Coincident Resection at Both Ends of Random, γ–Induced Double-Strand Breaks Requires MRX (MRN), Sae2 (Ctp1), and Mre11-Nuclease

English version České info

Resection is an early step in homology-directed recombinational repair (HDRR) of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Resection enables strand invasion as well as reannealing following DNA synthesis across a DSB to assure efficient HDRR. While resection of only one end could result in genome instability, it has not been feasible to address events at both ends of a DSB, or to distinguish 1- versus 2-end resections at random, radiation-induced “dirty” DSBs or even enzyme-induced “clean” DSBs. Previously, we quantitatively addressed resection and the role of Mre11/Rad50/Xrs2 complex (MRX) at random DSBs in circular chromosomes within budding yeast based on reduced pulsed-field gel electrophoretic mobility (“PFGE-shift”). Here, we extend PFGE analysis to a second dimension and demonstrate unique patterns associated with 0-, 1-, and 2-end resections at DSBs, providing opportunities to examine coincidence of resection. In G2-arrested WT, Δrad51 and Δrad52 cells deficient in late stages of HDRR, resection occurs at both ends of γ-DSBs. However, for radiation-induced and I-SceI-induced DSBs, 1-end resections predominate in MRX (MRN) null mutants with or without Ku70. Surprisingly, Sae2 (Ctp1/CtIP) and Mre11 nuclease-deficient mutants have similar responses, although there is less impact on repair. Thus, we provide direct molecular characterization of coincident resection at random, radiation-induced DSBs and show that rapid and coincident initiation of resection at γ-DSBs requires MRX, Sae2 protein, and Mre11 nuclease. Structural features of MRX complex are consistent with coincident resection being due to an ability to interact with both DSB ends to directly coordinate resection. Interestingly, coincident resection at clean I-SceI-induced breaks is much less dependent on Mre11 nuclease or Sae2, contrary to a strong dependence on MRX complex, suggesting different roles for these functions at “dirty” and clean DSB ends. These approaches apply to resection at other DSBs. Given evolutionary conservation, the observations are relevant to DNA repair in human cells.

Vyšlo v časopise: Coincident Resection at Both Ends of Random, γ–Induced Double-Strand Breaks Requires MRX (MRN), Sae2 (Ctp1), and Mre11-Nuclease. PLoS Genet 9(3): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003420
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003420

Souhrn

Zdroje

1. ResnickMA (1976) The repair of double-strand breaks in DNA; a model involving recombination. J Theor Biol 59: 97–106.

2. PaullTT (2010) Making the best of the loose ends: Mre11/Rad50 complexes and Sae2 promote DNA double-strand break resection. DNA Repair 9: 1283–1291.

3. MimitouEP, SymingtonLS (2011) DNA end resection–unraveling the tail. DNA Repair 10: 344–348.

4. SymingtonLS, GautierJ (2011) Double-strand break end resection and repair pathway choice. Annual Review of Genetics 45: 247–271.

5. HuertasP (2010) DNA resection in eukaryotes: deciding how to fix the break. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 17: 11–16.

6. NiuH, ChungWH, ZhuZ, KwonY, ZhaoW, et al. (2010) Mechanism of the ATP-dependent DNA end-resection machinery from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 467: 108–111.

7. MimitouEP, SymingtonLS (2008) Sae2, Exo1 and Sgs1 collaborate in DNA double-strand break processing. Nature 455: 770–774.

8. ZhuZ, ChungW-H, ShimEY, LeeSE, IraG (2008) Sgs1 helicase and two nucleases Dna2 and Exo1 resect DNA double-strand break ends. Cell 134: 981–994.

9. MimitouEP, SymingtonLS (2010) Ku prevents Exo1 and Sgs1-dependent resection of DNA ends in the absence of a functional MRX complex or Sae2. The EMBO Journal 29: 3358–3369.

10. ShimEY, ChungWH, NicoletteML, ZhangY, DavisM, et al. (2010) Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mre11/Rad50/Xrs2 and Ku proteins regulate association of Exo1 and Dna2 with DNA breaks. The EMBO Journal 29: 3370–3380.

11. ChenC, KolodnerRD (1999) Gross chromosomal rearrangements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae replication and recombination defective mutants. Nature Genetics 23: 81–85.

12. SmithS, GuptaA, KolodnerRD, MyungK (2005) Suppression of gross chromosomal rearrangements by the multiple functions of the Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA Repair 4: 606–617.

13. BuntingSF, CallenE, WongN, ChenHT, PolatoF, et al. (2010) 53BP1 inhibits homologous recombination in Brca1-deficient cells by blocking resection of DNA breaks. Cell 141: 243–254.

14. ColemanKA, GreenbergRA (2011) The BRCA1-RAP80 complex regulates DNA repair mechanism utilization by restricting end resection. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 286: 13669–13680.

15. YangY, GordeninDA, ResnickMA (2010) A single-strand specific lesion drives MMS-induced hyper-mutability at a double-strand break in yeast. DNA Repair 9: 914–921.

16. YangY, SterlingJ, StoriciF, ResnickMA, GordeninDA (2008) Hypermutability of damaged single-strand DNA formed at double-strand breaks and uncapped telomeres in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet 4: e1000264 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000264.

17. MalkovaA, RossL, DawsonD, HoekstraMF, HaberJE (1996) Meiotic recombination initiated by a double-strand break in rad50Δ yeast cells otherwise unable to initiate meiotic recombination. Genetics 143: 741–754.

18. RattrayAJ, McGillCB, ShaferBK, StrathernJN (2001) Fidelity of mitotic double-strand-break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a role for SAE2/COM1. Genetics 158: 109–122.

19. MyungK, KolodnerRD (2003) Induction of genome instability by DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA Repair 2: 243–258.

20. LobachevK, VitriolE, StempleJ, ResnickMA, BloomK (2004) Chromosome fragmentation after induction of a double-strand break is an active process prevented by the RMX repair complex. Curr Biol 14: 2107–2112.

21. NakaiW, WestmorelandJ, YehE, BloomK, ResnickMA (2011) Chromosome integrity at a double-strand break requires exonuclease 1 and MRX. DNA Repair 10: 102–110.

22. KayeJA, MeloJA, CheungSK, VazeMB, HaberJE, et al. (2004) DNA breaks promote genomic instability by impeding proper chromosome segregation. Current Biology 14: 2096–2106.

23. WilliamsRS, MoncalianG, WilliamsJS, YamadaY, LimboO, et al. (2008) Mre11 dimers coordinate DNA end bridging and nuclease processing in double-strand-break repair. Cell 135: 97–109.

24. de JagerM, van NoortJ, van GentDC, DekkerC, KanaarR, et al. (2001) Human Rad50/Mre11 is a flexible complex that can tether DNA ends. Mol Cell 8: 1129–1135.

25. HunterN, KlecknerN (2001) The single-end invasion: an asymmetric intermediate at the double-strand break to double-holliday junction transition of meiotic recombination. Cell 106: 59–70.

26. SachoEJ, MaizelsN (2011) DNA repair factor MRE11/RAD50 cleaves 3′-phosphotyrosyl bonds and resects DNA to repair damage caused by topoisomerase 1 poisons. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 286: 44945–44951.

27. LisbyM, BarlowJH, BurgessRC, RothsteinR (2004) Choreography of the DNA damage response: spatiotemporal relationships among checkpoint and repair proteins. Cell 118: 699–713.

28. StrackerTH, PetriniJH (2011) The MRE11 complex: starting from the ends. Nature reviews Molecular Cell Biology 12: 90–103.

29. BuisJ, WuY, DengY, LeddonJ, WestfieldG, et al. (2008) Mre11 nuclease activity has essential roles in DNA repair and genomic stability distinct from ATM activation. Cell 135: 85–96.

30. LongheseMP, BonettiD, ManfriniN, ClericiM (2010) Mechanisms and regulation of DNA end resection. The EMBO Journal 29: 2864–2874.

31. FosterSS, BalestriniA, PetriniJH (2011) Functional interplay of the Mre11 nuclease and Ku in the response to replication-associated DNA damage. Molecular and Cellular Biology 31: 4379–4389.

32. LangerakP, Mejia-RamirezE, LimboO, RussellP (2011) Release of Ku and MRN from DNA ends by Mre11 nuclease activity and Ctp1 is required for homologous recombination repair of double-strand breaks. PLoS Genet 7: e1002271 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002271.

33. WestmorelandJ, MaW, YanY, Van HulleK, MalkovaA, et al. (2009) RAD50 is required for efficient initiation of resection and recombinational repair at random, gamma-induced double-strand break ends. PLoS Genet 5: e1000656 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000656.

34. MaW, WestmorelandJW, GordeninDA, ResnickMA (2011) Alkylation base damage is converted into repairable double-strand breaks and complex intermediates in G2 cells lacking AP endonuclease. PLoS Genet 7: e1002059 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002059.

35. PerrinA, BuckleM, DujonB (1993) Asymmetrical recognition and activity of the I-SceI endonuclease on its site and on intron-exon junctions. EMBO J 12: 2939–2947.

36. NicoletteML, LeeK, GuoZ, RaniM, ChowJM, et al. (2010) Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 and Sae2 promote 5′ strand resection of DNA double-strand breaks. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 17: 1478–1485.

37. ClericiM, MantieroD, LucchiniG, LongheseMP (2005) The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sae2 protein promotes resection and bridging of double strand break ends. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 280: 38631–38638.

38. LengsfeldBM, RattrayAJ, BhaskaraV, GhirlandoR, PaullTT (2007) Sae2 is an endonuclease that processes hairpin DNA cooperatively with the Mre11/Rad50/Xrs2 complex. Mol Cell 28: 638–651.

39. HuertasP, Cortes-LedesmaF, SartoriAA, AguileraA, JacksonSP (2008) CDK targets Sae2 to control DNA-end resection and homologous recombination. Nature 455: 689–692.

40. GarciaV, PhelpsSE, GrayS, NealeMJ (2011) Bidirectional resection of DNA double-strand breaks by Mre11 and Exo1. Nature 479: 241–244.

41. LlorenteB, SymingtonLS (2004) The Mre11 nuclease is not required for 5′ to 3′ resection at multiple HO-induced double-strand breaks. Mol Cell Biol 24: 9682–9694.

42. KroghBO, LlorenteB, LamA, SymingtonLS (2005) Mutations in Mre11 phosphoesterase motif I that impair Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 complex stability in addition to nuclease activity. Genetics 171: 1561–1570.

43. JainS, SugawaraN, LydeardJ, VazeM, Tanguy Le GacN, et al. (2009) A recombination execution checkpoint regulates the choice of homologous recombination pathway during DNA double-strand break repair. Genes & Development 23: 291–303.

44. MimitouEP, SymingtonLS (2009) Nucleases and helicases take center stage in homologous recombination. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 34: 264–272.

45. MoreauS, FergusonJR, SymingtonLS (1999) The nuclease activity of Mre11 is required for meiosis but not for mating type switching, end joining, or telomere maintenance. Molecular and Cellular Biology 19: 556–566.

46. MalkovaA, NaylorML, YamaguchiM, IraG, HaberJE (2005) RAD51-dependent break-induced replication differs in kinetics and checkpoint responses from RAD51-mediated gene conversion. Mol Cell Biol 25: 933–944.

47. ArguesoJL, WestmorelandJ, MieczkowskiPA, GawelM, PetesTD, et al. (2008) Double-strand breaks associated with repetitive DNA can reshape the genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 11845–11850.

48. MaW, ResnickMA, GordeninDA (2008) Apn1 and Apn2 endonucleases prevent accumulation of repair-associated DNA breaks in budding yeast as revealed by direct chromosomal analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 36: 1836–1846.

49. GoldsteinAL, McCuskerJH (1999) Three new dominant drug resistance cassettes for gene disruption in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 15: 1541–1553.

50. StoriciF, ResnickMA (2006) The delitto perfetto approach to in vivo site-directed mutagenesis and chromosome rearrangements with synthetic oligonucleotides in yeast. Methods Enzymol 409: 329–345.

51. StoriciF, LewisLK, ResnickMA (2001) In vivo site-directed mutagenesis using oligonucleotides. Nature Biotechnology 19: 773–776.

52. MaW, HalwegCJ, MenendezD, ResnickMA (2012) Differential effects of PARP inhibition and depletion on single- and double-strand break repair in human cells are revealed by changes in EBV minichromosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 6590–6595.