The Amidation Step of Diphthamide Biosynthesis in Yeast Requires , a Gene Identified through Mining the - Interaction Network

English version České info

Diphthamide is a highly modified histidine residue in eukaryal translation elongation factor 2 (eEF2) that is the target for irreversible ADP ribosylation by diphtheria toxin (DT). In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the initial steps of diphthamide biosynthesis are well characterized and require the DPH1-DPH5 genes. However, the last pathway step—amidation of the intermediate diphthine to diphthamide—is ill-defined. Here we mine the genetic interaction landscapes of DPH1-DPH5 to identify a candidate gene for the elusive amidase (YLR143w/DPH6) and confirm involvement of a second gene (YBR246w/DPH7) in the amidation step. Like dph1-dph5, dph6 and dph7 mutants maintain eEF2 forms that evade inhibition by DT and sordarin, a diphthamide-dependent antifungal. Moreover, mass spectrometry shows that dph6 and dph7 mutants specifically accumulate diphthine-modified eEF2, demonstrating failure to complete the final amidation step. Consistent with an expected requirement for ATP in diphthine amidation, Dph6 contains an essential adenine nucleotide hydrolase domain and binds to eEF2. Dph6 is therefore a candidate for the elusive amidase, while Dph7 apparently couples diphthine synthase (Dph5) to diphthine amidation. The latter conclusion is based on our observation that dph7 mutants show drastically upregulated interaction between Dph5 and eEF2, indicating that their association is kept in check by Dph7. Physiologically, completion of diphthamide synthesis is required for optimal translational accuracy and cell growth, as indicated by shared traits among the dph mutants including increased ribosomal −1 frameshifting and altered responses to translation inhibitors. Through identification of Dph6 and Dph7 as components required for the amidation step of the diphthamide pathway, our work paves the way for a detailed mechanistic understanding of diphthamide formation.

Vyšlo v časopise: The Amidation Step of Diphthamide Biosynthesis in Yeast Requires , a Gene Identified through Mining the - Interaction Network. PLoS Genet 9(2): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003334
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003334

Souhrn

Zdroje

1. AhrneE, MullerM, LisacekF (2010) Unrestricted identification of modified proteins using MS/MS. Proteomics 10: 671–686.

2. SeetBT, DikicI, ZhouMM, PawsonT (2006) Reading protein modifications with interaction domains. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7: 473–483.

3. WalshCT, Garneau-TsodikovaS, GattoGJJ (2005) Protein posttranslational modifications: the chemistry of proteome diversifications. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 44: 7342–7372.

4. GreganovaE, AltmannM, ButikoferP (2011) Unique modifications of translation elongation factors. FEBS J 278: 2613–2624.

5. Van NessBG, HowardJB, BodleyJW (1980) ADP-ribosylation of elongation factor 2 by diphtheria toxin. NMR spectra and proposed structures of ribosyl-diphthamide and its hydrolysis products. J Biol Chem 255: 10710–10716.

6. BärC, ZabelR, LiuS, StarkMJ, SchaffrathR (2008) A versatile partner of eukaryotic protein complexes that is involved in multiple biological processes: Kti11/Dph3. Mol Microbiol 69: 1221–1233.

7. BotetJ, Rodriguez-MateosM, BallestaJP, RevueltaJL, RemachaM (2008) A chemical genomic screen in Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals a role for diphthamidation of translation elongation factor 2 in inhibition of protein synthesis by sordarin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 52: 1623–1629.

8. Van NessBG, HowardJB, BodleyJW (1980) ADP-ribosylation of elongation factor 2 by diphtheria toxin. Isolation and properties of the novel ribosyl-amino acid and its hydrolysis products. J Biol Chem 255: 10717–107120.

9. DominguezJM, Gomez-LorenzoMG, MartinJJ (1999) Sordarin inhibits fungal protein synthesis by blocking translocation differently to fusidic acid. J Biol Chem 274: 22423–22427.

10. JørgensenR, OrtizPA, Carr-SchmidA, NissenP, KinzyTG, et al. (2003) Two crystal structures demonstrate large conformational changes in the eukaryotic ribosomal translocase. Nat Struct Biol 10: 379–385.

11. OppenheimerNJ, BodleyJW (1981) Diphtheria toxin. Site and configuration of ADP-ribosylation of diphthamide in elongation factor 2. J Biol Chem 256: 8579–8581.

12. PappenheimerAMJr (1977) Diphtheria toxin. Annu Rev Biochem 46: 69–94.

13. Uthman S, Liu S, Giorgini F, Stark MJR, Costanzo M, et al.. (2012) Diphtheria disease and genes involved in formation of diphthamide, key effector of the diphtheria toxin. In: Priti R, editor. Insight and Control of Infectious Disease in Global Scenario. Rijeka: InTech.

14. ChenJY, BodleyJW, LivingstonDM (1985) Diphtheria toxin-resistant mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 5: 3357–3360.

15. LiuS, LepplaSH (2003) Retroviral insertional mutagenesis identifies a small protein required for synthesis of diphthamide, the target of bacterial ADP-ribosylating toxins. Mol Cell 12: 603–613.

16. LiuS, MilneGT, KuremskyJG, FinkGR, LepplaSH (2004) Identification of the proteins required for biosynthesis of diphthamide, the target of bacterial ADP-ribosylating toxins on translation elongation factor 2. Mol Cell Biol 24: 9487–9497.

17. DunlopPC, BodleyJW (1983) Biosynthetic labeling of diphthamide in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 258: 4754–4758.

18. LinH (2011) S-adenosylmethionine-dependent alkylation reactions: when are radical reactions used? Bioorg Chem 39: 161–170.

19. MoehringJM, MoehringTJ, DanleyDE (1980) Posttranslational modification of elongation factor 2 in diphtheria-toxin-resistant mutants of CHO-K1 cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77: 1010–1014.

20. FichtnerL, JablonowskiD, SchierhornA, KitamotoHK, StarkMJ, et al. (2003) Elongator's toxin-target (TOT) function is nuclear localization sequence dependent and suppressed by post-translational modification. Mol Microbiol 49: 1297–1307.

21. ZhangY, ZhuX, TorelliAT, LeeM, DzikovskiB, et al. (2010) Diphthamide biosynthesis requires an organic radical generated by an iron-sulphur enzyme. Nature 465: 891–896.

22. ZhuX, DzikovskiB, SuX, TorelliAT, ZhangY, et al. (2011) Mechanistic understanding of Pyrococcus horikoshii Dph2, a [4Fe-4S] enzyme required for diphthamide biosynthesis. Mol Biosyst 7: 74–81.

23. ProudfootM, SandersSA, SingerA, ZhangR, BrownG, et al. (2008) Biochemical and structural characterization of a novel family of cystathionine beta-synthase domain proteins fused to a Zn ribbon-like domain. J Mol Biol 375: 301–315.

24. ThakurA, ChitoorB, GoswamiAV, PareekG, AtreyaHS, et al. (2012) Structure and mechanistic insights into novel iron-mediated moonlighting functions of human J-protein cochaperone, Dph4. J Biol Chem 287: 13194–13205.

25. FichtnerL, SchaffrathR (2002) KTI11 and KTI13, Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes controlling sensitivity to G1 arrest induced by Kluyveromyces lactis zymocin. Mol Microbiol 44: 865–875.

26. GreenwoodC, SelthLA, Dirac-SvejstrupAB, SvejstrupJQ (2009) An iron-sulfur cluster domain in Elp3 important for the structural integrity of elongator. J Biol Chem 284: 141–149.

27. HuangB, JohanssonMJ, ByströmAS (2005) An early step in wobble uridine tRNA modification requires the Elongator complex. RNA 11: 424–436.

28. ParaskevopoulouC, FairhurstSA, LoweDJ, BrickP, OnestiS (2006) The Elongator subunit Elp3 contains a Fe4S4 cluster and binds S-adenosylmethionine. Mol Microbiol 59: 795–806.

29. ChenJY, BodleyJW (1988) Biosynthesis of diphthamide in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Partial purification and characterization of a specific S-adenosylmethionine:elongation factor 2 methyltransferase. J Biol Chem 263: 11692–11696.

30. MattheakisLC, ShenWH, CollierRJ (1992) DPH5, a methyltransferase gene required for diphthamide biosynthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 12: 4026–4037.

31. MoehringTJ, DanleyDE, MoehringJM (1984) In vitro biosynthesis of diphthamide, studied with mutant Chinese hamster ovary cells resistant to diphtheria toxin. Mol Cell Biol 4: 642–650.

32. ZhuX, KimJ, SuX, LinH (2010) Reconstitution of diphthine synthase activity in vitro. Biochemistry 49: 9649–9657.

33. ZhangY, LiuS, LajoieG, MerrillAR (2008) The role of the diphthamide-containing loop within eukaryotic elongation factor 2 in ADP-ribosylation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa exotoxin A. Biochem J 413: 163–174.

34. JørgensenR, PurdyAE, FieldhouseRJ, KimberMS, BartlettDH, et al. (2008) Cholix toxin, a novel ADP-ribosylating factor from Vibrio cholerae. J Biol Chem 283: 10671–10678.

35. Uthman S, Kheir E, Bär C, Jablonowski D, Schaffrath R (2011) Growth inhibition strategies based on antimicrobial microbes/toxins. In: A M-V, editor. Science against Microbial Pathogens: Communicating Current Research and Technological Advances: Formatex Research Center, Spain. pp. 1321–1329.

36. OrtizPA, UlloqueR, KiharaGK, ZhengH, KinzyTG (2006) Translation elongation factor 2 anticodon mimicry domain mutants affect fidelity and diphtheria toxin resistance. J Biol Chem 281: 32639–32648.

37. KimataY, KohnoK (1994) Elongation factor 2 mutants deficient in diphthamide formation show temperature-sensitive cell growth. J Biol Chem 269: 13497–13501.

38. ChenCM, BehringerRR (2004) Ovca1 regulates cell proliferation, embryonic development, and tumorigenesis. Genes Dev 18: 320–332.

39. LiuS, WigginsJF, SreenathT, KulkarniAB, WardJM, et al. (2006) Dph3, a small protein required for diphthamide biosynthesis, is essential in mouse development. Mol Cell Biol 26: 3835–3841.

40. WebbTR, CrossSH, McKieL, EdgarR, VizorL, et al. (2008) Diphthamide modification of eEF2 requires a J-domain protein and is essential for normal development. J Cell Sci 121: 3140–3145.

41. CaretteJE, GuimaraesCP, VaradarajanM, ParkAS, WuethrichI, et al. (2009) Haploid genetic screens in human cells identify host factors used by pathogens. Science 326: 1231–1235.

42. SuX, ChenW, LeeW, JiangH, ZhangS, et al. (2012) YBR246W is required for the third step of diphthamide biosynthesis. J Am Chem Soc 134: 773–776.

43. HillenmeyerME, EricsonE, DavisRW, NislowC, KollerD, et al. (2010) Systematic analysis of genome-wide fitness data in yeast reveals novel gene function and drug action. Genome Biol 11: R30.

44. KohJL, DingH, CostanzoM, BaryshnikovaA, ToufighiK, et al. (2010) DRYGIN: a database of quantitative genetic interaction networks in yeast. Nucleic Acids Res 38: D502–D507.

45. CostanzoM, BaryshnikovaA, BellayJ, KimY, SpearED, et al. (2010) The genetic landscape of a cell. Science 327: 425–431.

46. TongAH, EvangelistaM, ParsonsAB, XuH, BaderGD, et al. (2001) Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion mutants. Science 294: 2364–2368.

47. TongAH, LesageG, BaderGD, DingH, XuH, et al. (2004) Global mapping of the yeast genetic interaction network. Science 303: 808–813.

48. CostanzoM, BaryshnikovaA, MyersCL, AndrewsB, BooneC (2011) Charting the genetic interaction map of a cell. Curr Opin Biotechnol 22: 66–74.

49. DixonSJ, CostanzoM, BaryshnikovaA, AndrewsB, BooneC (2009) Systematic mapping of genetic interaction networks. Annu Rev Genet 43: 601–625.

50. DRYGIN [http://drygin.ccbr.utoronto.ca/]

51. FitDB [http://drygin.ccbr.utoronto.ca/]

52. HillenmeyerME, FungE, WildenhainJ, PierceSE, HoonS, et al. (2008) The chemical genomic portrait of yeast: uncovering a phenotype for all genes. Science 320: 362–365.

53. JusticeMC, HsuMJ, TseB, KuT, BalkovecJ, et al. (1998) Elongation factor 2 as a novel target for selective inhibition of fungal protein synthesis. J Biol Chem 273: 3148–3151.

54. SøeR, MosleyRT, JusticeM, Nielsen-KahnJ, ShastryM, et al. (2007) Sordarin derivatives induce a novel conformation of the yeast ribosome translocation factor eEF2. J Biol Chem 282: 657–666.

55. MumbergD, MullerR, FunkM (1994) Regulatable promoters of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: comparison of transcriptional activity and their use for heterologous expression. Nucleic Acids Res 22: 5767–5768.

56. JørgensenR, Carr-SchmidA, OrtizPA, KinzyTG, AndersenGR (2002) Purification and crystallization of the yeast elongation factor eEF2. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 58: 712–715.

57. SpahnCM, Gomez-LorenzoMG, GrassucciRA, JorgensenR, AndersenGR, et al. (2004) Domain movements of elongation factor eEF2 and the eukaryotic 80S ribosome facilitate tRNA translocation. EMBO J 23: 1008–1019.

58. OrtizPA, KinzyTG (2005) Dominant-negative mutant phenotypes and the regulation of translation elongation factor 2 levels in yeast. Nucleic Acids Res 33: 5740–5748.

59. HargerJW, MeskauskasA, NielsenJ, JusticeMC, DinmanJD (2001) Ty1 retrotransposition and programmed +1 ribosomal frameshifting require the integrity of the protein synthetic translocation step. Virology 286: 216–224.

60. de Crecy-LagardV, ForouharF, Brochier-ArmanetC, TongL, HuntJF (2012) Comparative genomic analysis of the DUF71/COG2102 family predicts roles in diphthamide biosynthesis and B12 salvage. Biology Direct 7: 32.

61. SuX, LinZ, ChenW, JiangH, ZhangS, et al. (2012) Chemogenomic approach identified yeast YLR143W as diphthamide synthetase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109: 19983–19987.

62. Marchler-BauerA, LuS, AndersonJB, ChitsazF, DerbyshireMK, et al. (2011) CDD: a Conserved Domain Database for the functional annotation of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 39: D225–D229.

63. BurmanJD, StevensonCE, SawersRG, LawsonDM (2007) The crystal structure of Escherichia coli TdcF, a member of the highly conserved YjgF/YER057c/UK114 family. BMC Struct Biol 7: 30.

64. SinhaS, RappuP, LangeSC, MantsalaP, ZalkinH, et al. (1999) Crystal structure of Bacillus subtilis YabJ, a purine regulatory protein and member of the highly conserved YjgF family. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 13074–13079.

65. VolzK (1999) A test case for structure-based functional assignment: the 1.2 A crystal structure of the yjgF gene product from Escherichia coli. Protein Sci 8: 2428–2437.

66. MistinieneE, PozdniakovaiteN, PopendikyteV, NaktinisV (2005) Structure-based ligand binding sites of protein p14.5, a member of protein family YER057c/YIL051c/YjgF. Int J Biol Macromol 37: 61–68.

67. LambrechtJA, FlynnJM, DownsDM (2012) Conserved YjgF protein family deaminates reactive enamine/imine intermediates of pyridoxal 5′-phosphate (PLP)-dependent enzyme reactions. J Biol Chem 287: 3454–3461.

68. ShiY, StefanCJ, RueSM, TeisD, EmrSD (2011) Two novel WD40 domain-containing proteins, Ere1 and Ere2, function in the retromer-mediated endosomal recycling pathway. Mol Biol Cell 22: 4093–4107.

69. HontzRD, NiedererRO, JohnsonJM, SmithJS (2009) Genetic identification of factors that modulate ribosomal DNA transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 182: 105–119.

70. GuptaPK, LiuS, BataviaMP, LepplaSH (2008) The diphthamide modification on elongation factor-2 renders mammalian cells resistant to ricin. Cell Microbiol 10: 1687–1694.

71. LiuS, BachranC, GuptaP, Miller-RandolphS, WangH, et al. (2012) Diphthamide modification on eukaryotic elongation factor 2 is needed to assure fidelity of mRNA translation and mouse development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109: 13817–13822.

72. NobukuniY, KohnoK, MiyagawaK (2005) Gene trap mutagenesis-based forward genetic approach reveals that the tumor suppressor OVCA1 is a component of the biosynthetic pathway of diphthamide on elongation factor 2. J Biol Chem 280: 10572–10577.

73. ShermanF (1991) Getting started with yeast. Methods Enzymol 194: 3–21.

74. GietzD, St JeanA, WoodsRA, SchiestlRH (1992) Improved method for high efficiency transformation of intact yeast cells. Nucleic Acids Res 20: 1425.

75. RoyV, GhaniK, CarusoM (2010) A dominant-negative approach that prevents diphthamide formation confers resistance to Pseudomonas exotoxin A and diphtheria toxin. PLoS ONE 5: e15753 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0015753.

76. JablonowskiD, FichtnerL, MartinVJ, KlassenR, MeinhardtF, et al. (2001) Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall chitin, the Kluyveromyces lactis zymocin receptor. Yeast 18: 1285–1299.

77. FrohloffF, JablonowskiD, FichtnerL, SchaffrathR (2003) Subunit communications crucial for the functional integrity of the yeast RNA polymerase II elongator (gamma-toxin target (TOT)) complex. J Biol Chem 278: 956–961.

78. KnopM, SiegersK, PereiraG, ZachariaeW, WinsorB, et al. (1999) Epitope tagging of yeast genes using a PCR-based strategy: more tags and improved practical routines. Yeast 15: 963–972.

79. ZachariaeW, ShinTH, GalovaM, ObermaierB, NasmythK (1996) Identification of subunits of the anaphase-promoting complex of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 274: 1201–1204.

80. GietzRD, SuginoA (1988) New yeast-Escherichia coli shuttle vectors constructed with in vitro mutagenized yeast genes lacking six-base pair restriction sites. Gene 74: 527–534.

81. JankeC, MagieraMM, RathfelderN, TaxisC, ReberS, et al. (2004) A versatile toolbox for PCR-based tagging of yeast genes: new fluorescent proteins, more markers and promoter substitution cassettes. Yeast 21: 947–962.

82. CoxJ, MannM (2008) MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat Biotechnol 26: 1367–1372.

83. CherryJM, HongEL, AmundsenC, BalakrishnanR, BinkleyG, et al. (2012) Saccharomyces Genome Database: the genomics resource of budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res 40: D700–D705.

84. FrohloffF, FichtnerL, JablonowskiD, BreunigKD, SchaffrathR (2001) Saccharomyces cerevisiae Elongator mutations confer resistance to the Kluyveromyces lactis zymocin. EMBO J 20: 1993–2003.

85. JablonowskiD, SchaffrathR (2007) Zymocin, a composite chitinase and tRNase killer toxin from yeast,. Biochem Soc Trans 35: 1533–1537.