Dynamic Association of NUP98 with the Human Genome

English version České info

Faithful execution of developmental gene expression programs occurs at multiple levels and involves many different components such as transcription factors, histone-modification enzymes, and mRNA processing proteins. Recent evidence suggests that nucleoporins, well known components that control nucleo-cytoplasmic trafficking, have wide-ranging functions in developmental gene regulation that potentially extend beyond their role in nuclear transport. Whether the unexpected role of nuclear pore proteins in transcription regulation, which initially has been described in fungi and flies, also applies to human cells is unknown. Here we show at a genome-wide level that the nuclear pore protein NUP98 associates with developmentally regulated genes active during human embryonic stem cell differentiation. Overexpression of a dominant negative fragment of NUP98 levels decreases expression levels of NUP98-bound genes. In addition, we identify two modes of developmental gene regulation by NUP98 that are differentiated by the spatial localization of NUP98 target genes. Genes in the initial stage of developmental induction can associate with NUP98 that is embedded in the nuclear pores at the nuclear periphery. Alternatively, genes that are highly induced can interact with NUP98 in the nuclear interior, away from the nuclear pores. This work demonstrates for the first time that NUP98 dynamically associates with the human genome during differentiation, revealing a role of a nuclear pore protein in regulating developmental gene expression programs.

Vyšlo v časopise: Dynamic Association of NUP98 with the Human Genome. PLoS Genet 9(2): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003308
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003308

Souhrn

Zdroje

1. AlberF, DokudovskayaS, VeenhoffLM, ZhangW, KipperJ, et al. (2007) Determining the architectures of macromolecular assemblies. Nature 450: 683–694.

2. HetzerMW, WaltherTC, MattajIW (2005) Pushing the envelope: structure, function, and dynamics of the nuclear periphery. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 21: 347–380.

3. WenteSR (2000) Gatekeepers of the nucleus. Science 288: 1374–1377.

4. AkhtarA, GasserSM (2007) The nuclear envelope and transcriptional control. Nat Rev Genet 8: 507–517.

5. BelmontAS, ZhaiY, ThileniusA (1993) Lamin B distribution and association with peripheral chromatin revealed by optical sectioning and electron microscopy tomography. J Cell Biol 123: 1671–1685.

6. SchermellehL, CarltonPM, HaaseS, ShaoL, WinotoL, et al. (2008) Subdiffraction multicolor imaging of the nuclear periphery with 3D structured illumination microscopy. Science 320: 1332–1336.

7. BlobelG (1985) Gene gating: a hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 82: 8527–8529.

8. CapelsonM, LiangY, SchulteR, MairW, WagnerU, et al. (2010) Chromatin-bound nuclear pore components regulate gene expression in higher eukaryotes. Cell 140: 372–383.

9. CasolariJM, BrownCR, DrubinDA, RandoOJ, SilverPA (2005) Developmentally induced changes in transcriptional program alter spatial organization across chromosomes. Genes Dev 19: 1188–1198.

10. CasolariJM, BrownCR, KomiliS, WestJ, HieronymusH, et al. (2004) Genome-wide localization of the nuclear transport machinery couples transcriptional status and nuclear organization. Cell 117: 427–439.

11. TaddeiA, Van HouweG, HedigerF, KalckV, CubizollesF, et al. (2006) Nuclear pore association confers optimal expression levels for an inducible yeast gene. Nature 441: 774–778.

12. Tan-WongSM, WijayatilakeHD, ProudfootNJ (2009) Gene loops function to maintain transcriptional memory through interaction with the nuclear pore complex. Genes Dev 23: 2610–2624.

13. VaquerizasJM, SuyamaR, KindJ, MiuraK, LuscombeNM, et al. (2010) Nuclear pore proteins nup153 and megator define transcriptionally active regions in the Drosophila genome. PLoS Genet 6: e1000846 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000846

14. BricknerJH, WalterP (2004) Gene recruitment of the activated INO1 locus to the nuclear membrane. PLoS Biol 2: e342 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020342

15. DilworthDJ, TackettAJ, RogersRS, YiEC, ChristmasRH, et al. (2005) The mobile nucleoporin Nup2p and chromatin-bound Prp20p function in endogenous NPC-mediated transcriptional control. J Cell Biol 171: 955–965.

16. IshiiK, AribG, LinC, Van HouweG, LaemmliUK (2002) Chromatin boundaries in budding yeast: the nuclear pore connection. Cell 109: 551–562.

17. KalverdaB, PickersgillH, ShlomaVV, FornerodM (2010) Nucleoporins directly stimulate expression of developmental and cell-cycle genes inside the nucleoplasm. Cell 140: 360–371.

18. GriffisER, XuS, PowersMA (2003) Nup98 localizes to both nuclear and cytoplasmic sides of the nuclear pore and binds to two distinct nucleoporin subcomplexes. Mol Biol Cell 14: 600–610.

19. KehatI, AccorneroF, AronowBJ, MolkentinJD (2011) Modulation of chromatin position and gene expression by HDAC4 interaction with nucleoporins. J Cell Biol 193: 21–29.

20. BrownCR, KennedyCJ, DelmarVA, ForbesDJ, SilverPA (2008) Global histone acetylation induces functional genomic reorganization at mammalian nuclear pore complexes. Genes Dev 22: 627–639.

21. SchneiderR, GrosschedlR (2007) Dynamics and interplay of nuclear architecture, genome organization, and gene expression. Genes Dev 21: 3027–3043.

22. MattoutA, MeshorerE (2010) Chromatin plasticity and genome organization in pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Curr Opin Cell Biol 22: 334–341.

23. MeshorerE, MisteliT (2006) Chromatin in pluripotent embryonic stem cells and differentiation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7: 540–546.

24. BrownKE, AmoilsS, HornJM, BuckleVJ, HiggsDR, et al. (2001) Expression of alpha- and beta-globin genes occurs within different nuclear domains in haemopoietic cells. Nat Cell Biol 3: 602–606.

25. KosakST, SkokJA, MedinaKL, RibletR, Le BeauMM, et al. (2002) Subnuclear compartmentalization of immunoglobulin loci during lymphocyte development. Science 296: 158–162.

26. WilliamsRR, AzuaraV, PerryP, SauerS, DvorkinaM, et al. (2006) Neural induction promotes large-scale chromatin reorganisation of the Mash1 locus. J Cell Sci 119: 132–140.

27. WiblinAE, CuiW, ClarkAJ, BickmoreWA (2005) Distinctive nuclear organisation of centromeres and regions involved in pluripotency in human embryonic stem cells. J Cell Sci 118: 3861–3868.

28. MeshorerE, YellajoshulaD, GeorgeE, ScamblerPJ, BrownDT, et al. (2006) Hyperdynamic plasticity of chromatin proteins in pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Dev Cell 10: 105–116.

29. EfroniS, DuttaguptaR, ChengJ, DehghaniH, HoeppnerDJ, et al. (2008) Global transcription in pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2: 437–447.

30. MeisterP, TowbinBD, PikeBL, PontiA, GasserSM (2010) The spatial dynamics of tissue-specific promoters during C. elegans development. Genes Dev 24: 766–782.

31. CapelsonM, HetzerMW (2009) The role of nuclear pores in gene regulation, development and disease. EMBO Rep 10: 697–705.

32. GriffisER, AltanN, Lippincott-SchwartzJ, PowersMA (2002) Nup98 is a mobile nucleoporin with transcription-dependent dynamics. Mol Biol Cell 13: 1282–1297.

33. GranokH, LeibovitchBA, ShafferCD, ElginSC (1995) Chromatin. Ga-ga over GAGA factor. Curr Biol 5: 238–241.

34. OhtsukiS, LevineM (1998) GAGA mediates the enhancer blocking activity of the eve promoter in the Drosophila embryo. Genes Dev 12: 3325–3330.

35. WallaceJA, FelsenfeldG (2007) We gather together: insulators and genome organization. Curr Opin Genet Dev 17: 400–407.

36. KrullS, DorriesJ, BoysenB, ReidenbachS, MagniusL, et al. (2010) Protein Tpr is required for establishing nuclear pore-associated zones of heterochromatin exclusion. EMBO J 29: 1659–1673.

37. HuggenvikJI, MichelsonRJ, CollardMW, ZiembaAJ, GurleyP, et al. (1998) Characterization of a nuclear deformed epidermal autoregulatory factor-1 (DEAF-1)-related (NUDR) transcriptional regulator protein. Mol Endocrinol 12: 1619–1639.

38. ZhongS, SalomoniP, PandolfiPP (2000) The transcriptional role of PML and the nuclear body. Nat Cell Biol 2: E85–90.

39. MooreMA, ChungKY, PlasilovaM, SchuringaJJ, ShiehJH, et al. (2007) NUP98 dysregulation in myeloid leukemogenesis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1106: 114–142.

40. WangJ, RaoS, ChuJ, ShenX, LevasseurDN, et al. (2006) A protein interaction network for pluripotency of embryonic stem cells. Nature 444: 364–368.

41. XuRH, Sampsell-BarronTL, GuF, RootS, PeckRM, et al. (2008) NANOG is a direct target of TGFbeta/activin-mediated SMAD signaling in human ESCs. Cell Stem Cell 3: 196–206.

42. ListerR, PelizzolaM, KidaYS, HawkinsRD, NeryJR, et al. (2011) Hotspots of aberrant epigenomic reprogramming in human induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 471: 68–73.

43. WuJQ, HabeggerL, NoisaP, SzekelyA, QiuC, et al. (2010) Dynamic transcriptomes during neural differentiation of human embryonic stem cells revealed by short, long, and paired-end sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 5254–5259.

44. KouzaridesT (2007) Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell 128: 693–705.

45. ReddyKL, ZulloJM, BertolinoE, SinghH (2008) Transcriptional repression mediated by repositioning of genes to the nuclear lamina. Nature 452: 243–247.

46. LeeDC, WeltonKL, SmithED, KennedyBK (2009) A-type nuclear lamins act as transcriptional repressors when targeted to promoters. Exp Cell Res 315: 996–1007.

47. Martinez-BalbasMA, DeyA, RabindranSK, OzatoK, WuC (1995) Displacement of sequence-specific transcription factors from mitotic chromatin. Cell 83: 29–38.

48. TaylorJH (1960) Nucleic acid synthesis in relation to the cell division cycle. Ann N Y Acad Sci 90: 409–421.

49. EgliD, BirkhoffG, EgganK (2008) Mediators of reprogramming: transcription factors and transitions through mitosis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9: 505–516.

50. FranzC, WalczakR, YavuzS, SantarellaR, GentzelM, et al. (2007) MEL-28/ELYS is required for the recruitment of nucleoporins to chromatin and postmitotic nuclear pore complex assembly. EMBO Rep 8: 165–172.

51. RasalaBA, OrjaloAV, ShenZ, BriggsS, ForbesDJ (2006) ELYS is a dual nucleoporin/kinetochore protein required for nuclear pore assembly and proper cell division. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 17801–17806.

52. WaltherTC, AlvesA, PickersgillH, LoiodiceI, HetzerM, et al. (2003) The conserved Nup107–160 complex is critical for nuclear pore complex assembly. Cell 113: 195–206.

53. BenaventeR, DabauvalleMC, ScheerU, ChalyN (1989) Functional role of newly formed pore complexes in postmitotic nuclear reorganization. Chromosoma 98: 233–241.

54. LightWH, BricknerDG, BrandVR, BricknerJH (2010) Interaction of a DNA zip code with the nuclear pore complex promotes H2A.Z incorporation and INO1 transcriptional memory. Mol Cell 40: 112–125.

55. GoughSM, SlapeCI, AplanPD (2011) NUP98 gene fusions and hematopoietic malignancies: common themes and new biological insights. Blood 118: 6247–6257.