A Domesticated Transposase Interacts with Heterochromatin and Catalyzes Reproducible DNA Elimination in
The somatic genome of the ciliated protist Tetrahymena undergoes DNA elimination of defined sequences called internal eliminated sequences (IESs), which account for ∼30% of the germline genome. During DNA elimination, IES regions are heterochromatinized and assembled into heterochromatin bodies in the developing somatic nucleus. The domesticated piggyBac transposase Tpb2p is essential for the formation of heterochromatin bodies and DNA elimination. In this study, we demonstrate that the activities of Tpb2p involved in forming heterochromatin bodies and executing DNA elimination are genetically separable. The cysteine-rich domain of Tpb2p, which interacts with the heterochromatin-specific histone modifications, is necessary for both heterochromatin body formation and DNA elimination, whereas the endonuclease activity of Tpb2p is only necessary for DNA elimination. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the endonuclease activity of Tpb2p in vitro and the endonuclease activity that executes DNA elimination in vivo have similar substrate sequence preferences. These results strongly indicate that Tpb2p is the endonuclease that directly catalyzes the excision of IESs and that the boundaries of IESs are at least partially determined by the combination of Tpb2p-heterochromatin interaction and relaxed sequence preference of the endonuclease activity of Tpb2p.
Vyšlo v časopise:
A Domesticated Transposase Interacts with Heterochromatin and Catalyzes Reproducible DNA Elimination in. PLoS Genet 9(12): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004032
Kategorie:
Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004032
Souhrn
The somatic genome of the ciliated protist Tetrahymena undergoes DNA elimination of defined sequences called internal eliminated sequences (IESs), which account for ∼30% of the germline genome. During DNA elimination, IES regions are heterochromatinized and assembled into heterochromatin bodies in the developing somatic nucleus. The domesticated piggyBac transposase Tpb2p is essential for the formation of heterochromatin bodies and DNA elimination. In this study, we demonstrate that the activities of Tpb2p involved in forming heterochromatin bodies and executing DNA elimination are genetically separable. The cysteine-rich domain of Tpb2p, which interacts with the heterochromatin-specific histone modifications, is necessary for both heterochromatin body formation and DNA elimination, whereas the endonuclease activity of Tpb2p is only necessary for DNA elimination. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the endonuclease activity of Tpb2p in vitro and the endonuclease activity that executes DNA elimination in vivo have similar substrate sequence preferences. These results strongly indicate that Tpb2p is the endonuclease that directly catalyzes the excision of IESs and that the boundaries of IESs are at least partially determined by the combination of Tpb2p-heterochromatin interaction and relaxed sequence preference of the endonuclease activity of Tpb2p.
Zdroje
1. OrgelLE, CrickFH (1980) Selfish DNA: the ultimate parasite. Nature 284: 604–607.
2. AlmeidaR, AllshireRC (2005) RNA silencing and genome regulation. Trends Cell Biol 15: 251–258 doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2005.03.006
3. VolffJ-N (2006) Turning junk into gold: domestication of transposable elements and the creation of new genes in eukaryotes. Bioessays 28: 913–922 doi:10.1002/bies.20452
4. ChengC-Y, VogtA, MochizukiK, YaoM-C (2010) A domesticated piggyBac transposase plays key roles in heterochromatin dynamics and DNA cleavage during programmed DNA deletion in Tetrahymena thermophila. Mol Biol Cell 21: 1753–1762 doi:10.1091/mbc.E09-12-1079
5. PrescottDM (1994) The DNA of ciliated protozoa. Microbiol Rev 58: 233–267.
6. EisenJA, CoyneRS, WuM, WuD, ThiagarajanM, et al. (2006) Macronuclear genome sequence of the ciliate Tetrahymena thermophila, a model eukaryote. PLoS Biol 4: e286 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040286
7. HamiltonE, BrunsP, LinC, MerriamV, OriasE, et al. (2005) Genome-wide characterization of tetrahymena thermophila chromosome breakage sites. I. Cloning and identification of functional sites. Genetics 170: 1611–1621 doi:10.1534/genetics.104.031401
8. FanQ, YaoM (1996) New telomere formation coupled with site-specific chromosome breakage in Tetrahymena thermophila. Mol Cell Biol 16: 1267–1274.
9. YaoMC, ChoiJ, YokoyamaS, AusterberryCF, YaoCH (1984) DNA elimination in Tetrahymena: a developmental process involving extensive breakage and rejoining of DNA at defined sites. Cell 36: 433–440.
10. LinI-T, ChaoJ-L, YaoM-C (2012) An essential role for the DNA breakage-repair protein Ku80 in programmed DNA rearrangements in Tetrahymena thermophila. Mol Biol Cell 23: 2213–2225 doi:10.1091/mbc.E11-11-0952
11. KapustaA, MatsudaA, MarmignonA, KuM, SilveA, et al. (2011) Highly precise and developmentally programmed genome assembly in Paramecium requires ligase IV-dependent end joining. PLoS Genet 7: e1002049 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002049
12. SchoeberlUE, KurthHM, NotoT, MochizukiK (2012) Biased transcription and selective degradation of small RNAs shape the pattern of DNA elimination in Tetrahymena. Genes Dev 26: 1729–1742 doi:10.1101/gad.196493.112
13. CoyneRS, StoverNA, MiaoW (2012) Whole genome studies of Tetrahymena. Methods Cell Biol 109: 53–81 doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-385967-9.00004-9
14. ChalkerDL, YaoM-C (2011) DNA elimination in ciliates: transposon domestication and genome surveillance. Annu Rev Genet 45: 227–246 doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-110410-132432
15. FassJN, JoshiNA, CouvillionMT, BowenJ, GorovskyMA, et al. (2011) Genome-Scale Analysis of Programmed DNA Elimination Sites in Tetrahymena thermophila. G3 (Bethesda) 1: 515–522 doi:10.1534/g3.111.000927
16. SchoeberlUE, MochizukiK (2011) Keeping the soma free of transposons: programmed DNA elimination in ciliates. J Biol Chem 286: 37045–37052 doi:10.1074/jbc.R111.276964
17. KataokaK, MochizukiK (2011) Programmed DNA elimination in Tetrahymena: a small RNA-mediated genome surveillance mechanism. Adv Exp Med Biol 722: 156–173 doi:_10.1007/978-1-4614-0332-6_10
18. LiuY, MochizukiK, GorovskyMA (2004) Histone H3 lysine 9 methylation is required for DNA elimination in developing macronuclei in Tetrahymena. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 1679–1684 doi:10.1073/pnas.0305421101
19. LiuY, TavernaSD, MuratoreTL, ShabanowitzJ, HuntDF, et al. (2007) RNAi-dependent H3K27 methylation is required for heterochromatin formation and DNA elimination in Tetrahymena. Genes Dev 21: 1530–1545 doi:10.1101/gad.1544207
20. MadireddiMT, CoyneRS, SmothersJF, MickeyKM, YaoMC, et al. (1996) Pdd1p, a novel chromodomain-containing protein, links heterochromatin assembly and DNA elimination in Tetrahymena. Cell 87: 75–84.
21. SmothersJF, MadireddiMT, WarnerFD, AllisCD (1997) Programmed DNA degradation and nucleolar biogenesis occur in distinct organelles during macronuclear development in Tetrahymena. J Eukaryot Microbiol 44: 79–88.
22. SavelievSV, CoxMM (2001) Product analysis illuminates the final steps of IES deletion in Tetrahymena thermophila. EMBO J 20: 3251–3261 doi:10.1093/emboj/20.12.3251
23. SavelievSV, CoxMM (1994) The fate of deleted DNA produced during programmed genomic deletion events in Tetrahymena thermophila. Nucleic Acids Res 22: 5695–5701.
24. YaoMC, YaoCH (1994) Detection of circular excised DNA deletion elements in Tetrahymena thermophila during development. Nucleic Acids Res 22: 5702–5708.
25. TavernaSD, CoyneRS, AllisCD (2002) Methylation of histone h3 at lysine 9 targets programmed DNA elimination in tetrahymena. Cell 110: 701–711.
26. ChalkerDL, La TerzaA, WilsonA, KroenkeCD, YaoMC (1999) Flanking regulatory sequences of the Tetrahymena R deletion element determine the boundaries of DNA rearrangement. Mol Cell Biol 19: 5631–5641.
27. GodiskaR, JamesC, YaoMC (1993) A distant 10-bp sequence specifies the boundaries of a programmed DNA deletion in Tetrahymena. Genes Dev 7: 2357–2365.
28. GodiskaR, YaoMC (1990) A programmed site-specific DNA rearrangement in Tetrahymena thermophila requires flanking polypurine tracts. Cell 61: 1237–1246.
29. ShangY, SongX, BowenJ, CorstanjeR, GaoY, et al. (2002) A robust inducible-repressible promoter greatly facilitates gene knockouts, conditional expression, and overexpression of homologous and heterologous genes in Tetrahymena thermophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 3734–3739 doi:10.1073/pnas.052016199
30. WellsJM, EllingsonJL, CattDM, BergerPJ, KarrerKM (1994) A small family of elements with long inverted repeats is located near sites of developmentally regulated DNA rearrangement in Tetrahymena thermophila. Mol Cell Biol 14: 5939–5949.
31. AusterberryCF, AllisCD, YaoMC (1984) Specific DNA rearrangements in synchronously developing nuclei of Tetrahymena. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81: 7383–7387.
32. BoldrinF, SantovitoG, FormigariA, BisharyanY, Cassidy-HanleyD, et al. (2008) MTT2, a copper-inducible metallothionein gene from Tetrahymena thermophila. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol 147: 232–240 doi:10.1016/j.cbpc.2007.10.002
33. KeithJH, SchaeperCA, FraserTS, FraserMJ (2008) Mutational analysis of highly conserved aspartate residues essential to the catalytic core of the piggyBac transposase. BMC Mol Biol 9: 73 doi:10.1186/1471-2199-9-73
34. MitraR, Fain-ThorntonJ, CraigNL (2008) piggyBac can bypass DNA synthesis during cut and paste transposition. EMBO J 27: 1097–1109 doi:10.1038/emboj.2008.41
35. BaudryC, MalinskyS, RestituitoM, KapustaA, RosaS, et al. (2009) PiggyMac, a domesticated piggyBac transposase involved in programmed genome rearrangements in the ciliate Paramecium tetraurelia. Genes Dev 23: 2478–2483 doi:10.1101/gad.547309
36. BienzM (2006) The PHD finger, a nuclear protein-interaction domain. Trends Biochem Sci 31: 35–40 doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2005.11.001
37. KatohM, HironoM, TakemasaT, KimuraM, WatanabeY (1993) A micronucleus-specific sequence exists in the 5′-upstream region of calmodulin gene in Tetrahymena thermophila. Nucleic Acids Res 21: 2409–2414.
38. AusterberryCF, SnyderRO, YaoMC (1989) Sequence microheterogeneity is generated at junctions of programmed DNA deletions in Tetrahymena thermophila. Nucleic Acids Res 17: 7263–7272.
39. SavelievSV, CoxMM (1996) Developmentally programmed DNA deletion in Tetrahymena thermophila by a transposition-like reaction pathway. EMBO J 15: 2858–2869.
40. DydaF, ChandlerM, HickmanAB (2012) The emerging diversity of transpososome architectures. Q Rev Biophys 45: 493–521 doi:10.1017/S0033583512000145
41. KlobutcherLA, HerrickG (1997) Developmental genome reorganization in ciliated protozoa: the transposon link. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol 56: 1–62.
42. WangH, MayhewD, ChenX, JohnstonM, MitraRD (2012) “Calling cards” for DNA-binding proteins in mammalian cells. Genetics 190: 941–949 doi:10.1534/genetics.111.137315
43. NowackiM, HigginsBP, MaquilanGM, SwartEC, DoakTG, et al. (2009) A functional role for transposases in a large eukaryotic genome. Science 324: 935–938 doi:10.1126/science.1170023
44. SteeleCJ, Barkocy-GallagherGA, PreerLB, PreerJR (1994) Developmentally excised sequences in micronuclear DNA of Paramecium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 2255–2259.
45. ArnaizO, MathyN, BaudryC, MalinskyS, AuryJ-M, et al. (2012) The Paramecium germline genome provides a niche for intragenic parasitic DNA: evolutionary dynamics of internal eliminated sequences. PLoS Genet 8: e1002984 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002984
46. GrewalSI (2010) RNAi-dependent formation of heterochromatin and its diverse functions. Curr Opin Genet Dev 20: 134–141 doi:10.1016/j.gde.2010.02.003
47. GorovskyMA, YaoMC, KeevertJB, PlegerGL (1975) Isolation of micro- and macronuclei of Tetrahymena pyriformis. Methods Cell Biol 9: 311–327.
48. BuschCJ-L, VogtA, MochizukiK (2010) Establishment of a Cre/loxP recombination system for N-terminal epitope tagging of genes in Tetrahymena. BMC Microbiol 10: 191 doi:10.1186/1471-2180-10-191
49. KataokaK, SchoeberlUE, MochizukiK (2010) Modules for C-terminal epitope tagging of Tetrahymena genes. J Microbiol Methods 82: 342–346 doi:10.1016/j.mimet.2010.07.009
50. BrunsPJ, Cassidy-HanleyD (2000) Biolistic transformation of macro- and micronuclei. Methods Cell Biol 62: 501–512.
51. YaoMC, YaoCH (1989) Accurate processing and amplification of cloned germ line copies of ribosomal DNA injected into developing nuclei of Tetrahymena thermophila. Mol Cell Biol 9: 1092–1099.
52. Sweet MT, Allis CD (2006) Transformation of Tetrahymena thermophila by Electroporation. CSH Protoc 2006. doi:10.1101/pdb.prot4502
53. LoidlJ, ScherthanH (2004) Organization and pairing of meiotic chromosomes in the ciliate Tetrahymena thermophila. J Cell Sci 117: 5791–5801 doi:10.1242/jcs.01504
Štítky
Genetika Reprodukčná medicínaČlánok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS Genetics
2013 Číslo 12
- Je „freeze-all“ pro všechny? Odborníci na fertilitu diskutovali na virtuálním summitu
- Gynekologové a odborníci na reprodukční medicínu se sejdou na prvním virtuálním summitu
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- The NuRD Chromatin-Remodeling Enzyme CHD4 Promotes Embryonic Vascular Integrity by Transcriptionally Regulating Extracellular Matrix Proteolysis
- Comprehensive Analysis of Transcriptome Variation Uncovers Known and Novel Driver Events in T-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
- Quantifying Missing Heritability at Known GWAS Loci
- Smc5/6-Mms21 Prevents and Eliminates Inappropriate Recombination Intermediates in Meiosis