Smc5/6-Mms21 Prevents and Eliminates Inappropriate Recombination Intermediates in Meiosis

English version České info

Repairing broken chromosomes via joint molecule (JM) intermediates is hazardous and therefore strictly controlled in most organisms. Also in budding yeast meiosis, where production of enough crossovers via JMs is imperative, only a subset of DNA breaks are repaired via JMs, closely regulated by the ZMM pathway. The other breaks are repaired to non-crossovers, avoiding JM formation, through pathways that require the BLM/Sgs1 helicase. “Rogue” JMs that escape the ZMM pathway and BLM/Sgs1 are eliminated before metaphase by resolvases like Mus81-Mms4 to prevent chromosome nondisjunction. Here, we report the requirement of Smc5/6-Mms21 for antagonizing rogue JMs via two mechanisms; destabilizing early intermediates and resolving JMs. Elimination of the Mms21 SUMO E3-ligase domain leads to transient JM accumulation, depending on Mus81-Mms4 for resolution. Absence of Smc6 leads to persistent rogue JMs accumulation, preventing chromatin separation. We propose that the Smc5/6-Mms21 complex antagonizes toxic JMs by coordinating helicases and resolvases at D-Loops and HJs, respectively.

Vyšlo v časopise: Smc5/6-Mms21 Prevents and Eliminates Inappropriate Recombination Intermediates in Meiosis. PLoS Genet 9(12): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004067
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004067

Souhrn

Zdroje

1. KleinF, MahrP, GalovaM, BuonomoSB, MichaelisC, et al. (1999) A central role for cohesins in sister chromatid cohesion, formation of axial elements, and recombination during yeast meiosis. Cell 98: 91–103.

2. BuonomoSB, ClyneRK, FuchsJ, LoidlJ, UhlmannF, et al. (2000) Disjunction of homologous chromosomes in meiosis I depends on proteolytic cleavage of the meiotic cohesin Rec8 by separin. Cell 103: 387–398.

3. BordeV, GoldmanAS, LichtenM (2000) Direct coupling between meiotic DNA replication and recombination initiation. Science 290: 806–809.

4. BornerGV, KlecknerN, HunterN (2004) Crossover/noncrossover differentiation, synaptonemal complex formation, and regulatory surveillance at the leptotene/zygotene transition of meiosis. Cell 117: 29–45.

5. ZakharyevichK, TangS, MaY, HunterN (2012) Delineation of joint molecule resolution pathways in meiosis identifies a crossover-specific resolvase. Cell 149: 334–347.

6. SourirajanA, LichtenM (2008) Polo-like kinase Cdc5 drives exit from pachytene during budding yeast meiosis. Genes Dev 22: 2627–2632.

7. MatosJ, BlancoMG, MaslenS, SkehelJM, WestSC (2011) Regulatory control of the resolution of DNA recombination intermediates during meiosis and mitosis. Cell 147: 158–172.

8. BennettRJ, SharpJA, WangJC (1998) Purification and characterization of the Sgs1 DNA helicase activity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 273: 9644–9650.

9. De MuytA, JessopL, KolarE, SourirajanA, ChenJ, et al. (2012) BLM helicase ortholog Sgs1 is a central regulator of meiotic recombination intermediate metabolism. Mol Cell 46: 43–53.

10. JessopL, LichtenM (2008) Mus81/Mms4 endonuclease and Sgs1 helicase collaborate to ensure proper recombination intermediate metabolism during meiosis. Mol Cell 31: 313–323.

11. JessopL, RockmillB, RoederGS, LichtenM (2006) Meiotic chromosome synapsis-promoting proteins antagonize the anti-crossover activity of Sgs1. PLoS Genet 2: e155.

12. OhS, LaoJ, TaylorA, SmithG, HunterN (2008) RecQ helicase, Sgs1, and XPF family endonuclease, Mus81-Mms4, resolve aberrant joint molecules during meiotic recombination. Mol Cell 31: 324–336.

13. FabreF, ChanA, HeyerWD, GangloffS (2002) Alternate pathways involving Sgs1/Top3, Mus81/Mms4, and Srs2 prevent formation of toxic recombination intermediates from single-stranded gaps created by DNA replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 16887–16892.

14. LiuJ, RenaultL, VeauteX, FabreF, StahlbergH, et al. (2011) Rad51 paralogues Rad55-Rad57 balance the antirecombinase Srs2 in Rad51 filament formation. Nature 479: 245–248.

15. AntonyE, TomkoE, XiaoQ, KrejciL, LohmanT, et al. (2009) Srs2 disassembles Rad51 filaments by a protein-protein interaction triggering ATP turnover and dissociation of Rad51 from DNA. Mol Cell 35: 105–115.

16. SugawaraN, GoldfarbT, StudamireB, AlaniE, HaberJE (2004) Heteroduplex rejection during single-strand annealing requires Sgs1 helicase and mismatch repair proteins Msh2 and Msh6 but not Pms1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 9315–9320.

17. ChenCF, BrillSJ (2010) An essential DNA strand-exchange activity is conserved in the divergent N-termini of BLM orthologs. EMBO J 29: 1713–1725.

18. WuL, HicksonID (2003) The Bloom's syndrome helicase suppresses crossing over during homologous recombination. Nature 426: 870–874.

19. DayaniY, SimchenG, LichtenM (2011) Meiotic recombination intermediates are resolved with minimal crossover formation during return-to-growth, an analogue of the mitotic cell cycle. PLoS Genet 7: e1002083.

20. GrieseJJ, WitteG, HopfnerKP (2010) Structure and DNA binding activity of the mouse condensin hinge domain highlight common and diverse features of SMC proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 38: 3454–3465.

21. HaeringCH, LoweJ, HochwagenA, NasmythK (2002) Molecular architecture of SMC proteins and the yeast cohesin complex. Mol Cell 9: 773–788.

22. HiranoM, HiranoT (2006) Opening closed arms: long-distance activation of SMC ATPase by hinge-DNA interactions. Mol Cell 21: 175–186.

23. CuylenS, MetzJ, HaeringCH (2011) Condensin structures chromosomal DNA through topological links. Nat Struct Mol Biol 18: 894–901.

24. IvanovD, NasmythK (2005) A topological interaction between cohesin rings and a circular minichromosome. Cell 122: 849–860.

25. RoyMA, SiddiquiN, D'AmoursD (2011) Dynamic and selective DNA-binding activity of Smc5, a core component of the Smc5-Smc6 complex. Cell Cycle 10: 690–700.

26. RoyMA, D'AmoursD (2011) DNA-binding properties of Smc6, a core component of the Smc5-6 DNA repair complex. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 416: 80–85.

27. ZhaoX, BlobelG (2005) From The Cover: A SUMO ligase is part of a nuclear multiprotein complex that affects DNA repair and chromosomal organization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 4777–4782.

28. DuanX, YangY, ChenYH, ArenzJ, RangiGK, et al. (2009) Architecture of the Smc5/6 complex of Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals a unique interaction between the Nse5-6 subcomplex and the hinge regions of Smc5 and Smc6. J Biol Chem 284: 8507–8515.

29. De PiccoliG, Torres-RosellJ, AragonL (2009) The unnamed complex: what do we know about Smc5-Smc6? Chromosome Res 17: 251–263.

30. McAleenanA, Cordon-PreciadoV, Clemente-BlancoA, LiuIC, SenN, et al. (2012) SUMOylation of the alpha-kleisin subunit of cohesin is required for DNA damage-induced cohesion. Curr Biol : CB 22: 1564–1575.

31. PottsPR (2009) The Yin and Yang of the MMS21-SMC5/6 SUMO ligase complex in homologous recombination. DNA Repair (Amst) 8: 499–506.

32. DuanX, SarangiP, LiuX, RangiGK, ZhaoX, et al. (2009) Structural and functional insights into the roles of the Mms21 subunit of the Smc5/6 complex. Mol Cell 35: 657–668.

33. TaylorEM, CopseyAC, HudsonJJ, VidotS, LehmannAR (2008) Identification of the proteins, including MAGEG1, that make up the human SMC5-6 protein complex. Mol Cell Biol 28: 1197–1206.

34. McDonaldWH, PavlovaY, YatesJR3rd, BoddyMN (2003) Novel essential DNA repair proteins Nse1 and Nse2 are subunits of the fission yeast Smc5-Smc6 complex. J Biol Chem 278: 45460–45467.

35. De PiccoliG, Cortes-LedesmaF, IraG, Torres-RosellJ, UhleS, et al. (2006) Smc5-Smc6 mediate DNA double-strand-break repair by promoting sister-chromatid recombination. Nat Cell Biol 8: 1032–1034.

36. CostGJ, CozzarelliNR (2006) Smc5p promotes faithful chromosome transmission and DNA repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 172: 2185–2200.

37. Torres-RosellJ, MachinF, FarmerS, JarmuzA, EydmannT, et al. (2005) SMC5 and SMC6 genes are required for the segregation of repetitive chromosome regions. Nat Cell Biol 7: 412–419.

38. LeungGP, LeeL, SchmidtTI, ShirahigeK, KoborMS (2011) Rtt107 is required for recruitment of the SMC5/6 complex to DNA double strand breaks. J Biol Chem 286: 26250–26257.

39. LindroosHB, StromL, ItohT, KatouY, ShirahigeK, et al. (2006) Chromosomal association of the Smc5/6 complex reveals that it functions in differently regulated pathways. Mol Cell 22: 755–767.

40. BranzeiD, SollierJ, LiberiG, ZhaoX, MaedaD, et al. (2006) Ubc9- and Mms21-mediated sumoylation counteracts recombinogenic events at damaged replication forks. Cell 127: 509–522.

41. MurrayJ, CarrA (2008) Smc5/6: a link between DNA repair and unidirectional replication? Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9: 177–182.

42. HarveySH, SheedyDM, CuddihyAR, O'ConnellMJ (2004) Coordination of DNA damage responses via the Smc5/Smc6 complex. Mol Cell Biol 24: 662–674.

43. Wehrkamp-RichterS, HyppaRW, PruddenJ, SmithGR, BoddyMN (2012) Meiotic DNA joint molecule resolution depends on Nse5-Nse6 of the Smc5-Smc6 holocomplex. Nucleic Acids Res 40: 9633–9646.

44. FarmerS, San-SegundoPA, AragonL (2011) The Smc5-Smc6 complex is required to remove chromosome junctions in meiosis. PloS One 6: e20948.

45. OnodaF, TakedaM, SekiM, MaedaD, TajimaJ, et al. (2004) SMC6 is required for MMS-induced interchromosomal and sister chromatid recombinations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA Repair (Amst) 3: 429–439.

46. DuanX, YeH (2009) Purification, crystallization and preliminary X-ray crystallographic studies of the complex between Smc5 and the SUMO E3 ligase Mms21. Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun 65: 849–852.

47. AllersT, LichtenM (2001) Differential timing and control of noncrossover and crossover recombination during meiosis. Cell 106: 47–57.

48. PezzaR, VoloshinO, VanevskiF, Camerini-OteroR (2007) Hop2/Mnd1 acts on two critical steps in Dmc1-promoted homologous pairing. Genes Dev 21: 1758–1766.

49. ZierhutC, BerlingerM, RuppC, ShinoharaA, KleinF (2004) Mnd1 is required for meiotic interhomolog repair. Curr Biol 14: 752–762.

50. GertonJL, DeRisiJL (2002) Mnd1p: an evolutionarily conserved protein required for meiotic recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 6895–6900.

51. PanizzaS, MendozaMA, BerlingerM, HuangL, NicolasA, et al. (2011) Spo11-accessory proteins link double-strand break sites to the chromosome axis in early meiotic recombination. Cell 146: 372–383.

52. GlynnEF, MegeePC, YuHG, MistrotC, UnalE, et al. (2004) Genome-wide mapping of the cohesin complex in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Biol 2: E259.

53. PanJ, SasakiM, KniewelR, MurakamiH, BlitzblauHG, et al. (2011) A hierarchical combination of factors shapes the genome-wide topography of yeast meiotic recombination initiation. Cell 144: 719–731.

54. CopseyA, TangS, JordanP, BlitzblauH, NewcombeS, et al. (2013) Smc5/6 coordinates formation and resolution of joint molecules with chromosome morphology to ensure meiotic divisions. PLoS Genet 6: e1001028.

55. GerlichD, KochB, DupeuxF, PetersJM, EllenbergJ (2006) Live-cell imaging reveals a stable cohesin-chromatin interaction after but not before DNA replication. Curr Biol 16: 1571–1578.

56. CarballoJA, PanizzaS, SerrentinoME, JohnsonAL, GeymonatM, et al. (2013) Budding yeast ATM/ATR control meiotic double-strand break (DSB) levels by down-regulating Rec114, an essential component of the DSB-machinery. PLoS Genet 9: e1003545.

57. AmpatzidouE, IrmischA, O'ConnellMJ, MurrayJM (2006) Smc5/6 is required for repair at collapsed replication forks. Mol Cell Biol 26: 9387–9401.

58. ChavezA, GeorgeV, AgrawalV, JohnsonFB (2010) Sumoylation and the structural maintenance of chromosomes (Smc) 5/6 complex slow senescence through recombination intermediate resolution. J Biol Chem 285: 11922–11930.

59. AllersT, LichtenM (2001) Intermediates of yeast meiotic recombination contain heteroduplex DNA. Mol Cell 8: 225–231.

60. ChuaPR, RoederGS (1998) Zip2, a meiosis-specific protein required for the initiation of chromosome synapsis. Cell 93: 349–359.

61. OhS, LaoJ, HwangP, TaylorA, SmithG, et al. (2007) BLM ortholog, Sgs1, prevents aberrant crossing-over by suppressing formation of multichromatid joint molecules. Cell 130: 259–272.

62. ClyneRK, KatisVL, JessopL, BenjaminKR, HerskowitzI, et al. (2003) Polo-like kinase Cdc5 promotes chiasmata formation and cosegregation of sister centromeres at meiosis I. Nat Cell Biol 5: 480–485.

63. ChavezA, AgrawalV, JohnsonFB (2011) Homologous recombination-dependent rescue of deficiency in the structural maintenance of chromosomes (Smc) 5/6 complex. J Biol Chem 286: 5119–5125.

64. ChenY, ChoiK, SzakalB, ArenzJ, DuanX, et al. (2009) Interplay between the Smc5/6 complex and the Mph1 helicase in recombinational repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 21252–21257.

65. St OngeRP, ManiR, OhJ, ProctorM, FungE, et al. (2007) Systematic pathway analysis using high-resolution fitness profiling of combinatorial gene deletions. Nature Genet 39: 199–206.

66. LynnA, SoucekR, BornerGV (2007) ZMM proteins during meiosis: crossover artists at work. Chromosome Res 15: 591–605.

67. AgarwalS, RoederG (2000) Zip3 provides a link between recombination enzymes and synaptonemal complex proteins. Cell 102: 245–255.

68. LuCY, TsaiCH, BrillSJ, TengSC (2010) Sumoylation of the BLM ortholog, Sgs1, promotes telomere-telomere recombination in budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res 38: 488–498.

69. CremonaCA, SarangiP, YangY, HangLE, RahmanS, et al. (2012) Extensive DNA damage-induced sumoylation contributes to replication and repair and acts in addition to the mec1 checkpoint. Mol Cell 45: 422–432.

70. FlottS, AlabertC, TohGW, TothR, SugawaraN, et al. (2007) Phosphorylation of Slx4 by Mec1 and Tel1 regulates the single-strand annealing mode of DNA repair in budding yeast. Mol Cell Biol 27: 6433–6445.

71. IpS, RassU, BlancoM, FlynnH, SkehelJ, et al. (2008) Identification of Holliday junction resolvases from humans and yeast. Nature 456: 357–361.

72. WuTC, LichtenM (1994) Meiosis-induced double-strand break sites determined by yeast chromatin structure. Science 263: 515–518.

73. WuTC, LichtenM (1995) Factors that affect the location and frequency of meiosis-induced double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 140: 55–66.

74. OhtaK, ShibataT, NicolasA (1994) Changes in chromatin structure at recombination initiation sites during yeast meiosis. EMBO J 13: 5754–5763.

75. BordeV, RobineN, LinW, BonfilsS, GeliV, et al. (2009) Histone H3 lysine 4 trimethylation marks meiotic recombination initiation sites. EMBO J 28: 99–111.

76. HaeringC, FarcasA, ArumugamP, MetsonJ, NasmythK (2008) The cohesin ring concatenates sister DNA molecules. Nature 454: 297–301.

77. LengronneA, KatouY, MoriS, YokobayashiS, KellyGP, et al. (2004) Cohesin relocation from sites of chromosomal loading to places of convergent transcription. Nature 430: 573–578.

78. LeeBH, AmonA (2003) Role of Polo-like kinase CDC5 in programming meiosis I chromosome segregation. Science 300: 482–486.

79. CarlileT, AmonA (2008) Meiosis I is established through division-specific translational control of a cyclin. Cell 133: 280–291.

80. OhSD, JessopL, LaoJP, AllersT, LichtenM, et al. (2009) Stabilization and electrophoretic analysis of meiotic recombination intermediates in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods Mol Biol 557: 209–234.

81. AllersT, LichtenM (2000) A method for preparing genomic DNA that restrains branch migration of Holliday junctions. Nucleic Acids Res 28: e6.

82. NairzK, KleinF (1997) mre11S–a yeast mutation that blocks double-strand-break processing and permits nonhomologous synapsis in meiosis. Genes Dev 11: 2272–2290.

83. KlutsteinM, XaverM, ShemeshR, ZenvirthD, KleinF, et al. (2009) Separation of roles of Zip1 in meiosis revealed in heterozygous mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Genet Genomics 282: 453–462.

84. LiangK, KelesS (2012) Normalization of ChIP-seq data with control. BMC bioinformatics 13: 199.