Binary Cell Fate Decisions and Fate Transformation in the Larval Eye
The functionality of sensory neurons is defined by the expression of specific sensory receptor genes. During the development of the Drosophila larval eye, photoreceptor neurons (PRs) make a binary choice to express either the blue-sensitive Rhodopsin 5 (Rh5) or the green-sensitive Rhodopsin 6 (Rh6). Later during metamorphosis, ecdysone signaling induces a cell fate and sensory receptor switch: Rh5-PRs are re-programmed to express Rh6 and become the eyelet, a small group of extraretinal PRs involved in circadian entrainment. However, the genetic and molecular mechanisms of how the binary cell fate decisions are made and switched remain poorly understood. We show that interplay of two transcription factors Senseless (Sens) and Hazy control cell fate decisions, terminal differentiation of the larval eye and its transformation into eyelet. During initial differentiation, a pulse of Sens expression in primary precursors regulates their differentiation into Rh5-PRs and repression of an alternative Rh6-cell fate. Later, during the transformation of the larval eye into the adult eyelet, Sens serves as an anti-apoptotic factor in Rh5-PRs, which helps in promoting survival of Rh5-PRs during metamorphosis and is subsequently required for Rh6 expression. Comparably, during PR differentiation Hazy functions in initiation and maintenance of rhodopsin expression. Hazy represses Sens specifically in the Rh6-PRs, allowing them to die during metamorphosis. Our findings show that the same transcription factors regulate diverse aspects of larval and adult PR development at different stages and in a context-dependent manner.
Vyšlo v časopise:
Binary Cell Fate Decisions and Fate Transformation in the Larval Eye. PLoS Genet 9(12): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004027
Kategorie:
Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004027
Souhrn
The functionality of sensory neurons is defined by the expression of specific sensory receptor genes. During the development of the Drosophila larval eye, photoreceptor neurons (PRs) make a binary choice to express either the blue-sensitive Rhodopsin 5 (Rh5) or the green-sensitive Rhodopsin 6 (Rh6). Later during metamorphosis, ecdysone signaling induces a cell fate and sensory receptor switch: Rh5-PRs are re-programmed to express Rh6 and become the eyelet, a small group of extraretinal PRs involved in circadian entrainment. However, the genetic and molecular mechanisms of how the binary cell fate decisions are made and switched remain poorly understood. We show that interplay of two transcription factors Senseless (Sens) and Hazy control cell fate decisions, terminal differentiation of the larval eye and its transformation into eyelet. During initial differentiation, a pulse of Sens expression in primary precursors regulates their differentiation into Rh5-PRs and repression of an alternative Rh6-cell fate. Later, during the transformation of the larval eye into the adult eyelet, Sens serves as an anti-apoptotic factor in Rh5-PRs, which helps in promoting survival of Rh5-PRs during metamorphosis and is subsequently required for Rh6 expression. Comparably, during PR differentiation Hazy functions in initiation and maintenance of rhodopsin expression. Hazy represses Sens specifically in the Rh6-PRs, allowing them to die during metamorphosis. Our findings show that the same transcription factors regulate diverse aspects of larval and adult PR development at different stages and in a context-dependent manner.
Zdroje
1. RisterJ, DesplanC (2011) The Retinal Mosaics of Opsin Expression in Invertebrates and Vertebrates. Developmental Neurobiology 71: 1212–1226.
2. RisterJ, DesplanC, VasiliauskasD (2013) Establishing and maintaining gene expression patterns: insights from sensory receptor patterning. Development 140: 493–503.
3. KeeneAC, MazzoniEO, ZhenJ, YoungerMA, YamaguchiS, et al. (2011) Distinct visual pathways mediate Drosophila larval light avoidance and circadian clock entrainment. J Neurosci 31: 6527–6534.
4. KeeneAC, SprecherSG (2012) Seeing the light: photobehavior in fruit fly larvae. Trends Neurosci 35: 104–110.
5. MazzoniEO, DesplanC, BlauJ (2005) Circadian pacemaker neurons transmit and modulate visual information to control a rapid behavioral response. Neuron 45: 293–300.
6. von EssenAMHJ, PaulsD, ThumAS, SprecherSG (2011) Capacity of Visual Classical Conditioning in Drosophila Larvae. Behavioral Neuroscience 125: 921–929.
7. SprecherSG, PichaudF, DesplanC (2007) Adult and larval photoreceptors use different mechanisms to specify the same rhodopsin fates. Genes & Development 21: 2182–2195.
8. GreenP, HartensteinAY, HartensteinV (1993) The embryonic development of the Drosophila visual system. Cell Tissue Res 273: 583–598.
9. DanielA, DumstreiK, LengyelJA, HartensteinV (1999) The control of cell fate in the embryonic visual system by atonal, tailless and EGFR signaling. Development 126: 2945–2954.
10. SuzukiT, SaigoK (2000) Transcriptional regulation of atonal required for Drosophila larval eye development by concerted action of eyes absent, sine oculis and hedgehog signaling independent of fused kinase and cubitus interruptus. Development 127: 1531–1540.
11. Mikeladze-DvaliT, WernetMF, PistilloD, MazzoniEO, TelemanAA, et al. (2005) The growth regulators warts/lats and melted interact in a bistable loop to specify opposite fates in Drosophila R8 photoreceptors. Cell 122: 775–787.
12. ChouWH, HuberA, BentropJ, SchulzS, SchwabK, et al. (1999) Patterning of the R7 and R8 photoreceptor cells of Drosophila: evidence for induced and default cell-fate specification. Development 126: 607–616.
13. ThanawalaSU, RisterJ, GoldbergGW, ZuskovA, OlesnickyEC, et al. (2013) Regional modulation of a stochastically expressed factor determines photoreceptor subtypes in the Drosophila retina. Dev Cell 25: 93–105.
14. WernetMF, MazzoniEO, CelikA, DuncanDM, DuncanI, et al. (2006) Stochastic spineless expression creates the retinal mosaic for colour vision. Nature 440: 174–180.
15. DomingosPM, BrownS, BarrioR, RatnakumarK, FrankfortBJ, et al. (2004) Regulation of R7 and R8 differentiation by the spalt genes. Dev Biol 273: 121–133.
16. DomingosPM, MlodzikM, MendesCS, BrownS, StellerH, et al. (2004) Spalt transcription factors are required for R3/R4 specification and establishment of planar cell polarity in the Drosophila eye. Development 131: 5695–5702.
17. HiromiY, MlodzikM, WestSR, RubinGM, GoodmanCS (1993) Ectopic expression of seven-up causes cell fate changes during ommatidial assembly. Development 118: 1123–1135.
18. VandendriesER, JohnsonD, ReinkeR (1996) orthodenticle is required for photoreceptor cell development in the Drosophila eye. Dev Biol 173: 243–255.
19. Helfrich-ForsterC, EdwardsT, YasuyamaK, WisotzkiB, SchneuwlyS, et al. (2002) The extraretinal eyelet of Drosophila: development, ultrastructure, and putative circadian function. J Neurosci 22: 9255–9266.
20. HofbauerA, BuchnerE (1989) Does Drosophila Have 7 Eyes. Naturwissenschaften 76: 335–336.
21. SprecherSG, DesplanC (2008) Switch of rhodopsin expression in terminally differentiated Drosophila sensory neurons. Nature 454: 533–537.
22. FortiniME, RubinGM (1990) Analysis of cis-acting requirements of the Rh3 and Rh4 genes reveals a bipartite organization to rhodopsin promoters in Drosophila melanogaster. Genes Dev 4: 444–463.
23. PapatsenkoD, NazinaA, DesplanC (2001) A conserved regulatory element present in all Drosophila rhodopsin genes mediates Pax6 functions and participates in the fine-tuning of cell-specific expression. Mech Dev 101: 143–153.
24. MismerD, RubinGM (1987) Analysis of the promoter of the ninaE opsin gene in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 116: 565–578.
25. FrankfortBJ, NoloR, ZhangZ, BellenH, MardonG (2001) senseless repression of rough is required for R8 photoreceptor differentiation in the developing Drosophila eye. Neuron 32: 403–414.
26. PeppleKL, AtkinsM, VenkenK, WellnitzK, HardingM, et al. (2008) Two-step selection of a single R8 photoreceptor: a bistable loop between senseless and rough locks in R8 fate. Development 135: 4071–4079.
27. ZelhofAC, KoundakjianE, ScullyAL, HardyRW, PoundsL (2003) Mutation of the photoreceptor specific homeodomain gene Pph13 results in defects in phototransduction and rhabdomere morphogenesis. Development 130: 4383–4392.
28. DietzlG, ChenD, SchnorrerF, SuKC, BarinovaY, et al. (2007) A genome-wide transgenic RNAi library for conditional gene inactivation in Drosophila. Nature 448: 151–156.
29. JukamD, XieB, RisterJ, TerrellD, Charlton-PerkinsM, et al. (2013) Opposite Feedbacks in the Hippo Pathway for Growth Control and Neural Fate. Science 342: 1238016.
30. ShengG, ThouvenotE, SchmuckerD, WilsonDS, DesplanC (1997) Direct regulation of rhodopsin 1 by Pax-6/eyeless in Drosophila: evidence for a conserved function in photoreceptors. Genes Dev 11: 1122–1131.
31. MishraM, OkeA, LebelC, McDonaldEC, PlummerZ, et al. (2010) Pph13 and orthodenticle define a dual regulatory pathway for photoreceptor cell morphogenesis and function. Development 137: 2895–2904.
32. MollereauB, DominguezM, WebelR, ColleyNJ, KeungB, et al. (2001) Two-step process for photoreceptor formation in Drosophila. Nature 412: 911–913.
33. XieB, Charlton-PerkinsM, McDonaldE, GebeleinB, CookT (2007) Senseless functions as a molecular switch for color photoreceptor differentiation in Drosophila. Development 134: 4243–4253.
34. FrankfortBJ, MardonG (2004) Senseless represses nuclear transduction of Egfr pathway activation. Development 131: 563–570.
35. PapatsenkoD, ShengG, DesplanC (1997) A new rhodopsin in R8 photoreceptors of Drosophila: evidence for coordinate expression with Rh3 in R7 cells. Development 124: 1665–1673.
36. Jafar-NejadH, AcarM, NoloR, LacinH, PanH, et al. (2003) Senseless acts as a binary switch during sensory organ precursor selection. Genes Dev 17: 2966–2978.
37. ChandrasekaranV, BeckendorfSK (2003) senseless is necessary for the survival of embryonic salivary glands in Drosophila. Development 130: 4719–4728.
38. JiaY, XieG, AamodtE (1996) pag-3, a Caenorhabditis elegans gene involved in touch neuron gene expression and coordinated movement. Genetics 142: 141–147.
39. JiaY, XieG, McDermottJB, AamodtE (1997) The C. elegans gene pag-3 is homologous to the zinc finger proto-oncogene gfi-1. Development 124: 2063–2073.
40. CameronS, ClarkSG, McDermottJB, AamodtE, HorvitzHR (2002) PAG-3, a Zn-finger transcription factor, determines neuroblast fate in C. elegans. Development 129: 1763–1774.
41. WallisD, HamblenM, ZhouY, VenkenKJ, SchumacherA, et al. (2003) The zinc finger transcription factor Gfi1, implicated in lymphomagenesis, is required for inner ear hair cell differentiation and survival. Development 130: 221–232.
42. KuhnleinRP, FrommerG, FriedrichM, Gonzalez-GaitanM, WeberA, et al. (1994) spalt encodes an evolutionarily conserved zinc finger protein of novel structure which provides homeotic gene function in the head and tail region of the Drosophila embryo. EMBO J 13: 168–179.
43. MlodzikM, HiromiY, WeberU, GoodmanCS, RubinGM (1990) The Drosophila seven-up gene, a member of the steroid receptor gene superfamily, controls photoreceptor cell fates. Cell 60: 211–224.
44. NoloR, AbbottLA, BellenHJ (2000) Senseless, a Zn finger transcription factor, is necessary and sufficient for sensory organ development in Drosophila. Cell 102: 349–362.
45. O'KeefeL, DouganST, GabayL, RazE, ShiloBZ, et al. (1997) Spitz and Wingless, emanating from distinct borders, cooperate to establish cell fate across the Engrailed domain in the Drosophila epidermis. Development 124: 4837–4845.
46. ChangT, Younossi-HartensteinA, HartensteinV (2003) Development of neural lineages derived from the sine oculis positive eye field of Drosophila. Arthropod Struct Dev 32: 303–317.
47. BischofJ, MaedaRK, HedigerM, KarchF, BaslerK (2007) An optimized transgenesis system for Drosophila using germ-line-specific phiC31 integrases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 3312–3317.
48. CookT, PichaudF, SonnevilleR, PapatsenkoD, DesplanC (2003) Distinction between color photoreceptor cell fates is controlled by Prospero in Drosophila. Dev Cell 4: 853–864.
49. TherianosS, LeuzingerS, HirthF, GoodmanCS, ReichertH (1995) Embryonic development of the Drosophila brain: formation of commissural and descending pathways. Development 121: 3849–3860.
50. KanaiMI, OkabeM, HiromiY (2005) seven-up Controls switching of transcription factors that specify temporal identities of Drosophila neuroblasts. Dev Cell 8: 203–213.
51. KosmanD, SmallS, ReinitzJ (1998) Rapid preparation of a panel of polyclonal antibodies to Drosophila segmentation proteins. Dev Genes Evol 208: 290–294.
52. TahayatoA, SonnevilleR, PichaudF, WernetMF, PapatsenkoD, et al. (2003) Otd/Crx, a dual regulator for the specification of ommatidia subtypes in the Drosophila retina. Dev Cell 5: 391–402.
53. ChouWH, HallKJ, WilsonDB, WidemanCL, TownsonSM, et al. (1996) Identification of a novel Drosophila opsin reveals specific patterning of the R7 and R8 photoreceptor cells. Neuron 17: 1101–1115.
54. HirthF, KammermeierL, FreiE, WalldorfU, NollM, et al. (2003) An urbilaterian origin of the tripartite brain: developmental genetic insights from Drosophila. Development 130: 2365–2373.
Štítky
Genetika Reprodukčná medicínaČlánok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS Genetics
2013 Číslo 12
- Je „freeze-all“ pro všechny? Odborníci na fertilitu diskutovali na virtuálním summitu
- Gynekologové a odborníci na reprodukční medicínu se sejdou na prvním virtuálním summitu
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- The NuRD Chromatin-Remodeling Enzyme CHD4 Promotes Embryonic Vascular Integrity by Transcriptionally Regulating Extracellular Matrix Proteolysis
- Comprehensive Analysis of Transcriptome Variation Uncovers Known and Novel Driver Events in T-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
- Quantifying Missing Heritability at Known GWAS Loci
- Smc5/6-Mms21 Prevents and Eliminates Inappropriate Recombination Intermediates in Meiosis