency Data
- Zcchc11 Uridylates Mature miRNAs to Enhance Neonatal IGF-1 Expression, Growth, and Survival
- Histone Methyltransferases MES-4 and MET-1 Promote Meiotic Checkpoint Activation in