Fine Characterisation of a Recombination Hotspot at the Locus and Resolution of the Paradoxical Excess of Duplications over Deletions in the General Population

English version České info

We demonstrated previously that 75% of infertile men with round, acrosomeless spermatozoa (globozoospermia) had a homozygous 200-Kb deletion removing the totality of DPY19L2. We showed that this deletion occurred by Non-Allelic Homologous Recombination (NAHR) between two homologous 28-Kb Low Copy Repeats (LCRs) located on each side of the gene. The accepted NAHR model predicts that inter-chromatid and inter-chromosome NAHR create a deleted and a duplicated recombined allele, while intra-chromatid events only generate deletions. Therefore more deletions are expected to be produced de novo. Surprisingly, array CGH data show that, in the general population, DPY19L2 duplicated alleles are approximately three times as frequent as deleted alleles. In order to shed light on this paradox, we developed a sperm-based assay to measure the de novo rates of deletions and duplications at this locus. As predicted by the NAHR model, we identified an excess of de novo deletions over duplications. We calculated that the excess of de novo deletion was compensated by evolutionary loss, whereas duplications, not subjected to selection, increased gradually. Purifying selection against sterile, homozygous deleted men may be sufficient for this compensation, but heterozygously deleted men might also suffer a small fitness penalty. The recombined alleles were sequenced to pinpoint the localisation of the breakpoints. We analysed a total of 15 homozygous deleted patients and 17 heterozygous individuals carrying either a deletion (n = 4) or a duplication (n = 13). All but two alleles fell within a 1.2-Kb region central to the 28-Kb LCR, indicating that >90% of the NAHR took place in that region. We showed that a PRDM9 13-mer recognition sequence is located right in the centre of that region. Our results therefore strengthen the link between this consensus sequence and the occurrence of NAHR.

Vyšlo v časopise: Fine Characterisation of a Recombination Hotspot at the Locus and Resolution of the Paradoxical Excess of Duplications over Deletions in the General Population. PLoS Genet 9(3): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003363
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003363

Souhrn

Zdroje

1. GuW, ZhangF, LupskiJR (2008) Mechanisms for human genomic rearrangements. Pathogenetics 1: 4.

2. SmithCE, LlorenteB, SymingtonLS (2007) Template switching during break-induced replication. Nature 447: 102–5.

3. LupskiJR, StankiewiczP (2005) Genomic disorders: molecular mechanisms for rearrangements and conveyed phenotypes. PLoS Genet 1: e49 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0010049

4. TurnerDJ, MirettiM, RajanD, FieglerH, CarterNP, et al. (2008) Germline rates of de novo meiotic deletions and duplications causing several genomic disorders. Nat Genet 40: 90–5.

5. MolinaO, AntonE, VidalF, BlancoJ (2011) Sperm rates of 7q11.23, 15q11q13 and 22q11.2 deletions and duplications: a FISH approach. Hum Genet 129: 35–44.

6. LiuP, LacariaM, ZhangF, WithersM, HastingsPJ, et al. (2011) Frequency of nonallelic homologous recombination is correlated with length of homology: evidence that ectopic synapsis precedes ectopic crossing-over. Am J Hum Genet 89: 580–8.

7. ArnheimN, CalabreseP, Tiemann-BoegeI (2007) Mammalian meiotic recombination hot spots. Annu Rev Genet 41: 369–99.

8. PaigenK, PetkovP (2010) Mammalian recombination hot spots: properties, control and evolution. Nat Rev Genet 11: 221–33.

9. KongA, ThorleifssonG, GudbjartssonDF, MassonG, SigurdssonA, et al. (2010) Fine-scale recombination rate differences between sexes, populations and individuals. Nature 467: 1099–103.

10. MyersS, FreemanC, AutonA, DonnellyP, McVeanG (2008) A common sequence motif associated with recombination hot spots and genome instability in humans. Nat Genet 40: 1124–9.

11. HayashiK, YoshidaK, MatsuiY (2005) A histone H3 methyltransferase controls epigenetic events required for meiotic prophase. Nature 438: 374–8.

12. BergIL, NeumannR, LamKW, SarbajnaS, Odenthal-HesseL, et al. (2010) PRDM9 variation strongly influences recombination hot-spot activity and meiotic instability in humans. Nat Genet 42: 859–63.

13. MyersS, BowdenR, TumianA, BontropRE, FreemanC, et al. (2010) Drive against hotspot motifs in primates implicates the PRDM9 gene in meiotic recombination. Science 327: 876–9.

14. BaudatF, BuardJ, GreyC, Fledel-AlonA, OberC, et al. (2010) PRDM9 is a major determinant of meiotic recombination hotspots in humans and mice. Science 327: 836–40.

15. BergIL, NeumannR, SarbajnaS, Odenthal-HesseL, ButlerNJ, et al. (2011) Variants of the protein PRDM9 differentially regulate a set of human meiotic recombination hotspots highly active in African populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 12378–83.

16. SasakiM, LangeJ, KeeneyS (2010) Genome destabilization by homologous recombination in the germ line. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11: 182–95.

17. HarbuzR, ZouariR, PierreV, Ben KhelifaM, KharoufM, et al. (2011) A Recurrent Deletion of DPY19L2 Causes Infertility in Man by Blocking Sperm Head Elongation and Acrosome Formation. Am J Hum Genet 88: 351–61.

18. DamAH, FeenstraI, WestphalJR, RamosL, van GoldeRJ, et al. (2007) Globozoospermia revisited. Hum Reprod Update 13: 63–75.

19. Florke-GerloffS, Topfer-PetersenE, Muller-EsterlW, MansouriA, SchatzR, et al. (1984) Biochemical and genetic investigation of round-headed spermatozoa in infertile men including two brothers and their father. Andrologia 16: 187–202.

20. KilaniZ, IsmailR, GhunaimS, MohamedH, HughesD, et al. (2004) Evaluation and treatment of familial globozoospermia in five brothers. Fertil Steril 82: 1436–9.

21. NistalM, HerruzoA, Sanchez-CorralF (1978) [Absolute teratozoospermia in a family. Irregular microcephalic spermatozoa without acrosome]. Andrologia 10: 234–40.

22. DamAH, KoscinskiI, KremerJA, MoutouC, JaegerAS, et al. (2007) Homozygous mutation in SPATA16 is associated with male infertility in human globozoospermia. Am J Hum Genet 81: 813–20.

23. LiuG, ShiQW, LuGX (2010) A newly discovered mutation in PICK1 in a human with globozoospermia. Asian J Androl 12: 556–60.

24. CarsonAR, CheungJ, SchererSW (2006) Duplication and relocation of the functional DPY19L2 gene within low copy repeats. BMC Genomics 7: 45.

25. CouttonC, ZouariR, AbadaF, Ben KhelifaM, MerdassiG, et al. (2012) MLPA and sequence analysis of DPY19L2 reveals point mutations causing globozoospermia. Hum Reprod 27: 2549–58.

26. ElinatiE, KuentzP, RedinC, JaberS, Vanden MeerschautF, et al. (2012) Globozoospermia is mainly due to DPY19L2 deletion via non-allelic homologous recombination involving two recombination hotspots. Hum Mol Genet 21: 3695–702.

27. KoscinskiI, ElinatiE, FossardC, RedinC, MullerJ, et al. (2011) DPY19L2 deletion as a major cause of globozoospermia. Am J Hum Genet 88: 344–50.

28. PierreV, MartinezG, CouttonC, DelarocheJ, YassineS, et al. (2012) Absence of Dpy19l2, a new inner nuclear membrane protein, causes globozoospermia in mice by preventing the anchoring of the acrosome to the nucleus. Development 139: 2955–65.

29. ShaikhTH, GaiX, PerinJC, GlessnerJT, XieH, et al. (2009) High-resolution mapping and analysis of copy number variations in the human genome: a data resource for clinical and research applications. Genome Res 19: 1682–90.

30. PintoD, MarshallC, FeukL, SchererSW (2007) Copy-number variation in control population cohorts. Hum Mol Genet 16 Spec No. 2: R168–73.

31. ItsaraA, CooperGM, BakerC, GirirajanS, LiJ, et al. (2009) Population analysis of large copy number variants and hotspots of human genetic disease. Am J Hum Genet 84: 148–61.

32. de SmithAJ, TsalenkoA, SampasN, SchefferA, YamadaNA, et al. (2007) Array CGH analysis of copy number variation identifies 1284 new genes variant in healthy white males: implications for association studies of complex diseases. Hum Mol Genet 16: 2783–94.

33. ConradDF, PintoD, RedonR, FeukL, GokcumenO, et al. (2010) Origins and functional impact of copy number variation in the human genome. Nature 464: 704–12.

34. SchimentiJ (2000) Segregation distortion of mouse t haplotypes the molecular basis emerges. Trends Genet 16: 240–3.

35. GreyC, BarthesP, Chauveau-Le FriecG, LangaF, BaudatF, et al. (2011) Mouse PRDM9 DNA-binding specificity determines sites of histone H3 lysine 4 trimethylation for initiation of meiotic recombination. PLoS Biol 9: e1001176 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001176

36. JeanpierreM (1987) A rapid method for the purification of DNA from blood. Nucleic Acids Res 15: 9611.

37. World Health Organization (2010) WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen. 5th ed. Geneva: WHO Press.